User talk:Drdoht

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Drdoht!

Remove redundant categories and try to put it in the most specific category/categories

Contents

Rappen[edit]

If you think that "Rappen" isn't a coin from Germany, first change the text in this article.

--Carlomorino (talk) 09:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


Concerning http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Rappen


All shown coins belong to Switzerland, with one exeption http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rappen_pfennig_freiburg_.jpg a coin from 1290. Freiburg im Breisgau is indeed a city of Germany, but in 1290, there was no Germany! Have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Roman_Empire

At http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freiburg you can read something about Freiburg in the year 1200.

My opinion: none of the shown rappen coins do refer to germany. Mit freundlichen Grüßen from Germany --Drdoht 10:35, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Danzig[edit]

Hello!

Please to use "Danzig" only about Free City. Thanks. --Starscream (talk) 17:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

at what location (category)? --Drdoht 17:09, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
"Danzig" and "Gdańsk" in English language are in the same way correct. But took root in Wikipedia to use "Danzig" only in the matter of the Free City. The usage alternant "Danzig" and "Gdańsk" causes misunderstandings. Greetings. --Starscream (talk) 17:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Well, Danzig became 1918 "Free city" after WWI. Now I dealed with very old coins, Holy Roman Empire. I suggest, at that time Danzig was named "Hansestadt", like Hamburg, Lübeck, Bremen in Germany. Danzig was german until 1945. Danzig is part of Poland since 1945, and so it changed to "Gdańsk". What shall we do now? greetings --Drdoht 17:21, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Kraków was also a member of Hanse. But it does not matter. I want avoidances of misunderstandings. The traversal of the subcategories in which "Danzig" and "Gdańsk" appears alternant, will cause misunderstandings. I assure that the name "Gdańsk" exists from Middle Ages. Even in Latin language are two names: "Dantiscum" and "Gedanum". The same way correct. I want only to prevent to the of chaos. Greetings. --Starscream (talk) 17:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Fairchild opamp ado-13.jpg[edit]

Fairchild opamp ado-13.jpg

Dear Drdoht,
Noticing the blue cast on the image File:Fairchild opamp ado-13.jpg, I wanted to ask whether you would mind if I balanced the contrast and colours a little? You're free to revert any changes, of course :-).
Best regards, --
ElHeineken (talk) 19:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

please feel free in adapting this picture of an very oldfashened opamp. best regards --Drdoht 15:01, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
✓  Done Sorry for taking so long. If you're unhappy with the results, don't hesitate to contact me or revert the changes. --
ElHeineken (talk) 18:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

The thaler category[edit]

First of all, thank you for your thorough sorting of German coins on Commons!

I'd like to discuss a few things with you, though. My most pressing concern is that you generally remove the category "Thaler" from the thaler coins. It appears to me (correct me if I'm wrong) that your rationale is that thaler coins do not belong to one single period of German history and thus cannot be confined to any particular section of German coins - e.g. thalers are not products of the Holy Roman Empire only.

This is how I see things: 1) "Thaler" is a concept that has prevailed through centuries of European history as an important currency type. 2) Therefore, we should have a "Thaler" category on Commons, and we should be able to find (in principle) all thaler coins on Commons by browsing the "Thaler" category and its sub-categories. 3) If you are not comfortable with the idea of all thalers from the Joachimsthalers to 20th century Maria Theresia thalers being lumped together in a single category, the "Thaler" category could always have sub-divisions that would fit into, say "Category:Coins of the Holy Roman Empire" and others.

Please note that there are other currency units that have their own category, even though they were issued by different states. See for instance Category:Solidus.

Let me know what you think. Alfons Åberg (talk) 20:36, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

A couple of other things[edit]

I'm also concerned about this edit (and similar edits). This is a Prussian 20 mark coin from 1914, and should thus remain in Category:Coins of Prussia. I realise that the coin was issued after the German unification of 1871 and was issued according to the gold mark standard of the German Empire. Nevertheless, it is a Prussian coin and should remain in that category. Think of the implications - should German euro coins also be moved to Category:Euro coins, and should we abolish Category:Euro coins (Germany), simply because German euro coins do not represent an independent currency? Probably not :-)

The final thing is moving coins to Category:Medieval German coins. I'm thinking of this edit (and similar edits). Basically, a coin from 1696 is not medieval, so regardless where it belongs, it doesn't belong in Category:Medieval German coins. There might be different definitions as to when the medieval era ended, but it was certainly before 1696. Alfons Åberg (talk) 20:50, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your critical sight on the new directory of mostly german coins. I have structured the huge amount of mostly unsorted german money (coins & banknotes!) along the timeline. Now it’s telling a long story of with very interesting unknown details of history. The main structur was given by categories of others and I did some finetuning and streamlining.

Before starting I reflected on the problem – what’s the best way? Sorting by content, name or timeline. Everything seems to be mixed before I started and so there was a confusing bulk of names. „Money of Austria“ has until now a interesting structure along the timeline (somebody did this work). Generally it’s unfortunate that many coins are only pictured with only one side. (two sides on one picture is optimal). Refering to „Commons“ we need as much as possible subfolder and as less as possible files in it. Many many user don‘t understand the sense of categories and subcategories, and so a small mixing up will continue. These user are thinking “category“ means a „field of interest“. Everybody should compare the structure of wiki-categories with the computer’s directory.

So I considered primarily gathering all coins by time is the savest way for non-numismatic user (as I am). On this way I discharged all folders like „Thaler“, „Vereinsthaler“, „Groschen“, „Rappen“ etc. which are refering only to names and content (unfortunately there are suddenly confusing new austrian, switzer and other coins).

