User talk:FunkMonk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Christmas and the New Year[edit]

Hi,

And happy holidays! DenesFeri (talk) 11:53, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas?
Thanks, and right back to you! FunkMonk (talk) 12:12, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Sinosauropteryx with Dalinghosaurus.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sinosauropteryx with Dalinghosaurus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

92.234.201.12 11:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Rapetosaurus BW.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rapetosaurus BW.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Taivo (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Could you please take a look[edit]

Hey FunkMonk,

I remember that you have some experience dealing with self made drawings off dinosauria. Could you please take a look at File:Betasuchus by jonagold2000-d9vf4gw.png and nominate the file for deletion if it's inaccurate? I'm asking this because this uploader tried to include this image in the Dutch Wikipedia and some other wiki's. Thanks in advance! Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

It looks anatomically ok to me (the animal isn't known by much, so can only compare to other abelisaurs, which it is thought to be), but I've added it to a discussion at the dinosaur image review page:[1] FunkMonk (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Problem med renaming[edit]

Hej FunkMonk. Du står på listen med dansktalende administratorer, så det benytter jeg mig af:
Kunne du give os et godt råd hvis vi bliver ved med at få afslag på en 'renaming request' til en fil der ikke blot har en forkert kunstner som ophavsmand, men også en forkert titel.
Det er nok lettest blot at læse begrundelsen her på filens diskussionside:

c:File talk:Friedrich Overbeck - Joseph wird von seinen Brüdern verkauft (Casa Bartholdy in Rom) - Google Art Project.jpg

.. og læs også gerne diskussionen på denne danske diskussionsside: da:Brugerdiskussion:Brams#The_Selling_of_Joseph.
Ved enhver fremtidigt 'renaming request' ville den pågældende administrator vel blot trykke på dette link til Google Arts & Culture, og mene at alt ser rigtigt ud.

https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/beta/asset/0wHXmZUn2XzTVg fra Google Arts & Culture.

Så hvordan ser situationen ud fra administratorside. Man går vel næppe ind i substansen?
-- Mvh PHansen (talk) 09:38, 7 February 2018 (UTC) (da:Bruger:PHansen)

Ser ud til du har ret, da det i hvert fald ikke ligner et billede af Josef som bliver solgt af sine brødre... Jeg tror måske det er nemmere at få billedet flyttet hvis du finder nogle flere kilder der entydigt bruger den anden titel? Og derefter kan du fremlægge sagen på Commons talk:Help desk. Jeg ville selv flytte filen, hvis ikke det var fordi der ser ud til at være en form for modvilje overfor det fra en eller anden, så er nok bedst at få en bredere diskussion ud af det. FunkMonk (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

OK. Tak for et hurtigt svar. -- PHansen (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)