User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Valdreskviss.png & Valdres kart.png[edit]

Hi Eugene! Sorry for not answering the admin message, but you can delete the Valdres kart file, because another user made a vector version of it and I don't need it anymore, the file valdres kviss can also be deleted because I doesn't want to be blocked because I am new at wikipedia and I didn't know about this copyright violation before today when I saw the message first time.

When it is about that picture I uploaded today, I have sent a mail to get a license, because I don't want to be blocked, because I saw that previous message after I uploaded it.

Sorry for not knowing about that, but it should not happen again...

Alexvinbaek (talk) 16:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Valdres kviss.jpg looked like book cover for me. If you know book illustrator, you could ask him/her to send permission to Commons:OTRS.
Actually if you need photo of lock, you could try to make your own. Sure, you need to spend some time to find old school one :-)
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Maycown Reichembach´s photos[edit]

Hi, Eugene

Can you help me?. The Maycown Reichembach´s photographs uploaded to illustrate his biography have the erase´s warning. They are: 1) Guitarist Maycown Reichembach.jpg 2) Maycown Reichembach 2012.jpg

I don´t know the origin of their warning. Can you explain me?. How can I recover them?. Do I have to argue or upload them again?: Thanks.

--Maik12 (talk) 04:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Could you please explain origins of images? One of them was taken from MySpace.
If photos are taken from artist web site, you need to ask artist (or copyright holder) to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example Commons:Email templates).
Alternatively you could try to search for artist photos licensed under Creative Commons licenses on sites like Flickr. Please note that not all variants of Creative Commons licenses are accepted by Commons. See Commons:Licensing for details.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of file: 9mfk_matiasbruno.jpg for deletion[edit]

Hello Eugene, I wanted to inform that all photos I've uploaded have been taken by me. They are nor promotilnal as they are used in objective articles and in the case of observable universe....jpg it is being considered favorably impressive ilustration by wikipedia administrators in articles talk page. I want to contribute to this enciclopedia with many images and articles in the future so I hope this dont break my entusiasm. --Unmismoobjetivo (talk) 20:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

You could upload photos in full resolution with EXIF to confirm your authorship. You need to ask band lawyer or members to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example Commons:Email templates) for album covers. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I cant upload exif full resolution as this files were edited by a batch app to save hard disc space and originals were deleted. There are no album covers in this photos. This is the case for this photos: "When contacting OTRS is unnecessary [edit] I took the image myself and it hasn't been previously published. Just follow the instructions found on the Commons:Upload page."Unmismoobjetivo (talk) 02:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Tapaninemilesfromkingston.jpg is clearly described as album cover, File:Nueve Millas (siluetas marcan ritmo).jpg is logo/promo photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Tapaninemilesfromkingston.jpgis an image made by me that was meant to be used as album art but never got to it as the album was released before the image was finished. if the name is the problem I can change it. File:Nueve Millas (siluetas marcan ritmo).jpg was uploaded to be used for a descriptive visual feature of the band's live shows, but it wasn't used. If is better that isnt stored in wikimedia commons server, I can delete that file.

So I think File:Tapaninemilesfromkingston.jpg is out of Commons:Project scope.
Please don't forget to put all your arguments on deletion request page.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Ok. About the other files, can you remove the deletion request? exept for File:Nueve Millas (siluetas marcan ritmo).jpg I don't know if I can delete that file myself. But the other files are in the proyect scope. In the case of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logarhitmic_radial_photo_of_the_universe_by_pablo_budassi_9MFK.jpg is not even related with the other files. I'm confused, I found it very agressive from you to just nominate for deletion all my files whithout asking or checking first. I hope the confusion is mine. Unmismoobjetivo (talk) 16:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry, if I wounded you feelings. I definitely didn't intend to do so.
Please make add all further comments to files on deletion request page.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
The files were deleted as I waited for your response. Cant access the deletion page any more. I just wanted to contribute. One of the files were present in 8 wikipedia articles that now are with missing links. Took me about a month drawing that observable universe diagram. Congratulations.

from Commons:Project scope "File in use in another Wikimedia project[editar] A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough."Unmismoobjetivo (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but I several times suggested you to write all arguments on deletion requested page. Deletion request was about copyrights status, not project scope. In this case used files could be deleted.
Commons:Undeletion requests is a standard procedure to restore deleted files.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
So next time you nominate for deletion all files uploaded by an user, please check them one by one and specify in each case why that file is being requesting to be deleted. Please be more carefull because now some articles are with missing links. And please contact the uploader. Unmismoobjetivo (talk) 21:35, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for recommendations! I'll try to be more careful in controversial cases. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Can you help me restoring the files? Mail was sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and permission was granted but some some error occurred. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Logarhitmic_radial_photo_of_the_universe_by_pablo_budassi_9MFK.jpg Unmismoobjetivo (talk) 06:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
I restored description. Please ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission verification. Sorry, I don't have OTRS access. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Deleted file[edit]

hi friend Eugene, you deleted this file File:CA Guaraní.png uploaded by me, claiming violation of rights, obviously this does not occur, since this logo was developed and designed by me, with intention to promote a small football team of Paraguay.

Nomination of File:SeleccionFACMED.jpg to deletion[edit]

Hi Eugene, you have nominated my photo to deletion, but that photo was taken by me, so i don't understand why did you do that. I would like you to remove that tag from my photo. Thanks.

If you took these photos, please re-upload them in original resolution with EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Wrike screenshots[edit]

Hi Eugene, you have deleted all the files that I have uploaded two days ago to http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrike and http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrike without a single warning. They are all in the public domain - on the official Pinterest page: http://pinterest.com/wriketeam/localized-screenshots/ Why cannot I use them? And if I can, how can I restore the files? Thanks, Lapoletta

Source page doesn't contain term of use and doesn't mention public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of logo L214[edit]

Hi Eugene, I have uploaded a file which is the official logo of an organization, free to use as you can see from the organization's logo page : http://visuels.l214.com/logos/ I am preparing an article on this organization, is there any way to put this image back, or anything more I should do on my side ? The deleted file was Logo-L214-fond-blanc-contour-orange-carre-800x845.png Thanks,

There are no terms of use on this page. You need to find them on site or ask them to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

[edit]

Eugene,

This is my first time uploading file image to wikimedia commons and it seems that I have made a mistake. The file I uploaded is the logo for the organization I work for, Plant With Purpose, and this is not a copyrighted or trademarked item. The file image was created by the organization and is the logo of the company, but it is not protected in anyway and is free for public use. Could you please reverse the deletion of this image or allow me to upload it again under the correct licensing terms. Thanks, Chris.

If somebody create work, it should be copyrighted, unless it trivial. You could ask organization legal department to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help with permission review and image undeletion on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Usb sede-litoral entrada.jpg[edit]

It is a public University in Venezuela, how do I specify licence?

You need to search credits and term of use information on source web site. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Source and author?[edit]

Hi!

On File:A beautiful clown (7530078600).jpg, you ask for source and author. Both are given: The picture was taken by Karen Mardahl and uploaded to her Flickr account under CC-BY-SA. --Palnatoke (talk) 16:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

This photo is Commons:Derivative works from other photos. Who are photographers? WHa is copyrights status? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Posters[edit]

THIS IS MY FIRST TIME ON WIKIPEDIA AND IMAGES THAT HAD IN MY WEB CREATIONS ARE FOR OUR FESTIVAL we made all the summers. RIGHTS belong to us. Thank you to give me back the images. MAURICIO.

Please ask your organization legal department to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help with permission review and image undeletion on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

help[edit]

hello, you delete my image (casus-belli.jpg) Why? i just wonted to illustrate the game article on game page. How to do?

