User talk:Fæ

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

for older archives, see User talk:Fæ/2021, User talk:Fæ/2020, User talk:Fæ/2019, et seq.


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jaqen (talk) 07:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Subway system in Hong Kong (2886566102).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Subway system in Hong Kong (2886566102).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Enyavar (talk) 19:53, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of James Weldon Johnson LCCN2004663098.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Portrait of James Weldon Johnson LCCN2004663098.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FMSky (talk) 01:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:CID Aircraft slap-down DVIDS706296.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:CID Aircraft slap-down DVIDS706296.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Askeuhd (talk) 06:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ICRC Newsroom copyright[edit]

Hi Fae. I see that way back in 2014 you had some dealings with the ICRC about copyright. Given your experience, would you mind giving a view on whether my interpretation of the ICRC Newsroom copyright "rights-free material", different from the main ICRC website, is correct.

As a test example for discussion I've uploaded a single photo File:ICRC buses for evacuation convoy from Mariupol to Zaporizhzhia.jpg. I've taken their top of page copyright statement "Preview and download rights-free material" to be PD per our Template:Copyrighted free use. They appear to want free use by the media, so I think this is in the spirit the ICRC Newsroom wants, as well as their text. Unfortunately their copyright page is unhelpful gibberish, other than repeating in the page header "Preview and download rights-free material."

I'd welcome an opinion on whether my interpretation is valid. Or should we contact them to check? Unfortunately the photos on the ICRC Newsroom aren't that good, and they prefer video, so this isn't a goldmine. And, quite reasonably, they seem to avoid media of actual evacuation or sensitive situations, eg just doing before and after media for an evacuation convoy.

Thanks, Rwendland (talk) 15:40, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fæ left the project last year, you will probably not get an answer from them. --C.Suthorn (talk) 17:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hinein in die Kommunistischen Partei Deutschlands! (joint the German Communist Party) Art.IWMPST7847.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Hinein in die Kommunistischen Partei Deutschlands! (joint the German Communist Party) Art.IWMPST7847.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 09:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]