User talk:EVula

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[en] As a dedicated Wikimedian, I don't limit myself to just one project or just one language.


Pelley Image[edit]

Hi, I have information specifically giving consent to release this photo File:Pelley 2014.jpg. How do I go about showing this so that it can be used? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Test1test (talk • contribs)

Feel free to post it here for now; eventually it may need to be sent to OTRS so they can officially vet the consent. (since it likely needs to be from CBS) EVula // talk // // 15:53, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks a lot for your response. By post it here do you mean post the information about releasing it here. Can I simply upload the photo under the same name?

I'll let Elcobbola take over from here, since his response pretty much covered all the bases. EVula // talk // // 16:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Regarding the above: Test1test, please do not reupload the file. Once we have received permission (see my response), the OTRS volunteer who processes the ticket will restore the file for you. Эlcobbola talk 16:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks again, much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Test1test (talk • contribs)

E1027 Analyse Rukschcio-Barres.pdf[edit]

I absolutely not understand why you have deleted two times the PDF I have sent : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:E1027_Analyse_Rukschcio-Barres.pdf There is absolutely no problem of Copyright about this work, done by architects Rukschcio and Barres. Please tell me axaclty what could be the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Badovici (talk • contribs)

You are claiming that it's your own work on the file, but you just stated that the copyright is held by Rukschcio and Barres. You cannot release files that you do not have ownership of. (also, that file has only been deleted once, not sure why you think I've done so twice) Files on Commons need to be released by the copyright holders, not a third-party. For that matter, there's no reason to use it as a reference; you'd be better off linking to wherever this file was originally located, which would bypass this entire issue. EVula // talk // // 14:47, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks very much for this. Best wishes 77.96.249.228 21:10, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You're welcome. I'm always happy to delete crap that doesn't belong here. :) EVula // talk // // 15:46, 7 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear EVula, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

De-adminship[edit]

Hi EVula — in line with the above, I'd like to let you know that the admin inactivity run for February-March 2016 has now finished. As you failed to indicate willingness to retain your admin privileges or to perform the required number of admin actions, I submitted a request on Meta-Wiki to have your adminship revoked as required by our inactivity policy. A Wikimedia steward will attend to this request in the coming hours, after which I will add your to the autopatrolled user group as you are a trusted and experienced member of the Commons community. I'd like to use this opportunity to thank you for the many years of your service to Commons; while it is disappointing that you're no longer as active as you used to be, I hope you will come back to us one day and will continue contributing to the project. Of course, please do feel free to re-apply for adminship when this happens :-) Thanks again! odder (talk) 00:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--Touzrimounir (talk) 22:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Beluga, Weißwal (Delphinapterus leucas).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Beluga, Weißwal (Delphinapterus leucas).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 13:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ishiquiver.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ishiquiver.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]