User talk:Dr. Bernd Gross

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Adding to the talk page trimmer

Hi, based on discussion at the administrator's noticeboard, there is a consensus to go ahead with adding user talk pages that are unattended to be processed by the talk page trimmer. These cosmetic changes trim unnecessary boilerplate text in standard notices, lower the template transclusion count, and will make this talk page readable and quicker to render for all readers, without losing any content. Other users have asked to be added to this housekeeping task for this reason.

Please leave a note on my user talk page, or email me, if you would like to opt-out. If changes by the trimmer are reverted, they are likely to be re-implemented automatically unless opted-out. Thanks -- (User talk:Fæ) 16:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Bundle DR:
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Saurierpark Kleinwelka

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:10, 14 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Gorkhi-Terelj National Park 54.JPG

File:Gorkhi-Terelj National Park 54.JPG (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gorkhi-Terelj National Park 54.JPG Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:10, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UlaanBaatar-2009.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:UlaanBaatar-2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ox1997cow (talk) 17:08, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Ruine Oybin bei Mondschein.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ruine Oybin bei Mondschein.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dominus (talk • contribs) 16:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Pillnitzer Landstraße 86 Loschwitz 2.JPG

Dialog-warning.svg
File:Pillnitzer Landstraße 86 Loschwitz 2.JPG is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

Foto nicht von öffentlichem Grund aus gemacht

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.

If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

Deutsch  English  español  português  français  Bahasa Indonesia  +/−

Kannst du die IP-Behauptung bestätigen oder sollen wir das durch einen regulären LA laufen lassen? Túrelio (talk) 06:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Túrelio: , Bernd ist auf commons gesperrt. Aber wenn ich mir dieses Foto Pillnitzer Landstraße 86 Loschwitz 1.JPG aus derselben Cat anschaue, gehe ich davon aus, dass das Foto von der Straße aus aufgenommen wurde. Es wurde wohl über den Zaun fotografiert, aber das sieht aus meiner sicht ok aus. Viele grüße Z thomas 07:12, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pillnitzer Landstraße 86 Loschwitz 2.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Pillnitzer Landstraße 86 Loschwitz 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]