User talk:FlickreviewR/reviewed-pass

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Robot icon.svg[edit]

Why was this image added to the template without discussing it first? Is it really useful? There are many bots operating on Commons, but they don't leave any pictures of a robot after each edit. In my opinion, since checks done by FlickreviewR bot are more reliable than that of a human, the reason mentioned in the summary is not very accurate. --Kimsə (talk) 06:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

See Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Phonebook DNA.jpg. Teofilo (talk) 10:00, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
The deletion request is not connected to this template. There are hundreds of similar requests, and they're dealt with appropriately according to a case-by-case system. Therefore, I don't see any use of adding this image to the template except the amusing part of it. --Kimsə (talk) 05:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
This deletion request (or this other one : Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Web advertising consortium awards.jpg) shows that your opinion that "checks done by FlickreviewR bot are more reliable than that of a human" is inaccurate. The Flickr reviewer bot is unable to sort out pictures showing a 3-dimensional copyrighted artwork. Teofilo (talk) 05:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
The robot icon is not only "amusing". It is first of all understandable by people who do not speak/read English. Teofilo (talk) 06:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

But it is ugly! -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:21, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, I like the idea of making the template more easily understandable for people for whom English is not the first language. Can we change this image to a more suitable one though? I'm still uncomfortable with the smiling robot face, it makes this look too corny. --Kimsə (talk) 05:22, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


Please add Russian translation:
|ru=Это изображение изначально опубликованно на [[:ru:Fkickr|Fkickr]] участником проекта {{{1}}} по ссылке {{{2}}}. Оно было досмотрено {{ISOdate|{{#time:Y-m-d|{{{3}}}}}}} роботом [[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]], который подтвердил, что изображение лицензировано в соответствии с условиями {{{4}}}.

✓ Done but it seems to be only semi-protected. -- Rillke(q?) 15:19, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


{{editprotected}} Please add bn translation:
|bn=এই চিত্রটি মূলত {{{1}}} কর্তৃক [[:bn:ফ্লিকার|ফ্লিকারে]] পোস্ট করা হয়েছিল ({{{2}}})। {{ISOdate|{{#time:Y-m-d|{{{3}}}}}}} তারিখে [[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]] রোবট কর্তৃক এটি পর্যালোচনা করা হয় এবং {{{4}}} শর্তাবলীর অধীনে লাইসেন্স নিশ্চিত করা হয়। Thanks --Aftab1995 (talk) 00:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done, thank you –⁠moogsi (blah) 00:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Please update bn translation:
|bn=এই চিত্রটি প্রথম [[:bn:ফ্লিকার|ফ্লিকারে]] {{{1}}} কর্তৃক {{{2}}} -এ প্রকাশ করা হয়েছিল। [[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]] রোবট কর্তৃক {{ISOdate|{{#time:Y-m-d|{{{3}}}}}}} তারিখে এটি পর্যালোচনা করা হয় এবং {{{4}}} শর্তাবলীর অধীনে লাইসেন্স নিশ্চিত করা হয়। --Aftab1995 (talk) 16:45, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done레비Revi 04:24, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


Please add Japanese translation:
|ja=この画像は当初、{{{1}}} によって [[:ja:Flickr|Flickr]] の {{{2}}} に投稿されたものです。{{#time:Y-m-d|{{{3}}}}}}}、[[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]] ボットによってレビューされ、{{{4}}} のライセンスで提供されていることが確認されました。
Thanks.--Mugu-shisai (talk) 07:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)



Please add italian translation:

|it=Questa immagine è stata originariamente caricata su [[:it:Flickr|Flickr]] da {{{1}}} all'indirizzo {{{2}}}. È stata controllata in data {{ISOdate|{{#time:Y-m-d|{{{3}}}}}}} dal robot [[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]] ed è stato confermato il suo rilascio sotto i termini della licenza {{{4}}}.

Thanks. --Simo82 (talk) 15:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


{{sudo}} Please replace Korean translation:

|ko=이 이미지는 {{{2}}} 에서 {{{1}}}에 의하여 [[:ko:플리커|플리커]]에 처음 게시되었습니다. 이것을 [[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]] 로봇이 검토하였고, {{{4}}}의 조건에 따른 라이선스임을 확인하였습니다.

Thank you, --레비ReviD✉CM 10:06, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

✓ Doneebraminiotalk 21:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

pl version[edit]

{{sudo}} Please add Polish translation:

|pl=Ten plik, opublikowany pierwotnie w serwisie [[:pl:Flickr|Flickr]] przez {{{1}}} pod adresem {{{2}}}, został zrewidowany {{ISOdate|{{#time:Y-m-d|{{{3}}}}}}} przez robota [[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]], który potwierdził, że jest on tam dostępny na licencji {{{4}}}.

