User talk:Gżdacz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gżdacz!

-- 21:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Gżdacz!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Gżdacz,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

zatoka Pucka, NAC[edit]

Moje zdolności edytorskie co do map ograniczają się do "kopiuj-wklej", więc nie przekraczają poziomu niedoświadczonego amatora. Nie podejmę się dodawania innych rezerwatów, doradzałbym poszukania w polskiej Wiki kogoś, kto umie i kto lubi rysować mapy (nasuwa mi się tu np. wikipedysta Malarz).

Co do NAC: nie jestem prawnikiem, nie mam pojęcia co ustawodawca miał na myśli pisząc o "wyraźnym zastrzeżeniu". Doradzam posługiwanie się zdrowym rozsądkiem przy publikowaniu fotografii: w Wikipedii (a szczególnie w Commons) sporo jest oszołomów, którzy przyczepić się mogą do każdej fotografii, ale nikt cię nie wsadzi do więzienia, jeśli popełnisz jakiś błąd. Najbezpieczniej jest zamieszczać skany z konkretnych publikacji, jeśli upłynęło już te ustawowe 70 lat, bo obróbka zdjęć (usuwanie logo) NAC ze zdjęć - nawet jeśli są identyczne z tymi, które zostały kiedyś wydrukowane - może być przez kogoś potraktowane jako wykorzystanie innego źródła niż to drukowane.

Sam musisz rozwiązać te dylematy, nie oczekuj, że zapalę Ci zielone światło i powiem: rób tak, albo rób inaczej. Muszę Ci powiedzieć, że - szczególnie w Commons - można spotkać się z takimi idiotyzmami, że nie sposób przewidzieć, jaki będzie los przesłanego obrazka. No ale z drugiej strony na razie przynajmniej nie ma lepszej metody, więc musimy się z tymi "specami" od polskiego prawa męczyć (choćby oni byli w rzeczywistości australijskimi gimnazjalistami albo amerykańskimi farmerami).

Julo (talk) 07:24, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

NAC[edit]

Przepraszam, że dopiero teraz odpowiadam. Ilustracje ładowane na Commons przycinam i tak uzyskuję efekt końcowy. Pozdrawiam Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 06:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Praga 1867.png[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Praga 1867.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:43, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Löschtroll[edit]

Mach mal lieber was vernünftiges, als die Arbeit anderer Benutzer zu nichte und nur Löschanträge zu stellen. Typisch Polnisch. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.201.2.188 (talk) 06:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC) Das Problem ist, dass es sich hier um keine "Arbeit anderer Benutzer" handelte, sondern um die Arbeit der echten Autoren, die mittels falscher Angaben gestohlen wurde. Gżdacz (talk) 07:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Orzeł NAC.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Orzeł NAC.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dd1495 (talk) 08:22, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Szczekociny 01 AB.png[edit]

Dzięki za uwagę! :) Przy okazji dodałem W24. Pozdrawiam! --Chepry (talk) 22:27, 26 October 2016 (UTC)