User talk:Frank Schulenburg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Babel
Noia 64 apps karm.svgThis user has been on Wikimedia Commons for
16 years, 11 months and 18 days
de


en-4
fr-3
la-2
Quality images logo.svgThis user has uploaded 532 quality images to Wikimedia Commons.
Valued image seal.svgThis user has uploaded 7 valued images to Wikimedia Commons.
Cscr-featured.svgThis user has uploaded 119 featured pictures to Wikimedia Commons.
Cscr-featured.svgThis user has uploaded 2 featured media to Wikimedia Commons.
PODY ribbon.svgThis user has uploaded 4 finalist to Pictures of the Year to Wikimedia Commons.
Commons File mover.svgThis user has file mover rights on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)


Archive of former discussions: (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Western burrowing owl, Glenn County-0550.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Western burrowing owl, Glenn County-0550.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:44, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Ardea alba with prey at Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge-1670.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ardea alba with prey at Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge-1670.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ardea alba with prey at Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge-1670.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Western burrowing owl, Glenn County-0550.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Western burrowing owl, Glenn County-0550.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Western burrowing owl, Glenn County-0550.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your most memorable shot of 2021[edit]

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Greater white-fronted goose in flight-1413.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greater white-fronted goose in flight-1413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent. --Tagooty 03:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sandhill crane in flight-1377.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhill crane in flight-1377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 20:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Resting ruddy duck-1347.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Resting ruddy duck-1347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 20:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Male american wigeon in flight-1274.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Male american wigeon in flight-1274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 20:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Female northern harrier in flight-1142.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female northern harrier in flight-1142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 20:49, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Female northern harrier in flight-1672.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female northern harrier in flight-1672.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Wow. --Ermell 21:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Female northern pintail in flight-1827.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female northern pintail in flight-1827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 21:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Red-tailed hawk on power pole-2033.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-tailed hawk on power pole-2033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Snow geese at Llano Seco-2069.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snow geese at Llano Seco-2069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Black-necked stilt landing-1909.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black-necked stilt landing-1909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Very Good. --Rjcastillo 03:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Northern harrier in flight-1930.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Northern harrier in flight-1930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Millsap Cemetery, January 2022-2155.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Millsap Cemetery, January 2022-2155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Millsap Cemetery, January 2022-2152.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Millsap Cemetery, January 2022-2152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Millsap Cemetery, January 2022-2148.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Millsap Cemetery, January 2022-2148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Red-tailed hawk flying towards a flock of dunlins-2545.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-tailed hawk flying towards a flock of dunlins-2545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good --Rjcastillo 02:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sandhill cranes along River Road, Butte County-2296.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhill cranes along River Road, Butte County-2296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good --Rjcastillo 02:22, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grus canadensis in flight-2618.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grus canadensis in flight-2618.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge, January 2022-2001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge, January 2022-2001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Buteo jamaicensis in flight at Llano Seco-1520.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Buteo jamaicensis in flight at Llano Seco-1520.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buteo jamaicensis in flight at Llano Seco-1520.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mount Shasta as seen from Highway 97-2920.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Shasta as seen from Highway 97-2920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mount Shasta, North Face-2183.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Shasta, North Face-2183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mount Shasta as seen from Lake Siskiyou-2886.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Shasta as seen from Lake Siskiyou-2886.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 22:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Common merganser landing on Lake Siskiyou-2036.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common merganser landing on Lake Siskiyou-2036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Common merganser landing on Lake Siskiyou-2037.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common merganser landing on Lake Siskiyou-2037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good! --Radomianin 20:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 21:51, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St Joseph Catholic Church in McCloud-2855.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Joseph Catholic Church in McCloud-2855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality! --Radomianin 20:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
North face of Mount Shasta at sunset-2175.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North face of Mount Shasta at sunset-2175.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality, fascinating veil of clouds. --Radomianin 20:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

North face of Mount Shasta at sunset-2175.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:North face of Mount Shasta at sunset-2175.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:North face of Mount Shasta at sunset-2175.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Northern pintail drake in flight at Llano Seco-2961.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Northern pintail drake in flight at Llano Seco-2961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality, great capture! --Radomianin 22:55, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chico Seed Orchard in December 2020 - 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chico Seed Orchard in December 2020 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:42, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Big Chico Creek Ecological Reserve-2360.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Chico Creek Ecological Reserve-2360.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Grus canadensis in flight-2618.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Grus canadensis in flight-2618.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grus canadensis in flight-2618.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Red-tailed hawk on power pole-2033.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Red-tailed hawk on power pole-2033.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red-tailed hawk on power pole-2033.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tobin Bridges, Plumas County, in February 2022-0058.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tobin Bridges, Plumas County, in February 2022-0058.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and beautiful motif. -- Ikan Kekek 02:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Belden Town Hotel, Plumas County-3229.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belden Town Hotel, Plumas County-3229.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:43, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Hello,