Please read Commons:Licensing. Commons does not accept non-free images. You could upload such image only into project which allow them, like English Wikipedia. Anyway, you could add link to site with game artwork into article. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


I read Commons: Licensing, but not understand anyway..

I have link game www.casus-belli.com where can see this logo and i want illustrate her in my first article - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Casus_Belli_(game) Please tell me what kind of license i need to take for my case --SilenQ

Where permission to use this image under terms of free license could be seen? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
I am owner this image on site www.casus-belli.com where you can find this logo, but i don't know how i need provide you licence... --SilenQ
If you an owner and creator of this image, you could add license information to site itself. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Is there an example?

p.s. can i use logo from the article in ru.wiki (http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Casus-belli.jpg) here or no? If Yes - how it do? --SilenQ

I think Flickr images are good example. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
So, i need to create a new account in flicker or http://www.gamespot.com then download into my image. Then i upload image in commons.wikimedia.org and put source is "*url image in flicker/bigspot". Right? What type of license used correctly in this case? --SilenQ
No. License statement should be placed on www.casus-belli.com. Isn't this site is supposed to be a primary source of image? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Ok. I sent a letter to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from my site. How do I know that the license for the image was approved? --SilenQ
You need to ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Socks[edit]

Hi Eugene. As you were the admin that first blocked Daniel alves teixeira (talk · contribs) you may find that at Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/ Daniel alves teixeira the blocked user (and whose block is still active) has been caught socking evading your block as Dat2014 (talk · contribs). Best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 19:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done Thank you for notifying! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

DR question[edit]

Hi Eugene. Can you take a look at User talk:INeverCry#Wrong deletion of files and let me know what you think about these files? Thanks for your time. INeverCry 18:23, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Aram enfi diplom big.jpg[edit]

Dear Admin Zelenko,

If this image is a copyrighted derivative, please feel free to delete it as I can't read Cyrillic. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
I nominated this and other promotional stuff from this uploader for deletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank You. Its hard to do anything when one can't read the language. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Nini00 -> DocElisa[edit]

If I understand, the 02-11th I have created by mistake a new account DocElisa here, at the same time I was asking to change name. I'm relatively new editor and for me this is yet complicate. Thanks for help DocElisa (talk) 09:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Answered on request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Re:Administrator[edit]

Thanks! :) --Jaqen (talk) 23:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

what??[edit]

how is it a copyright violation when others have just re-uploaded it?? regarding what you nominated for deletion on my talk page Baboon43 (talk) 23:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

This is definitely not {{PD-textlogo}}. So re-uploading will not help. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Why did you asked for supression of all the images in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kofeemaker. Most of them have Metadata that shows they have been taken by a camera and not captured from a URL or magazine?

They seem legitimate to me.

Pierre cb (talk) 05:04, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Images resolutions are small and inconsistent. Camera information is missing in majority of images. Anyway uploader could upload images in original resolutions with EXIF to confirm authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Commercial packaging[edit]

Hi, I notice that you deleted File:Fourat 2 litres, Tunisie.jpg as Derivative non-free content: Commercial packaging. I wonder if this category is also a derivative non-free content? Regards --— Habib M'HENNI [Message] 17:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

If logo doesn't fall into {{PD-textlogo}} or {{PD-trivial}}, it'll be derivative work. Anyway packaging is not required to illustrate product. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright owner is 'God' from the metadata[edit]

Deat Admin Zelenko,

Please look at these 4 images and feel free to pass them, launch a mass DR or mark them as copyvios. The source flickr account has very few images...and no one wants to mark them it seems. I don't know if it is the uploader's own work. The quality of the images is 'so so'.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

It's definitely {{PD-Art}}, however it's good idea to try to find sources (place and date of creation; school, painter if possible), otherwise it's mostly useless to have such images. I think will be good idea to mark these images with {{no source since}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  • I will do that. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: It seems that the uploader incresaed the number of images on his flickr account from 4 to 61 here: I filed a DR and a Speedy which got converted into a DR and the uploader has replied to both deletion requests. I don't know if you have any questions or comments to pose in any of the DRs. It would be nice to know if this was digitally created by the uploader but from the low quality of the images, I think this is not likely....and that it was taken perhaps from somewhere else. I tagged another image as npd. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:08, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
I added source requests on couple of deletion requests. I hope uploader will got an idea that images need good description, including source information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: The uploader says its from a c13th Byzantine Icon from Monastery of Saint Catherine in Sinai, Egypt. It would be nice to have more information but perhaps that is all that one can know. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:19, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
    It's quite reasonable description. User need to add similar ones to all uploaded images. As well as change tag to {{PD-art}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
  • OK. I will withdraw the deletion requests. Its likely PD-Art. --Leoboudv (talk) 02:25, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletions of photos posted on articles Sawana and Lomaloma[edit]

These photos were taken from my holidays to the islands and are not exposed or subject to any violation of copyright.

The article is bare without the photos and provide quality addition to the articles - particularly those who have not been there

Please reinstate the photos as a matter of urgency or provide me with some guidelines on how to reinstate as I have the originals and will commence loading them again into the article - unless you have better explanations for their permanent deletions.

Trabeta

Pictogram voting info.svg Info Hi Eugene. This is in relation to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Trabeta. I've responded to Trabeta on my talk. INeverCry 05:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Restoration request to File:Drawing of Jerri hall by James Mylne in Evening Standard Newspaper.jpg (OTRS)[edit]

Hi, i´m OTRS volunteer.

OTRS has received a supposedly valid (I can not see it) authorization for the image. (ticket:2013022310004693) Can you restore it?

Thanks. --Alan Lorenzo (talk) 17:36, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey folks, I'm a wikipedia editor/author and i've got a major complaint about a sudden batch of deletions made to files related to ballpoint pen artist James Mylne. The above file was also uploaded by James, but not part of the deletions to which I'm referring. Two other files were suddenly deleted with what I believe to be insufficient notification or understanding. I'm sorry I don't have the file names on hand, but I do have a batch of complaint-messages from the artist himself toward the trigger-happy staff who made the deletions. James was generous enough to spend his time uploading the files, not to mention the fact that by doing so he was providing free content to the project. I myself also don't have the adequate time to be chasing down neither the people nor the reasons behind the deletions, but I do politely demand that the files be re-loaded at the most immediate moment possible!
The files in question were deleted from the James Mylne (artist) wiki, and the Ballpoint pen artwork wiki. One was a file of his artwork possibly titled "Polo Pony." The other was a photo depicting James Mylne at-work/drawing. I solicited those images from him personally; he was nice enough to respond to my requests, and he uploaded them to commons himself, therefore he MUST've surely submitted some kind of statement granting permission for usage at that time. His User-name for the Commons uploads may be his own name, "James Mylne." Will someone please get on this pronto and send copious apologies to the man as well! Thanks for your attention. Penwatchdog (talk) 04:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Could you please be more specific about file names? Please note thay you may need people with Commons:OTRS access assistance. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Three files:

  • File:Polo Pony, ballpoint biro drawing.jpg
  • File:McQueen ballpoint biro drawing art.jpg
  • File:2011,_Addlib_Magazine_Cover.jpg (this was his most recent upload; so recent I hadn't yet added my disclaimer about fair-usage of magazine cover)

Please assist with this, anyone! You folks are the Commons folks; I'm just a wikipedia writer. Forwarding the above complaint and file-info to the right persons will be helpful enough! Somebody jumped the gun with these deletions, and I shouldn't have to be tracking down the solution except that it makes me look (& feel) bad seeing as I'm the one who solicited Mr. Mylnes time and input! Penwatchdog (talk) 03:45, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Morning Sunshine restored first two images. I restored last, but is only painter has copyrights and not publisher? I left {{no permission}} on this image. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

THANKS very much to M.Sunshine & E.Zelenko for your swift attention to this matter! As for the magazine cover in question, I personally (the author of the articles in which the above files are utilized) have notified artist James Mylne (whom uploaded the magazine cover featuring his artwork) and he will make the effort to contact the publishers to obtain & submit the proper permission. I would like it noted through proper channels that this is under way, and request time-consideration for this to be dealt with.

