User talk:Elinnea

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:GreeceMessinia.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please copy all information from original image (author, uploader (if not the same), description) when you move it to Commons from other Wiki.

EugeneZelenko 01:49, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! / Elinnea 15:27, 26 July 2005 (UTC)


Hello - thank you for providing images to the wikimedia commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the commons should be useful to all users of wikimedia projects - this is possible only if the images can be found by other people. To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should either place the images on topic pages (galleries) or put the images directly into a category, or do both. Which of those possibilities is preferred is however a matter of debate, see here.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There is a large number of completely unsorted images on the commons right now, see Commons:Really unused. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do! Thank you. -- Duesentrieb(?!) 11:18, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll do that! / Elinnea 11:25, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thanks -- Duesentrieb(?!) 12:08, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Image:Isabelallende writer.gif[edit]

Hej, är detta foto verkligen PD? Library of Congress har massor av foton som inte är det och jag kan inte hitta uttryckligen att detta verkligen är det? Thuresson 11:52, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Ajdå, jag utgick från att licensinformationen på en: stämde eftersom den legat där sedan i somras och ingen hade kommenterat det där, antar att man får ställa frågan till uppladdaren där eller ta bort den. / Elinnea 00:01, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Swedish Wikipedia[edit]

Hi. Saw that you've just uploaded Image:Fig 1 Trepan.jpg. If the image came from Swedish wikipedia then don't forget to add the version history for that image. Cheers /Lokal Profil 22:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Hoppas att det är ok att jag svarar på svenska? Behövs historiken från :se när originalet är från Ugglan, det har väl ingen betydelse vem som laddade upp den på :se eller när, eller? Hur som helst har du ju fixat en transparant version så det spelar väl ingen roll, den där kan väl ändå raderas nu när det finns en bättre bild. / Elinnea 23:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Jag vet inte om historiken behövs när det är Ugglan. Kanske borde kollas upp. Ursäktar för den transparenta versionen, höll på med den (och skallen) när jag insåg att den blivit upplagd. /Lokal Profil 00:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Frågade på Sv wiki och fick följande svar [1] /Lokal Profil 12:30, 11 July 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Cecilsr.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cecilsr.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:37, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Tips[edit]

Under varje bild finns en knapp som heter "Add a note", det är bara att klicka på den och dra en ruta med musen runt de som man vill markera på bilden. Det är också beskrivet här Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator.--Ankara (talk) 11:34, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Jättebra! Tack! / Elinnea (talk) 13:18, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Portraits[edit]

Hej, why do you crop the faces so narrow? Usually portraits have more space around, otherwise they look too much as a picture from a passport where the faces are just trapped perfectly as in the prison of the frame. Especially the swedish Wikipedia has huge thumbnails so theres no reason why not to care a bit about the esthetical issuses. Also, the images become quite unsharp and noisy in the full size and just look worse than they actually are, not to talk about ugly faces the people made just in the moment the picture was taken. But this is just my opinion in the eye of a photographer... --Prolineserver (talk) 21:20, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

I find this kind of narrow cropped pictures more usable in the dictionary, like in infoboxes and such, it's kind of annoying when the infobox becomes very long and the persons face is just like a 1/10 of the picture or something like that. I think it looks better with just the face, to portray the stomach, the knees and the feet etc of a person doesn't seem that important to me. Some times there is a picture where there other items that can disturb the viewer, like a part of somebody elses nose/hand on the side, so I try to cropp that kind of stuff out, and just leave the important parts. But i'll definitely think about your advise the next time I cropp a picture and leave a little more space around the person. / Elinnea (talk) 06:37, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
What a strange portrait it is having knees and feet in the picture ;-) I actually had something like File:Royal_Wedding_Stockholm_2010-Konserthuset-Prince_Edward,_Earl_of_Wessex.jpg or File:Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010-Konserthuset-Per Unckel.jpg in mind. And I personally think that it is quite ok to remove disturbing objects in the background. --Prolineserver (talk) 07:41, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
You're right. I cropped those picture to narrow, I've made some new ones. / Elinnea (talk) 08:05, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Btw: Do you know User:Cropbot? --Prolineserver (talk) 09:01, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
No, using that seems a little bit to complicated to me. / Elinnea (talk) 09:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Hej, du behöver inte ändra något men visste du att man kan göra wikilänkar även när man lägger till en note i bilden? Se exempel på http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Royal_Wedding_Stockholm_2010-Konserthuset-370.jpg Mvh Atlantic Chef (talk) 10:58, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Nej, det kände jag inte till, det verkar bra! / Elinnea (talk) 11:05, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

File:JasonPatric_by_Roger_Ebert.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:JasonPatric_by_Roger_Ebert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SpeakFree (talk) 17:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I've read the diskussion here, this file should be deleted. / Elinnea (talk) 10:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:JasonPatric_by_Roger_Ebert.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:JasonPatric_by_Roger_Ebert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Burpelson AFB (talk) 19:14, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Turkish Van Example.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Turkish Van Example.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 22:12, 15 October 2012 (UTC)


File:Flogstaskriket.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flogstaskriket.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Kattegatt (talk) 10:25, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 20:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Robertson Davies (cropped).jpg[edit]

Hello!,

File:Robertson Davies (cropped).jpg, which you uploaded, is tagged for speedy deletion. Unfortunately, copyrighted images from the collection of Library and Archives Canada may not be used commercially and may not be freely modified without special permission. For more information, you can see Category:Images from Library and Archives Canada, the letter from LAC, Commons:Deletion requests/Library and Archives Canada non-PD images and the pages [2] and [3] on the website of LAC. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:44, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

I understand, I cropped it from a file which now has been deleted, but at the time seemed to have the correct copyright information. / Elinnea (talk) 13:01, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Official press photo of Princess Isabella, 5 years old, April 2012 (cropped).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Official press photo of Princess Isabella, 5 years old, April 2012 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Surtsicna (talk) 19:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Dag Hammarskjöld cropped.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dag Hammarskjöld cropped.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

shizhao (talk) 01:04, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Lady Louise Windsor.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lady Louise Windsor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Re5x (talk) 09:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)