User talk:Enslin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Question about picture Image:Amphibienfahrzeug D.jpg[edit]

What model is this?

Is this a Mercedes-Benz ? If so, please write it in the description for the picture and categorize it :-) G®iffen 15:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

This car is not a Mercedes-Benz:

Amphi-Ranger 2800SR

The Amphi-Ranger was a purpose built amphibious four wheel drive vehicle. A fresh start makes for fewer compromises in the design. The hull is made of sea-water resistant aluminium alloy Water drive is by a propeller which is retracted by an electric motor. The front wheels do the steering in water.

Made in Germany by RMA Maschinen & Armaturenbau Faulhaber & Truttenbach KG, Deutschland.

The last one was built in 1995 and is owned by Alberto Dubini. 66 or 85 depending on who to believe where built. 15 or 19 (left hand drive) where sold to Japan. Some found there way to Australia. --Enslin 07:46, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


Mercedes Benz Museum Photo[edit]

Hello Enslin. I'm Torme, a user of the spanish wikipedia. i'm working in the spanish articule about Ben van Berkel and I saw a very good quality photo in the Deutsch articule. Can I use it?. Or if you want to colaborate you can put it in the articule. Gracias.

The image is in the article - OK. --Enslin 20:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Dank Sie Torme


new[edit]

Image deletion notification Image:Schoental-jagst-1930.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig 12:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

is OK, --Enslin 22:09, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

LKW´s[edit]

Hallo Enslin, Du hast die Bilder Image:Mercedes-benz-museum-benz-lastwagen1912-3to.jpg und Image:Kaelble-zugmaschine-stuttgart-2005.jpg gemacht und nun möchte ich Dich bitten, mir Dein Erlaubnis zu geben, die zwei Bilder hier Image:Trucks.gif und Image:Trucks1.gif als GFDL einfügen zu dürfen. Wenn ich richtig verstand ist {cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0} auf commons ungeeignet!? Gruß --Magellan @_/" 21:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Ist OK - habe Lizenz auf GFDL reduziert. --Enslin 18:50, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Danke. --Magellan @_/" 13:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Hallo Enslin, habe erst heute Nachmittag erfahren, dass CC-BY auf Commons in Ordnung ist. Wenn Du meinst, kannst Du die Bilder wieder auf CC-BY zurückbenennen (kein muss), dann werde ich die nötigen Angaben bei der neu entstandenen .gif Bild einsetzen. --Magellan @_/" 18:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Hallo Magellan, eine kleine Info am Rande, ein Zurücknehmen einer einmal erteilten GFDL Lizenz geht nicht, also vorher überlegen. Gruß --Martin 18:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Landkreiskats[edit]

Hallo Enslin, wenn dir der Zusatz „, Germany“ ebenso missfällt wie mir, gebe ich dir hiermit offiziell die Erlaubnis, ihn wegzulassen ;-). Die Benennung der Landkreise ist hier sowieso nicht einheitlich und demnächst werden alle auf ein Lemma ohne den Zusatz umgestellt.--Borheinsieg 16:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. - --Enslin 17:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Herr Enslin,

können Sie mir bitte mitteilen-falls es Ihnen zufällig geläufig ist- ab wann das Wappen MAISENBACH erstmalig erwähnt wurde ?

leider unbekannt -einfach im Rathaus nachfragen - müsste dort bekannt sein.--Enslin (talk) 16:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Freundliche Grüße Bettina Ivancic

Category:Coats of arms from the Eifelkreis Bitburg-Prüm[edit]

Du solltest nur wissen, dass es diese Kategorie existiert :-).--Borheinsieg 17:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Danke - war zu spät ...--Enslin 21:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Stuttgart-vfb-1954-dfb-pokal.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Stuttgart-vfb-1954-dfb-pokal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 20:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Wappenkategorien[edit]

Hallo Enslin! Ich hatte vor ein paar Wochen die Category:Former coats of arms from Baden-Württemberg angelegt, um dort die ehemaligen Gemeindewappen einzusortieren. Findest du, dass eine solche Kategorie für die Wappen der ehemaligen Gemeinden sinnvoll ist? Wäre am Besten jetzt zu klären, damit ich nicht umsonst Edits mache. Gruß --Notschrei 13:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Noch eine Wappen-Kategorie - nein - in den Listen der Wappen der Landkreise wird deutlich unterschieden nach ehemaligen Gemeinden - bei einigen Stadtteilen wurden Wappen beibehalten und sogar neue Wapppen angelegt - siehe Karlsruhe. Gruß --Enslin 18:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
    • OK, dann schmeiße ich das ganze wieder raus. Der Name wäre nicht so unbedingt ein Problem, es wäre nur darum gegangen, alle nicht amtlich geführten Wappen in eine eigene Kat zu bringen. So, dann versuche ich mal, das ganze per Bot wieder zu entsorgen. gruß--Notschrei 12:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

