User talk:Frank Behnsen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Frank Behnsen!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Frank Behnsen!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 08:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Done. — Frank Behnsen (talk) 21:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

File:SI Nikolaikirche-Laengsschnitt Ludorff 1903.png[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please use the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Done. — frank (talk) 17:26, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 04:49, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Freut mich, danke! — frank (talk) 05:25, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Auferstehungskirche (Frankfurt-Praunheim)[edit]

Hallo Frank Behnsen,

kann es sein, das du bei der Kirche die Sakrestei (links neben der Kirche) und auch die Rückseite vergessen hast? Innen ist diese auch auch schön. Am WE ist diese immer geöffnet --Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 19:43, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Woelle, das habe nicht vergessen; meine Fotos davon sind wegen des Sonnenstandes an dem Tage nur leider nichts geworden, so dass ich sie nicht hochgeladen habe. Dankeschön für den Tip mit den Öffnungszeiten der Kirche; das wusste ich noch nicht – das werde ich bald nachholen. Übrigens: Ich fotografiere sehr gerne für die Wikipedia und bin in der wärmeren Jahreszeit deswegen oft mit der Kamera in Frankfurt unterwegs. Wenn Du einen Foto-Wunsch für Wikipedia-Themen rund um Frankfurt hast, teile ihn mir bitte an dieser Stelle mit; ich werde versuchen, ihn zu erfüllen. Viele Grüße zurück, — frank (talk) 20:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Frank, vielen Dank für dein Angebot. Mir fallen da sofort ein paar Sachen ein: Liste der Kulturdenkmäler in Frankfurt-Praunheim (ua. Gebäude in der Kolbenbergstraße und Fachwerkhäuser im Ortskern), Alt-Praunheim (Wichtige Gebäude), Praunheimer Brücke (Besseres Bild für Grundsteine), Praunheimer_Landstraße (fehlende Kirchen und wichtige Gebäude) und das Neubaugebiet in Praunheim.--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 21:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Okay, ist notiert.  :^) — frank (talk) 14:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
ggf, mich ansprechen, ich wohne in Praunheim; PS.: Umbau Heerstrasse kann noch interessant sein --Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 14:24, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Frank Behnsen, ich habe eine dringend Bitte. kannst du bitte den Anbau Pfarrhaus 50° 8'58.08"N, 8°37'22.91"E und 50° 8'57.66"N 8°37'23.23"E; Jugendclub 50° 8'57.31"N 8°37'23.46"E , das Gemeindehaus 50° 8'56.95"N 8°37'23.83"E fotografieren? . Dies Gebäude werden demnächst abgerissen :( --Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 19:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Hallo Woelle ffm; es tut mir leid, doch zur Zeit habe ich bedauerlicherweise keine Gelegenheit, nach Praunheim rauszufahren. Bitte frage doch auch noch jemand anderen aus Frankfurt, ob sie die fraglichen Fotos machen können. Sorry und ein Gruß, — frank (talk) 04:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Landkarte ca.1850 Frankfurt Praunheim.JPG[edit]