I tried to add a proper "rationale" template to the file but was unsuccessful. The cover is being used in the wiki to illustrate the fact that Kate Moss is a regular subject of James Mylne artwork, which in turn have also been published as magazine covers on several occasions. Please do not delete the "Addlib" magazine file hastily without allowing a fair amount of time, considering we are all busy with other real-life concerns! Penwatchdog (talk) 09:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

User:Constantin1706[edit]

Здравствуйте. Участник отсидел вторую блокировку и продолжает в том же духе. Mithril (talk) 15:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Пришлось применить третью... Спасибо за помощь проекту! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#User:FSIII[edit]

Hi Eugene, hope you're well. When you have a moment, could you help me out at Commons:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#User:FSIII? Thanks! -FASTILY (TALK) 07:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

My file[edit]

File:Lotte Mart, Beijing.jpg This is just a photo of a supermarket entrance. It has nothing to do with copyright violation. 螺钉 (talk) 05:17, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, it was my mistake. I restored file. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, EugeneZelenko. You have new messages at Commons:Bots/Requests/RileyBot 4#Discussion.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Riley Huntley (talk) 04:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Again. :) Riley Huntley (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you but we are awaiting your feedback. :). Riley Huntley (talk) 00:36, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

[edit]

Хочу поконкретней узнать проблему удаления этого файла... Я новичок в этом деле, но уверен, что этот файл находится в общем доступе (точнее разрешен) и его можно скачать с официального сайта альянса Oneworld. Вот ссылка на файл: http://www.oneworld.com/news-information/image-gallery/details/?objectID=135&categoryID=6&subCategoryID=0&viewYear=0.

То, что произведение находится в Интернете, ещё не означает, что оно находится в общественном достоянии или распространяется согласно условий свободной лицензии. Смотрите Commons:Лицензирование. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Ну и как мне это понять? На Commons:Лицензирование все нудно и умно, а также некоторые части на английском. Не поможете решить этот вопрос?
Кратко: в общем случае произведение охраняется авторскими правами в течении некоторого срока (обычно исчисляемого после смерти автора), потом оно переходит в общественное достояние. Могут быть исключения из правила: исключения, указанные в законе, тривиальные работы или же те случаи, когда автор отказался от части авторских прав (свободные лицензии). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Confirming 1 edit I made on Russian wikipedia?[edit]

Dear Admin Eugene Zelenko,

By the time you receive this message, I will be asleep as your time in Moscow/Belarus is 10-11 hours ahead of me in the Pacific coast of Canada. I was wondering if you--or someone you knew on Russian wiki--could confirm this one edit I made on Russian wiki regarding the Ancient Egyptian game of Senet. Basically I used this new Commons image here: File:Senet game pieces (Tutankhamun).jpg to replace an older out of focus image that was previously used in the article here: File:P9210016.JPG

I hope that this is not controversial. Perhaps someone on Russian wiki could approve my edit...if possible as a more in focus image might help people understand this Egyptian game in the Russian wiki article. If not, that's OK. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:08, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have right to patrol edits :-( So somebody else should confirm edit.
But I fixed spelling - ending was missed :-)
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
  • OK, thank you, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:17, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
  • By the way, I've confirmed the edit :) rubin16 (talk) 18:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you, rubin16. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:53, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Logo PPSM.jpg[edit]

Good Evening:

The last few days, the image "Logo PPSM.jpg" of the page of People's Socialist Party of Mexico in spanish , has been removed from alleged "violation of CopyRights", check the page www.ppsm.org.mx this image is the oficial logo of party, and not it's only text. Please restore the image. Thanks for you attention, greetings. --Edtiburcio92 (talk) 21:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Logo PPSM.jpg
OFFICIAL LOGO OF PEOPLE'S SOCIALIST PARTY OF MEXICO
Where permission to use logo under terms compatible with Commons:Licensing could be found? Logo is definitely not trivial and does not fall under {{PD-textlogo}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

This DR[edit]

Please feel free to make a comment in the above DR. The extended camera metadata says its from a Russian website. It may or may not be OK. The flickr account may be a flickrwashing account but I'm not 100% sure and I'd prefer not to make a comment about that in a DR. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:01, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

File:980x440px Public Site Pilot Cockpit.jpg[edit]

Hi, I noticed you'd tagged this file for a permissions issue and not being familiar with proceedures here on commons, I thought it best to drop you a message. I've hit google and that image appears on the main page of [1]. I can't see any kind of content license there declaring it public domain. If you want to get hold of me, I work on en.wikipedia regularly. I'm one of the grumpier users. ;) Dolescum (talk) 21:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for help! In this case file could be reported as copyrights violation. You could enable gadget which will simplify such nominations. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Logo Fútbol Uruguayo.png[edit]

Excuse me, but I don't undertand why you delete File:Logo Fútbol Uruguayo.png. That image was made by me, so say that is a possible copyright violation is not correct. A lot of football tournaments and championships have in Wikipedia's articles an image of the logo of the competition (from the Copa Libertadores, Premier League, etc., etc.). Please explain why do you think my image is could be copyright. Sorry for my basic english, I´m uruguayan. --Juanchocarbonero (talk) 18:53, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Is this logo official logo of Uruguay championship? In this case you could upload it to project which allow non-free images like English Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
I don´t understand very well. You say that I could upload it to the page of Uruguay Championship if I upload the image first in English Wikipedia? Do you speak spanish? In that case I be pleased because is my native language. Thanks!
Sorry, I don't speak Spanish :-( But you could ask help of Spanish-speaking administrator. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Stephen Whatley paintings, Seth Kahan photo[edit]

Hi, as per your request I have forwarded my permissions for these photos to OTRS. Commonplace Book (talk) 18:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Please use Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard to ask help with permission verification. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

The Seven Sins cover[edit]

I checked several book covers at Wikipedia before trying to upload the Seven Sins cover. Dick Francis' Nerve and Dead Cert, Laurel Hamilton's Guilty Pleasures, etc. They all have the same kind of license,

Copyrighted This image is of book cover(s), and the copyright for it is most likely owned either by the artist who created the cover(s) or the publisher of the book(s). It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of book covers

   to illustrate an article discussing the book in question
   on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,

qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Other use of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information. File history.

I thought I had uploaded this license,

Licensing 

---Non-free book cover|image has rationale=yes--- (took out the coding because it gave some weird picture...

to the Seven Sins cover, but apparently failed. Now I can't get in to modify the license.

However, it clearly is allowable under Wikipedia rules since there are hundreds of book covers on Wikipedia with just this license.

Thanks, Commonplace Book (talk) 18:32, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Some projects like English Wikipedia allows non-free content, but Wikimedia Commons does not. See Commons:Licensing for details. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Ratan Planet.jpg[edit]

Why you have deleted my file. You don't need to bother in my affairs.Its wrong, without mentioning anything you have deleted the file.Upload it again.

