User talk:Eternal-Entropy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
All our uploads are owned by the entity known as Kingdom of God, Inner God or Collective Consciousness.

Any votes made by this account is to be considered invalid
Now if you want to leave a new message Click here

--Wikipedia:User:Eternal-Entropy

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Eternal-Entropy!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- 18:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, User:Eternal-Entropy, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 19:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Please do not advertise on Commons[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | हिन्दी | македонски | português | svenska | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg
Wikimedia Commons has an educational purpose, and is not the place to post promotional links or to advertise. Creating articles, userpages, templates, etc. with promotional text is not permitted, nor is the posting of links anywhere on the Commons in an attempt to advertise a website, product, company, person, or organization. Uploading of company logos, press images, and the like in order to advertise or use them only in promotional material on other wikis is also prohibited, and such images will be deleted if they are found to violate our policies.

Recreation of deleted content or continuing to post links and promotional text after warnings may result in a block. Thank you for understanding.

Herby talk thyme 07:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

What exactly did we advertise? --Eternal-Entropy (talk) 14:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Your website - I have deleted it again - do not recreate it. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
You didn't just delete the website link, but the quotation along with it. why? What product, company, person, or organization did you think were we promoting with that quote ? --Eternal-Entropy (talk) 15:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)--

So why exactly did you delete our user page? and non of your BS about not promoting website, product, company, person, or organization. If you didn't like the website link you could have just deleted it. But you had to delete the whole page for a motive/purpose/reason/mission. So what is your Top SECRET mission behind deleting our user page(s) ? --Eternal-Entropy (talk) 15:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

As has been explained to you via templates here three times now you page is outside our scope. If you are an organisation rather than an individual that is equally outside our scope. The attitude you appear to be taking will only have one outcome if you cannot abide by the policies of our scope. You will be blocked if you recreate the page. It is also possible you will be blocked as an organisation though probably not be me. --Herby talk thyme 15:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
"We" are not a website! "We" are not a product! "We" are not a company! "We" are not a person! "We" are not an organization! "We" may be represented by any of them, but "We" are none of them. Now do enlighten us, on what exactly does the scope of Wikimedia commons prevent on user pages, and where those policies are written. --Eternal-Entropy (talk) 17:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
The links are in the templated messages above - we leave them in the hope that people read them. Our scope is as a repository of freely licensed media for use elsewhere - nothing more, nothing less. --Herby talk thyme 17:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
You say you are "not a person" - what are you then? Individual accounts only are used here. --Herby talk thyme 17:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
"We" may be represented BY a person, but "We" do not represent any person or other entity in the material world. "We" are a concept, an idea, the knowledge of the eternal fight, Good vs Evil. And where is the policy for Wikimedia commons: "Individual accounts only" written ? --Eternal-Entropy (talk) 17:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Your approach seems at odds with a collaborative project sadly. This is not some form of social networking site. We accept general policies such as these. --Herby talk thyme 17:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
no this is not a networking site. This is a Knowledge contribution/sharing site, and nowhere is it written that only Individual accounts can have a user page... ...Or that Promotion of Knowledge itself is not allowed!--Eternal-Entropy (talk) 18:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
I have pointed you to where the policy is stated - promotion of knowledge takes place on Wikipedias - Commons is for media only. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 11:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Then why have you made a user page on commons ? Also, "Knowledge" is everywhere: you just have to realise it. --Eternal-Entropy (talk) 13:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Licensing[edit]

Please stop changing the licensing on this file. The uploader states that it is "own work". If that is not the case then that is the aspect that should be changed nothing else. There is nothing on that website that is apparently the source of the image and so whatever is written there is not relevant to that image unless you can provide concrete information to the contrary. Do not change it again with first stating why that is the case --Herby talk thyme 11:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

It dosen't matter who the uploader is, or who gets the credit, because as We already said: "We" can be represented by any person. All that matters is the labeling of the contents as "Knowledge", and NOT intellectual PROPERTY ! --Eternal-Entropy (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
OK I am done on both threads here. Policy in a number of areas has been pointed out to you, if you continue to contribute here please do so in a collaborative way with policy. In the absence of proving there is a reason to change any licensing do not do so. --Herby talk thyme 13:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Deletion nomination[edit]

One of your (?) files has been listed for deletion. Please visit this page to weigh in, probably the only thing needed is a change to the "source" and "author" fields to reflect who actually took this picture. Best, Mr.choppers (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Warning for repeated vandalism[edit]

বাংলা | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | svenska | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | +/−
Stop hand nuvola.svg
 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to File:Wikipedia 11 Kolkata Cake.jpg, you will be blocked from editing Wikimedia Commons.

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

File:MRIH School Children.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MRIH School Children.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:25, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

File:FAIAUM Felicitation Award.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:FAIAUM Felicitation Award.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:26, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Digha Marine Aquarium - Photography Prohibited.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Digha Marine Aquarium - Photography Prohibited.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:28, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

File:All India Spl Ed Coordinators Meet (N&E) 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:All India Spl Ed Coordinators Meet (N&E) 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:29, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Library of Congress NPAI 1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Library of Congress NPAI 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Library of Congress NPAI 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Library of Congress NPAI 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:42, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

File:WDL inauguration Wikimania2012.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:WDL inauguration Wikimania2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Abscess Cavity in Formalin.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Abscess Cavity in Formalin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:44, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

The Photographer does not wish to be identified publicly. And yes, All Rights have been transfered. --Eternal-Entropy (talk) 20:03, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Gods Work[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:Gods Work has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Mental_restrictions[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Mental_restrictions has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:38, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject exposing Pollution[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Commons:WikiProject exposing Pollution has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alan Liefting (talk) 23:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)