--> The very rest of my work I collected all unknown coins (to me) together in the folder „medevial coins“. Sorry.

On my way I recognized two main problems: 1) New times (>2002) – only few staates but a huge number of material. 2) Old times (<1900) – only few coins but a great number of small shorttime countries

1) Euro Coins: As you can check, every state wants to show its own pictures on the coins („Euro coins (Austria)“ until „Euro coins (Vatican)“, each ca 40-50 coins). It’s a unique currency indeed, but in sum to much coins! I did not create the folder „euro coins (germany)“, but I made subfolder for german goldcoins (32 files) and german commemorative coins (188 files) – and what’s in the year 2014?? It’s a overwhelming amount of pictures, please dont mix them up in the general folder „euro coins“. Euro coins are bringing up a new inflation – a numismatic one.

2) Old coins <1900: Just now. I had a short look on two schoolmaps from 1815 and 1914 – very confusing number of borderlines inside europe. And there was a great number of currencies (Gulden, Kronen, Thaler ...) I suggest the following will be helpfull:

- Let’s create a new main category/folder „Money of Europe before 1900“ or „Money of Europe until beginning 20th century

- Next platform to be linked: „money of counties before 1900“ e.g. Duchy of Prussia, Duchy of Hanover-Lüneburg-Braunschweig, Hansestadt Lübeck, Freie Stadt Frankfurt ........, Lombardei ..... Böhmen ..... Switzerland .... Austria .... Vatican

- Other platform to be linked: „currencies before 1900“ e.g. Rappen before 1900, Goldmark before 1900, Kreuzer before 1900, Groschen before 1900, Heller before 1900, Kronen before 1900, Gulden before 1900, Forint before 1900, Thaler before 1900

By this way it should be possible, to incooperated all interesting coins listed in all categories „Money by country“ manually. Every interesting file gets only a second link. By this way, nobody disturbs the existing structure of main folders „Money of xxxx“ containing the stock of coins.

If we do so, I get rid of false categories switzer „Rappen“ austrian „Maria-Theresia-Thaler“, curious name „Groschen“ linked to my german structure of coins.

What do you think about this proposal? best regards --Drdoht 06:04, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

=========[edit]

"Coin picturing Wilhelm II": He was virtually King of Prussia but in reality Emperror of the German Empire. All coins are printed "Deutsches Reich 19xx" e.g. http://www.usagold.com/gold/coins/ger20mark.html and http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Reichsgesetzblatt_1896_Seite_195.png. Otherwise there are no stamps existing for prussia at that time. Very complicated political correlations in this time.

"Coin of Prussia" would mean, invalid in e.g. Bavaria and other parts of the German Empire. In fact this coin was valid in all parts of the German Empire.

hello[edit]

2 RPf 1923 Weimarer Republik.jpg What do you mean by "private source" ? The coin is 1923 and created by a bank, but the photo is not. Are you the author of the photography ? The cleaning surrounding the coins is also pretty badly made, could you please rather uplaod the source image and request a wikigraphist to redo it ? thank you Lilyu (talk) 13:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much for uploading the original photo :) the right part still have harsh hedges but it's ok
Are you the photographer ? If yes, you would have to add your name as the photographer : the bank is only the creator of the coin. I don't know who hold copyright of the design of the coin, probably the German state or public domain. But as the photographer, you are the author of the photo, and your name should be cited :)
Have a nice day, and thank you for sharing your images.--Lilyu (talk) 01:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Category:ASM-A-1 Tarzon[edit]

Hi there,

I noticed you removing Category:Tallboy bomb from Category:ASM-A-1 Tarzon. I readded the category only for it to be removed again without comment. The category is appropriate for the ASM-A-1 to be included under, as the ASM-A-1's actual "bomb" component was, in fact, a Tallboy. - The Bushranger (talk) 04:02, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi Bushranger,

thank you for your remark refering ASM-A-1 Tarzon. As you can see I have structured the huge field [„air-dropped bombs“] by creating subfolders. First I sorted by states and then by time (WW1, WW2). There are about 600 entries from me and so I had no time to comment each move. Sorry that I didn’t notice, that you have made a remove of category „ASM-A-1 Tarzon“. Well, this type is US and made „after WW2“. The „Tallboy bomb“ is UK and made „during WW2“. There are similarities (not by size but by technique):

best regards --Drdoht 00:55, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Ah. Well, I can see your point. I assumed though, that since actual Tallboys (not sure if they were bought from England or license-produced) formed the core of Tarzon, it would fit as a subcategoy of Tallboy. :) - The Bushranger (talk) 06:46, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

sin/cos drehen?[edit]

Hallo Drdoht, wieso willst du das Bild drehen lassen http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sine_cosine_one_period.svg&action=history  ? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 19:34, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

owehhhh, sorry, ich dachte, das wäre nur eine Darstellungsoption für meinen Bildschirm. Bitte nix drehen an der Grafikdatei, wäre ja Unsinn. Beste Grüße --Drdoht 21:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Alles klar, kein Problem - habe es revertiert. Ich versuche mal zu sehen, wie wir da noch einen kurzen erklärenden Text wie z.B. "Hiermit kannst du falsch gedrehte Bilder korrigieren (wie es z.B. oft bei Digitalfotos im Hochkantformat vorkommt)" in das Pop-up-Fenster einfügen. Falls es dich interssiert: Hilfe findest du hier: Help:RotateLink. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 22:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Dronning Ingrid (1951).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Dronning Ingrid (1951).jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.

Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | português | svenska | +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Please clarify who the author is. Were your parents the photographers or did they just "collect" a bought photo/postcard?

Saibo (Δ) 19:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks here, too! --Saibo (Δ) 16:33, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
http://www.ferry-site.dk/ferry.php?id=DronningIngrid1951&lang=en (very bad quality) was not apparently the source, as everybody can see e.g. at the flag, the top of the front windows and the position of the name. best regards --Drdoht 00:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I saw that the image it not from there (I saw it at the water on the front of the ship). However, the description is more clean without a external URL, don't you think? I have linked the Wikipedia article of the line instead. Übrigens können wir natürlich auch Deutsch reden, wenn du magst. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
ok, nu vi kan taler tysk! (Klar, weiß ich doch) Den Link hatte ich nur deswegen beigefügt, weil ich zwecks Kategorisierung das Baujahr brauchte. Außerdem stehen dort andere wissenswerte Daten (z.B. daß sie später in Sjælland umbenannt wurde). Von der Sjælland gab es bei Commons auch schon ein Bild, aber eben ohne Bezug zur Dronning Ingrid. Mange hilsener fra --Drdoht 01:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
War das jetzt Norwegisch? Dänisch? Das kann ich leider nicht. Okay, ich habe den Link wieder hinzugetan, mit Beschriftung. Danke für die Bilder! Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
*smile* Det var dansk. Aber norwegisch, dänisch und schwedisch unterscheiden sich nur relativ wenig in der Schreibweise, mehr dagegen in der Aussprache. So ähnlich wie bei den deutschen Dialekten, schlimmer ist es nicht. Nu jeg ønsker god nat. Farvel og tak for alt. --Drdoht 02:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Jeg forstår det ("Det var dansk"). Du er velkommen og smuk søndag! (with a bit help from google :-)   ) --Saibo (Δ) 22:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Deutschland (1953).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Deutschland (1953).jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.

Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | português | svenska | +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Please clarify who the author is. Were your parents the photographers or did they just "collect" a bought photo/postcard?

Saibo (Δ) 19:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification - in case you do not want to make such statements public: send them to OTRS instead. --Saibo (Δ) 16:29, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Dampffaehre_Deutschland_1909.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Dampffaehre_Deutschland_1909.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 19:25, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

File:DK-14051963_vogelfluglinie.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:DK-14051963_vogelfluglinie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 19:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

File:20 dm bbkII bdr rs.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

danke für Hinweis, Lizenzbaustein falsch im Text eingesetzt und daher vom bot nicht erkannt. --Drdoht 14:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Bitte beachten[edit]

User talk:Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5#Fremde Bilder von FlickR --Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 14:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Drehung der File:Farø Bridges aerial (from west).jpg[edit]

Hallo Drdoht, ist das versehentlich passiert? Falls das so ist, könntest Du bitte die Datei wieder auf die "Original-Version" zurücksetzen? Vielen Dank. -- Rillke(q?) 21:01, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Hmmmmh, Norden ist jetzt oben, aber irgendwie sieht es formatmäßig doof aus. Soll ich zurückdrehen? --Drdoht 00:37, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Kannst ja eine Kompassrose reinbasteln (oder nur einen Pfeil nach Norden oder so). Wenn die Aufnahmen nicht orthogonal zur Erdoberfläche gemacht wurden, kann man bei Winkeln nahe 90° noch einfach entzerren aber bei vorliegendem Beispiel nutzt das auch nichts. -- Rillke(q?) 09:43, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Hast recht, habe es zurückgedreht. --Drdoht 11:12, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Sanka fbb9fb1e71025295584b4e1d35a2bb1f image document xxl.jpg u.a.[edit]