Please read Commons:Licensing and Commons:Project scope first. If you are really photographer, please upload this image in full resolution with EXIF without watermarks. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

AG-1B flashbulb photo[edit]

Please see my rebuttal at Commons:Deletion requests/File:AG-1B flashbulbs.JPG. --Zeamays (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

This DR[edit]

Please feel free to make a comment in this DR that I decided to create if you wish. Its a Russian/Ukrainian uploader. He also uploaded this professional looking image with a slightly different Canon camera but I'm not 100% sure if its the uploader's own work but you may know more:

I discussed the issue yesterday with Admin McZusatz here yesterday but I guess both of us are not 100% sure if they could be own work or not. The DR I launched has a name in the camera metadata. The other image I mentioned could be suspicious but I'm not certain at all. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:42, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

File Mbeju[edit]

Hola, desearia saber por que elimino mi archivo file:mbeju, agradeceria que me respondiera, gracias por su tiempo.

Sorry, I don't know Spanish. Please read Commons:Licensing and Commons:Project scope. Both files are very likely to violate these policies. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Edit summary[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko, could you please have a look at Commons talk:Administrators/Requests? Thank you! Multichill (talk) 09:35, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Augusto ferrer dalmau → Tono Muñoz Molina[edit]

you ask me, ¿Do you plan to rename accounts on other projects?

I have no intention

thanks :)

Looks like Spanish Wikipedia is your home project. I think will be good idea to rename account there too and use SUL. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

This DR[edit]

Feel free to send a message to this Russian/Ukrainian or Belarussian uploader on OTRS if you wish. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done on request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Help[edit]

Hi, You deleted my file "PomPoms cover" 'cuz I violated Copyright , so I wanna know, how can I upload a pic and never ever have that problem? Thank You

You could upload non-free files onto projects which allow them, like English Wikipedia. See also Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

This DR[edit]

Please feel free to participate in this DR if you wish. I only ask you because you tagged several of this uploader's images for deletion I see (from his/her talkpage). I have not voted but made a comment in the DR. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your comments. I'll change my vote to delete now. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


Copyright[edit]

I would like to ask what is the problem of the photo took by me? If the photo really took by me, could I use it in wiki? --People91 (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

You uploaded album covers and photo of advertisement. Please read Commons:Licensing and Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

I know this one....I mean how about the other photo like took in some function or ceremony? -- People91 (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Could you please be more specific and provide file name? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Почему Вы удалили фотографии фестиваля "Славянский Рок"[edit]

Моя тема пока находится в ИНКУБАТОРе - http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Инкубатор:Международный_рок-фестиваль_СЛАВЯНСКИЙ_РОК Удивлен? Все фотографии фестиваля "Славянский Рок" - авторские! Ссылка здесь - http://slavrock.ru/foto.html Вопрос - на каком основании Вы предлагаете к удалению эти фотографии! Также - почему удалили фото обложек нашего журнала "Славянский Рок" - ссылка - http://slavrock.ru/main/68-zhurnal-slavyanskiy-rok.html Журнал выходит официально уже 2 года, все права принадлежат организаторам проекта "Славянский Рок". Объясните, пожалуйста, ваши действия! С уважением Олег Николаевич Ткаченко (talk)

Если фотографии делали лично Вы, пожалуйста, загрузите их в оригинально разрешении с EXIF, чтобы подтвердить Ваше авторство. Не забудьте сообщить об этом на странице запроса на удаление.
По поводу обложек журналов и CD: попросите обладателя авторских прав послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (образец: Commons:Email templates).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Poster logo without background.jpg is deleted[edit]

It was developed by the Global Synergy Foundation and was allowed to be posted here by their administration to display logo of Schools Save the World campaign. Why was it deleted then? Best Regards, Norion

Please ask Global Synergy Foundation to send permission (example: Commons:Email templates) to Commons:OTRS. Then you could ask help with permission review and undeletion on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks...[edit]

...for so quickly attending to my name change requests at Wikimedia Commons! I've now unified my account. Markus Pössel (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

This media file has been nominated for deletion since 7 April 2013 User Anjali Reddy J[edit]

Hello Eugene,

This is user Anjali Reddy J, i received a message from you that my pictures got nominated for deletion. Eugene those are my own pictures i took it from Canon Sx120 12 Mp camera. Could you please suggest me what shall i do to keep the pictures as it is. I choosed the option my own work when i uploaded them apart from that do i need to do anything. PLease suggest me, because those are my own pictures and i am the phorographer for those. It would be really helpful to me if you suggest me what license tag do i need to use and it is my own work. I have taken those pictures when i attended their dance performances. I know wiki have strong review process thats why i have added my own photographs which i took and mentioned it while uploading, i don't know i missed out anything, if it is please suggest me. I don't want to loose those pictures as those dancer photographs are my own work and close to my heart. The reason you mentioned is Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. I took it from that 12 MP camera only and i haven't edited anything i uploaded the pictures as it is :-(...I don't know much about editing the pictures as i am learning photograpghy now. Could you please suggest me and help me in keeping my pictures with out getting deleted.

The below all pictures of Mine got nominated. Please help me in keeping this pictures with out getting deleted Eugene as am new to wiki your suggestions would really help me to know the things better about file uploads.

File:Achuta Manasa.jpg File:Prateeksha kashi2.jpg File:Prateeksha kashi.jpg File:Prateeksha kashi1.jpg File:Vyjayanthi kashi3.jpg File:Vyjayanthi kashi4.jpg File:Vyjayanthi kashi1.jpg File:Vyjayanthi kashi2.jpg File:Vyjayanthi kashi.jpg File:Shazia Khan.jpg File:Prateeksha Kashi3.jpg File:Prateeksha Kashi2.jpg File:Prateeksha Kashi1.jpg File:Prateeksha Kashi.jpg


Thanks in Advance

Anjali Reddy J

You could re-upload images in original resolution with EXIF to confirm your authorship. Please don't forget to reflect this on request page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


Hello Eugene,

I didn't get the solution what you gave, how can i upload the image with the original resolution, i directly took that picture from that camera and copied to ma system and from there i uploaded that. Actually i don't know what is EXIF, what is this exactly. Could you please explain me about that and where can i do that. Please your suggestions will really helps me in doing so.

Thanks & Regards Anjali Reddy J

EXIF is automatically generated at time of creating photo by digital camera. It should include camera model, date, time, etc. See w:en:Exchangeable image file format for details.
It's strange that 12 megapixel camera is used in so low resolution.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
I've just been talking with this editor in the editing help IRC channel. Sure, they tell me, all these pictures were uploaded directly from the camera, unedited, no idea why the EXIF data is missing. I take a look at the first one, "Achuta Manasa". Look, I say, that has obviously been edited, the background is a plain sheet of one colour.
Ah! No, they forgot. They did edit _that_ one. But all the others were uploaded unedited, etc. Then I take a look at "Prateeksha kashi"; the metadata is exactly what I'd expect to see if it was edited in iPhoto. I point this out. About then they leave the channel. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:57, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
After some digging, it seems the pictures may have been transmitted via an upload to and download from Facebook, which of course shrinks them and strips the original EXIF data. I pointed this out, and recommended uploading originals. Pinkbeast (talk) 17:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

@Pinkbeast@Eugene: I was away for a while, see achutamanasa picture is the only one which we edited the back ground. The remaining pictures which i am using right now in my pages (prateeksha kashi, Vyjayanthi kashi, Shazia khan) are my own pictures which i took from that 12Mp camera. I haven't set any time and date in camera and i switched off the option as i don't want to display the time and date on the picture, is this showing some impact or so????...i really don't know now what shall i do. I took the pictures and through a card reader i uploaded them in my dell laptop which is having window OS and from their i uploaded them in my facebok and wiki...now i don't know what exactly needs to be done. :(

Regards Anjali


Hello Eugene,

I spoke to pink beast and he explained me what to do. will upload the pictures and will update in this page only.


