User talk:FredrikT

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Whitemanband1921.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example to Category:United States musicians.

EugeneZelenko 14:30, 12 July 2005 (UTC)


Hej, jag har redigerat Image:MagnusSteendorff.jpg lite. Om du inte samtycker till förändringarna, kan du gå in på bildens beskrivningssida och använda funktionen "rev" bredvid den ursprungliga bildens uppladdningshistoria, vilket återställer den. --Fred Chess 08:48, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Hej Fred! Måste tillstå att jag föredrog den ursprungliga sepiafärgade versionen (fotot jag scannat från har den färgen) så jag har ändrat tillbka till den. Lustigt nog fortsätter återgivningen på själva "bildsidan" trots detta att vara svartvit trots att de artiklar och kategorier där den finns i länkad form åter blivit sepiafärgade. Vad beror månne det på?
Beror på cachen. Tar ett tag att uppdateras. --Fred Chess 12:21, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
Kanske skulle lägga till att den ursprungliga färgen troligen var svart&vit, och att sepiafärgen väl egentligen är en åldersskada... --Fred Chess 12:25, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
Jag är inte säker på det. Som arkivarie har jag sett åtskilliga foton på runt 100 år och äldre och en del är helt oföärändrat svartvita fortfarande medan andra är mycket jämt och estetiskt sepiafärgade, ofta på ett sätt som matchar inramning och liknande. Jag tror att det var ett val fotografen kunde göra redan i kopieringen. FredrikT 12:46, 22 August 2005 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:KarlGerhard1930.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KarlGerhard1930.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. LX (talk, contribs) 10:39, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Source information has been added. The photographer is unknown but the picture was published in a book before 1944 which makes it PD according to Swedish law. /FredrikT 15:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


Image:FletcherHendersonOrchestra1925.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:FletcherHendersonOrchestra1925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dr. Shaggeman 10:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Decca198.jpg[edit]

Someone tagged the image as fair use, and I missed the pd-old. I have restored the image. Giggy 00:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I've restored the links in the Decca articles on sv:and en: /FredrikT 08:23, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gustaf VI Adolf at Madame Tussauds .jpg[edit]

I have deleted to image because it was a photograph of a wax figure. Those are considered derivative works and cannot be hosted on Commons. For more information, see a previous discussion on this issue: Commons:Deletion requests/Madame Tussauds. --Matt314 20:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


Image:Columbia1116D.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Columbia1116D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

abf /talk to me/ 12:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Record Images[edit]

You uploaded images of record labels, I'M working on an article about the Skillet Lickers; see Category:Skillet Lickers. Do you have any pictures of their records? Waylon 16:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC) I voted Keep for your image deletion above! :)

I'm afraid not. The main focus in my collection is jazz and "hot dance", so I have rather few hillbilly/country records (though I have a couple on Grey Gull and related labels, featuring Vernon Dalhart among others). But if I come acrossa Skillet Lickers record I'll let you know! /FredrikT 08:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Waylon 12:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


Image:Eitelprussia1883-3.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Eitelprussia1883-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 08:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Category:Record labels[edit]

Hello, I'm tyring to make a structure out of this main category and try to categorize the images as good as I can. I saw that you uploaded a lot of them record labels. The next time you upload such images, please put them - if there is anyone - in the correct category of the record company. If there isn't category for the company, you can create it or only put the image in the category record labels. It's better, because there would be no double categorize. Thanks, Waylon (talk) 12:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello! I usually avoid double categorization, but the reason that I put the HMV label today in Category:Record labels as well as in Category:HMV was that the latter category consisted mainly of pictures that showed other things than record labels and thus pperhaps would not be the place where someone searching for a label picture would be looking. Regards! /FredrikT (talk) 21:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
User:Sdrtirs tries to delete all of the record label images. Two of mine are nominated now, look at Image:StarvingToDeathOnAGovernmentClaim.jpg and Image:ForkedDear.jpg. Maybe, you images will be the next. Keep your eyes open, regards, Waylon (talk) 17:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

File:Ernst Blomgren på Hvar 8 dag 1911 liten.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 12:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Fixed! I had just forgotten the small {{-signs around the license tag. /FredrikT (talk) 12:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Shilkret photo[edit]