Hallo Drdoht, deine Auslegung des UrhG bzgl. dieser Fotos hat mich etwas überrascht. Wenn sie standhält, hätte das ja erhebliche (positive) Folgen für uns. Deshalb die Frage: ist die Gültigkeit dieser Lizenzierung/Argumentation schon einmal in einem Löschantrag oder anderswo ausdiskutiert worden? --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo auch, ich hatte bisher noch keine Probleme, will aber dazu sagen, daß ich mich in letzter Zeit etwas intensiver mit der Problematik "WERK" und "PHOTO" beschäftigte. Habe dazu diverse aktuelle nationale Gesetze ausgewertet. Siehe auch die Entwürfe und Links auf meiner user-Seite. Ansatzweise habe ich meinen Gedankengang bei PDs für dänische und schwedische "Fotos und Werken" angelehnt. Ich denke dabei wie Du an eine fortschrittliche Lösung für Wikipedia!! beste Grüße --Drdoht 11:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
URAA Diskussion ist eröffnet!! --Drdoht (talk) 22:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Schmuggler 532ab6c930c8ee64dfbb01cca653bdae image document xxl.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Schmuggler 532ab6c930c8ee64dfbb01cca653bdae image document xxl.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Funfood 19:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Du kannst die Bilder auf Wikipedia de hochladen, da ist das gängig.--Stanzilla (talk) 19:43, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Bitte was ist "gängig"? Darf dieses 62 Jahre alte Foto etwa nur auf Wikipedia.de und nicht auf Commons? --Drdoht 19:47, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
gängig bedeutet möglich. Ich kannte das vorher auch nicht es gibt die Commons:Hirtle chart, bei Outside of US wird das URAA erwähnt. Das kam wohl letztes Jahr erst zur Sprache und ist eine total dämliche Lizenzvorschrift. Commons:URAA-restored copyrights. Eigentlich war uns nur die Sprachverwirrung aufgefallen, wegen der ich das Bild einem Admin zeigte. Dumm gelaufen. Ich verstehe, dass du dich ärgest, aber man kann es immerhin lizenzkonform auf de hochladen.--Stanzilla (talk) 19:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Keine Sorge, ich bin nicht sauer, nur sehr erstaunt und verunsichert betreffs USA und commons. Schaut euch unter dem Aspekt „50 Jahre alte Fotos“ einmal PD-denmark50 und PD-sweden-photo an. Ich habe für einige EU-Mitgliedsstaaten bereits die Rechtslage geklärt, siehe meine Entwürfe auf meiner Userseite. --Drdoht 20:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Ok, ich werfe jetzt meinen ersten Blick auf diese URAA (bei Wiki beschrieben), mir fällt sofort auf, daß sie sich auf "foreign works" bezieht. Im europ. Urheberrecht wird unterschieden zwischen Werken ("works") und Lichtbildern ("pictures"). Möglicherweise zielt das URAA nur auf echte Werke (Kunstwerke, Portraits etc) ab? --Drdoht 20:17, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Soweit ich weiss, ist hier "works" alles, auch Fotos. :S --Stanzilla (talk) 20:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
NeNe, ein Werk ("work") hat etwas mit schützenswerter geistiger Schöpfung zu tun, ein einfaches Foto ("photographic picture") kann ein Automat machen oder kann ein Schnappschuß sein. Bei letzterem stehen keine keine finanziellen Interessen dahinter. In den nationalen UrhG findet man ellenlange Abhandlungen (90%) über das Werk und nur am Ende (10%) steht etwas über Lichtbilder. Schaut mal bei der WIPO rein, da findet man die nationalen Gesetze auch mit Übersetzungen. --Drdoht 20:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Der Originalgesetzestext 1994 steht bei http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-103hr5110enr/pdf/BILLS-103hr5110enr.pdf (bei wipo gibt es leiter keine Übersetzung dazu), beim Querlesen sieht man, das nur "works" enthalten sind, der Begriff "pictures" fehlt. Insgesamt dreht es sich doch um merkantile Interessen und deren Schutz, aber keinesfalls um Materie, mit der sich nicht MONEY machen läßt. Unter dem Aspekt müßt ihr bei Wiki das einmal durchleuchten. --Drdoht 20:44, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Stanzilla hat recht, siehe die Erläuterung hier: [1]. --Funfood 20:49, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Dass dieses URAA großer Mist ist, da sind wir uns glaub ich einig, aber das hilft ja nix.--Stanzilla (talk) 20:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Nur die Ruhe, habe www.benedict.com gelesen, nix neues, es betrifft nur works und photographic works. Beispiel: das Hochzeitsphoto beim Photographen ist ein Portrait, ein photograhic work. Wenn das gleiche Hochzeitspaar von den Freunden geknipst wird, dann ist das ein Foto, "photographic picture". Die merkantilen Interessen des Photographen werden vom Gesetzgeber durch das UrhG geschützt. --Drdoht 21:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Also wenn du das aus dem US Copyright Gesetz irgendwo hieb- und stichfest raus belegen kannst, wird dir halb Commons zu Füßen liegen :) --Funfood 21:21, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Das wird relativ einfang gelingen über ‘‘§ 104A. Copyright in restored works - (b) OWNERSHIP OF RESTORED COPYRIGHT, wo das URAA auf das nationale Gesetz des Urheberlandes verweist. In den nationalen UrhG (meist bietet die WIPO engl. Übersetzungen an) wird nämlich glasklar unterschieden zwischen "photographic works" und "photographic pictures". Habe wikisource ergänzt: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_States_Code/Title_17/Chapter_1/Section_104A#.28b.29_Ownership_of_Restored_Copyright . Welche Paragraphen das für einige EU-Länder sind, siehe meine user-Seite. Näheres hierzu in Kürze hier ....
Gut, ich habe den Copvio-tag vom bild wieder weggenommen, ich denke das sollte durchaus auch auf COM:VP weiterdiskutiert werden - ich denke dein Englisch ist sicher gut genug um das dort mal zur Diskussion anzustoßen wenn du deine Infos beisammen hast? --Funfood 23:13, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Moin, habe fertig. Jetzt wie weiter? --Drdoht 08:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Ah, jetzt erst gesehen. Da hast du dich ja richtig reingelegt/gelesen. Danke schonmal dafür! Ich denke, das sollte (auf Englisch zusammengefasst) auf dem Copyright-Forum zur Diskussion gestellt werden. Dort sollten sich auch mehr US/internationale Auskenner finden, die dazu schon Erfahrungen gesammelt haben. Viele Grüße --Funfood 22:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, ich habe gerade alles auf meiner user-seite als Pkt.3 eingestellt, um zu sehen, wo noch formatfehler sind. Das Problem ist ja nicht auf D beschränkt sondern betrifft alle außerhalb USA. Sag mir bitte, was noch in den abstract rein soll, bzw. selbst ergänzen. Wenn alles ok, dann gehen wir in die Diskussion. besten Gruß --Drdoht 22:53, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Der abstract ist schon eine gute Diskussionsgrundlage, es sollte aber vielleicht noch rein, wo denn nun wirklich von offizieller Seite zwischen den "works" und den "pictures" unterschieden wird. Eine sichere Quelle sorgt schin mal für weniger Nachfragen und Spekulationen. --Funfood 07:46, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
URAA Diskussion ist eröffnet!! --Drdoht (talk) 22:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Media needing chemical classification[edit]

