User talk:Estopedist1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Estopedist1!

-- 15:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Kategooriad[edit]

Panen südamele, et ka siin kehtib põhimõte, et pole tarvis lisada sama asja juurde nii ülem- kui alamkategooriat. Näiteks Category:Monuments and memorials in Estonia oli teiste kategooriate kaudu juba varem "Culture of Estonia" alamkategooria ja Category:Stone graves in Estonia oli juba varem kategooria "Prehistoric tombs" alamkategooria. Ja ka siin võiks teha uusi kategooriaid vastavalt vajadusele. Näiteks pilt File:Sagadi mõisa kaalumaja.jpg võib esialgu vabalt kuuluda kategooriatesse "Weigh houses" ja "Agricultural buildings in Estonia" selle asemel, et niiviisi omaette kategooriasse eraldatud olla. Samuti pole erilist mõtet ebamäärasel alusel lõdvalt seotud asju kokku panna nagu siin ja tuleb arvestada, millised pildid on ja võiksid olla seal alamkategooriates, näiteks kaminad, noad, kuivatid, laudad, kaevud jne ei käi ju oma põhiolemuselt rahvakultuuri alla. Kui arusaamine kategooriate süsteemist veel eriti hea pole, siis soovitan esialgu kategoriseerida pilte juba olemasolevate kategooriate piires. Pikne 15:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

täiesti nõus Sinuga, küll aga on kategoriseerimisel teatav topeldamine mu meelest mõttekas ja kasutajasõbralikkuse huvides vältimatu. Seda on üksjagu isegi Commonsi sakslaste omas (Category:Germany), mida ma olen sageli püüdnud eeskujuks võtta. Püüan seda võimalikult vältida. Samuti nõus, et mõne kategooria tegemisel olen v-o liiga ettevaatav, kasvõi see kaalumaja pilt, sest ma olen üsna kindel, et sinna kategooriasse tuleb juurde, ja pärast ei pea enam ümber kategoriseerima. Folk culture'iga nõus; algul tahtsin sinna koondada rahvakultuuriga seotud (kohati lõdvalt) asjad, ent jätsin selle katki. Tegelt võiks kategoriseerimishuvilistega üldse kuidagi vahetumat koostööd teha, nt Skype'ga --Bioneer1 (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

(ilmselt kasutajale Pikne suunatud kommentaar)

Hi, I see you tried to fix my categorization actions. Although, most of the reverted actions can be acceptable, I think it is much better to be user-friendly (some overcat is unavoidable) not to try use always some (subjective) logic. Unfortunately my English is not so good to argue at professional level--Bioneer1 (talk) 19:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

mu pandud kategooriasüsteem oli enne Su kategooriate ennistamist väga sarnane etwiki kategooriale "Eesti". Ma arvan, et mingit ühtlust võiks taotleda, liiati kui kategoriseerimine pole täppisteadus--Bioneer1 (talk) 06:27, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Vikipeedia ja Commonsi kategooriasüsteemil on see põhimõtteline erinevus, et esimeses kategoriseeritakse mõisteid ja Commonsis seevastu paljusid pilte, mis käivad ühe ja sama mõiste kohta, nii et Vikipeedia ja Commonsi süsteemi ühtlustamist minu meelest ei saa taotleda. Samuti pole selline lähenemine vastupidi ühtne teiste Commonsi kategooriatega, näiteks Saksamaa kategooriaga, mida väidetavalt eeskujuks võtad.
Samuti on selline kastuajasõbralikkus kahe otsaga ehk mida rohkem on kategooriapuu alamad astmed ülemalpool dubleeritud, seda raskem on selliste n-ö pseudoalamkategooriate seast leida muid alamkategooriaid, mis viivad kategooriateni, mis pole dubleeritud ja lõppude lõpuks ei tea nii, kust mida otsida, kui loogika asemel tuginetakse suhtelisele kasutajasõbralikkusele. Pikne 06:43, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Categories fyki[edit]

Hi, as being tagged {categorize} has been fixed, please see here, thx Roland zh (talk) 00:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Ma arvan, et väikeste kohtade ehitiste jaoks pole omaette kategooriaid (nt Category:Buildings in Turba) esialgu tarvis. Süsteem läheb nii väga kirjuks, ilma et sellest kuigivõrd tulu oleks, eriti kui igas sellises kategoorias on heal juhul paar pilti. Optimaalne võiks olla nii, et kui maakonna ehitiste kategooria on juba suureks kasvanud (100–200 pilti, alamkategooriaid arvestamata), siis võiks ehitised jagada omavalitsuste kaupa. Ja kui omavalitsuse ehitiste kategooria ka suureks on kasvanud, võiks mõelda asulate ehitiste kateooriate peale. Kui mõnest konkreetsest kohast on palju ehitiste pilte, siis on muidugi mõtet ka varem eraldi kategooria teha, nii nagu see linnade puhul sageli on. 2001:7D0:88C2:F401:F059:A4B:8DD1:6657 17:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