Hello Pinkbeast (talk) and EugeneZelenko (talk)

I have uploaded the original picture of achuta manasa, could you please check this out and let me know is that picture is meeting the requirements or not.

this is the file i uploaded File:Achutamanasaa.jpg

Regarding other pictures : Vyjayanthi kashi, Prateeksha Kashi, Shazia khan :- I atteneded their performances and took the pictures Eugene, the mistake unknowingly which i did is i have that pictures in my face book page and i downloaded to my system and uploaded them to wiki commons which i could have avoided(but i really don't know about this process). I have those pictures in my hard disk ecternal, can i upload them from that to wiki directly. Please suggest me in this regard.

Regards Anjali

Re-uploaded image seems fine for me. It still misses EXIF, but probably you suppressed it generation on camera. I think it's good idea to enable it, so you'll not have hard time to guess when particular image was created :-)
Please write about re-uploaded images on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Anjali Reddy J.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello : EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much. :-)...sure will upload the other images also and mention those in the page suggested. Yeah you are absolutely correct probably i need to check that option and enable it in ma camera, otherwise it will be difficult for me also to get the exact details of the picture. Thank you for the valubale suggestions and i learned what to do and what no in wiki common. Thank you so much. Once i upload the pictures and mention the picture names will drop in a message here.

Have a great day Regards Anjali


Hello Eugene: EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

I have re-uploaded all the other pictures as well. Could you please check them and suggest me if required anything.

Theses are the files i re-uploaded

Thanks & Regards Anjali

I had some problems with request closing script, I just add my opinion on nomination page, so it'll be closed by other administrator.
Sorry for all inconveniences, but I hope, they have good side too :-) At least high-resolution images will be useful for those who will want additional post-processing or printed versions.
Thank you for sharing great images represented Indian culture!
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Eugene,: EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much for considering my request and suggested me what needs to be done Eugene. Yes you are absolutely correct everything will have a good side :-) ...i learned a lot of new things from you guys now,will implement those eventually it helps me to increas my knowledge. There are so many art forms in indian villages but didn't come to lime light, i want to contribute through wiki to those kind of traditional art forms so that the next generation will atleast come to know that such kind of art forms exists. :-)

Thank You So Much once again Eugene!!! :-)

Regards Anjali

Sure, life is changing and not necessarily to the better... And many signs of traditional life are disappearing :-(
I could suggest you to take pictures of not only art, but everyday objects (tools, houses, etc) and routines/activities (construction, repairing, agricultural, food preparation, etc) and ceremonies (wedding, child born, funerals, etc) if you'll have possibilities. It could be very interesting too!
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Eugene,: EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes you are absolutely correct not only this dance forms other traditional life's are also getting disappeared :-(...thank you, sure will take the pictures of all the suggested things infact when ever i go to the historical and heritage places i will take the monuments and also the greenary over there and also the people. As you mentioned we have different kinds of weddings here each and every religion is having their own customs so it will be evry interesting to capture that, i have done few but now i will try to capture moe of those kinds...:-)

Regards Anjali

Arnaldo Sialle[edit]

Una imagen de Arnaldo Sialle no existe más pero no era violación al Copyright ya que la había editado yo. Me gustaria saber la razón por la que fue borrada y si es posible que yo pueda subirla otra vez.

Sorry, I don't speak Spanish :-( If you took this photo, please re-upload it in original resolution with EXIF. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Alfred Romer.jpg[edit]

Здравствуйте! Хочу проконсультироваться с Вами насчёт одного из удалённых файлов, загруженных мною в Commons, мне не всё с ним ясно: Бронзовая медаль с профилем Альфреда Ромера, автопортрет, 1880, Национальный музей Литвы После того, как мне выставили предупреждение, я нашла в интернете другой ресурс, где этот файл лежит в свободном доступе, и поменяла источник в описании файла. Несмотря на это, файл всё же был удалён. Это правильно?

Думаю, тут происхождения файла неясно, да и медаль довольно рельефна, чтобы утверждать, что это двухмерное воспроизведение.
Кстати, а чем не устраивают монеты в Category:Coins of the Soviet Union? Да и отсканировать самостоятельно нетрудно. Есть участники, которые умеют делать очень хорошие фотографии монет (например, User:Komarov Nickolay).
Кроме того, надо убедится, что на изображения денег нет ограничений (Commons:Currency).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
    • Честно говоря, я немного не поняла... Если медаль не двухмерна, то что из этого может следовать? Я не так давно в Википедии, поэтому не знаю всех правил... И насчёт монет - это Вы к чему спрашивали? Tatiana Matlina (talk) 15:18, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Для двухмерных произведений есть {{PD-Art}}. Монеты и медали - всё-таки трёхмерные объекты. Сканирование трудно назвать творческим процессом, а вот фотографию - вполне.
Про монеты я, возможно, ошибся, упомянул в связи названиями файлов в запросе на удаление вместе с медалью.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

DelReqHandler issue[edit]

Hi Eugene. Any idea on how to get some attention on this issue? I don't want the DRs to pile up, but this problem has been going on for about 6 weeks now. Thanks for your time. INeverCry 19:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

I definitely had similar issue for at least last week, and many file lock problems ~ 2-3 days ago. I notified about them on wikimedia-tech IRC channel, but reply was that it known problem. Frankly, I don't know other methods to communicate with developers/sysadmins except wikitech mailing list. Bugzilla is mostly pile of requests which rarely get attention from my point of view. So I could only suggest to send letter to wikitech. However reaction may be no different then on IRC. At least developers didn't show too much enthusiasm to investigate frequent (and unlikely to by justified by real updates) pulling of bits.wikimedia.org.
I'm subscribed to wikitech mailing list, so I could send mail there.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Просьба о проверке[edit]

Добрый день! Не могли бы вы проверить законность размещения данного файла. Меня очень смущает рекламная подпись вверху фото.--Gruszecki (talk) 10:58, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Судя по описанию другого файла, подпись - это сокращение от имени и фамилии автора. Хотя не помешает попросить загрузить оригинал без оной, благо объект фотографии не так уж и труднодоступен :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Да, но не является ли это нарушением, как ВП:РЕКЛАМА? Особенно её использование в статьях. Вот я к чему веду.--Gruszecki (talk) 18:06, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Трудно сказать, насколько это реклама, скорее всего это собственное имя, и по Commons:Watermarks это не запрещено. Хотя, если по каким-то причинам участник не загрузит оригинал, надпись легко убрать кому-нибудь другому. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


File:Pfarrblatt Herz Jesu Graz 1991.jpg[edit]

Habe bereits eine Genehmigung seitens der Pfargemeinde Graz Herz-Jesu und diese auch an German persmission wikipedia geschickt (vor 2 Wochen). Bitte Dokument bzw. Bild wiederauferstehen lassen. Kann diese Gebehmigung auch an sie weiterleiten.--Hamilkar1893 (talk) 07:47, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know German :-( If permission was sent to Commons:OTRS already, plase ask help to review it and undelete image if it'll be OK on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Question[edit]

Hello honourable Mr. administrator! Could You check Special:Statistics? When You try to follow the link to the list of active users it leads to nowhere. Could you please help with this bug? Should it be posted to bugzilla? -- Jarash (talk) 17:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Хутчэй за ўсё гэтая старонка ствараецца MediaWiki аўтаматычна, адпаведна пра памылкі трэба паведамляць у Bugzilla. Калі не памыляюся, сьпіс актыўных удзельнікаў нядаўна адключылі з-за хуткадзейнасьці. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Belarusian naming[edit]