Praunheim ca. 1850

Hallo, danke für das bearbeiten des Bildes, jedoch fehlen da 3 Kleinigkeiten ;) zweiter und dritter Teil von Alt-Praunhaum, die Graebstrasse und auch die Praunheimer Landstrasse, soll das bild auch in passenden Artikel eingefügt werden oder zumindest die Kategorie hinzugefügt werden?--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 10:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Woelle ffm, dass ich auf weitere Anmerkungen auf der Karte verzichtet habe, liegt hauptsächlich am Platzmangel; ich wollte vermeiden, dass die Vorschau zu sehr mit Notizen „zugekleistert“ wirkt. Auch war ich mir bei einigen Straßen – so zum Beispiel bei der Praunheimer Landstraße – beim Abgleich der historischen Karte mit aktuellen Stadtplänen nicht hundertprozentig sicher. — Die Abbildung der Karte in passende Artikel einzufügen halte ich nur dann für sinnvoll, wenn dort genügend Platz vorhanden ist; die Idee mit der Kategorisierung finde ich gut. Übernimmst Du das? Grüße zurück, — frank (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Hallo, danke für deine Erklärung. Für die Praunheimer Landstrasse habe ich einen >Link< Kann man aus den Anmerkungen auch Links machen? --Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 19:07, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Ja, Interwiki-Links in Bildnotizen müssten eigentlich funktionieren, da in den Notizen Wikicode erlaubt ist. Sowas habe ich bereits öfter in Bildbeschreibungen auf Commons gemacht; ich werd’s auch mal bei den Bildnotizen versuchen. — frank (talk) 08:40, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Update: Hat leider noch nicht geklappt. Die Form der Standard-Interwiki-Links (aktuelles Beispiel: [[de:Alt-Praunheim]] wird zu de:Alt-Praunheim) funtioniert in den Notizen nicht. Immerhin bietet die Hilfeseite Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator/de einige andere interessante Informationen zu Bild-Anmerkungen … — frank (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Corrupted file information while uploading[edit]

FFM-Nieder-Erlenbach Alt-Erlenbach Pfarrhaus Totale dynamisch.jpg

Yesterday afternoon my upload of this photo was messed up — for some reason unknown to me. I checked double file description, license information, and categories for possible illegal characters in the code but couldn’t find any. Tonight I received an error message stating technical server problems. For documentation here’s the referring wikicode with all necessary information for the above file:

== {{int:filedesc}} == {{Information |Description={{de|1=Frankfurt am Main, Stadtteil Nieder-Erlenbach: Evangelisches Pfarrhaus (barockes Wohnhaus, Baujahr 1748. Frankfurter Baudenkmal 90) in der Straße ''Alt-Erlenbach,'' Ansicht von Südosten.}} |Source={{self-photographed}} |Date=2015-08-31 |Author=[[User:Frank Behnsen|Frank Behnsen]] |Permission= |other_versions= }} == {{int:license-header}} == {{self|author=[[User:Frank Behnsen|Frank Behnsen]]|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}} [[Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Frankfurt-Nieder-Erlenbach]]

Thanks in advance for any assistance in this issue! — frank (talk) 02:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Update: apparently, the problem is fixed now. — frank (talk) 02:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:FFM-Nieder-Erlenbach Lersnersches Schloss Herrenhaus vor 1939 FoP.de.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FFM-Nieder-Erlenbach Lersnersches Schloss Herrenhaus vor 1939 FoP.de.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your note; license information should be complete now. — frank (talk) 19:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:FFM Brentanopark Musikpavillon-Zeichnung FoP-de.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FFM Brentanopark Musikpavillon-Zeichnung FoP-de.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 08:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:FFM Brentanopark-Schulgarten 1931 FoP-de.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FFM Brentanopark-Schulgarten 1931 FoP-de.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 08:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Max Bromme Portraitfoto undatiert FoP-de.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Max Bromme Portraitfoto undatiert FoP-de.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 08:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis, ist erledigt. Gruß, — frank (talk) 10:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Rotlink[edit]

Hei, warum hast du die Rohlinks hier [1] entfernt? Grüße --Sjokolade (talk) 12:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Sjokolade, ich halte es für sinnvoll, nur auf bereits existierende Kategorien Links zu setzen. Grüße zurück, — frank (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Hallo Frank, Rohlinks sind erwünscht und ich nutze sie häufig. Dadurch werden viele Bilder wieder gefunden, die vorher nur unzureichend oder in allgemeinen Kategorien kategorisiert waren. Lasse solche präzisen Rohlinks bitte stehen, falsche oder unsinnige können natürlich weiterhin entfernt werden. Danke im voraus. --Sjokolade (talk) 07:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Ist okay, das Argument überzeugt mich.  :^) — frank (talk) 09:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)