User talk:Flappiefh

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Flappiefh!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Blason Vide 3D.svg and layers[edit]

Hi, i'm a contributor of the french Wikipedia. I just realized that you suppressed all layers information from this file. But layers are a very useful feature for artists learning heraldry. The use of the different layers is important to them, to understand where they should put the components of the coat of arms they're working on. So, can you please tell me why you deliberately deleted those layers? I'm planning to restore the file from 2006 but before that, i'd like to discuss with you, to avoid a possible edit war. --Flappiefh (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Flappiefh. Thanks for your message. My intention was remove the unused gradients and make the drawing more light and accurate. When I redrew it, I saw no reason to keep groups for layers composed by just 1 element, but I thing I get the point now. The inkscape:label (with "Fond écu", "Meubles", etc,) is also usefull to identify the layers, right? The contour and reflection layers should be locked. I'm missing anything else? If you don't mind, I'll upload a new version restoring these features from the original drawing. My appologies, and sorry for take your time. Giro720 (talk) 14:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Yes, you got the point. In the French heraldry project, we use to make coats of arms using this structure (you can see the 4 layers). The Contour and Reflet final layers must be locked, yes. OK, I let you do the job. Thanks for understanding. Bye, Flappiefh (talk) 15:22, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Kristiina Ojuland IF MOW 04-2011-crop.jpg[edit]

Sorry for disturbing, but do you plan to use this cropped version somewhere? And if yes, why this tight crop and not the original file? - A.Savin 15:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, there's no harm. I work in the French Graphic Workshop, and this cropping was one among several orders. The goal is to complete this table with pictures of identical format (1228*1818px). Unfortunately, I can't reach this format due to the dimensions of the original image. The cropping work has not been validated yet. That is why the picture is not part of any article for the moment. --Flappiefh (talk) 19:03, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
But it's still a puzzle to me, what additional value that extremely cropped version should have. (And no, I'm not a fan of planting various different versions of one shot in separate files.) - A.Savin 19:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
The cropped versions were asked to complete the facebook so every face has the same size. If it causes you trouble, I suggest you contact the person who ordered the job. Regards, Flappiefh (talk) 19:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ranger Parking Orbit-en.svg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ranger Parking Orbit-en.svg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Chapter logo for Wikimedia Cascadia?[edit]

Hi there. I see you uploaded the chapter logos for WM Canada. If you have the ability and time, would it be possible to upload logos (or other images such as banners, barnstars, etc.) for Wikimedia Cascadia? I am not familiar with how to create similar logos, so I made an appeal for assistance here. If you are not able to help, no worries, just had to ask! (I will likely ask several contributors for assistance, so it might be worth checking to see if someone else has already offered to help or has uploaded images -- thanks!) --Another Believer (talk) 22:22, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Logo tipi indien[edit]

Salut Flappieh ! Comment vas-tu ? Je te remercie d'avoir terminé cette ébauche de tipi. J'avais complètement zappé car je suis à fond sur l'armorial des familles basques, le bouquin fait plus de 400 pages et je ne suis pas sorti de l'auberge (d'autant plus que je fais pas mal d'erreurs). Je suis comme un enfant devant une montagne de jouet à Noël. En dessinant je me rends compte que j'ai fait des erreurs sur les précédents mais parfois ce sont des erreurs d'inattention et là... ce sont des spécialistes qui me font des remarques. @ + Etxeko (talk) 18:28, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Affiche WikiPermanence octobre 2013.svg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | suomi | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Affiche WikiPermanence octobre 2013.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:37, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done --Flappiefh (talk) 11:32, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Orthographic maps[edit]

As a point of curiosity, is there a reason your maps include the borders of Kosovo and Morocco/SADR, but not of say Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh, or is that just the data you have? Regards, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 19:44, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

No politics? It's like you don't want to cause trouble! Anyway, I was just curious as it's rare to see those borders on maps. Thanks, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 07:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Questions pratiques[edit]

Bonjour, Je viens de m'inscrire sur Commons pour faire de la retouche d'image, je ne peux pas trop bosser pour le moment car mon compte est trop récent et ne me permet pas d'écraser les fichiers existants, du coup je me contente de Cropbot. Je t'écris parce que j'ai une question, pour le moment je trouve les requêtes à faire dans la reserve de la section 8 requêtes. Mais je vois que pas mal d'images ont déjà été traitées (principalement des crops que tu as fait, c'est pour ça que je te demande). Est-ce qu'un bot se charge régulièrement de mettre à jour ces requêtes, ou faut-il le faire à la main de temps en temps? Qui s'occupe d'en ajouter à la catégorie? Je débarque et j'essaye de comprendre comme tout cela tourne pour pas tout désordonner. Merci en tout cas si tu trouves le moment de répondre. --Tangram (talk) 11:53, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Cool merci pour les précisions. Moi aussi je suis allé directement dans la catégorie des images à cropper, j'en ei fait un paquet mais surement pas autant que toi ^^. J'ai aussi remarqué que pas mal d'images dans cette categorie sont des vieilles gravures, et sont donc pas supposées être recadrées, je sais pas non plus si un bot les a ammenées ici. Il y a une balise à retirer si on considère que l'image ne doit finalement pas être recadrée? --Tangram (talk) 16:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
C'est vrai que dans beaucoup de cas il y a beaucoup de papier pour pas grand chose. La notice allant avec les images qui ont besoin d'êtres recadrées dit pourtant qu'il faut pas trop toucher aux gravures, notamment quand le papier contient des informations (par exemple le nombre d'exemplaires). Je bosse en ce moment chez un encadreur, et c'est vrai que pourtant en général nous on masque cette partie avec une marie-louise. On laisse quand même une marge autour de la zone d'impression (la zone renfoncée au milieu de la page), donc il y a le blanc qu'il faut. Autrement dit mon bon sens me dirait de faire la même chose, mais je vais me contenter de ne pas y toucher pour le moment. Peut-être qu'on peut poser la question en effet.

Copyright status: File:Chronoplus transport map.svg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | suomi | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chronoplus transport map.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 13:28, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

South Sudan[edit]

I have noticed that you can add the South Sudan border to this orthographic projection maps. Would you mind to the same for the below maps:

Thank you in advance, Blackfish (talk) 18:14, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Well done. Thank you again. Blackfish (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Blankmap-ao-000 -africa europe.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blankmap-ao-000 -africa europe.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Blankmap-ao-000 -africa europe.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of Oscar II of Sweden 1905-1907.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Coat of arms of Oscar II of Sweden 1905-1907.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

5.147.52.121 18:15, 26 March 2014 (UTC)