Hallo Drdoht. Danke für diese Kategorisierung. In einigen Fällen hast du den Baustein {{Query chemical}} durch Category:Chemical structures ersetzt. Die Kategorie ist aber viel zu generell und muss regelmässig ausgemistet werden. --Leyo 08:38, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Moin Leyo, ich dachte die Kategorie "needs classification" müßte primär ausgemistet werden. Und daher habe ich diese "organischen Einzelstrukturen" erstmal nach "chemical structures" verschoben. (wo ich, falls ich etwas brauchen sollte, auch suchen würde). Baustein {{Query chemical}} dachte ich wäre für das große Fragezeichen im File zuständig. Als Chemiker gehöre ich zu der Generation, die Formeln noch mit Tusche und Schablone zeichnen mußten. beste Grüße --Drdoht 08:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Ja, diese Kategorie muss schon auch ausgemistet werden. Aber da es zigtausende von Strukturformeln gibt, muss die Kategorisierung schon etwas spezifischer sein als Category:Chemical structures. --Leyo 12:42, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:World_War_II_aerial_photographs_of_Freiburg[edit]

Schubbay (talk) 12:52, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Freiburg ist bei Commons üblicher als Freiburg (Breisgau) --Drdoht (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Schmuggler 532ab6c930c8ee64dfbb01cca653bdae image document xxl.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Schmuggler 532ab6c930c8ee64dfbb01cca653bdae image document xxl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 02:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Kriegsweihnacht 1940-Hemmerich.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kriegsweihnacht 1940-Hemmerich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 02:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

I am the owner of the original. --Drdoht (talk) 05:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 02:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Jubiläumskarte 1922 Großherzogin.jpg[edit]

Woher weißt du das der Fotograf 70 Jahre tot ist?--Symposiarch (talk) 14:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, unter Autor schrieb ich vom herausgebenden Verlag. Die Aufnahmen sind erheblich älter. Siehe Alice-Kaserne, die Schloßkaserne wurde 1903 abgerissen. --Drdoht (talk) 14:31, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Volksempfänger 1936 FA Berlin.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Volksempfänger 1936 FA Berlin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

El Grafo (talk) 13:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 16:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Caserne Gallieni.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Caserne Gallieni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Rheinkaserne 1936.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Rheinkaserne 1936.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Europaviertel 1943.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Europaviertel 1943.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Caserne Marceau 1925.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Caserne Marceau 1925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Pionierkaserne Mainz-Kastel franz..jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Pionierkaserne Mainz-Kastel franz..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Mainz-Kastel Kaserne25.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mainz-Kastel Kaserne25.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:24, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Max Le Blanc.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Max Le Blanc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Kurt Alder 1936 Kiel.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kurt Alder 1936 Kiel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:26, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Georg Wittig 1923 Marburg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Georg Wittig 1923 Marburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Butenandt Nobel 1939.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Butenandt Nobel 1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:33, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Bekanntmachung Reichskreditkassen notes Jersey 1943.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bekanntmachung Reichskreditkassen notes Jersey 1943.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Währungsreform-Westzone 1948-06-20.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Währungsreform-Westzone 1948-06-20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:51, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Willy Marckwald ca. 1930.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Willy Marckwald ca. 1930.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:52, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Otto dimroth 1935 würzburg-2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Otto dimroth 1935 würzburg-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:53, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Werk Kalle ca 1955-58.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Werk Kalle ca 1955-58.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Temp.stationen D 2013.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Temp.stationen D 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:58, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Fuldatal 8261128040 b8c578c42f o.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Fuldatal 8261128040 b8c578c42f o.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:MS Europa 8254749762 6b7654f584 o.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:MS Europa 8254749762 6b7654f584 o.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Baltic star 1963 8253938699 b36aa684ab o.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Baltic star 1963 8253938699 b36aa684ab o.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:04, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Spree Fotogr. unbekannt berlin 1925.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Spree Fotogr. unbekannt berlin 1925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:07, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Josetti juno baer.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Josetti juno baer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Josetti juno godewind.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Josetti juno godewind.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Josetti juno preis.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Josetti juno preis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Josetti juno staedte.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Josetti juno staedte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 17:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Notgeld_of_Ludwigshafen[edit]

PanchoS (talk) 13:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

File:50marks 1917.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:50marks 1917.JPG seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.

Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | português | svenska | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 17:16, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Was soll das?? Das Bild stammte von [Wiki], wurde nur von mir nach commons verschoben. Die gesamte Geldscheinserie von 1916-18 ist PD. --Drdoht (talk)

File:Walter König um 1950.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Walter König um 1950.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Paulae (talk) 19:13, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Walter König um 1940.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Walter König um 1940.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Paulae (talk) 11:18, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello. {{PD-textlogo}} is not appropriate for all logos. Its text states: "This image only consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection [...]". I do not think that the very detailed drawing of a lion in File:01- Hoechst MLB signet 1883.jpg can be described as "simple geometric shapes" (please see Commons:Threshold of originality). Therefore, this image is not per se in the public domain. It is in the public domain only because of its age: I think we can use {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} (because the author is unknown) or maybe {{PD-old-70}} (because an artist active in 1877 probably died before 1944). In any way, {{PD-textlogo}} cannot be used because the drawing is way too complex. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 09:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Historic radios - speakers are not loop antennas.[edit]

Re File:AttwaterKentFtLaudCarMuseum.jpg and similar. I notice you have placed inappropriately added Category:Loop antennas when there is no loop antenna in the photo. Possibly you are under the mistaken impression that a loudspeaker and a loop antenna are the same thing; they are not, having different functions and appearances. Thanks. -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi there! Sorry I'm calculating some loop antennas for medium wave radios and building up a huge one like [2] (click the last line "Bauanleitung..." to see the picture). For other loop antennas see [3]. These coils had to be fitted to the radio to receceive a special wave band (long wave, medium wave, some short waves up to 7000 kHz). best regards --Drdoht (talk) 22:34, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Round speakers from the 1920s (for example seen at Category:Atwater Kent loudspeakers were fairly common in the USA. I don't know if they're as familiar in Europe. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

bandpass filter circuits no loop antennas[edit]

No loop antennas. Coils (electricity) High frequency bandpass filter circuits, Coils (electricity) Medium wave bandpass filter circuits, Coils (electricity) Low frequency bandpass filter circuits.