võiks vähemalt normaalset kasutajanime kasutada :) Üldiselt nõus, ent mu eesmärk oli ehitised "Building in X County" kategoorias täpsemalt kategoriseerida. Üks võimalus on ka lihtsalt "X asula" kategooriasse panna, ilma kategooriat "Buildings in X" lisamata. Hiljem, kui pilte rohkem, siis niikuinii lähevad nad uuesti "X asula ehitiste" kategooriasse. Märgin ka, et kasutajat huvitab enamasti mingi asula objektid ja kategooriast maakonnad otsida ta ei taipa. See on küsitav nt kategooria "Granaries in Saare County" vajalikkus, samas vallati ma ei tahaks neid panna, sest vallad on märksa vähem staatilised haldusüksused kui maakonnad--Bioneer1 (talk) 13:54, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Minu meelest võivad pildid vabalt olla ka otse maakonna ehitiste katgoorias. Need kategooriad pole veel kaugeltki liiga suured. No see, kui alevike või külade ehitiste kategooriad laiemalt vajalikuks osutuvad, võib olla nii kauges tulevikus, et siis võib-olla polegi enam Vikipeediat ega Commonsit. :) Pigem võiks lähtuda praegusest seisust. Ma ei tea, asula on üks võimalik loogiline lüli asjade ruumist kuuluvust puudutavas hierarhias, mitte rohkem loogiline kui vallatasand. Võiks ka arvata, et laiemalt teatakse millegi asukohta eeskätt laiemate üksuste järgi, st kõigepealt kuuluvuse järgi maakonda, siis kuuluvuse järgi valda ja alles siis asukoha järgi mingis külas. Lihtsalt loogiline oleks kategooriapuud arendada alustades üldisemast (vallad enne asulaid) ja tehes kitsamaid jaotisi vajadusel. Igatahes seni pole üldiselt jäetud midagi omavalitsuse järgi kategoriseerimata. Eesti aitadest on juba üle mitme saja pildi, sellepärast oli mõistlik nad maakondade kaupa ära jagada. 2001:7D0:88C2:F401:FDBE:DD36:BEFC:BD38 15:51, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kandavas pilsdrupas ar pulvertorni 18. gs..jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kandavas pilsdrupas ar pulvertorni 18. gs..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

File:CancerApp.jpg[edit]

Hello!. You should always try to categorize your uploaded media in a more accurate category. In this case Category:CT images of mesothelioma. Before upload a media, you should browse by categories to determine the most convenient one/s (or create a new category). The name (CancerApp) is not appropriate, better Mesothelioma, CT image, 01 or similar. Thanks. Jmarchn (talk) 06:07, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

definitely, but this is not my picture. It was an uncategorized picture which was also used in Estonian Wikipedia--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
But you try must categorize correctly (Category:Medicine must be without media, only categories). The same problem with File:EndoApp.png, where explain "for diabetes". I categorize it as File:Blue circle for diabetes.svg. Thanks. Jmarchn (talk) 06:01, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
If I add picture to the upper category then I hope that an expert in the field of medicine will categorize it better--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:08, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of empty categories[edit]

Hi. I see you have been tagging empty categories with "{{delete|empty}}". Thank you for highlighting the problems, but your use of that incomplete syntax makes those cats ugly and puts them into Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing subpage, leaving others to fix your work. Instead of doing that, please tag those cats "{{speedy|[[COM:CSD#G1]] empty}}" or use Template:Category redirect, as appropriate. See also Template:Delete, Template:Speedy, COM:CSD#G1, and COM:DP.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

thanks, Jeff--Estopedist1 (talk) 10:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


Category:Estonia under Soviet occupation[edit]

--SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 08:47, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your uploads[edit]

Hi, please only import files here if the author/source information is clear and if you are doing proper aftercare, e.g. filling in the information template as required. Jcb (talk) 21:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi, you are still importing a lot of problems to Commons. Please stop importing files. Jcb (talk) 00:05, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Bad name?[edit]

Hello! What do you mean by "bad name" here? Hundreds of categories have the years of life in the category name. There is nothing "bad" about that. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:39, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

if it is really accepted practice in Commons then OK--Estopedist1 (talk) 14:43, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Needs OTRS[edit]

Selline kustutamise põhjus ei ütle üleslaadijale midagi ja ta ei oska selle peale midagi teha. Tuleks viidata vähemasti ingliskeelsele abilehele Commons:OTRS või veel parem kui selgitada üleslaadijale lisaks paari lausega eesti keeles, milles asi ning viidata ka eestikeelsete kirjade jaoks mõeldud aadressile. Veel, kui luba puudub, siis selleks tarbeks on Commonsis Template:No permission since, mida saab kasutada kustutamisettepaneku asemel. Pikne 11:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Please do not delete my files[edit]

Sorry, I have no idea how the discussion should happen on that platform. Please do not delete files https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Metallilise_sideme_mudel.svg Olunet

Things needing to be categorized by country[edit]

moved here: Category talk:Media needing categories#Things needing to be categorized by country --Estopedist1 (talk) 07:10, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Omar Ismail Waberi.jpg[edit]

