User talk:Explicit

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


File:Haruka Shimada at Tokyo Auto Salon Singapore.jpg[edit]

Dear Explicit,

If you can verify that this image is free, please consider passing it. If not, please fail it. It appears to be a useful image. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

  • Thank You for your help. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:53, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Shaun Wallace.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Shaun Wallace.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SolomanMcKenzie (talk) 10:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Tistory blog consult[edit]

As another Tistory blog reviewer what is your thoughts on this blog: http://hdpics.tistory.com/267

There is a CCL icon indicating CC-BY 4.0 but at the bottom there is "CopyRight © 2015-2016, HDPICS All Right Reserved". Is this another, they didn't understand what they are doing situation? If so there are hundreds of images from this site that need to be DR'ed which is why I would appreciate a second opinion on this before going through with such a thing. --Majora (talk) 20:53, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

@Majora: The copyright statement is produced by the layout itself, created by Studio 8. That statement does not apply the contents of the blog, which is posted by HDPICS under a Creative Commons license. xplicit 23:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Oh good. I was worried there for a second. Thanks for the explanation. Tistory is quite the confusing site sometimes. --Majora (talk) 02:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

File:VOISPER (보이스퍼) Missing U (꺼내보면) (Live Ver.).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:VOISPER (보이스퍼) Missing U (꺼내보면) (Live Ver.).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 19:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Bonobono tistory blog[edit]

Hi Explicit. I was wondering if I could get another tistory consult. This time for the bonobono blog. The guestbook has a recent line by the blog owner that says "사진을 상업적 용도로 사용하시는게 아니면 사용하셔도 됩니다" which translates to "Do not use the photo for commercial purposes." Because the original comment is secret I don't know if that only applies to a singular image, a singular blog post, or the entire blog. From what I can tell most of the blog posts are under the CC-BY 4.0 license (if you go by the CCL icon) but that blog post has me really concerned now. There are almost 800 images from this blog on Commons so for this one, like the last one, I would really appreciate a second opinion from someone I know knows what they are doing. Thought? Is that enough to DR all the images we have from there? --Majora (talk) 05:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

@Majora: It translates as "If the picture is not used commercially, you can use it." A few years ago, a similar situation occurred and all the photos from a blog were deleted, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images from toto1024.tistory.com. Personally, I don't agree with this approach. In addition to Creative Commons licenses being irrevocable, Creative Commons also states, Central to our licenses is the grant of a standard set of permissions in advance, without requiring users to ask for permission or seek clarification before using the work. Prior to the photographer's comment, there was no indication of any restriction on commercial use. In my opinion, photos uploaded to the blog prior to June 13, 2018, are fine, but all posts after that date are not. Others would disagree and would opine all uploads from this blog should be deleted. Ultimately, I think that's an approach that should be made individually. xplicit 01:42, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
@Explicit: I uploaded some images from the blog june 15, but I wasn't aware of this situation (I didn't have bad faith), since there is no general notice on the blog, and the source page still have cc-by icon (unlike flickr and youtube). Puramyun31 (talk) 02:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
@Puramyun31: It's probably best to mark those files for deletion using {{SD|G7}}, as those definitely wouldn't survive a deletion request. xplicit 02:15, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you Explicit. I think I'll go with that way forward. No need to remove the entire blog (I'm aware that CC isn't revocable) but from now on we really don't know. As for uploads after June 13, I'm not actually seeing any. There have only been two posts since that date on that blog and the images don't seem to be on Commons. I'm also not seeing any in your uploads, Puramyun31. Perhaps you are thinking of a different blog? In any case, it looks like we are good to go here. I'll keep an eye out for any additional uploads from this blog and act accordingly. Thanks again. --Majora (talk) 02:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Ooops, the files was posted on the blog at may 26 2018. so the declaration on the guestbook (june 13 2018) doesn't apply to this files (since cc-by license is irrevocable). Puramyun31 (talk) 02:50, 17 June 2018 (UTC)