User talk:GeorgHH/Archiv 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Cloaca Maxima[edit]

Dear Sir,

I contacted the author of the picture, who, as I found out, lives in Argentina, and requested his permission which he gracefully gave. The correspondence has been sent to wikipedia and reference to it is made in the image file. Please let me know if there is anthing else which has to be done.

Afil 16:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

About Herb/Wappen and Herb/Wappengemeinschaft[edit]

Dear GeorgHH:

I did not empty the Category:Coats of arms of families from Poland just by trolling. The matter is there is none Coat of arms from a Polish family.

We got a problem with the translation of the Polish word "Herb" which means, at the same time the Clan and the Coat of arms (the drawing) of this clan. So, Coats of arms belongs to the clans and not to the families. Please, if you have any time, see Polish clans, Polish Heraldry, or better, see Wappengemeinschaft.

Korwin is not my family's Coat of arms, it is the Clan to which the Szwedowskis belong and the Coat of arms (the drawing) used by the clan Korwin. The Polish nobility surnames came from the Renascence, the Polish nobility clans came from the Middle Ages, even before the Christening of Poland itself. That means we were Korwin time before to use our actual surname (in the legend)...

As an example: Sapieha is the surname of a well known family, but his Clan is Lis and Lis (the fox) is also their Coat of arms. (Even if as princes of the Holly Roman Empire they use nowadays a variation). In Polish Heraldry a Variation is not another Coat of arms, it is just another drawing of the same Coat of arms. In Poland they call it a "odmiana".

So we have a problem with the Category name. We can keep the Category:Coats of arms of families from Poland and add a note at the top explaining all of this, and copy the full Category:Polish nobility coats of arms images, (and later empty and erase this Category). Or keep my work, linking it to the Category:Coats of arms by families, as I did, and empty and erase the other one.

In both cases it is OK for me. Be free to choose what do you prefer.

By the way, you have good taste in pictures. This [1] is a very nice photo for me too. I presume you visited Bydgoszcz, I have some "distant cousins" in this area also.

Best regards my friend. Let me know your choice.

--Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 00:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Please, see also Dynastic Genealogy (Dynasties and Aristocratic families)

--Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 06:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


Hello Gustavo, i have restored your changes and redirected Category:Coats of arms of families from Poland to Category:Polish nobility coats of arms images.
Please, don't empty galleries or categories without a statement in the edit summary filed. Empty galleries and categories should be redirected to another gallery/category or can be deleted if they are tagged with {{reason for the deletion}}. Thank you. --GeorgHH 11:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Defilada.JPG[edit]

I opened this and found two different description: one with, another without licence. The Licence is {{PD-Polish}} and should be recognized as legal. I am not in possesion of this particular photo anymore, so I can not upload it. Thank you! Peterd 00:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

The picture has no information about his author, so we can't say it was made by a polish photographer... --GeorgHH 10:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Why?[edit]

hello GeorgHH, you has deleted image Image:Zaror1.jpg of my article. I guees that is a mistake, this image Zaror1 is mine, this has captured for me in live. Please, tellme where are the mistake. I waiting your answer.

Hello Mampato, the image was deleted by User:Barcex, not me. The Problem is, that the image wasn't tagged with a approriate licence tag (like {{PD-self}} or {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}. You can list the image on Commons:Undeletion requests. --GeorgHH 20:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bic Cristal macro.jpg[edit]

Yeah, sorry about using this image. I wasn't sure if no derivatives allowed for the use of unaltered versions in wikicommons.--Trounce 10:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Alerted by email[edit]

I'm not sure this was the best move, as the reason I created it in the first place was because many times one can simply modify the URL in a browser to try and see the applicable page. Thus, my hard redirect gets them directly to the correct page, whereas the soft redirect fails by requiring the extra navigation step. Hence this seemed to be one good reason to use a hard redirect on a cat page. The interwiki link using template:commonscat1 on the en.wikipedia side would also get them there, but they'd not see that page if composing the URL by hand. My assumption was we were looking at an occasion where we had an expert editor in mediawiki software, looking for the commons schema. It also strikes me as being something of a fib—the page was never moved, nor existed absent the redirect. LOL! I don't care much either way, but it may save someone some time the way I programmed it originally. Besides, I wanted to say Hi! How on earth did you ever even find it? Best regards // FrankB 22:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