Hi Eugene, could you shine your light on Commons:Village_pump#Guideline_for_transliteration.3F. Thank you. --Foroa (talk) 05:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Map of Nanchang Metro Line 1.svg[edit]

File:Map of Nanchang Metro Line 1.svg why? is my do it。--Qa003qa003 (talk) 08:15, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

They do, but also what source? The next clear right?--Qa003qa003 (talk) 10:05, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Somebody else added that this map is based on OpenStreetMap. Please note that this is not entirely your work and OpenStreetMap uses different license. So you need to change license for this image. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
A lot of subway map with OSM, but did not explain.--Qa003qa003 (talk) 06:14, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
If you use OSM, you need to use right license and attribute properly. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:01, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

File:A3-05南昌市轨道交通2020年规划线网图.jpg etc[edit]

because File:Qingdao metro m3.jpg --Qa003qa003 (talk) 10:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

I don't see maps mentioned in {{PD-PRC-exempt}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
The following is not it?--Qa003qa003 (talk) 06:12, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Those documents is the government publicity documents, pictures inside did not mention it.--Qa003qa003 (talk) 06:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
1 and 2--Qa003qa003 (talk) 06:28, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't know Chinese :-( Please ask help of administrator who knows it. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick rename![edit]

– 296.x (talk) 16:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Svyatogorskaya Blessed Virgin.png[edit]

Вроде, же есть разрешение от мастерской Шматько? Номер в OTRS 2010081910003526. Сам сейчас проверить не могу из-за проблем с авторизацией.

У меня нет доступа к OTRS, поэтому будет лучше попросить помощи на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Mis fotos subidas a Wiki Commons[edit]

Hola amigo: Estoy totalmente confuso. He subido fotos mías y me salen unas advertencias en rojo grandísimas. Mi nivel de inglés es bajo y aún en español no entiendo lo que me piden y lo que debo hacer para que no se borren las fotos en unos días. Te rogaría me ayudases. Y es que, además, los mayores (soy septuagenario) necesitamos una ayuda especial. Muchas gracias y perdona la lata que te da este viejo-novato. Saludos cordiales.--Adolfobrigido (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Some of your uploads look like historical photos and book illustrations. You need to provide source information, so their copyright status could be determined. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Topic, please let me know, not silent I view.[edit]

Topic, please let me know, not silent I view. --Qa003qa003 (talk) 06:30, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Russia-Moscow-Emperor Alexander II Monument-1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Russia-Moscow-Emperor Alexander II Monument-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Clarissy. 14:19, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Mark Humphrey at St James Theatre.jpg[edit]

Dear Admin Zelenko,

This image is from a new 1 month old flickr account and bears the copyright owner's name. If you think it belongs to the copyright owner, please feel free to pass it. If not, please tag it with npd. I'm not sure what to do as there is no metadata or contact address and when I see images like this I assume its meant to promote this person's profile. But if he owns the rights, then I suppose its OK. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Looks like promotional photo made by hired photographer. At least set of images on Flickr is quite large and consistent. I think will be good idea to look on other places like Facebook, Twitter, etc for same person and see if these account will refer to Flickr one, just to check for imposter. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
  • OK, thank you, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:35, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Why was the Logo deleted?[edit]

Hi Eugene, I just saw that you deleted the Picture of a Bandlogo I uploaded today (for the article of the band Mor Dagor). I got the affirmation of the Owner of the Logo to upload it on the Wikipedia Article. So what do I have to do in order to get the Picture uploaded?! I put the note about the authors affirmation into the file's description. And why does the use of an unlicensed logo for example in the german wikipedia article of the band "Darkthrone" work? Please help me with this, because it's frustrating if you try to support the growth of wikipedia but not getting supported on your own. --Capriphonus (talk

Please ask band member to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Some logos may be trivial and fall under {{PD-textlogo}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

WALS deletion[edit]

WALS images such as the one you deleted at File:TOnedistribution.jpg are CC. Kwamikagami (talk) 02:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

This map is based on Google Maps which is not freely licensed. You could create similar image based on OpenStreetMap. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

files from Perozopeligroso[edit]

First, sorry for my bad english. You have write to me that

may be deleted because missing information. I don't know what are these missing information. I have created these files and then I have uploaded whith UploadWizard. As you can see the field "source" and "author" are filled. I am not an expert. Maibe the field "permission" is required? Can you suggest an appropriate value? Please help me!

  • =={{int:filedesc}}==
  • {{Information
  • |description={{en|1=Junkers Ju 488}}
  • |date=2013-04-27 17:11:46
  • |source={{own}}
  • |author=[[User:Perozopeligroso|Perozopeligroso]]
  • |permission=
  • |other_versions=
  • |other_fields=
  • }}
  • =={{int:license-header}}==
  • {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}
  • [[Category:Uploaded with UploadWizard]]
  • [[Category:Junkers Ju 488]]

--Perozopeligroso (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

These files are definitely historical photos. You need to find out date of creation and country of origin information and original photographers if possible. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Почему удалены медиа-файлы?[edit]

На все удаленные файлы имеются права собственности! http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Chronograph Valery Galaktionov (talk) 16:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Загруженные Вами файлы — явная корпоративная реклама. Вы можете попросить юридический отдел послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). После за помощью обратитесь в Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Renaming information request[edit]

You have been identified as someone who does a large number of renames. If you could visit meta:Rename practices and explain your renaming practices and policy, we would appreciate the effort. We are making this request to help us better understand local renaming practices as we work towards SUL finalization. Thank you for your time and feel free to contact me if you have any questions. MBisanz talk 22:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Eric Walter renaming request[edit]

Hi, as you suggested, I USURP the name used on English Wikipedia and SUL. It has just be done so hope that my rename request will be now possible. Regards. --Eric Walter (talk) 08:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Merci ! --Eric Walter (talk) 15:56, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Forced user renames coming soon for SUL[edit]

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to translate and review the notification that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames. You may also want to help with the pages m:Rename practices and m:Global rename policy. Thank you, Nemo 12:58, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Photos the Chacal & Yakarta[edit]

Hola(Hello) no entiendo el motivo(motive) del borrado(delete) de las fotos(photos) de(the) Chacal & Yakarta. No hablo(speaking) Ingles(English), buscame a alguien parcial que hable los dos idiomas Spanish y English. Saludos(Good Bye)

You could find Spanish-speaking administrators on Commons:List of administrators by language.
You could upload original photos with EXIF to confirm your authorship. If you part of a gropup, you could send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of Vitorias e Patrimonio.jpg[edit]

Hi Eugene,
How can I restore the file? The deleted photo is an snapshot of one of the TV
programs and all the credits belong to the respective owners, in this case
the TV broadcaster "Benfica TV" and its holder "Sport Lisboa e Benfica".
Thank You

Please read Commons:Licensing. You could upload non-free images to projects which allow them (like English Wikipedia). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Modalines[edit]

La foto è stata rilasciata con licenza CC by SA come risulta da http://www.modalines.it/camerinovirtualefoto.html Aspetto la risposta e poi ricarico la foto.Mizardellorsa 16:05, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't speak Italian :-( I don't think that image itself and part of it is clear. Most likely it advertisement. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Optim Consult[edit]

Здравствуйте. Зачем Вы удалили наши медиафайлы. Наш логотип, наши сертификаты? Логотип, сканкопии документов, видео, является собственностью компании.

