User talk:FunkMonk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Saltriosaurus image[edit]

I gave the user the permission to upload the image Lucas-Attwell (talk) 23:10, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

It just needs to be very clear in the file. Best would be to send an OTRS permission.[1] FunkMonk (talk) 04:14, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Mumia graffiti.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mumia graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

B dash (talk) 08:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Problemer med at oprette underkategori[edit]

Hej FunkMonk
Forhåbentlig kan du hjælpe mig. Jeg har forsøgt at oprette en underkategori til kategorien "Category:Esbjerg". Underkategorien er "Category:Fortidsminder i Esbjerg Kommune", men jeg kan ikke få den til at blive placeret rigtig. Mvh.PHE77 (talk) 17:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Ser ud til at din kategori skal være under Esbjerg, men at du nu har gjort det omvendte (Esbjerg er under din kategori)? Jeg har har forsøgt at gøre hvad jeg tror du mener, så nu skal du bare placere din kategori på de kategorier og filer du mener hører under den. FunkMonk (talk) 17:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Mange tak. Det var præcis sådan jeg havde tænkt. Og tak for den hurtige hjælp, så vil jeg begynde at tilføje billeder til kategorien. Mvh. PHE77 (talk) 17:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Cool, bliver spændende at se! FunkMonk (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Jeg tænkte forresten om kategoriens navn ikke burde være på engelsk? FunkMonk (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Jeg kan godt se, at de andre underkategorier er på engelsk, så den burde jo faktisk være på engelsk, hvis det er almindelig praksis. Jeg kan se, at en bot User:ErfgoedBot allerede har indsat en engelsk kategori på billederne, men kategorien er endnu ikke oprettet. Skal jeg bare slette de danske kategorier igen fra billederne? Jeg kan måske få dig til at slette den danske kategori og oprette den engelske, så den bliver placeret rigtig? Beklager, hvis jeg har skabt ekstra bøvl med min wikimedia-dilettantisme. Mvh. PHE77 (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Det skulle være nemt nok at erstatte en kategori hvis du følger beskrivelsen her:[2] Jeg har gjort det for dig i første omgang, så det bliver nemmere en anden gang.FunkMonk (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Tak for hjælpen, men det er desværre lidt for teknisk for mig. Jeg er rookie. Jeg kan finde ud af at slette den indsatte danske kategori manuelt fra de 13 billeder. Hilsen PHE77 (talk) 19:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Det burde blive gjort automatisk nu efter jeg indsatte den move request. FunkMonk (talk) 21:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
I dag har jeg oprettet den engelske side , men man kan ikke finde den som underkategori til . Den danske undermappe er der stadig. Har du mulighed for at hjælpe mig igen? Hilsen PHE77 (talk) 18:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Jeg har nu slettet den danske kategori. FunkMonk (talk) 18:36, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Velociraptor photo[edit]

Should we replace this. It has a inaccurate features.https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/Velociraptor_Wyoming_Dinosaur_Center.jpg--Bubblesorg (talk) 19:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Which features are inaccurate? FunkMonk (talk) 19:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Tail position and pronated hands--Bubblesorg (talk) 19:53, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

The hands are not pronated, one arm is mlifted so that the palm faces down, and the other hand is folded down,like those of a bird. As for the tail, dromaeosaur tails were stiff, but not inflexible.[3] FunkMonk (talk) 00:16, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Ah ok--Bubblesorg (talk) 16:12, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

New uploads[edit]

Is there a way to have this post-1923 photograph uploaded as fair use by any chance? If so, could you guide through the process?

I also wanted to make sure that I got this one right, so I'd appreciate it if you could take a look. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

The 1914 image should be fine, as for the 1957 image, perhaps something like the tag I used here[4] could work? You can check if the copyright of a US publication was renewed here:[5] FunkMonk (talk) 23:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for that second link. It works for academic papers too, right? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 11:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure I've seen some academic papers there (in any case, seems their copyright was rarely renwed). This link for periodicals might also be of help:[6] FunkMonk (talk) 11:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Turns out the 1957 photo from the link I gave you was nowhere to be found on this Archive.org version of the Quarterly covering the volume and article in question (p. 79-82). I just looked it up to find more information for the file's description (date on which the photo was taken, etc), but it simply wasn't there. Is that an obstacle or should I now assume that the ucpress.edu link was a different "edition" of this publication and then upload it anyway?
I also had this photo in mind (redirects to the Online Archive of California), but the description in the 'Rights Information' section below drew me away from it. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 13:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Hmmm, that does seem pretty strange. Might be iffy to upload it on an assumption. Are there other copies of the source online that could be checked? Sometimes images accompanying an article in a journal is placed way in the back of the issue as a plate... You might have to go for fair use instead, then. As for the other image, it also seems a bit iffy, since there is no original publication mentioned, it seems? FunkMonk (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Looked through the entire Archive.org document and I still couldn't find it. The other image can also be found here in the article's preface (no page number) and the caption says that it was taken in 1951. But it's cropped and the quality is much lower than the OAC one. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:09, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
As long as you show a link in the file source description to where it was first published, even if in lower quality, it should be fine. But yeah, the other image seems a strange case. FunkMonk (talk) 19:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Looks good? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 22:14, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
I think so, yeah. FunkMonk (talk) 02:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Good to know. Thanks again for the help and sorry if I keep bringing this up to you. It's just that uploading stuff around here can be quite an annoying experience for some. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 10:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No problem, feel free to ask me about anything. Though I can't guarantee I'll know the answer, hehe... FunkMonk (talk) 11:15, 12 November 2018 (UTC)