You didn't have to do that... I was just touching base with you yesterday, more or less. Thanks! That was nice of you. // FrankB 20:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello Fabartus, i've found it by a fluke. In your version it was a self-link: categorized in Category:Topics with a redirect also to Category:Topics. Now i changed it back to your hard redirect but without categorizing. I think this is correct so? If not please feel free to revert my edits! --GeorgHH 20:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Don't think there's a correct or not on that kind of thing. On en.wp, we have templates for redirects to auto-categorize and keep them trackable. Some 'topic' redirects, I'll add to the categories because people browse for topics and might be more familiar with the nickname like 'Princess Di', or 'Princess Fergie', just to bring up a couple obvious ones... news accounts made those names far more understandable than [Sarah, Duchess of York]]. So I guess if I had a cat on it, I was thinking along those lines. The biggest problem with a lot of administrative nicities here is the multi-cultural/multi-language barriers, I would guess. Some idiomatic descriptive name in English just doesn't translate well much of the time. The product and tasking are far different as well. So I'd guess it's no big deal. There's probably a way for someone to look at all redirects in the database, if someone wants that. I just plug away, it's all above our pay grade. If they doubled our salaries, we'd still be earning nothing here right!?? <G> ttfn // FrankB 21:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

bad tagged by EnciclopediaDG-logo.jpg[edit]

This is a logo of my organization, designed by me. Is the icon of my encyclopedia: Enciclopedia DG. Can restart by his deletion log. Please!!. Have a article in the es-wiki.

See Enciclopedia DG

Hello, please list the image on Commons:Undeletion requests with the name of the author, a approriate licence and a link to the original image source. Thank you. --GeorgHH 20:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello![edit]

The images come from the articles about these cities in the english wikipedia and I gave them the same licence as they have there. Aaker 16:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello, this is not enough. You must state the link to the image source to allow other users check the licence information. Please see Commons:Licensing. Thank you. --GeorgHH 17:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Disp-med-ppe.jpg[edit]

The image has been submitted by the owner of the image. It is not on the TMI web site specifically, but TMI owns it. What do I need to do? I submitted the image with self type license. What do you need to verify this?

Drewk 18:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello, if you have a written permission from the owner to use the images under cc-by-sa-2.5 licence, please send a copy to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (for help see Commons:OTRS). Without a permission the images will be deleted because verifying is not possible. --GeorgHH 18:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

OK.

Drewk 00:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Removal of deletion notice.[edit]

Why did you remove the deletion notice here? It would seem that this image slipped through the deletion cracks, but that is no reason to remove the notice. The image is one of many images which were copied out of music catalogs on the net and uploaded to plwiki then blindly copied over to commons. --Gmaxwell 20:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

It was no source given from which it is a copyvio, and pl.wiki has no information about this, too. So we have no information why it is a copyvio. Feel free to list the image again on COM:DEL. --GeorgHH 20:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
It was part of a large batch of images, with sources provided elsewhere, most of which it seems were deleted. One other remains, Image:Sousaphone.jpg. Of course, they were already deleted on PL wiki. Because I know they are copyvio I'll just go ahead and deleted them now. I just wanted to make sure there was no other confusion involved. --Gmaxwell 20:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Images removal[edit]

How come you remove all the images I uploaded... Most of the pics were taken by me... it's unfair.. is there any way to recover those images... contact me on my talk page for more info..--Mayooresan 16:51, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello, the deleted images was missing any information about the author and the source. I have restored the images, you can add all information about author, source and licence in the next seven days. Please see Commons:Licensing to learn about the commons licensing police! --GeorgHH 21:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