Думаю, что значимость Вашей компании несколько сомнительна. Вряд ли для иллюстрации статьи о компании нужно такое количество сертификатов. На оформление нетривиальных компания авторских прав не имеет, т. к. они созданы другими организациями. Кроме того, для действия от имени компании нужно подтверждать юридическим отделом через Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Размещая информацию о компании, мы стремились осветить её деятельность максимально подробно, чтобы каждый читатель Википедии мог получить исчерпывающую информацию, даже, не заходя на сайт. Мы старались сделать не только всесторонне по информации, но и красиво, чтобы читатель не искал ничего дополнительного. Всё таки сейчас статья смотриться куцо, а до этого, нам удалось сделать её более наглядной и полезной. В правилах мы не нашли запрета на вывешивание сертификатов, грамот, инфографики и видео? Может мы не там читали? Укажите нам пожалуйста, что посмотреть? Убедительно просим Вашего разрешения вернуть информацию в том виде, в котором она была размещена до модерации.

Не стоит забывать, что "краткость - сестра таланта". Думаю, что сертификаты могут быть интересны только или партнёрским компаниям или контролирующим органам. Но для этого есть сайт или оригиналы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Полностью согласны. Мы убрали раздел 8 про сертификаты. Полностью. Скажите, можно ли нам оставить другую информацию, она ведь не расходится с "краткость - сесетра таланта"? Мы смотрели разделы о компаниях.... и везде есть логотипы, а нам убрали. Наверное, сертификаты смутили? Теперь их нет, можно остальное поставить как было? Было же красиво и наглядно?

Как я уже упоминал, на произведения, созданные компанией (это включает логотипы, ракламу, и т. д.), необходимо послать разрешение от юристов в Commons:OTRS (образец: Commons:Email templates). Но не забывайте, что это разрешение дасть возможность использовать материалы любым пользователям (включая конкурентов) в любых целях. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Мы готовы согласиться с тем, чтобы убрать сертификаты, но как можно разместить информацию без логотипа? Это тоже краткость? Не кажется Вам это банальным перебором. Нет в википедии компаний, без логотипов! А что касается видео презентации компании, то может кто то не хочет читать, он хочет посмотреть и всё понять из видео? Касательно фотографии здания... мы находимся в Китае, и люди просят высылать им фотографию здания, потому как по-китайски они не говорят, а ориентироваться как-то надо... Давайте всё таки вставим и его, как думаете? Это же рационально.

Если логотип нетривиален, то Вы можете загрузить его в те проекты, которые разрешают несвободные изображения. Например в Википедию на русском языке. Если фотография здания сделана Вами лично, то загружайте. На все произведения компании должно быть разрешение, как я уже писал выше. Думаю, что для видео-рекламы лучше использовать другие сайты: компании, YouTube, и т. д. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

This DR[edit]

Dear Admin Zelenko,

Please feel free to comment on the DR above. Perhaps I was wrong in tagging the image in the DR?

As for this image below, would you consider flickrpassing it as I am not familiar with this flickr account.

Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:50, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done for first. I think it's good idea to verify no copyrights notice in source book. Flickr is secondary source. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank You for your comments. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Logo Fondation FDJ[edit]

Why did you remove "Logo Fondation FDJ"? It wasn't a Copyright violation.--Julie89 (talk) 10:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Could you please be more specific about file name? I could not find such file in your deleted contributions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

image concern[edit]

Hi Eugene, you have nominated several images of mine in my article for deletion, siting a possible copyright issue. However, all images noted in my article are painted by me and are my own work. thank you, Michael

Please send identity confirmation letter to Commons:OTRS. You could ask confirmation verification and images undeletion on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Bots/Requests/Smallbot 9[edit]

Is it good to go?Smallman12q (talk) 14:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

x 2.Smallman12q (talk) 23:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
x 3. And also Commons:Bots/Requests/Smallbot (10).Smallman12q (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

voting[edit]

More than one year ago there was an community consensus on voting analysis, see Commons talk:Requests and votes#Comment on election analysis, but you still insist on your personal point of view as everyone can see at Commons:Administrators/Requests/Ralf Roletschek.

Please change your behaviour according to community consensus! a×pdeHello! 17:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for reminding. I'll try to not forget next time. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Mig.jpg[edit]

Hi Eugene, FYI we're also discussing a bunch of other files by the same uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Selvportræt af mig 2012.png. De728631 (talk) 19:46, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for help! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Crystal Palace F.C.[edit]

Thanks for your warning. Please note if I breached the copyright, why is the new badge now on the page? Also please note I asked on the help page for someone to add the correct license. Please remove your warning.--Rockybiggs (talk) 13:38, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Because English Wikipedia allow non-free media. Commons doesn't. See Commons:Licensing for details. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Pictures of Gregory 14[edit]

All of the pictures I uploaded may be not deleted because it date before 1923 so unless copyright. The problem is most the pictures of the writers upload from wikipédia in English. Gregory 14 (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

{{PD-US}} is applicable only to works created in US. Commons and English Wikipedia rules may be different in this respect. See Commons:Licensing for details. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Flickr human review[edit]

There are 11 .ogv extension files that my computer cannot access and mark in the flickr human review category above. If you can mark them--or know someone that can mark them--please pass this message to them mark them. If not, I'm afraid the files will remain here for quite some time taking up this category. My computer cannot access ogv files and its old, I'm afraid. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, it's not easy for me to find time to review video :-( You could try to software mentioned in Commons:Software#Ogg Theora (video). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Perhaps you know someone who can view and mark the video. My computer is old unfortunately. Just a suggestion. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:52, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
    I could not suggest :-( But you could leave files unreviewed, so somebody else could review later. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
I will do as you suggest. On another matter, see below...on Armenia FOP

File:Armenian Presidential Palace.jpg[edit]

This image was restored because Armenia now has full Freedom of Panorama due to a recent change in this country's laws. Sadly, the rest of the former Soviet Union's states still don't but at least its progress. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

So will be good idea to review related deletion requests. However amendment text is only in Armenian :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

a heads-up[edit]

In 2011 you participated in Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb_(de-adminship 2). That discussion ended with User:Jcb losing his administrator privileges.

This note is to inform you that User:Odder proposed Jcb have unconconditional access to administrator privileges restored.

Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (readmin) is scheduled to close on May 20th.

Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 23:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Help needed (again) :)[edit]

Hello Eugene! I'd like to ask for your ru-language skills again. If you find the time, could you please have a look here and check for notability and/or what categories apply? Thanks a bunch!! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:37, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

There is no article about company in Russian Wikipedia. Company seems to be yet another incarnation of TicketMaster. I nominated all files for deletion because of notability and missing permission in Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Fast and furious :-) Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

A brief comment on FOP in Armenia[edit]

This link is the earliest discussion that I know of on Commons about the new FOP law in Armenia. In it, user Vacio gives an English translation of the Armenian text. Then Carl Lindberg says that through Google Translate, it appears that the Armenian government has 'deleted the "for non-commercial purposes"' portion of the old law. So, it appears clear that by May 1, 2013, there was full FOP for outdoor artworks in Armenia. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Finite Automata - Recurse.jpg deletion[edit]

Hi Eugene, I am the copyright holder for this file. File:Finite Automata - Recurse.jpg

It was deleted, twice. What do I have to do to prove I created this artwork so it won't keep getting deleted?

--DomPrice (talk) 18:00, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

I think you or band need to send confirmation to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could use Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard to review confirmation and undelete images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DR?[edit]

Hi, you appear to have not finished creating a DR on File:Boys out.jpg. I have reverted the notice on this basis. Thanks -- (talk) 06:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

My picture will be deleted[edit]

Hi, some of my pictures are mine and some are other but I don't know how to put a license to it or something and where to put in?