Bonjour les bobines sont interchangeables pour la commutation de la bande. Bonne lecture https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%A9cepteur_%C3%A0_cristal amicalement --F1jmm (talk) 21:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC) No Loop antennas

Hi there! Sorry I'm calculating some loop antennas for medium wave radios and building up a huge one like [4] (click the last line "Bauanleitung..." to see the picture). For other loop antennas see [5]. These coils had to be fitted to the radio to receceive a special wave band (long wave, medium wave, some short waves up to 7000 kHz). best regards --Drdoht (talk) 22:36, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
How to find the right direction for receiving radio broadcast from far away. three sites. You can use the coils as loop antennas

for this purpose. And you must use a capacity 50-500 pF for bringing to resonance (= best signal). coils as loop antennas, Q, etc

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Drdoht,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)


IGFarbenGoetterrat.jpg[edit]

Hallo Drdoht,

kannst du mir erklären, warum du die auf dem Bild fehlenden Personen aus der Beschreibung gelöscht hast.

--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, ich habe es gestrichen, weil unter "Beschreibung" nur die gezeigten Personen aufgeführt werden. Gezeigt ist der "harte Kern" der IG-Farben, die die Fäden zu den Werken und den Konten in der Hand hielten. Der Aufsichtsrat umfaßte bei der Gründung 86 Personen. Die fehlenden (bitte auch die Liste in der dt. Wiki vervollständigen) könnte man unten unter "other_versions=" einsetzen, dort ist Platz für zusätzliche Informationen zum Bild. Schade, daß mein Opi schon lange im Himmel ist, der gehörte 1920-1960 zum "Dunstkreis" von W. Kalle und könnte noch einiges erzählen. Vielleicht finde ich noch etwas in seinem Nachlaß. Auf alle Fälle freuts mich, daß ich zum richtigen Zeitpunkt bei Hoechst eine hochauflösende Bilddatei abgreifen konnte. mfg --Drdoht (talk) 14:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Wimmer[edit]

Weisst du schon sicher dass Friedrich Wimmer in File:UBAdam1941.jpg figuriert? Ich bin ja auch nicht sicher, aber der NL-Text sagt: "Stellvertreter von Dr. Friedrich Wimmer, dhr. Tluzar (T. Luzar?)." Vysotsky (talk) 08:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, ich hatte die vorhandenen drei Bilder primär in Kategory Friedrich Wimmer zusammengefaßt. Bild 1 und 3 zeigen ihn eindeutig. Bild 2 (UBAdam1941.jpg) kommt mir falsch beschriftet vor. Die gezeigte Person zeigt keine Ähnlichkeit mit 1 und 3 und trägt keine SS, sondern Wehrmachtsuniform. M.e. zeigt Bild 2 daher keinen Friedrich Wimmer. Aber wie gesagt, das merkt man erst bei Vergleich der drei Bilder. --Drdoht (talk) 11:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
"T. Luzar" wird der korrekte deutsche Name sein [6]

File:AnkvdMoer.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:AnkvdMoer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:38, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

DEFAULTSORT[edit]

Hello, Drdoht. Please remember to add the all-important DEFAULTSORT to new categories of people that you create. It is important for alphabetizing them. Thank you. - Hoops gza (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

I have added them to some of your categories. Please go back and add them to all of the categories you have created when you have time. - Hoops gza (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Sprechen sie englisch? - Hoops gza (talk) 01:44, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice. I didn't know about the importance of "DEFAULTSORT". I'll do so in future. --Drdoht (talk) 04:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. I am also asking you to change your past categories. You need to put DEFAULTSORT in them. - Hoops gza (talk) 05:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

How to find the past person-categories I've created? --Drdoht (talk) 05:07, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Click here: Special:Contributions/Drdoht. Click on "Only show edits that are page creations", then Search. - Hoops gza (talk) 06:51, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Are your settings in German or English? - Hoops gza (talk) 06:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Please also add births and deaths for each person. - Hoops gza (talk) 10:21, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

I have fixed your categories as far back as October 22. - Hoops gza (talk) 12:47, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Verstehen Sie? - Hoops gza (talk) 23:44, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Man hat mich gebeten zu übersetzen. Es geht wohl darum, in den Kategorien

