User talk:Frank-m

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wappen Ibersheim[edit]

Hallo Frank-m, Dein Wappen zu Ibersheim ist das der Stadtverwaltung von Worms und im Vergeich zu dem der früheren Ortsgemeinde schlecht. Die Bilder der Mannheimer Christuskirche bitte ich zu überprüfen. Nach meiner Meinung gehören nicht alle Figuren mit dieser Bezeichnung zu dieser Kirche. ~~Edmund Ritscher~~

Hallo Edmund, schau bei Ibersheim mal auf das Hochladedatum :-) Es gab hier Zeiten, da wurde jedes noch so erdenklich schlechte Wappen hochgeladen, weil es es besser als nichts war; bessere Wappen sind natürlich jederzeit gerne willkommen. Deinen Hinweis zur Christuskirche verstehe ich nicht, welche Figur gehört nicht zur Kirche (bitte mit Link)? Grüße --Frank (talk) 22:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Ziegenskulptur in Ladenburg.JPG[edit]

Zunächst mal herzlichen Dank fürs korrigieren und ergänzen. Weißt Du zufällig, ob die Ziege auch von Karl Ulrich Nuss ist? Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Hallo 4028mdk09, nein, das weiß ich leider nicht. Mein Führer zu Ladenburg schweigt sich über die Ziege aus. Grüße --Frank (talk) 20:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Danke. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Nachtrag: lt. Stadtinformation stammt die Ziege von Eckard Schembs / Worms. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 09:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Datumsangabe[edit]

Hallo Frank!

Erstmal danke für deine Beiträge!

Ein wichtige Anregung: Bitte verwende als Datumsformat bitte YYY-MM-DD (Beispiel: 2011-04-23) statt die ausgeschriebene Variante in Worten. Hier habe ich das Aufnahmedatum entsprechend geändert.

Danke für deine Unterstützung!

Viel Spaß bei deinen weiteren (sehr guten) Beiträgen!

Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 14:38, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Hallo High Contrast, kein Problem, kann ich machen. Grüße --Frank (talk) 14:46, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Danke[edit]

hier- und hierfür. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 22:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Keine Ursache und den Dank gebe ich gerne zurück: ich plane gerade einen Artikel zu der Kirche und es ist toll, dass es schon so viele Bilder dazu gibt. Grüße --Frank (talk) 21:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen Brühl(Baden).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wappen Brühl(Baden).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Perhelion (talk) 15:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen Brühl(Baden).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wappen Brühl(Baden).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Perhelion (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Deletion[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:File:Luguelín Santos.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:File:Luguelín Santos.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Osplace (talk) 14:18, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Auxiliary_bishops_of_Freiburg[edit]

Category discussion warning

Auxiliary bishops of Freiburg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Schubbay (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Ev. Kirche Gauangelloch 1832[edit]

Hallo Frank-m,

handelt es sich bei den von Ihnen hochgeladenen Bildern mit den Plänen zur ev. Kirche Gauangelloch 1832 tatsächlich -wie angegeben- um diese und nicht eher um die katholische Kirche? Ist Ihnen hier eine Prüfung möglich? In jedem Fall Danke für den Upload!

Hallo, es ist schon die evangelische Kirche. Wichtig ist aber der Zusatz "Entwurf", die Kirche wurde nie in dieser Form ausgeführt. Grüße --Frank (talk) 13:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Jules-Rimet-Pokal.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Jules-Rimet-Pokal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 10:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Culture_of_Ludwigshafen[edit]

Category discussion warning

Culture of Ludwigshafen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


PanchoS (talk) 12:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Coats_of_arms_from_Ludwigshafen[edit]

Category discussion warning

Coats of arms from Ludwigshafen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


PanchoS (talk) 12:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Buses_in_Ludwigshafen[edit]

Category discussion warning

Buses in Ludwigshafen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


PanchoS (talk) 12:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Trams_in_Ludwigshafen[edit]

Category discussion warning

Trams in Ludwigshafen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


PanchoS (talk) 12:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Wappen Neustadt.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wappen Neustadt.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fränsmer (talk) 11:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:51. Maimarkt-Turnier[edit]

Noue kommt. :)) Zwiadowca 21 17:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827-02.png[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827-02.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827-02.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827.png[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Gaiberg-Peterskirche-1833.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Gaiberg-Peterskirche-1833.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Natuur12 (talk) 20:52, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Mannheim-sunshine-live.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mannheim-sunshine-live.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vera (talk) 12:22, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:German_Strikes_-_Öffentlicher_Dienst_2006[edit]

Category discussion warning

German Strikes - Öffentlicher Dienst 2006 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sturm (talk) 07:08, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Wappen Russheim.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wappen Russheim.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BlueBreezeWiki (talk) 16:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Sina Dostert.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sina Dostert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

David Slusky (talk) 11:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Monika Sozanska.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Monika Sozanska.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

David Slusky (talk) 11:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Die Staufer und Italien 3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Die Staufer und Italien 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Category:Peter_Hofmann[edit]

Category discussion warning

Peter Hofmann has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


2A02:908:D83:E460:216:CBFF:FEAD:FF9 22:31, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers[edit]

Commons File mover.svg

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Mannheim-Adler-Stoff.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mannheim-Adler-Stoff.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:50, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Wappen Breitenheim.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wappen Breitenheim.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GerritR (talk) 19:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Wappen Desloch.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wappen Desloch.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GerritR (talk) 20:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Wappen Loellbach.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wappen Loellbach.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GerritR (talk) 09:24, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Wappen Oberhausen bei Kirn.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wappen Oberhausen bei Kirn.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 21:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)