User talk:F l a n k e r

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Nuvola apps kedit.png Hi! If you want to send me a message, please send it to my Italian discussion page here. Thank you!

File:Coat of arms of the Holy See.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Coat of arms of the Holy See.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bellae artes (talk) 01:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Vexilloid of the Roman Empire.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vexilloid of the Roman Empire.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TcfkaPanairjdde (talk) 15:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Help[edit]

Can you create a file with the image-run Russian field marshal to illustrate a series of articles. Appearance overhead of Field Marshal (images can not be loaded because of copyright), you can see here and here (with crossed staves). --Kolchak1923 (talk) 09:09, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

  • First: Yes, you need a left version with batons.

Second: Lace need right. Third: What is the photo you are interested in? --Kolchak1923 (talk) 13:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


File tagging File:Coat of arms of the Vatican City.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of the Vatican City.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Amadscientist (talk) 06:15, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


File tagging File:Emblem of the Papacy SE.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Emblem of the Papacy SE.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Amadscientist (talk) 06:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Nastro Jugoslavia.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nastro Jugoslavia.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Flor!an (talk) 08:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Article5 medal.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Article5 medal.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Flor!an (talk) 08:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Not Article5 medal.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Not Article5 medal.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Flor!an (talk) 08:46, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of Archduchy of Austria (1894 - 1918).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flag of Archduchy of Austria (1894 - 1918).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ÄDA - DÄP (talk) 15:49, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Retroactive licensing changes to more restrictive licenses[edit]

Generally not allowed, except in certain special cases which have been discussed in an appropriate forum here beforehand... AnonMoos (talk) 14:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure that I personally have a problem, but I noticed several others reverting your changes, and according to general policies they're entitled to do so. AnonMoos (talk) 18:14, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Logo for Wikivoyage[edit]

Hey Flanker. We are wanting to use this derivative work of your image as the logo for Wikivoyage. Would you be willing to give rights to it to the Wikimedia Foundation as described here [1]? Not sure if you have already. Thanks James Heilman, MD (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

If you could also reply here that would be great [2] James Heilman, MD (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of the United Kingdom (3-2 aspect ratio).svg[edit]

Sorry, but the file you uploaded was 700% of the size of the existing file, and no explanation at all was given of the alleged improvement. You really need to say why your file might be considered superior if you're going to replace a file with one that's 7 times bigger, with no increase of detail... AnonMoos (talk) 17:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

1) You can have hundreds of kilobytes of irrelevant file bloat in an SVG file, and the file will still render to a PNG just fine -- but there are a number of people active on Commons who care about SVG coding quality, and like to keep SVG files "lean and clean" when possible (especially flag SVGs), so from that point of view replacing a clean SVG with a dirty SVG is a step backwards.
2) You still have provided no explanation whatsoever as to why your SVG might be considered superior.
3) Maybe you should have discussed the matter first on the file talk page before uploading a file version with a significantly different appearance to all previous file versions. AnonMoos (talk) 17:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

File:United Kingdom Flag Specifications.svg[edit]

That's nice, but it's a 2:1 construction sheet, and does not automatically translate to a 3:2 flag. File:Complete Guide to Heraldry Fig777.png might be more relevant... AnonMoos (talk) 17:46, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