Hi, I've nominated those files you added to the said page as COM:CSD#F7. Also, seems like you added the nom to the wrong page. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:06, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

nice work! Yes, speedy delete is correct there. --Estopedist1 (talk) 16:09, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Shall I remove the noms? It shouldn't be there in the first place. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
✓OK deleted from there --Estopedist1 (talk) 16:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Medical X-Ray imaging JBL05 nevit.jpg and File:Medical X-Ray imaging JBK05 nevit.jpg[edit]

Hello!. It is not correct to move these files from Category:Nevit Dilmen Radiology to Category:Medicine. As you can see in Category:Nevit Dilmen Radiology there are thousands of files that are not categorized. Moving them to Medicine does not improve the knowledge of these x-rays. --Jmarchn (talk) 16:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

✓OK I added better categories--Estopedist1 (talk) 17:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Polyarch profile picture.png[edit]

This image has been nominated for deletion, and I can see the context that it could be deleted in. The only reason I uploaded this image was because I have no other way of displaying the image on my user page. Polyarch (talk) 03:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

✓OK problem solved. See your user page and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Polyarch profile picture.png--Estopedist1 (talk) 05:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! Polyarch (talk) 02:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Is there a need for why this pixel image is 16 times larger (in pixel) than needed? -- User: Perhelion 10:42, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
It's to stop the image from automatically being "blurred" by the image displayer Polyarch (talk) 02:22, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

File:US Navy 100915-N-6003P-091 Aviation Structural Mechanic Airman Ismayda Acquie receives a flag and condolences from Chief Machinist's Mate (Sel.) Jo.jpg[edit]

Hi, when fixing syntax errors, please check the history. The error may be caused by vandalism, like in this case. Jcb (talk) 14:44, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

media by source[edit]

Hi, Estopedist1. I noticed that you removed the following categories from Category:Media by source:

I assume you did this because those categories are in more-specific media source categories. However, whereas "media" and "files" are general categories, each of these is in a more-specific "images" category.

Lower-level categories should be more specific, not less. File and media categories don't fit under image categories, just as they wouldn't fit under audio or video categories. In addition, categories named "files" or "media" can have non-image media. Right now these categories have only images, but if non-image media were ever added they would no longer belong in image categories.

So I think these categories need to be either renamed to "images", or recategorized so they are not in image categories. What do you think? --Auntof6 (talk) 08:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

actually, it is bigger problem. See, for example, the header in Category:Images by source (should encompasses also video, audio files??). Maybe we do not need categories: category:Image sources (integrated to new category: category:Media sources) and category:Images by source (integrated to category: category:Media by source). So it is a topic of general discussion--Estopedist1 (talk) 09:15, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

verwijdering categorie bij hotel restaurant Loenermark[edit]

Kan jij mij uitleggen waarom jij de categorie "Loenen" heb verwijderd bij een foto van hotel-restaurant Loenermark in Loenen? Of controleer jij de categorie Loenen aan de Vecht? --Michielverbeek (talk) 12:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

I do not understand Dutch--Estopedist1 (talk) 12:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Sunseeker[edit]

Hi there. Regarding this edit, I don't think that this is "personal text". I believe it is a brand, given sale sites such as this and forum sites such as this. Mindmatrix 13:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

...and I just found the company website (it is owned by Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway). Here's the Forest River RV models. I'll create the relevant categories for this and update the files accordingly. Mindmatrix 13:11, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
well done!--Estopedist1 (talk) 14:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:William Faithorne[edit]

This is a case of COM:OVERCAT, I believe. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:04, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

no. Category:Google Art Project works by William Faithorne is a hiddencat. Ideally there should be cat named category:Paintings by William Faithorne (not a hidden cat)--Estopedist1 (talk) 12:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Well, I think those Google Art categories are a bad idea anyway. Really there should be Category:Google Art, nothing more. This one was created seven years ago. If hidden categories are really not in the scope of OVERCAT then, OK, I have learned something. What you say isn't mentioned at COM:HIDDENCAT. Charles Matthews (talk) 13:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Please do not put images in the top-level category "Yoga"[edit]

Hi, I've moved your image to "Category:Yoga therapy". You could also use "Yoga in India".

Please do not put any images in Category:Yoga --- it's only for other categories as it is HUGE and we have MANY sub-categories, in fact we have sub-sub-sub-categories.

Your co-operation will be appreciated. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Comment metadata[edit]

@JoKalliauer: Related to Special:Diff/372372558. I thought the file's description, but it is rather OK now--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:23, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks.[edit]

I don't browse Wikimedia Commons or anything. I only use it for uploading files that need to be used on other Wikimedia projects.

I'm often busy, so I appreciate edits like this one.

Incidentally, do you know if there is a way that I could search through the file information of multiple audio files that I have uploaded? Tharthan (talk) 20:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

@Tharthan: I didn't get the point. But here are yours uploads: Tharthan's iploads?--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)