  • Thanks for the cat updates, I had not noticed the PDF category. Sigh, will have to remember that for future files - as well as update the others when I get a chance... Smee 04:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

my pictures[edit]

I´ve received a message telling me i have to say the pictures i have uploaded are of my authory.. they are.. all of them i´ve clicked myself. but i have no clue what you want me to do to say this... User:Jvcbrasil 2007-fev-4

Hello, you must add a approriate copyright tag like {{PD-self}} to the image descriptions. For help see Commons:Licensing. --GeorgHH 19:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

From Zohair Harb About Image:King_Saud_Mosque2_(21).jpg.[edit]

To GeorgHH : I get your note about Image:King_Saud_Mosque2_(21).jpg.So i have edited the copyright status. I swear that i'm the auther of this photo (Smile)

--زهير حرب 15:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for adding a licence. --GeorgHH 20:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Chauvirey.jpg[edit]

...This media may be deleted...

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 13:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello GeorgeHH, Is-it OK now, Thanks Jean René 22:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for adding the licence. --GeorgHH 20:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

I want this page to appear in tha main page of Alexandria[edit]

To GeorgeHH: Could you help me to show this page http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Mosques_of_Alexandria as a part of main page of Alexandria? Because i failed to organize it. Thanks (Zohair Harb) --زهير حرب 16:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello Zohair, i have added a section Mosques of Alexandria to the Alexandria gallery. --GeorgHH 17:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Fragen betr. Deiner Nachricht[edit]

Du hast mir eine Nachricht auf User talk:SebastianHelm hinterlassen, und ich habe sie durch Zufall gesehen. Durch Zufall, da ich sehr selten hier bin. Damit genau das nicht passiert, habe ich diese Seite als Redirect eingerichtet. Leider geht das nicht so direkt, aber wenigstens sagt die Seite, dass sie ein "Redirect page" ist, und zeigt einen dicken Link an. So, wie Du die Nachricht geschrieben hast, wird sie gar nicht angezeigt, da Wikipedia alles nach dem Redirekt Befehl ignoriert. Hast du das übersehen?

Oder hast Du die Nachricht nicht selber geschrieben, sondern das einen Bot machen lassen? (Wenn das der Fall ist, möchte ich Dich bitten, das auch in der Mail klar zu machen. Ich jedenfalls fühle mich immer veräppelt wenn ich Formbriefe bekomme, die so tun als ob sie von einem richtigen Menschen geschrieben wurden. Außerdem möchte ich dich bitten, entweder den Fehler im Bot zu beheben oder, was generell eine gute Idee ist, selbst nachzuschauen ob er alles richtig gemacht hat.)

Das Löschen selber geht in Ordnung. Wie ich bereits im letzten Edit Summary geschrieben habe, wusste ich nur nicht, wie ich ein Bild selber löschen kann. Ich kann ja keine speedy deletion template aufs Bild heften.

Bitte antworte mir auf en:User talk:SebastianHelm. SebastianHelm 18:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I want this page to appear in the main page of Saudi Arabia[edit]

To Adminstrator GeorgHH: Thanks for your help about Alexandria page. I hope to organize this page to be a part of Saudi arabia page

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Jeddah

Under title (Mosques of Jeddah) With Thanks - Zohair Harb- --زهير حرب 21:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Carry-le-rouet-voice1.ogg[edit]

hello georghh, i've added a file to the wikimedia commons, it's an audio file i've recorded. i don't really understand how to change the tag. Admonr 16:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I've tagged it with PD, according to your other file which i have deleted because the quality was bad. --GeorgHH 21:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Blaufluegel-Prachtlibelle-Weibchen.jpg[edit]

Moin Georg, ich bin nicht der ursprüngliche Uploader dieses Bildes. Der entsprechende Hinweis an den Bildautor ist inzwischen schon ein halbes Jahr alt. Also schnellstens löschen, es ist kein Verlust! ;-) --Olei 09:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Olei, danke für den Hinweis. Die Nachricht bezüglich der fehlenden Lizenz hab ich per script eingefügt, welches wohl fälschlicher Weise nicht den Original-uploader informiert, sorry. --GeorgHH 21:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Biondi.Leshan.big.jpg deleted. Why?[edit]

