User talk:Frank Schulenburg

Babel

This user has been on Wikimedia Commons for 15 years, 10 months and 6 days de Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache. en-4 This user speaks English at a near-native level. fr-3 Cette personne peut contribuer avec un niveau avancé de français. la-2 Hic usuarius lingua latina mediae difficultatis conferre potest. This user has uploaded 436 quality images to Wikimedia Commons. This user has uploaded 7 valued images to Wikimedia Commons. This user has uploaded 99 featured pictures to Wikimedia Commons. This user has uploaded 2 featured media to Wikimedia Commons. This user has uploaded 4 finalist to Pictures of the Year to Wikimedia Commons. This user has file mover rights on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

Archive of former discussions: (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Gyeonghoeru (Royal Banquet Hall) at Gyeongbokgung Palace, Seoul.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chico State Campus – New Science Building-00751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frank Schulenburg Photographic Collection – Ambrotype – Hamilton Campbell-5037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 13:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chico State Campus – New Science Building-00743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meriam Library, Chico State-00759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chico station-00780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chico station-00769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:50, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorting categories

Hi! I've been sorting and cleaning up Category:Photographers, where I was able to sort everyone but you. :-) You have some complicated combo-thing going on with the categories you are in, and I can't figure out how to correct it. It is probably meant to be an easy way of sorting 'you' in categories, but it doesn't work right since it doesn't place you in slots relevant to your name. I wonder if you could have a look at it and see if you can correct things.

You are in Category:Photographers under "P" as in "Photographer" when you should be under "S" in Category:Photographers by name, Category:Male photographers from Germany and perhaps some other cats (but not in the main category). A bit further down on the Category:Photographers page, Heading: 'Pages in category "Photographers"'; you also end up under "P" while all the others are under their names.

You get the same blooper in the list in Category:Wikipedians where the system thinks your name is spelled with "W" as in "Wikipedians".

These are the instances I have stumbled upon, there may be more. I think you may need to break up some global template or something, I could probably find out how, but it's probably best if you took care of this yourself. All the best, --Cart (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cart, thanks so much for your message. It seems like that's an error that stems from the template called "Wikidata Infobox". Maybe Mike Peel, who's the creator and maintainer of that template can help. As I'm not an administrator on Commons, I wouldn't be able to edit the template, as it is protected – and honestly, I'm not very good at understanding templates anyway ;-) Hope that helps. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the info. I'm going to try some stuff and see if I can fix this, please bear with me if things get messy for a while, I'll revert everything if it doesn't work out. :-) --Cart (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

@W.carter: There was a bug in {{Wikidata Infobox}}, now fixed in the sandbox. I've changed Category:Frank Schulenburg to use {{Wikidata Infobox/sandbox}} until the fix is synced with the main version. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

@Mike Peel: Thanks a lot! I try to get things to sync between WD and COM best I can, but some things are still beyond me. I posted on the WD chat and got the heads up on these bugs. Good thinking with the sandbox, it takes forever to sync WD with COM after changes. ;-) Thanks again, I'll continue my sorting. --Cart (talk) 12:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! California State Capitol during blue hour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 05:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upper Bidwell Park, February 2021-00974.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 20:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almond Bloom in Butte County, 2021-5094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 20:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angel Island Ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Julia Shannon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support per nom. Fantastic! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kendall Hall as seen from Laxson Auditorium-01006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:57, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Almond bloom near Chico, February 2021-00995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Kopfstudie eines Japanmakaken (Macaca fuscata) im Jigokudani Yaen Kōen, Japan.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! African Daisy (Osteospermum)-5204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wildflower Bloom on Table Mountain-01039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:42, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Statue of James Meredith at the University of Mississippi.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Statue of James Meredith at the University of Mississippi.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

-- Marchjuly (talk) 06:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castleberry Covered Bridge, March 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 22:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enloe Medical Center – FlightCare Helicopter-01065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Great shot and good quality! --Radomianin 00:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mansfield House, Chico, March 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 21:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mason-Barnard House, Chico, March 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Foundation Building (Front view), Thrive District in Meriam Park, Chico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northstate Foot and Ankle Specialists building, Thrive District in Meriam Park, Chico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2454 Builders Pl, Thrive District in Meriam Park, Chico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:54, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1817 Concord Ave, Thrive District in Meriam Park, Chico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Foundation Building (Detail), Thrive District in Meriam Park, Chico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:22, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter view of Mount Lassen in Lassen Volcanic National Park, April 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Neighborhood Church Of Chico, Entrance.jpg

Copyright status: File:Neighborhood Church Of Chico, Entrance.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Neighborhood Church Of Chico, Entrance.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neighborhood Church Of Chico, Entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neighborhood Church of Chico, April 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upper Bidwell Park Scenery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Neighborhood Church of Chico, April 2021.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neighborhood Church of Chico, April 2021.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)