User talk:Doomych

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Doomych!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Herby talk thyme 12:35, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Doomych!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Категории будут добавлены после того, как мне станут известны названия пауков. --- Categories will be added after to me names of spiders become known. --Doomych (talk) 16:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Hello Doomych!

You have emptied Category:2009 MAKS Airshow and moved its content to Category:MAKS Airshow 2009 - that's OK, but please nominate the empty category for speedy deletion. Thanks in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 06:41, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I have not found a corresponding template. Where he can be seen? --Doomych (talk) 05:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Just insert {{speedy|Reason}}. That is sufficient. By the way: Nice images from MAKS 2009! Thanks for uploading! Do you have more? Did you take some images of the Almaz Antey SAM systems? --High Contrast (talk) 18:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, High Contrast, for a good estimation!
I have made about 500 pictures, basically, planes and their units on a static exposition. And so forth I have not reached systems of antiaircraft defence, engines: here it is not enough one day. I almost did not photograph flights, as I do not have telephoto lens. Now I on the sly spread pictures in various categories (not only in MAKS-2009).
If you want, I will inform you when all I will finish (it will be not fast).
By the way, in one of concern "Almsz-Antej" organisations my father works. He is engaged in control systems of an air traffic. --Doomych (talk) 19:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your uploads! Very good contributions. Yes, would be nice, if you inform me when you are finnished with uploading! So you have contact to "Almaz-Antej" - that's good! Perhaps you can upload some photos, when there is an exhibition or something like that. Maybe it is possible. Greets, High Contrast (talk) 13:37, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
ОК, I have finished. If I am not mistaken, these are 92 pictures. --Doomych (talk) 15:30, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank you again for your very good photos from the MAKS 2009 Airshow! They are definately a benefit for Wikimedia Commons. Hope to see more good images from you! Greets, High Contrast (talk) 10:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Про значимость улиц[edit]

(к вопросу в ру-вики) Вот тут старые обсуждения по теме.

NVO (talk) 06:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Понял. Мое мнение: независимо ни от чего все улицы Москвы, Питера, других крупных городов - значимы. Мелкие города - не знаю. --Doomych (talk) 20:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Предложение по расчистке/ревизии "Истории Москвы"[edit]

см. Category talk:History of Moscow. NVO (talk) 09:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

OK. Отвечаю в обсуждении категории. --Doomych (talk) 20:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

GUM (Moscow) during New Year's holidays.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GUM (Moscow) during New Year's holidays.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Су-30МКМ (МАКС-2007).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Су-30МКМ (МАКС-2007).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Москва, бывшая Виндавская ул. (02).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

OK, {{PD-self}} --Doomych (talk) 07:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Москва, бывшая Виндавская ул. (01).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

OK, {{PD-self}} --Doomych (talk) 07:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Новое[edit]

Предлагается к удалению со всей начинкой: Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/01/Category:Buildings in Russia - NVO (talk) 08:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

MAKS Airshow 2011[edit]

Hello Doomych!

Do you have more images of the MAKS Airshow 2011? Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 13:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, of course! :) Wait it is a little! --Doomych (talk) 14:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! No hurry! If you need support, please let me know. Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 15:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Well, has understood! --Doomych (talk) 15:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
High Contrast, I'm finished. There are 156 photos. --Doomych (talk) 19:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Про станции МЖД[edit]

См. на User talk:A.Savin#Станции. Вы ещё планируете расширять "покрытие" MZD-категориями или нет? NVO (talk) 14:27, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Хм... Нет, пока не планирую, разве что пара фоток платформы 42-й км с "МАКСа" появилась. А что именно не понравилось в моих названиях категорий? Слово "MZD" или сама структура? Как бы сделали вы? --Doomych (talk) 15:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Я бы за это вовсе не взялся - если нужда в категориях есть, пусть они берутся "органически", а сплошное окатегоривание - одному не под силу. Нужна куча единомышленников (или трудолюбивых негритят) а где их взять? Но "если бы директором был я", я бы делал просто, скажем, Category:Pavlovsky Posad train station без указания направления и дирекции. Дирекция (дорога) у каждой станции одна, направления - в абсолютном большинстве случаев тоже одно. Имена, конечно, не все уникальны - но повторы не часты. Т.е. достаточно категории, в названии кодировка излишня. NVO (talk) 15:47, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Во-первых, в любом случае, без категорий по станциям в каком бы то ни было виде - вообще труба. Искать среди нескольких десятков фотографий разбросанные среди них снимки нужной станции было несколько неудобно. Почему я выбрал именно такой формат? Во-первых, как раз из-за названий-дублей. Я с вами не согласен. Их - масса. Ведь практически к каждой станции найдется одноименный населенный пункт или район города, категории под которые уже есть либо рано или поздно будут созданы, после чего существующие категории придется переименовывать для уточнения. Во-вторых, я это сделал ради унификации названий. --Doomych (talk) 16:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Проблема с категориями возникнет только тогда, когда будет 2 одинаковых станции в одной дороге. Однако уже теперь в названиях категорий неудобно видеть dir и неудобно видеть MZD. Это попросту непонятно. Как ещё можно называть категории?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Eстественным языком. Поскольку он должен быть английским - то либо просто топоним (Category:Krasnopresnenskaya), либо с добавлением английского "ж.-д. станция", чтобы отделить от имени населённого пункта (Category:Pavlovsky Posad train station). Ленинградцы добавляли либо "railway station", либо только "station" - последнее в английском слишком многозначно (Category:Police stations etc.). Повторы - разруливать здравым смыслом. NVO (talk) 19:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
OK. Буду придерживаться "НазваниеСтанции"+"ж/дСтанция". --Doomych (talk) 13:22, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Yakovlev Yak-42D at the MAKS-2011 (01).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

{{PD-self}} --Doomych (talk) 05:32, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Give credit where credit is due![edit]

Commons barnstar.png The Commons Barnstar
Thank you for your delightful image contributions to Commons and your good work! Thank you! High Contrast (talk) 23:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! --Doomych (talk) 05:22, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

An Invite to join Aviation WikiProject[edit]

Silhouette An-124.svg

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Aviation WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Commons' coverage of aviation. This includes aircraft, airports, airlines and other topics.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project! russavia (talk) 06:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Здравствуйте, Russavia! Думаю, что могу ответить и по-русски:). Спасибо за приглашение, но у сейчас меня мало свободного времени, и, соответственно, в течение уже года моя активность в Википедии оставляет желать лучшего. Участие же в проекте к чему-то обязывает, и я боюсь, что не буду соответствовать тому, что от меня будет ожидаться. --Doomych (talk) 11:22, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The_book_"Japan_and_Japanese"[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg The_book_"Japan_and_Japanese" has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this <articlefeedback-table-heading-page>, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rodhullandemu (talk) 03:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

I think this content, if it is out of copyright, should move to Wikisource, with any useful images kept here, but there seems little point in doing so unless they can be used somewhere. You know more about this than I do, so I hope you'll explain. Thanks. Rodhullandemu (talk) 03:17, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

MAKS 2013[edit]

Hello Doomych!

You have uploaded a bunch of great images of the MAKS airshow of 2011. This year, the MAKS airshow is held again. Do you plan to visit it again? Would be great to have your photographs of the 2013 show again. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

I answered here. --Doomych (talk) 09:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Subscription_to_the_literature[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Subscription_to_the_literature has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 14:27, 6 September 2013 (UTC)