Thank you for following George Chernilevsky. The first thing I do each morning is to see if he has posted. Krok6kola (talk) 11:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bok Kai Temple, Marysville, March 2022-3395.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bok Kai Temple, Marysville, March 2022-3395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:04, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Willows Hardware Store, March 2022-3372.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willows Hardware Store, March 2022-3372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Pit Stop, Mount Shasta-02687.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Pit Stop, Mount Shasta-02687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:28, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
CSUC University Box Office, Chico-02694.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CSUC University Box Office, Chico-02694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Suey Sing Chamber of Labor and Commerce-3377.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suey Sing Chamber of Labor and Commerce-3377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Well composed -- top of flagpole not vital to the image IMO --Virtual-Pano 23:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Congregation Beth Shalom, Marysville-3374.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Congregation Beth Shalom, Marysville-3374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Non-breeding pied-billed grebe-6514.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Non-breeding pied-billed grebe-6514.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Non-breeding pied-billed grebe-6514.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Union Pacific Railroad train on Pulga Bridge-3776.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Union Pacific Railroad train on Pulga Bridge-3776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rock Creek Powerhouse, Feather River Canyon-3805.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock Creek Powerhouse, Feather River Canyon-3805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Feather River Canyon-3798.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feather River Canyon-3798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Chico State Science Building in March 2022-02699.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chico State Science Building in March 2022-02699.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Be carefull to not add to much sharpening (or in selected areas), e.g. the roof of the right building. --Christian Ferrer 21:53, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Union Pacific freight train in the Feather River Canyon-3872.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Union Pacific freight train in the Feather River Canyon-3872.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Poe Dam, Feather River Canyon-0070.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poe Dam, Feather River Canyon-0070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rock Creek Powerhouse, Feather River Canyon-3810.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock Creek Powerhouse, Feather River Canyon-3810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Big Four Building, Old Sacramento-4064.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Four Building, Old Sacramento-4064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Possible FP? I'm not sure how it would be received at FPC, but I would vote for it. -- Ikan Kekek 03:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Arcade Building, Old Sacramento-4049.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcade Building, Old Sacramento-4049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
B. F. Hastings Building, Old Sacramento-4052.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! B. F. Hastings Building, Old Sacramento-4052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sacramento Engine Company No. 3, Old Sacramento-4040.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacramento Engine Company No. 3, Old Sacramento-4040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sacramento Engine Company No. 3, Old Sacramento-4042.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacramento Engine Company No. 3, Old Sacramento-4042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
California Firefighters Memorial, California State Capitol Park-3925.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! California Firefighters Memorial, California State Capitol Park-3925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Unusual for the QIC page – we have very seldom intentionally low DoF here –, but IMHO well done and elegant. --Aristeas 08:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

California State Capitol during blue hour-3982.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:California State Capitol during blue hour-3982.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:California State Capitol during blue hour-3982.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Adult white-faced ibis (Plegadis chihi)-4026.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adult white-faced ibis (Plegadis chihi)-4026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Adult white-faced ibis (Plegadis chihi)-3067.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adult white-faced ibis (Plegadis chihi)-3067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Adult white-faced ibis (Plegadis chihi)-4026.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Adult white-faced ibis (Plegadis chihi)-4026.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Adult white-faced ibis (Plegadis chihi)-4026.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Female northern pintail in flight-1827.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Female northern pintail in flight-1827.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Female northern pintail in flight-1827.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Juvenile white-faced ibis (Plegadis chihi)-4089.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juvenile white-faced ibis (Plegadis chihi)-4089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Historic Quincy Schoolhouse-5261.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Historic Quincy Schoolhouse-5261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

American avocet at Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge-5380.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! American avocet at Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge-5380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Blue-winged teal at Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge-5326.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue-winged teal at Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge-5326.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good, the juxtaposition of colors makes it FP IMO. --King of Hearts 02:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week[edit]

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations:

  • Photography in Nigeria
  • Photographing vehicles
  • I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…

If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference!

I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Saturday is June 18th, Sunday is June 19th - which day is the meeting? Atsme Talk 📧 08:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Atsme, I apologize. I just fixed it on the events page. It's Sunday, 9 am our time. Hope you're doing well. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thx, Frank - what is "our time"? I'm on Bonaire which is EST (same as the Florida Keys or Venezuela). Atsme Talk 📧 17:03, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I thought you were in PST. My mistake. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Frank, I can't find the Zoom link - where is it? Atsme Talk 📧 16:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Atsme, you'll find the Zoom link on the meeting page next week. Usually, I post it on the day prior to the meeting. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm such a dork!! For some reason I thought the meeting was today. Now marked properly on my calendar. Atsme Talk 📧 20:18, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Brokeoff Mountain in June 2022-5880.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brokeoff Mountain in June 2022-5880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kings Creek Meadow in June 2022-5903.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kings Creek Meadow in June 2022-5903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This Sunday![edit]

Hi, this is just a quick reminder: the next virtual meeting of our user group is scheduled for Sunday, June 19, 16:00 UTC. Topics are: “Photography in Nigeria”, “Photographing Vehicles”, “Wildlife photography and citizen science”, and “I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…”. I'm thrilled about this great agenda and I'm looking forward to connecting with you again. Stay safe and all the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kings Creek Falls Trail in June 2022-5978.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kings Creek Falls Trail in June 2022-5978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sarcodes sanguinea in Lassen Volcanic National Park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarcodes sanguinea in Lassen Volcanic National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:29, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Lake Helen in June 2022-6022.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Helen in June 2022-6022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:24, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Reflection Lake, Lassen Volcanic National Park, in June 2022-6049.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reflection Lake, Lassen Volcanic National Park, in June 2022-6049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --IamMM 20:31, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]