User talk:ETH-Bibliothek/de

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ETH-Bibliothek!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:50, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:ETH-BIB-Kematen im Tirol, Zirl-Inlandflüge-LBS MH01-006698.tif[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ETH-BIB-Kematen im Tirol, Zirl-Inlandflüge-LBS MH01-006698.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Fotos von Walter Mittelholzer[edit]

Hallo, vielen Dank für die wertvollen Fotos von Walter Mittelholzer. Mir ist aufgefallen, dass viele (oder sogar alle) überkategorisiert sind. D.h. die Bilder sind in einer Kategorie und auch der übergeordneten enthalten, z.B.: file:ETH-BIB-2 Männer, Fokker im Hintergrund-Tschadseeflug 1930-31-LBS MH02-08-0338.tif unter category:Media contributed by the ETH-Bibliothek und category:ETH-BIB Mittelholzer-Lake Chad flight 1930-1931. Da würde es nach der bisherigen Vorgehensweise auf Commons genügen, wenn die Fotos in der zweiten Kategorie eingestellt sind, da diese ja in der ersten enthalten ist. Oder ist das beabsichtigt und es gibt einen Grund dafür, den ich nicht kenne? --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

@Berthold Werner: Das ist grundsätzlich der Aufbau auch bei anderen GLAM-Institutionen der Schweiz. Der Grund für die Kategorisierungen ist folgender: 1. Alle unsere Bilder, und es werden noch weitere nebst Mittelholzer folgen, sollen unter der ersten Kategorie zusammengehalten werden. 2. Die einzelnen Sammlungen, wie etwa die Mittelholzer-Flüge sollen mit einer zweiten speziellen Kategorie, in der auch ETH-BIB steht, versehen werden. ETH-Bibliothek

File:E-manuscripta hs 114-1 s.54.jpg[edit]

Hallo ETH-Bibliothek/de, nur eine Frage: Warum hat das angeführte Bild überhaupt noch ein Urheberrecht, wenn es doch von 1804 ist. Die Digitalisierung schafft doch kein neues Urheberrecht? --K@rl (talk) 07:17, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.


Copyright status: File:ETH-BIB-Clariden, Claridenfirn v. O. aus 3000 m-Inlandflüge-LBS MH01-004761.tif[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ETH-BIB-Clariden, Claridenfirn v. O. aus 3000 m-Inlandflüge-LBS MH01-004761.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Fehler in Bildbeschreibung[edit]

@ETH-Bibliothek: Sind Fehlermeldungen auf diesem Wege willkommen? Ich habe gerade die Beschreibung von File:ETH-BIB-Solothurn, Delta Co, Schweizerische Präzisions-Schraubenfabrik und Façon-Dreherei-Inlandflüge-LBS MH03-1005.tif korrigiert (siehe Änderung). Das Areal der abgebildeten "Delta"-Fabrik liegt (und lag auch damals) nicht auf dem Boden der Stadt Solothurn, sondern der benachbarten Gemeinde Langendorf. Auch fast alle Gebäude im Hintergrund (darunter der Bahnhof von Langendorf und die Uhrenfabrik Langendorf, "Lanco") liegen in Langendorf. Nur das unbebaute Stück Land in der rechten unteren Ecke der Fotografie und das erste Haus rechts oben von der "Delta" befinden sich tatsächlich auf Solothurner Boden, wie z.B. auf OpenStreetMap, wo der (etwas kuriose) Verlauf der Gemeindegrenzen eingezeichnet ist, gut zu erkennen ist. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:06, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Als Einheimischem ist mir gleich noch ein Fehler aufgefallen: Auf File:ETH-BIB-Solothurn-Kapuzinerkloster, Gärisch aus 300 m-Inlandflüge-LBS MH01-002751.tif ist trotz Dateiname und Bildbeschreibung das Kapuzinerkloster Solothurn überhaupt nicht zu sehen. Das in der linken Bildhälfte deutlich zu erkennende Klostergebäude ist das Frauenkloster Visitation. Ganz am linken Bildrand sieht man die Loretokapelle; das Kapuzinerkloster befindet sich ausserhalb des Fotos, links oberhalb von der Loretokapelle. Ich werde auch diese Bildbeschreibung korrigieren; eigentlich müsste man ja auch den Dateinamen anpassen, in dem es fälschlich "Kapuzinerkloster" heisst, wie geht ihr mit solchen Fällen um? Gestumblindi (talk) 22:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

@Gestumblindi: Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Verbesserungen in bezug auf Metadaten wie Titel, Beschreibung, Datierungen bitte in unserem Quellsystem (http://ba.e-pics.ethz.ch) eintragen, dort gibt es hierzu extra eine Feedback-Funktion bei den Bildinformationen. Mittels DOI kommen Sie direkt auf das Bild. Die Informationen zu den zwei genannten Bilder tragen wir nun in unser System ein. In Bezug auf Dateinamen müssen wir uns noch kundtun. Vielen Dank! ETH-Bibliothek

File:ETH-BIB-Herzogenbuchsee-Inlandflüge-LBS MH01-002189.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ETH-BIB-Herzogenbuchsee-Inlandflüge-LBS MH01-002189.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Anvilaquarius (talk) 16:06, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

@Anvilaquarius:Das File ist ein Platzhalter und enthält keine Fotografie, das Löschen ist korrekt. Vielen Dank! ETH-Bibliothek


Copyright status: File:ETH-BIB-Bassersdorf-LBS H1-009861.tif[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ETH-BIB-Bassersdorf-LBS H1-009861.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

File:ETH-BIB-Begleiterin Mittelholzers, fehlerhaftes Bild-Abessinienflug 1934-LBS MH02-40-0008.tif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ETH-BIB-Begleiterin Mittelholzers, fehlerhaftes Bild-Abessinienflug 1934-LBS MH02-40-0008.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

File:ETH-BIB-Passagiere in der Fokker zwischen Zürich und Biarritz-Weitere-LBS MH02-23-0004.tif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:ETH-BIB-Passagiere in der Fokker zwischen Zürich und Biarritz-Weitere-LBS MH02-23-0004.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 20:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Possible additional information about photos[edit]

Is there any more information about photos that you have uploaded on source? Some photos of river Neretva are lack of location information (e. g. this one). Click on source open a page with some error. I would like to categorize pictures of Neretva, but, unfortunatelly, without more information is very hard (almost impossible) to do it. By the way, many thanks for these old photos.--MaGa 07:04, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Expiry of GWToolset user group memberships[edit]

There is a proposal on the Bureaucrat's noticeboard to automatically expire GWT memberships after one year unless the user requests an extension. Please add your views and suggestions to the discussion. The reasonably informal process for getting access to GWT access will remain as is.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Revi. 15:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)