Electron   15:01, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

You should not forget template. (Added) --레비ReviD✉CM 03:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Good point! -- Rillke(q?) 22:40, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done -- Rillke(q?) 22:40, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Merge with Template:Flickrreview?[edit]

Would there be any opposition in merging this template with Template:Flickrreview. They seem to serve the same purpose. --Jarekt (talk) 14:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

In principle, I don't have any objections. However, there are some practical complications. There wouldn't be any purpose in merging it if you didn't get the operator of the FlickreviewR bot to change the bot use {{Flickrreview}} instead of {{User:FlickreviewR/reviewed-pass}}. Have you talked to him/her about that? Complicating the issue is that the this template uses different parameters and operates somewhat differently (for example, this template always reports the Flickr license that was identified by the bot at the time of the review, while {{Flickrreview}} just says "under the stated license"). —RP88 15:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Also, do you intend to handle the many other variants of this template used by the bot? —RP88 15:29, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
I did not look much into it, but merging might require changes to Template:Flickrreview as well. I was not planning to change the files (yet or ever - not sure) so the User:FlickreviewR/reviewed-pass would still be around but it would become a redirect or it would call Template:Flickrreview. As for different parameters I do prefer to state the license instead of "under the stated license". Several times I run into flickr files without licenses where original could not be found and review bot did not recorded which one of valid licenses it used. Very annoying. This proposal is a result of this discussion about cases when this template does not work correctly. As with any maintenance tasks, the easiest solution is not to maintain dozen of versions of the same code but merge templates that do the same into one. --Jarekt (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Better not touch this unless you get someone actually maintaining the Bot or someone operating an improved clone. --Denniss (talk) 17:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Error: Invalid time[edit]

Copied from COM:VP
Why is there no maintenance category for such errors? See File:Adam Dutckiewicz-masfield.jpg for an example. --Leyo 23:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Don't know why there is no maintenance category for this, but it was fixed by this edit. Lupo 09:24, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
BTW, this google search yields 2330 pages with that problem. Lupo 09:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Strange: [1]. --тнояsтеn 09:43, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
That is odd and there seem to be many causes:
--Jarekt (talk) 14:30, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
We should really rewrite User:Torben/Info to use standard templates and merge User:FlickreviewR/reviewed-pass with Template:Flickrreview. --Jarekt (talk) 14:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
In contrast to the other user template, User:Torben/Info is not used so many times. Hence, replacing them with {{Information}} might be an alternative.
@Lupo: Thanks, but I was aware of the cause and the solution. I think that creating a maintenance category is essential. --Leyo 17:18, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Any other opinions or suggestions? --Leyo 19:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

@Jarekt, Lupo: What about now, two years later? See e.g. Special:PermaLink/114509505 to confirm that there is still no maintenance category. --Leyo 15:19, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Leyo, I added support for Category:Flickr images reviewed by FlickreviewR: wrong date. --Jarekt (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. The category is about to get populated. --Leyo 23:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Estonian translation[edit]

{{editprotected}} |et={{{1}}} postitas selle pildi algselt saidile [{{{2}}} Flickr]. Robot [[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]] vaatas selle pildi üle ja kinnitas, et see oli saadaval litsentsi {{{4}}} all. <small>Vaadatud: {{ISOdate|{{#time:Y-m-d|{{{3}}}}}}}</small>

Thanks in advance! 13:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done by Ebraminio --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


{{editprotected}} |uk=Це зображення початково було завантажене користувачем {{{1}}} на [[:uk:Flickr|Flickr]] за посиланням {{{2}}}. {{ISOdate|{{#time:Y-m-d|{{{3}}}}}}} його переглянув робот [[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]] і підтвердив, що зображення ліцензоване згідно з умовами {{{4}}}.

Thanks -- Ата (talk) 18:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:06, 14 May 2015 (UTC)



|hr=Ovu je sliku na [[:en:Flickr|Flickr]]u izvorno postavio {{{1}}} {{{2}}}. [[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]] robot ju je pregledao {{ISOdate|{{#time:d-m-Y|{{{3}}}}}}} i potvrdio da da je bila licencirana pod licencijom {{{4}}}.

Thanks.--MaGa 18:13, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Awesome! Thank you! Steinsplitter (talk) 18:19, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


{{edit request}}

 |be-tarask=Гэтая выява першапачаткова была зьмешчаная на {{w|Flickr||be-tarask}} карыстальнікам {{{1}}} а {{{2}}}. Яна была прагледжаня {{ISOdate|{{#time:Y-m-d|{{{3}}}}}}} робатам карыстальніка [[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]] і пацьверджаная на ўмовах ліцэнзіі {{{4}}}.

Thanks in advance, Renessaince (talk) 03:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Done, thanks! — regards, Revi 09:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


{{edit request}} Please add the following German translation:

|de=Diese Bilddatei wurde ursprünglich auf [[:de:Flickr|Flickr]] durch {{{1}}} in {{{2}}} hochgeladen. Sie wurde am {{ISOdate|{{#time:d-m-Y|{{{3}}}}}}} durch den [[User:FlickreviewR|FlickreviewR]]-Bot geprüft und die Lizenzierung der Datei unter den Bedingungen von {{{4}}} wurde bestätigt.

Thanks in advance. --Furfur (talk) 02:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done --Jarekt (talk) 13:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


@Jarekt: Somehing went wrong with this edit. A date is now showign up below the template. See File:Fungus Weevil Ischnocerus impressicollis (Anthribidae) (14364594420).jpg#Licensing. Josve05a (talk) 10:19, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Josve05a, Thanks for alerting me. It is fixed now. --Jarekt (talk) 12:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)