User talk:Enomil

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Enomil!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Template:DE Wikisource Book[edit]

Please, do not break work with Category:books by author. For correct work of the template {{DE Wikisource Book}} use "Author link" and "Wikisource link". I have corrected Category:Kafka - Der Prozeß (1925). It works in en, it and ru templates. --Bkmd (talk) 19:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

You can add this automatic category, but please update all not working inclusions of the template (they produce errors like Category:Langenstein_Martina and so on). If you would like to use your new parameter and/or auto cat, then please update all existing error producing cats by yourself (nobody wants to do this job for you). --enomil 20:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Revert of my editing has not eliminated all errors even in Category:Kafka - Der Prozeß (1925). You have not noticed a problem with {{DEFAULTSORT: {{{Title}}}}}. Certainly, I know about errors and I will try to check up all inclusions of this template. It is a pity that you do not want to help me. --Bkmd (talk) 22:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
You know, like me, that this is a poor work. I think the first thing to do is to write an documentation for the template. With this there are less errors in the future. Then I can help you sometimes, but I have a lot of work on my to-do-list on de.ws. --enomil 22:50, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Be so kind as to stop removing books from Category:19th century books; I can see no reason why you are depopulating a perfectly legitimate category. Hesperian 07:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Many of your edits are fine, but it is not appropriate to be removing this category if you're not also putting it in a sharper category.[1][2] Hesperian 07:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Germany, Federal Republic of location map September 1955 - December 1957.svg[edit]

Well. I corrected the file description already. That's why file description and filenmae differs. Sorry for causing trouble with this preemptive strike...However the file should be renamed 'cause the state of Saarland became full member state of Germany beginning January 1957. Hence the filename should be changed into Germany, Federal Republic of location map September 1955 - December 1956.svg. The next "era" is then displayed in File:Germany, Federal Republic of location map January 1957 - October 1990.svg. See that? This "era" beginns in January 1957. Overlapping of two periods ain't feasible. So please rename it and revert your changes in the file description. Thx. --TUBSMail-closed.svg 07:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

I looked at the german Project of Kartenwerkstatt where is the same mistake. Sorry, rename approved and revert all 1957 to 1956. --enomil 11:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

De Kafka Hungerkünstler (1924) is up for deletion[edit]

Category:De Kafka Hungerkünstler (1924)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:De Kafka Hungerkünstler (1924) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Note that Der Prozess, Das Schloss, and Amerika were all renewed and are still under US copyright, too.--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Vorlage DE Wikisource[edit]

Lässt sich die Vorlage nicht irgendwie ändern, dass bei mehreren Autoren diese nicht ganz unterschlagen werden? Bzw. gibts ne Möglichkeit, zB hier einen Link auf ein Teilwerk unterzubringen. Der unabhängige Anhang des Werkes (also all das vom zweiten Autor) hat ja in WS einen Text. Die Vorlagen sind ja hin und wieder recht schön, aber sie lassen überhaupt keine Nicht-0815-Situationen zu und dann sind sie alles andere als gut. Ich stolpere momentan bei so ziemlich jeden Upload über ein Problem, das nervigste davon, dass man entweder nur einen Autor nennen darf oder aber gar keinen. -- Cecil (talk) 22:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Das Problem mit den meheren Autoren lässt sich nicht so einfach rausarbeiten. Möglichkeiten wären:
  1. Das Feld Description dafür benutzen.
  2. Parameter Autor2, Autor3, ... einbauen, würde die Vorlage aber noch mächtiger machen.
Als WS-Link könnte man die Indexseite der djvu einfügen. --enomil 23:17, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

locator maps auf Kreisebene in Thüringen[edit]

Hallo Enomil,
Du hast im Februar 2009 sehr schöne svg-locator maps auf Kreisebene in Thüringen erstellt, die im Wesentlichen schon dem de facto Standard in Nord-, Ost- und Westdeutschland entsprechen Ich möchte gern freundlich fragen, ob Du große Einwände hättest, wenn ich die Karten in den Kreisartikeln ersetze, denn der Kollege TUBS und ich haben Karten verfügbar, die zusätzlich zu den Infos in Deinen Karten auch Flüsse, Meere und Nachbarn (und natürlich auch eine imagemap) beinhalten. Wir haben zuvor schon Niedersachsen mit locator maps zu den Ortsartikeln überzogen und auch Brandenburg und Schleswig-Holstein vervollständigt: Nun haben wir uns an Thüringen und Sachsen-Anhalt gemacht und wahrscheinlich machen wir auch noch Sachsen, da ist auch nicht mehr viel white space auf Rauensteins Karte. Im gleichen Zug haben auch das layout der Karten ("Lage von Kreis in Land" im grey scheme) zu den Kreisartikeln vereinheitlicht, dies für Niedersachsen, Bremen, Schleswig-Holstein, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Brandenburg und Sachsen-Anhalt. Nun würden wir (sicher verständlich) gern auch Thüringen so vereinheitlichen. Aber: Wir wollen das nicht gegen Dich machen! Wie siehst Du das? --Hagar66 (talk) 15:11, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Kein Problem, bessere Karten für den Endverbraucher. :) --enomil 15:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Vielen Dank! Karten sind umgestellt, imagemap folgt in Kürze. --Hagar66 (talk) 20:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Kategorien[edit]

Wie soll man dies verstehen? Die narratio prima ist von Rheticus. --Matthead (talk) 22:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

File:VZBG 64 001-008.djvu[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | Українська | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Zeitschrift des Vereins fuer Volkskunde 19 A 002.png, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Gsingh (talk) 15:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Zeitschrift des Vereins fuer Volkskunde 19 A 002.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Zeitschrift des Vereins fuer Volkskunde 19 A 002.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gsingh (talk) 03:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:Books_by_W._S._G._E.[edit]

Auntof6 (talk) 20:42, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Template:De Kafka Hungerkünstler[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:De Kafka Hungerkünstler has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rd232 (talk) 08:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Gustav Hergsell.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Mühlhausen (Merian).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mühlhausen (Merian).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Spielertyp (talk) 23:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)