About Image:Wappen Rommersheim.png[edit]

Please, what kind of birds are there in the Coat of arms? (In order to do the classification)

Thank you my friend

--Gustavo 21:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

  • This are Crows - Common Raven (Corvus corax) - Grettings from Stuttgart --Enslin 08:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wappen Karlsruher Suedtstadt.png[edit]

Hi, this file depicts not the coat of arms of a German Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts. It belongs maybe to the Bürger-Gesellschaft Südstadt and I hoped to get the name of the originator and owner in Wikipedia. --Kawana 09:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Hirschstangen[edit]

Im Rahmen der Umkategorisierung der baden-württembergischen Wappen bin ich immer wieder auf die Hirschstangen gestoßen, für die es aber bis jetzt noch keine eigene Kategorie gibt. Eine englische Übersetzung konnte ich bis jetzt noch nicht ausfindig machen, oder wie würdest du das handhaben? Einfach die deutsche Bezeichnung nehmen? Vielleicht ganz unkompliziert Category:Hirschstange, das "in heraldry" kann man sich ja sparen, da es sowieso ausschließlich eine Wappenfigur ist. Was meinst du? Gruß--Notschrei 10:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

So, ich habe die Category:Hirschstangen jetzt mal angelegt, eine Umkategorisierung auf einen anderen Namen kann man später innerhalb von Sekunden per Bot erledigen. Zumindest besser als am Ende nochmal alle Wappen auf die Hirschstangen durchzugehen :-).--Notschrei 10:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Nochwas: Einige Wappen enthalten Abtsstäbe, die ich bis jetzt auch noch nicht im Kategoriesystem unterbringen konnte. Wüsstest du hier eine passende englische Bezeichnung?--Notschrei 10:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Der de:Krummstab heißt englisch en:Crosier--Enslin 14:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
OK, danke. Abtstab war leider bis vor einer Minute noch kein Redirect auf Krummstab. Die Kategorie gibt es auch schon (Category:Croziers in heraldry). Dann werde ich noch mal die Wappenlisten auf die Abtstäbe durchgehen.--Notschrei 15:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Wappen_Zillhausen.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wappen_Zillhausen.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 13:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ritter-sport-emailschild-1950.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Ritter-sport-emailschild-1950.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Benn Newman 02:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Kategorien...[edit]

Hi! Jetz wo ich sicher schon deine Beobachtungsliste gesprengt habe, hab ich gedacht ich lass dir mal ein paar Grüße als Entschädigung hier ;) VLG aus Stuttgart --Stefan-Xp 20:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


Image:Torpedo-werke-ffm-roedelheim.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Torpedo-werke-ffm-roedelheim.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Fred J 17:08, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


Image:Altes-schloss-stuttgart-1931.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Altes-schloss-stuttgart-1931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig 20:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Pizza Calzone.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pizza Calzone.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wappen Neukirch im Schwarzwald.png[edit]

welches ist die genaue Quelle dieses Bildes? (Link!) Schwarzwälder 06:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Hallo Schwarzwälder,

die Quelle stammt aus deinem Upload in der deutschen Wikipedia - habe Source ergänzt -sorry - Original-Download und Bearbeitung/Common-Upload lagen 2 Wochen auseinander --Enslin 06:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Dann stammt das Bild also wie vermutet nicht von www.furtwangen.de sondern ist mein eigenes Foto, bei dem auch der Urheber weiterhin genanant werden sollte. Bitte korrigiere das. Schwarzwälder 14:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Sorry - Quellenangabe wurde am 21.10.2007 ergänzt - Gruß aus Stuttgart --Enslin 14:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Albert-boehringer-senior.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Albert-boehringer-senior.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 16:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Wappen Muehlhofen.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry "PD-Coa-Germany" was added - --Enslin (talk) 17:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)----

Bitte Fundort angeben[edit]

Hallo Enslin,

wenn du ein Wappen hochlädst, dann gib doch bitte auch an, woher du die Grafik hast. Und wenn du wie bei File:Wappen Freudenbach.png eine neue bessere Version drüberlädst, dann gib bitte auch da an, wo sie her ist, denn jetzt steht in der Beschreibung, sie sei von http://www.creglingen.de/uebuns/content/uebuns_con04.html, was aber nur für die erste Version zutrifft und deswegen falsch ist. Ein bisschen mehr Sorgfalt wäre sehr wünschenswert. Bitte trag also die noch fehlenden URLs oder sonstigen Quellen für die Wappengrafiken nach. Viele Grüße --Rosenzweig δ 16:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