Why did you delete my image Biondi.Leshan.big.jpg? It belongs to me, I have taken it in july 2006 in Leshan, Sichuan, China, I have uploaded it with the right copyright permission. Can you please reload it, and, please, be more careful when you delete images? Many thanks from the italian writer Mario Biondi

--Baburkhan 16:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

The image description says Permission= Granted for non commercial use - and for all files on commons commercial use must be allowed (see Commons:Licensing). What is the licence for the image, {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} or {{cc-by-nc-2.5}}??? --GeorgHH 20:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Xavier121[edit]

User was instructed via OTRS to use "OTRS Ticket#2006082110002647" for all images belonging to Lasse Hoile regarding the Porcupine Tree band. It appears okay. Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 19:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Idroponica g5.jpg[edit]

Hi, thanks for your notice. Usually I put the GFDL-self template, but in this picture I forgot to do it. Now there is the license and I've removed the "No license" template. Regards --gian_d 21:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Boscastle_011.jpg[edit]

I have released my image to the public domain. Thank you for pointing this out to me. I think I must have forgotten to select the copyright tag when I was uploading the picture.--Benjaminevans82 01:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Help![edit]

I've written the source and the license in Psittacula krameri2.jpg, yet I'm not sure it won't be deleted. What can I do?

Hello, it's ok now, the images will not be deleted. Thank you. --GeorgHH 08:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

From Zohair Harb About Image:King_Saud_Mosque2_(21).jpg.[edit]

To GeorgHH : I get your note about Image:King_Saud_Mosque2_(21).jpg.So i have edited the copyright status. I swear that i'm the auther of this photo (Smile)

--زهير حرب 15:26, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for adding a licence. --GeorgHH 20:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Chauvirey.jpg[edit]

...This media may be deleted...

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 13:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello GeorgeHH, Is-it OK now, Thanks Jean René 22:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for adding the licence. --GeorgHH 20:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

I want this page to appear in tha main page of Alexandria[edit]

To GeorgeHH: Could you help me to show this page http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Mosques_of_Alexandria as a part of main page of Alexandria? Because i failed to organize it. Thanks (Zohair Harb) --زهير حرب 16:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello Zohair, i have added a section Mosques of Alexandria to the Alexandria gallery. --GeorgHH 17:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Fragen betr. Deiner Nachricht[edit]

Du hast mir eine Nachricht auf User talk:SebastianHelm hinterlassen, und ich habe sie durch Zufall gesehen. Durch Zufall, da ich sehr selten hier bin. Damit genau das nicht passiert, habe ich diese Seite als Redirect eingerichtet. Leider geht das nicht so direkt, aber wenigstens sagt die Seite, dass sie ein "Redirect page" ist, und zeigt einen dicken Link an. So, wie Du die Nachricht geschrieben hast, wird sie gar nicht angezeigt, da Wikipedia alles nach dem Redirekt Befehl ignoriert. Hast du das übersehen?

Oder hast Du die Nachricht nicht selber geschrieben, sondern das einen Bot machen lassen? (Wenn das der Fall ist, möchte ich Dich bitten, das auch in der Mail klar zu machen. Ich jedenfalls fühle mich immer veräppelt wenn ich Formbriefe bekomme, die so tun als ob sie von einem richtigen Menschen geschrieben wurden. Außerdem möchte ich dich bitten, entweder den Fehler im Bot zu beheben oder, was generell eine gute Idee ist, selbst nachzuschauen ob er alles richtig gemacht hat.)

Das Löschen selber geht in Ordnung. Wie ich bereits im letzten Edit Summary geschrieben habe, wusste ich nur nicht, wie ich ein Bild selber löschen kann. Ich kann ja keine speedy deletion template aufs Bild heften.