I really do not understand the "17:46, 28 December 2012" remarks you left on my user talk page, nor can I figure out whether they are worth trying to understand. However, what I do know is that a 2:1 flag construction sheet cannot always be automatically translated to a 3:2 flag construction sheet (and certainly not in the case of the United Kingdom flag). For example, when you change 2:1 to 3:2, you can either keep the ratio of the width of the red cross strokes as a proportion of the height of the flag, or you can keep the ratio of the width of the red cross strokes as a proportion of the width of the flag, but you can't do both at the same time simultaneously. You can only do one or the other, and which one you choose to do is a matter of interpretation. There are many other interpretative decisions necessarily involved in trying to use a 2:1 flag construction sheet as a guide for a 3:2 flag.
Your version may be better in some particular details, but overall, it makes the George cross and its white fimbriation occupy a large percentage of the whole flag rectangle, crowding the blue flag field and the Andrew and so-called "Patrick" crosses into the relatively small corner rectangles. I don't think there's an official UK government 3:2 flag specification, but we do have File:Complete Guide to Heraldry Fig777.png, which purports to be a copy of an 1801 document showing the pattern of a non-2:1 flag, and it certainly doesn't show the George cross fimbriation as being nearly as wide as it is in your SVG file.
Therefore for various reasons, your SVG file does not appear to be useful in its current form under the name "File:Flag of the United Kingdom (3-2 aspect ratio).svg" at the current time -- and you really would have done well to discuss some of the issues above first, before launching an file overwrite war.
I just now uploaded a cleaned-up version of your bloated SVG file at File:Flag of the United Kingdom (3-2 aspect ratio) - alternate.svg. It is another unfortunate aspect of your recent actions that you rely on other people to do the work of cleaning up after you. AnonMoos (talk) 01:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Dude, I still have no idea whatsoever what you're talking about, and strongly doubt whether you have any idea what you're talking about. Where is this alleged non-horizontality, and how could it be produced by the following untransformed SVG path specification: M30,0V40M0,20H60? It would be nice if you had your act together so that you could work together with others without producing completely unnecessary friction accompanied by tangential nonsense. AnonMoos (talk) 20:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. As for File:United Kingdom Flag Specifications.svg, as I attempted to explain above, it's impossible to simplistically or automatically translate a 2:1 flag construction sheet into 3:2 flag construction sheet, because the proportionalities with respect to overall flag width and the proportionalities with respect to overall flag height cannot both remain the same (or the George cross will be distorted), so that some interpretive decisions need to be made. Your particular interpretive decisions no doubt seem good to you, but they result in the George cross plus its white fimbriation taking up a greater proportion of the overall 3:2 flag rectangle than they did of the overall 2:1 flag rectangle, which other people might consider a bad thing. Maybe you could answer why the George cross fimbriation is quite a bit wider in File:Flag of the United Kingdom (3-2 aspect ratio) - alternate.svg than in File:Complete Guide to Heraldry Fig777.png, which is claimed to be a copy of an 1801 specification of the flag at a ratio which is a lot closer to 3:2 than 2:1 is? -- AnonMoos (talk) 12:28, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of Jamaica (3-2 aspect ratio).svg[edit]

P.S. I won't be overwriting your file, but it seems that the yellow saltire is too narrow. AnonMoos (talk) 01:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Flags of Canada and the United States.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flags of Canada and the United States.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Canoe1967 (talk) 12:32, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of Veneto.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flag of Veneto.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

VernoWhitney (talk) 19:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Sede Vacante[edit]

Ciao, vorrei chiederti un favore. Se hai tempo, potresti migliorare lo stemma della Sede Vacante, magari a partire dall'emblema del papato che tu stesso hai creato? Questi sono i file presenti attualmente, ma di scarsa qualità: File:Sede vacante.jpg, File:Pavillon pontifical.png e File:Ombrellino-keys.svg. Grazie. --Κrepiδeia tradidi quod et accepi 23:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, AFBorchert (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Field hockey pengoal[edit]

Can you make one image similar to File:Soccerball shad check.svg for field hockey? As we already have File:Field hockey penmiss.svg. Thank you. --Aleenf1 (talk) 13:44, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Military_rank_insignia_of_the_Luftwaffe[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Military_rank_insignia_of_the_Luftwaffe has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Flor!an (talk) 20:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Leninposter.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Leninposter.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Leninposter.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Not interested, I've only retouched the image. --F l a n k e r (talk) 09:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

File:CaboBatista.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CaboBatista.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 22:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Not interested, I've only retouched the image. --F l a n k e r (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Emblem of the Vatican City (2).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Emblem of the Vatican City (2).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gambo7 (talk) 13:23, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Ciao, ho visto che hai scritto nella pagina di discussione File talk:Emblem of the Vatican City (2).svg, rispondendo ad un commento vecchio di un anno... forse intendevi scrivere qui?

--Gambo7 (talk) 20:26, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Regione-Umbria-Stemma.svg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Regione-Umbria-Stemma.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

79.22.149.137 03:36, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of Russian SFSR (1937-1954).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flag of Russian SFSR (1937-1954).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

188.226.80.44 13:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

What?!? BTW I'm not interested, I've only correct the file. ----F l a n k e r (talk) 17:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Arms of the House of Yñigo.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Arms of the House of Yñigo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lemmens, Tom (talk) 10:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of the United Nations.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flag of the United Nations.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DHeyward (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2014 (UTC)