2nd version: http://www.freudenbach.de Modified, transparency added and converted into PNG format by User:Enslin - Gruß - --Enslin (talk) 16:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Danke. Gruß --Rosenzweig δ 21:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Useless rename requests[edit]

Enslin, please stop your useless rename requests like this one. Multichill (talk) 21:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Please have a look at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Useless media rename requests. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 10:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I stopped the renaming--Enslin (talk) 19:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Enslin!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


File tagging Image:Kaufhaus-schocken-stuttgart-1930.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Kaufhaus-schocken-stuttgart-1930.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:Image:Kaufhaus-schocken-stuttgart-1930.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rosenzweig δ 13:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Image:Wappen Tuefingen.png // Image:Wappen Tuefingen.svg[edit]

Hallo,

ich habe mal ne Version des Tüfinger Wappens erstellt gehabt, jedoch nie eine Vorlage gefunden, diesen Stab genauer abzuzeichnen. Deine Art von Stab habe ich hier noch nie gesehen, jedoch finde ich deine Bildquelle nicht. Auf der Gemeinde-Seite (salem-baden.de ist nur meine Vorlage unter Teilorte zu finden.

Außerdem steht in der heraldischen Beschreibung: "in 9 Plätzen geschacht", ist jedoch in den meisten Abbildungen unten rechts mit 11 Plätzen geschacht, weils wohl besser aussieht.

Welche Version sollen wir verwenden?

Grüße, --David (20:48, 30. Apr. 2009)

Hallo David, ich habe meine Version damals aus zwei vorhandenen Wappen zusammengebastelt. Am Schluss las ich zwar von 9 Feldern unten - aber die Vorgabe zum Vierteln liegt eigentlich etwas oberhalb der Mitte. Deine Version passt besser zur Beschreibung. Ich empfehle aber dünne schwarze Trennlinien zumindest entlang der roten Felder. Die Krummstabausführung ist uneinheitlich - je nach örtlichem Usus. Viele Grüße --Enslin (talk) 14:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Habs mal abgeändert. Ich glaube, wir sind in der Aufteilung der Vierung so frei. Ein Wappen mehr in .svg :)

--David W. (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Wenn ich mich einmischen darf: Neumalgeschacht ist festgelegt, da kann und darf kein Feld mehr sein ( siehe Geschacht (Heraldik)). Das Wappen wird als (Vierung (Heraldik)) geviert blasoniert, d.h. 1 und 4 und 2 und 3 Feld sind gleich. Wenn die Wappenbeschreibung nichts Außergewöhliches zum Krummstab sagt, wird er nach gut dünken gemalt.J.R.84.190.247.124 16:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


File:Bambi-karlsruhe.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bambi-karlsruhe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:17, 30 September 2009 (UTC)


Schiefer Turm St. Moritz - falsches Bild[edit]

Hallo, dein Bild "Schiefer Turm St. Moritz" zeigt nicht den schiefen Turm (auf dem Foto ist auch nichts Schiefes zu erkennen *g*), sondern den Turm der evangelischen Dorfkirche. Gruss --81.62.166.162 12:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Ist korrigiert - --Enslin (talk) 18:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Wappen Seitingen-Oberflacht.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Seitingen-Oberflacht.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Calle Cool (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


File:Wappen Seitingen.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Seitingen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Calle Cool (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


File:Wappen Oberflacht.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Oberflacht.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Calle Cool (talk) 20:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Karte Bürgerausschüsse Esslingen am Neckar, bitte gebe mir einen Rat[edit]

Hallo Enslin, kannst du bitte die Karte File:Bürgerausschuss-Bezirke Stadtteile Esslingen am Neckar.svg anschauen. Nach den Beschreibungen habe ich gedacht, dass ich es selbst hinbekomme, dass die einzelnen Bürgerausschuss-Bezirke mit offizieller Bezeichnung angezeigt werden. Aber die Notizen, die ich einfügte werden in Wikipedia (Artikel:Esslingen am Neckar; Bereich: Bürgerausschüsse) nicht angezeigt. Bitte gebe mir einen Tipp. Vielen Dank --Zwiegel (talk) 19:47, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Wappen-Gaertringen.svg[edit]

Hier ist dir der in COM:SVG#External_files bzw. COM:SVG#Frequently_asked_questions beschriebene Fehler unterlaufen, die SVG verweist auf eine Datei file:///C:/Users/K[...]/Pictures/Wappen_Gaertringen.png --Martin H. (talk) 16:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Wappen von Gamerschwang (Teilort der Stadt Ehingen im Alb-Donau-Kreis) - File:Wappen Gamerschwang.png[edit]

