Hi, I have information specifically giving consent to release this photo File:Pelley 2014.jpg. How do I go about showing this so that it can be used? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Test1test (talk • contribs)
- Feel free to post it here for now; eventually it may need to be sent to OTRS so they can officially vet the consent. (since it likely needs to be from CBS) EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:53, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your response. By post it here do you mean post the information about releasing it here. Can I simply upload the photo under the same name?
- I'll let Elcobbola take over from here, since his response pretty much covered all the bases. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:02, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
E1027 Analyse Rukschcio-Barres.pdf
I absolutely not understand why you have deleted two times the PDF I have sent : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:E1027_Analyse_Rukschcio-Barres.pdf There is absolutely no problem of Copyright about this work, done by architects Rukschcio and Barres. Please tell me axaclty what could be the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Badovici (talk • contribs)
- You are claiming that it's your own work on the file, but you just stated that the copyright is held by Rukschcio and Barres. You cannot release files that you do not have ownership of. (also, that file has only been deleted once, not sure why you think I've done so twice) Files on Commons need to be released by the copyright holders, not a third-party. For that matter, there's no reason to use it as a reference; you'd be better off linking to wherever this file was originally located, which would bypass this entire issue. EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:47, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I'm always happy to delete crap that doesn't belong here. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:46, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Dear EVula, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Hi EVula — in line with the above, I'd like to let you know that the admin inactivity run for February-March 2016 has now finished. As you failed to indicate willingness to retain your admin privileges or to perform the required number of admin actions, I submitted a request on Meta-Wiki to have your adminship revoked as required by our inactivity policy. A Wikimedia steward will attend to this request in the coming hours, after which I will add your to the autopatrolled user group as you are a trusted and experienced member of the Commons community. I'd like to use this opportunity to thank you for the many years of your service to Commons; while it is disappointing that you're no longer as active as you used to be, I hope you will come back to us one day and will continue contributing to the project. Of course, please do feel free to re-apply for adminship when this happens :-) Thanks again! odder (talk) 00:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.