--Puunbatu (talk) 06:13, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

I think will be good idea to explain what is written in each sample. As well as to try to find some historical documents/books in this language. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Vue de l'hôpital Bicestre & cie[edit]

Hi!

Thanks for your message and help. I'm new on Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Are my changes about sources and author are ok?

Thanks

Please fix date field. You should specify date of creation there for historical photos or paintings reproduction. Please also consider to use creator templates for source field. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Information about Burbles[edit]

Dear Eugene Zelenko, I'd like to know what information is missing in the page of this file so it won't be erased. The photograpy was taken by the user who uploaded it and it's under a Creative Commons license.

Thank you for your help. Miketanis (talk) 20:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

It looks like historical promo photo. If user is really photographer, he/she could confirm this via commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Dear Eugene, thank you for your response. I'm the fotography's owner and I've already made my statement (declaration of consent email) to commons:OTRS. What am I supposed to do now? --Carlos Cobas (talk) 22:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Please clarify: do you photograph or copyrights (photographer or you hired photographer)? You could request furhter assitence on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Bots/Requests/UWCTransferBot[edit]

А не пора ли уже закрыть заявку?--Anatoliy (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Всё-таки стоит привлечь участников к проверке предлагаемых к переносу изображений. Например, в File:UaMigrGrowth.PNG отсутствует ссылка, в File:Алака1.JPG - перепутаны {{own}} и автор (и прямая ссылка на автора бы не помешала), File:Одеський аероклуб - 1912.jpg была сделана в Российской империи.
Мне кажется, что если подобные проблемы не будут исправлены в украинской Википедии, то здесь вероятность их исправления ещё меньше.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Non Urbanism (MONU cover April 17 2012).jpg[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko. Please let me know why this image was deleted although it has OTRS permission. Thank you. --Krd 15:43, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, It was my mistake. I restored file. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you. :) --Krd 16:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

user atcace file delete[edit]

i am confirming i am the owner of the content posted under the user name atcace. there is no reason to delete the files, attempting to upload high quality content to commons and it does not need to be deleted.

thank you, austin calhoon

Please use Commons:OTRS or license statement on your web site to confirm permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Mister hurry[edit]

One day to tell me that a file doesn't have any license, and the next day, it's deleted. What are you doing Mister hurry. Calm down and let people answer before deleting File:Fgmat.png within 24h. Thank you and have a nice day. --Zorion (talk) 01:14, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Read this : Unless permission is granted, the file can be speedy deleted seven days after this template was added.

I think for such cases permission should be processed before uploading. Anyway, you could request undeletion after resolving permission issues. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Before giving advices, admit your error first, and do your job properly by following your own rules. --Zorion (talk) 15:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Everybody could make mistakes, including me and you. I don't think that digging into who made mistake first will provide any constructive results. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Not agree with you, admitting its own mistakes is constructive, wasn't questioning who made a mistake first. I just said, before giving advice on somebody's mistake, admit yours. --Zorion (talk) 15:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
I don't feel that I'm 100% right in my actions, but I could say same about your actions. As I wrote, continuing such discussion will not help to resolve problem with image. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Undelete? - Files from archives of Perrier family[edit]

Dear Mr Zelenko,

Allow me to introduce myself as a student of art history at the American University of Paris and the Université Paris-Sorbonne, currently researching the history of the Perrier family (Robert, Madeleine and Marie-Jacques Perrier).

I see that all of the photos and advertisements I posted on Wikipedia Commons were deleted, somewhat unnecessarily as they are all my personal property, belonging to the archives of the Perrier family of which I am the sole proprietor since 2009.

Might you please be so kind as to undelete these files? It would be greatly appreciated.

Do not hesitate to contact me directly should you require anything further.

Yours sincerely,

Will Inrig.

User: Lencloitre

American University of Paris Université Paris-Sorbonne

winrig@gmail.com

If you a heir to family, please send confirmation to Commons:OTRS, then you could request undeletion on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. If not, I don't think that you have right to license photos, unless they are in public domain (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory for details). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

File:CA Guaraní.png[edit]

hi friend, you deleted this file File:CA Guaraní. png uploaded by me, claiming violation of rights, obviously this does not occur, since this logo was developed and designed by me, with intention to promote a small football team of Paraguay.

I think confirmation of your words from club legals or owners via Commons:OTRS will be best way to resolve a problem. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Euskal jainkoen familia.png[edit]

Hi Eugène,

I see you marked File:Euskal jainkoen familia.png as no permission. Since then we received a permission on OTRS which I am processing. But before validating it I’d like to know why you marked it as no permission − as far as I can see after a quick GoogleImage check, the media has not been published before on the web. Therefore, I don’t really see why we doubt the uploader word. What am I missing here?

Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 16:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

This image could originate from book or be compilation of book illustrations (sure, public domain is possible source too). If it's entirely uploader vision of deities, question is how accurate it's. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Question is, how a such image can be displayed for months in 15 different WPs and 180 pages without being withdrawn or questionned ? Think about it. --Zorion (talk) 15:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Cavid Süleymanlı[edit]

This user has deleted templates, so get repeat. These files are already in the discussion.--Ray Garraty (talk) 16:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Origati[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Origati

Hello,

Please I would like to understand why you removed files covered by freedom of panorama in Israel?


SemiPD-icon.svg

Israel

The reproduction of this architectural work, work of sculpture or work of applied art, is covered under the Israeli copyright statute (2007), which states that "Broadcasting, or copying by way of photography, drawing, sketch or similar visual description, of an architectural work, a work of sculpture or work of applied art, are permitted where the aforesaid work is permanently situated in a public place." (paragraph 23)
See Commons:Freedom of panorama#Israel and Commons:De minimis#Israel for more information.

العربية | English | עברית | Հայերեն | italiano | русский | +/−

I would be happy to know your explanations.

thank you very much.

Djampa (talk) 05:32, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Could you please clarify which set of files you referred to? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
I've responded to Djampa's question on my talk. This is how I interpreted the DR when closing it as delete. INeverCry 15:37, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:USA-Santa Barbara-Mission-2.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:USA-Santa Barbara-Mission-2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:USA-San Jose-Old Santa Clara County Court House-5.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:USA-San Jose-Old Santa Clara County Court House-5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:USA-San Jose-Hayes Mansion-Conference Hall-3.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:USA-San Jose-Hayes Mansion-Conference Hall-3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:02, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Переименование аккаунта[edit]

Приветствую! Последний год я нахожусь в армии, поэтому не мог следить за процессом глобализации аккаунтов. Так, я не смог вовремя позаботиться о приведении всех своих учётных записей в разных проектах к единому наименованию. По сути, наибольшую активность я имею в Русской Википедии как Сидик из ПТУ и в Коммонз как Sidik iz PTU. Сейчас эти учётки в разных глобальных записях, я подал запрос на включение вклада Sidik iz PTU в Сидик из ПТУ, но не дождался никакой реакции бюрократов. Возможно, это уже невыполнимо технически - полностью ознакомиться с нюансами сложившейся ситуации я не могу и не могу по сей день, так как ещё в армии и доступ к Интернету у меня крайне не постоянный. В то же время я видел как в РуВики аналогичные процедуры выполняются и сейчас. Вы можете мне помочь? Хотя бы авторитетно заявить, что привязать вклад старой учётки к новой невозможно никакими путями? Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Сделано. Вам надо ещё будет подать запрос на переименование учётной записи в английской Википедии. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Большое спасибо! Буду продолжать наводить порядок в своих учётках. Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 09:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)