Hallo Enslin,

wie ich gesehen habe, haben Sie viele Wappen von selbständigen und ehemalig selbständigen Gemeinden im Alb-Donau-Kreis bearbeitet bzw. hochgeladen. Nach langer Suche habe ich jetzt endlich auf einer Angebotsseite von eBay.ch das Wappen von Gamerschwang in alter Form (Rassler Freiherr von Gamerschwang) gefunden. Das reine Wappen (ohne äußerliche Ausschmückungen) mit den 4 einzelnen Wappenschilden und dem mittigen kleinen Wappenschild (L) war bis zur Gemeindereform im Jahr 1973 und auch noch danach in Gebrauch. Ich habe dieses Wappen als Vorlage einfach mal unter dem folgenden Namen bei Wikipedia Commons (inkl. Kategorisierung) hochgeladen:

Wappen Gamerschwang.png.

Legende zur Farbeinteilung:

schwarz gepunktet = gelb

senkrecht gestrichelt = rot

diagonal gestrichelt (Feld rechts oben und Feld links unten) = grün

schwarz gerastert (Feld links oben und Feld rechts unten) = schwarz

ohne Schraffierung = weiß


Leider bin ich der professionellen Bearbeitung dieses Wappen nicht mächtig und gebe die Bearbeitung falls Zeit und Lust vorhanden an Sie ab.

Viele Grüße.

--Heini Woldschläger (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Neresheimer Deckenfresko[edit]

Hallo Klaus, ich hoffe, du bist hier erreichbar. Du hast schon vor einiger Zeit die Datei File:Neresheim-fresko2.jpg des Neresheimer Deckenfreskos hochgeladen. Ich habe (schon vor einiger Zeit) am Artikel über die Gründergestalt dieses Klosters geschrieben, den heiligen de:Ernst von Neresheim. Ein passendes Bild fehlt allerdings noch. Auf dem Artikel fand ich die Information vor: In der Klosterkirche Neresheim stellt Martin Knoller ihn auf dem Deckenfresko mit Haspel und Winde dar. Leider ist dein Upload nicht hochauflösend, so dass ich das nicht verifizieren konnte. Könntest du eventuell die Datei - falls vorhanden - in größerer Auflösung hochladen oder einen entsprechenden Ausschnitt hochladen? Vielen Dank! --Saint-Louis (talk) 19:58, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Saint-Louis, habe das Bild in maximaler Auflösung getauscht. Wo soll da Ernst von Neresheim sein?--Enslin (talk) 07:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Vielen Dank. Ich konnte den Abt auch nicht entdecken. Vermutlich ist er auf einem anderen Fresko zu finden. Die Kirche scheint ja mehrere davon zu haben. --Saint-Louis (talk) 08:13, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Feldberg-schwarzwald-1900.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Feldberg-schwarzwald-1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 12:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Enslin,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Wappen_villingen.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen_villingen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Der Buckesfelder (talk) 23:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Wappen_Hambach_(bei_Dietz).png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen_Hambach_(bei_Dietz).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Maxtrab (talk) 19:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen_Hambach_(bei_Dietz).png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen_Hambach_(bei_Dietz).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.27.28.250 23:00, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen Schmaehingen.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Schmaehingen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Riespower (talk) 09:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Wappen Ruit[edit]

Hallo Enslin, das Wappen ist nicht ganz richtig: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wappen_Ruit_auf_den_Fildern.png

eine bessere Datei liegt unter http://www.nabu-ostfildern.de/NABU-Ostfildern-Dateien/Wappen~Ruit.jpg Kannst du das ändern? --91.44.226.150 11:18, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Danke, wurde erledigt -neue Version ist online. --Enslin (talk) 12:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
danke dir --91.44.226.150 13:47, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wappen Roetenberg.png[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wappen Roetenberg.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 18:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Seelen[edit]

Die von Grün sollen ja die besten sein.--Symposiarch (talk) 17:45, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Wappen Mettenheim.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Mettenheim.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fränsmer (talk) 17:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo Enslin,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

File:Karl-lautenschlager-1932.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karl-lautenschlager-1932.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Wappen Welterod.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Welterod.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Juergenk59 (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Niederstotzingen-1900.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Niederstotzingen-1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Niederstotzinger (talk) 12:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Wappen[edit]

Moin! Anstatt eine Datei zweimal hochzuladen und dann eine zum Loeschen vorzuschlagen bitte Commons:Dateien verschieben benutzen! Alle Dateiverwendungen werden automatisch mit dem neuen Dateinamen versehen. Dann muss man nix zu Fuss machen! Clin Gruss nach Stuttgart. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:48, 17 June 2015 (UTC)