Thank you for your work. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 17:01, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you too. I've followed your work for some time, and it's nice to know that there are other people with interest and knowledge about the music of the 1920s working with this project as well! /FredrikT (talk) 23:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. It has caused me some troubles which I have described here. /FredrikT (talk) 21:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Bicorne with plumes[edit]

Thank you, something learned. I must concede, it did not look really like fur, so I did not put it into category bearskin hats... ;-) But, maybe you have some furs in your collection? ---Kürschner (talk) 12:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Skogman[edit]

Är du säker på att det är fel Skogman? Om det som står i bildbeskrivningarna stämmer så är det fullständiga namnet är Carl Johan Alfred för både konstnären och riksdagsmannen, och födelse- och dödsår är samma (1820-1907). /Ö 20:14, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Minsann - Du har nog rätt i att det trots allt är samme man. Jag fick inte ihop konstnärsskapet med att Skogman i sin artikel på svwp i första hand beskrivs som sjömilitär och riksdagsman, men vid närmare studium av artikeln ser jag att han skall ha gett ut en bok illustrerad med egna litografier, så han kan nog vara upphovsman till denna skämtteckning också. Jag lägger tillbaks den i kategorin. Tack för påpekandet! /FredrikT (talk) 06:08, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Magic Maggi[edit]

I will never find out, wherefore I categorized this image and never which was the right one - sorry and thanks --Kürschner (talk)

No problem! /FredrikT (talk) 13:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Riksdagen 1897, sida 01 (försättsblad).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

{{PD-old}} kanske är bättre. Det är den mall som lagts in på mina inscanningar. En skannad sida från 1897 är normalt inget problem.
Nu till min fråga: Hur många sidor är det totalt i dokumentet? -- Lavallen (talk) 09:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Hej Lavallen! Du får gärna licens för försättsbladet (jag natar att det är det Du syftar på) från PD-text till PD-old om Du anser det mer lämpligt.
Totalt har jag skannat 41 sidor. Originalet är ytterligare några sidor, men dessa utgörs bara av rena annonssidor. Sedan finns det omslag också, men bortsett från att det i mitt fall är rätt trasigt så rymmer det också en teckning av en upphovsman som jag inte kunnat identifiera och därför har jag för säkerhets skull utelämnat det. /FredrikT (talk) 09:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Liknande meddelanden har jag aldrig fått på de sidor där jag lagt PD-old, så det var främst ett tips...
Annonser brukar vi (vanligen) inte lägga med i våra sidor på Wikisource, så sådana sidor klarar vi oss sannolikt utan, från WS sida sett. Om teckningen är från före 1926 och upphovsmannen är okänd, så ska det inte vara ngn fara. Material från före 1923 är alltid fritt i USA (där servern står), men du avgör helt själv vad du vill publicera här. -- Lavallen (talk) 13:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Skall titta närmare på omslaget; vill minnas att det är signerat men att jag inte kunnat tyda namnet, så då är det väl tveksamt om det kan anses "anonymt". Vad beträffar det automatiska meddelandet ovan fick jag inte det för att jag hade valt "PD-text" utan för att jag hade råkat slinta på en bokstav när jag ursprungligen skrev in licensen så att denna som helhet var obegriplig för Commons. /FredrikT (talk) 13:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Ok, då är jag med. Jag har lagt om stdsorten på sidorna, nu efter att det dykt upp lite annat smått och gott i kategorin. -- Lavallen (talk) 05:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Sonora505.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sonora505.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jafeluv (talk) 21:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Arne_Jones_-_Fossil_komposition.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Arne_Jones_-_Fossil_komposition.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.232.124.8 11:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Whiteman headsmall.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Whiteman headsmall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rd232 (talk) 18:35, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Steendorff, C W - Landsortskyrka (1896).jpg[edit]

Hallo FredrikT, here is your painting of Christian Wilhelm Steendorff a little bit larger from the „ Stadsauktion Frihamnen“, Stockh. 2011. Greetings --Botaurus (talk) 17:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that is probably the very same picture I used as the basis for my upload, though I decided to crop off the frame and reduce it in size a bit. /FredrikT (talk) 19:36, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Ferdinand Boberg; Regn (etsning).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ferdinand Boberg; Regn (etsning).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 10:06, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)