User talk:Genium/2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Genium!

File:Winkler-gnu.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Merci pour m'avoir prévenu, j'ai corrigé le problème en apposant le modèle de la licence Art Libre (Free Art License) (Genium (talk) 19:58, 17 July 2011 (UTC))

File:Mpfr500.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:43, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

This license should appear on mpfr.org soon, which will let other contributors verify it. (Genium (talk) 17:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC))

File tagging File:Laclotte-salon.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Laclotte-salon.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Laclotte-salon.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AzaToth 22:59, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Well, I've difficult to believe you took the photo 65 years ago; but if that's true, then please forgive me :) AzaToth 23:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
I didn't took this photo myself, please, I need your help here, English is not my native language. This is a family photo given to me by my mother, given to her by her grandmother Marcelle Boé (born Salon), and given to her after realized by her first cousin George Salon (the man who took the pic, he is dead in the late sixies), and René Salon was her brother, and her husband Clovis Boé was one of civilian shot at Laclotte. I am the only owner of the picture!! Do I have to send an email as suggested above? Again, sorry for my bad English! Thanks. (Genium (talk) 23:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC))
I just sent an email to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org to explain I am the legal owner of this photo. (Genium (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC))
That sounds good, I believe they are able to resovle this issue better than I am. AzaToth 23:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Inauguration 17 6 44 monument St Pierre.jpg[edit]

Bonjour, je me permets de vous contacter pour aider l'utilisateur Michel33, ce contributeur que je connais personnellement m'a contacté par email au sujet d'une photo supprimée qu'il avait lui-même publié (File:Inauguration 17 6 44 monument St Pierre.jpg). Je souhaiterais savoir si le titulaire unique et exclusif d'une œuvre peut la publier sur Commons en l'absence du nom de l'auteur avec mention D.R. (Droits Réservés), sous licence libre bien entendu, j'ai lu ça quelque part sur le web... Cette question m'interresse tout particulièrement car une photo que j'ai recemment publié a été supprimé pour les mêmes raisons. Cordialement. (Genium (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC))

Mettre une image sous mention "Droits Réservés" est assez contradictoire avec l'idée de licence libre. Dans ce cas, ces images ne sont pas utilisables sur Wikimedia Commons.--Bapti 16:22, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Merci pour la réponse. Je me permets de reformuler ma question car suite à la suppression du fichier "File:Laclotte-salon.png", ma mère n'est plus certaine que son auteur soit bien Georges Salon, bienqu'il qu'il ait été le seul membre de la famille à posseder un appareil photo. Et Michel33 semble être dans le même cas que moi. dans le doute sur l'identité de l'auteur, le titulaire unique et exclusif d'une œuvre a t'il d'autres options que celle d'attendre que la durée du droit d'auteur se termine, ce qui est en soit contradictoire en raison du doute sur l'identité de l'auteur. La photo "Laclotte-salon.png" a été prise en 1945 et j'en suis le titulaire exclusif. Et si je comprends bien, Michel33 est dans le même cas que moi pour la photo "Inauguration 17 6 44 monument St Pierre.jpg". Merci d'avance. (Genium (talk) 19:20, 9 November 2011 (UTC))
Si vous n'êtes pas l'auteur d'une image mais que vous ne savez pas qui est l'auteur, il n'est a priori pas possible de l'utiliser sur Wikimedia Commons tant qu'elle n'est pas tombée dans le domaine public. C'est effectivement embêtant (on appelle ça des œuvres orphelines) mais il n'y a aucune solution à ce problème vu la complexité des législations sur les droits d'auteurs.--Bapti 16:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Francis Lalanne.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Francis Lalanne.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin H. (talk) 21:20, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour, cette image est ume modification de la couverture du livre Révoltons-nous publié aux éditions ILV sous licence Art libre. J'ai fait la modification sous Gimp. On peut lire la notice suivante dans le livre : ... En application de la Licence Art Libre ou la Creative Commons BY-SA, il est autorisé de reproduire intégralement ou partiellement le présent ouvrage, sur quelque support que ce soit, tant qu’il est fait mention des auteurs, de l’éditeur et des présentes licences... La couverture faisant partie intégrante du livre, il n'y a pas de problème ici. (Genium (talk) 22:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC))
On est ici dans le même cas que pour l'image Richard Matthew Stallman cropped.jpeg, une modification de l'image de la couverture du livre Free as in Freedom.jpeg. (Genium (talk) 23:10, 17 December 2011 (UTC))
J'ai laissé un message sur la page de discussion de Martin. J'ai mis à jour les descriptions, etc... J'ai donc reverté sa contribution pour supprimer le bandeau. (Genium (talk) 23:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC))
Is the license applicable to the cover? The license is printed adjacent to the pdf. The pdf not includes the cover. Maybe for a good reason? --Martin H. (talk) 09:57, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Yes it is, the following notice appears in the paper version, too : reproduire intégralement ou partiellement le présent ouvrage. The paper version is licenced under the Free Art Licence, the same as the PDF version. The same way as the Stallman book that I talked above. (Genium (talk) 10:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC))

Francis_Lalanne[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Francis_Lalanne has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year