[[Category:Births by year]]
bzw.
[[Category:Deaths by year]]

und geeignete zu ergänzen. Gibt's dazu Fragen? Gruß a×pdeHello! 09:41, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Außerdem fehlt, wie ich sehe, noch die Kategorie Category:People by name, die ebenfalls in jede Personenkategorie gehört. --Kersti (talk) 21:18, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:People by name also. - Hoops gza (talk) 23:11, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Dear Hoops, you didn't mention "Category:People by name" at 11 November 2014. So I have forgotten it sometimes. Now I'll do so in future.
what's the sense of "birth/death"-category? millions of entries? Who wants to seak in this field (lists)?
I think you don't know the difference between "university ....." and "university .... faculty". Faculty means divisions of a university e.g. chemistry, physics, theologics etc see University of Regensburg. For example persons at "Philipps-Universität Marburg" category is quite ok, people at "University of Marburg faculty" is wrong, because there is no definition about what faculty is ment.
You have created category "Physical chemists". In accordance with other scientific fields you must create "Physical chemists of Germany", ... of USA, ... of switzerland etc.
At ~1900 it is very difficult to separate physical chemists from Chemists and Physicists.

best regards --Drdoht (talk) 02:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:4',5,6,7,8-Pentahydroxyflavone[edit]

Jynto (talk) 14:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Mathematiker vs. Naturwissenschaftler[edit]

Hallo, ich meine Mathematiker sind keine Naturwissenschaftler. Letztere machen Experimente (empirische Wissenschaften), erstere nicht. Auch ist die Category:Mathematicians nicht unterhalb von Category:Natural scientists angesiedelt. Category:Mathematicians from Czechoslovakia usw. sollte dann analog plaziert sein. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

N'abend. Du bestärkst meine Zweifel an meiner Operation. Nicht zu Unrecht hießen die Gymnasien früher "math.-naturwissenschaftlich". Ich mach's wieder alles Rückgängig. Vielen Dank für Deinen Hinweis. --Drdoht (talk) 21:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Phenacetin synthesis BAYER 1888.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Phenacetin synthesis BAYER 1888.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 11:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Phenacetin synthesis BAYER 1888-2.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Phenacetin synthesis BAYER 1888-2.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kopiersperre (talk) 14:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, ich bin Urheber dieser Datei und deshalb bleibt sie hier. Ich habe "Phenacetin synthesis BAYER 1888.jpg" durch "Phenacetin synthesis BAYER 1888-2.png" ersetzt, da einigen hier das jpg-Format nicht sonderlich gefällt. --Drdoht (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kugelfallviskosimeter neue Generation.JPG[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kugelfallviskosimeter neue Generation.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kugelfallviskosimeter neue Generation.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Wdwd (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, die Datei stand bei de:Kugelfallviskosimeter als erstes Bild, wurde von mir per download/upload nach Commons mit der identischen Bildbeschreibung wie bei de.Wikipedia übertragen. Siehe mein Vermerk bei Commons "übertragen von de-Wikipedia". Dateiname bzw. Format oder Lizenzgeber wurden ebenfalls nicht von mir geändert. Den Download kann ich auf meinem Rechner mit dt. Zeit 10.09.2015 04:41 rekonstruieren. Upload time war UTC 10.09.2015 02:47. Irgendwo in den Bildkellern der dt. Wikipedia muß sich das Original finden lassen. Ich kenne den Lizenzgeber "Thermo Scientific" nicht. Von ihm sind noch die Bildmetadaten vorhanden "Adobe Photoshop CS Macintosh - Speicherzeitpunkt 12:58, 23. Apr. 2007". Alles klar?? --Drdoht (talk) 20:10, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Derjenige, der hier eine Schnelllöschung durchführen will, sorgt gleichzeitig dafür, daß dieses Bild von der dt. Wikipedia dort im dt. Artikel wieder eingebunden wird. --Drdoht (talk) 20:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, hab's hier auch gelöscht, damit erledigt. Hatte auf de.wp nach > 14 tagen keine Freigabe, hierher war ein fehlerhafter Transfer. Bitte künftig keine Dateien von de.wp nach commons transferieren, welche sich auf der de.wp in der "Dateiprüfung" (DÜP) befinden.--Wdwd (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Der Urheber - wie angegeben - Thermo Scientific ist der Hersteller des Gerätes, sein Bild ist von 2008, findet sich in den von mir recherchierten Links (Firmenunterlagen). Wieso befindet es sich erst 2015 in einer DÜP?? Jetzt existiert das Bild weder bei Commons noch bei de-Wikipedia. Was ist jetzt los? -
Hier ein anderes Bild von Thermo Scientific 2011 Drdoht (talk) 22:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
dito 2009201120112012 --93.196.30.148 22:45, 2 October 2015 (UTC)


Franz Oppenheim[edit]

Gib mir doch mal kurz eine Erklärung, warum Du den Oppenheim hier raus genommen hast (Gedenktafel Königstr 4B (Wanns) Villenkolonie Alsen.jpg, Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Wannsee-Institut.jpg, Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Villen am Wannsee.jpg)?

Gruß OTFW (talk) 14:46, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Franz Oppenheim starb 1929. Zu seinen Bildern ist ein Grabstein und die Villa zu seiner Zeit ok. z.B. Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Franz Oppenheim.jpg
- bei Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Friedhof Lindenstraße2.jpg ist schon fast zu viel fremde Information enthalten.
- nix mit Oppenheim zu tun hat Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Villen am Wannsee.jpg
- überhaupt nix für die "Nachnutzung" seiner Villa durch die Nazis kann der Oppenheim bei Gedenktafel Am Großen Wannsee 58 (Wanns) Wannsee-Institut.jpg
-- dito Gedenktafel Königstr 4B (Wanns) Villenkolonie Alsen.jpg
ganz allgemein, die Bilder von Dir enthalten "zu viel Information PLUS zu klein dargestellt" im Bild, das liegt aber am Grafiker der Folien. Kannst Du nicht mit Grafikprogramm filetieren? Es ist dort zu viel Text enthalten.
also wegen der Villa Oppenheim, da würde ich es so machen wie bei z.B. Villa Dykerhoff, Villa Kalle, Villa Bosch, Villa Albert (p.s. die kannten sich alle untereinander). Eigene Kategorie "Villa Oppenheim" nur mit den Villendateien füllen und diese Kategorie mit dem Eigentümer verknüpfen. Dann sähe der Ordner Franz Oppenheim wieder "menschlich" aus. mfg --Drdoht (talk) 14:43, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Your category creations[edit]

I'm tired of fixing your categories since you refuse to listen to the instructions that were provided to you. If you keep it up, I will propose a topic ban. Regards, - Bossanoven (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Are these Mercks part of Category:Merck family, or are they a separate family? - Bossanoven (talk) 15:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

I fixed the Merck family. I understand what you were trying to do, but unfortunately, we do not categorize families in that way. If you think this policy is a bad one, you can bring it up for discussion. You can talk about it in German as there are administrators on the Commons who speak German. - Bossanoven (talk) 16:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

It is difficult to understand today the connections between former important persons named Merck. The only origin was in Hammelburg or Schweinfurt (north of Würzburg), possibly Johann Merck (1573–1642). From there grew two lines: 1) the very important line at Darmstadt (south of Frankfurt a. M.) with pharmacists and chemists. - 2) small line at Hamburg (500 km north of Frankfurt) with politicians and businessmen. Two coats of arms are shown here at wikipedia [7] and [8]. 3) Little is known about a Munich line.
After world war I the "Darmstadt line" was divided into the American Merck and the German Merck. - since 1918 up to now there are two different and independent companies.
if you look at the english side "merck family" all seems to be unimportant and easy. But the german side shows the real problems of genealogy.
Since 2015 the german company "Merck Darmstadt" became a very very important global player. I am searching in old german chemical literature about Mercks (ca 1800-1950).
Up to now there had been many Merck persons with first name Georg, George, Louis, Willy, Carl, Karl ... The 13th generation of Merck is born >=2002. Simply sorting by first name is not helpfull if not confusing. Let's go two ways, one sorting by first name and additional by origin. --Drdoht (talk) 05:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

You're still forgetting some essential things with these, namely the Category:People by name and DEFAULTSORT. Please learn how to do this, or I will propose a topic ban. Just check my recent edits to your categories to see the difference. - Bossanoven (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

ok, propose a topic ban and it's your turn to sort pictures out off the crowd of unsorted pictures. First job for you: there are thousend pics at "Chemists from the United Staates". I have not the time to learn anything and not the time to check and write birth and death dates. By the way whats your profession? Chemist, physicist or controller? --Drdoht (talk) 04:07, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
I deal mostly with existing pictures at commons and sort them acc. to the field of science. Why are they until now not "sorted by name"????

Because you fail to put the DEFAULTSORT template in when you create your categories. You need to learn how to do this before you make any new categories. Just look at the code on the pages by pretending to edit one of them. - Bossanoven (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

By the way, please do not abbreviate senior as sen. in category titles. Sen. is a common English abbreviation for Senator. - Bossanoven (talk) 04:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Great stuff :)[edit]

Just a note to say that I really like what you did here with your notes :) . I'm doing much the same on some other group photos of scientists. -- Deadstar (msg) 11:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Österreich Volkstrauertag 12g 25071937-8.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Österreich Volkstrauertag 12g 25071937-8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 14:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Bayer Tafel[edit]

Moin! Zur Info: Bitte keine edit wars mehr auf Commons! Trotziges hin- und her-verschieben hilft keinem weiter sondern schadet nur. Es gibt kein mein Bild auf Commons, die Lizenzen sind nicht widerrufbar. Einmal hochgeladen gehoert das Bild allen und jedem. Zwist bitte auf Euren Diskussionsseiten austragen oder einfach mal jemanden Fragen, der sich damit auskennt: Village pump. Weitere wilde reverts werden mit Urlaub vom editieren belohnt (Zugang wird gesperrt). Also bitte: zivil und sachlich ausdiskutieren. Besten dank und ein guts Nächtle! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Hans Finkelstein ca. 1922.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Hans Finkelstein ca. 1922.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rollingcontributor (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Upcoming Wiki Science Competition[edit]

Hi, I am contacting all active commons users I can find more interested in the management of pictures related to scientific or technical topics. If you have time, could you take a look in Commons:Village_pump#Upcoming_Wiki_Science_Competition. Thank you. If were already informed, sorry to bother you.--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

File:66dscf0830-NORDKAPP2.jpg[edit]

Hello. I’m curious about this file. You uploaded it in 2012 as your own work but a Tineye search suggests it has been on the internet since 2008. Some those links are inaccessible but an example is flickr.com/photos/moonbath/3751202755/in/album-72157612189671455/, which was uploaded to Flickr in 2009. Is this really your own work? Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 10:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your advise. My version "10:24, 2. Aug. 2012" was taken with my camera at the "Nordkapp Museet" (shop for tourists). We had been there with a cruise line ship (AIDA MAR). Meanwhile my picture has been replaced by Jindory1618 in 2016.
version 2012 is my work, version 2016 isn't my work. --Drdoht (talk) 12:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation. Are you saying that you took a photo of a photo? Green Giant (talk) 12:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I took a photo from the picture at the wall (ca. 1,5 x 3 m). --Drdoht (talk) 12:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Ah, I’m afraid that is a small problem. The only person who can license that image is the person who took the original photo, unless the photo is in the public domain. I’m going to have to delete it because it violates our licensing policy. If there any other similar files, please let me know. Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)