Bitte antworte mir auf en:User talk:SebastianHelm. SebastianHelm 18:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I want this page to appear in the main page of Saudi Arabia[edit]

To Adminstrator GeorgHH: Thanks for your help about Alexandria page. I hope to organize this page to be a part of Saudi arabia page

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Jeddah

Under title (Mosques of Jeddah) With Thanks - Zohair Harb- --زهير حرب 21:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Carry-le-rouet-voice1.ogg[edit]

hello georghh, i've added a file to the wikimedia commons, it's an audio file i've recorded. i don't really understand how to change the tag. Admonr 16:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I've tagged it with PD, according to your other file which i have deleted because the quality was bad. --GeorgHH 21:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Blaufluegel-Prachtlibelle-Weibchen.jpg[edit]

Moin Georg, ich bin nicht der ursprüngliche Uploader dieses Bildes. Der entsprechende Hinweis an den Bildautor ist inzwischen schon ein halbes Jahr alt. Also schnellstens löschen, es ist kein Verlust! ;-) --Olei 09:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Olei, danke für den Hinweis. Die Nachricht bezüglich der fehlenden Lizenz hab ich per script eingefügt, welches wohl fälschlicher Weise nicht den Original-uploader informiert, sorry. --GeorgHH 21:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Image Biondi.Leshan.big.jpg deleted. Why?[edit]

Why did you delete my image Biondi.Leshan.big.jpg? It belongs to me, I have taken it in july 2006 in Leshan, Sichuan, China, I have uploaded it with the right copyright permission. Can you please reload it, and, please, be more careful when you delete images? Many thanks from the italian writer Mario Biondi

--Baburkhan 16:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

The image description says Permission= Granted for non commercial use - and for all files on commons commercial use must be allowed (see Commons:Licensing). What is the licence for the image, {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} or {{cc-by-nc-2.5}}??? --GeorgHH 20:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Xavier121[edit]

User was instructed via OTRS to use "OTRS Ticket#2006082110002647" for all images belonging to Lasse Hoile regarding the Porcupine Tree band. It appears okay. Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 19:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Idroponica g5.jpg[edit]

Hi, thanks for your notice. Usually I put the GFDL-self template, but in this picture I forgot to do it. Now there is the license and I've removed the "No license" template. Regards --gian_d 21:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Boscastle_011.jpg[edit]

I have released my image to the public domain. Thank you for pointing this out to me. I think I must have forgotten to select the copyright tag when I was uploading the picture.--Benjaminevans82 01:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Help![edit]

I've written the source and the license in Psittacula krameri2.jpg, yet I'm not sure it won't be deleted. What can I do?

Hello, it's ok now, the images will not be deleted. Thank you. --GeorgHH 08:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Billgfdl.jpg[edit]

I removed the no source template you added to the image as it has an OTRS permission. Yonatanh 14:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The permission notice is correct, but the image description nevertheless need information about the licence status. I tagged it again with {{No license}}. --GeorgHH 21:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

¿¿WHAT ARE YOU DOING??[edit]

Why you delete the images iglesiadesantamariamagdalena2.jpg, iglesiadesantamariamagdalena1.jpg and iglesiadesantalucia? I made it with my own camera... Please, restart them...

EDuLiN

See this commentary on your discussion. --GeorgHH 20:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Hilfe![edit]

Hallo, Du hast einen Löschantrag für http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Lachender_Stein.jpg gestellt. Ich blick es nicht. Habe ich richtig die Lizenz eingegeben? Wer entfernt den Einbahnstraßenbaustein? Ich bin im deutschen WP: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Get%C3%BCm

Hallo, danke das du die Lizenz nachgetragen hast. Die Löschwarnung habe ich wieder entfernt. --GeorgHH 16:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:ROM-PalmyraTombstone-Man1-2ndCenturyAD.png[edit]

Thanks for pointing out the licensing omission. I have fixed that and have added the pertinent categories for the image as well. Danke! Captmondo 23:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for completing the information. --GeorgHH 07:41, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

permission for Image:L. Ron Hubbard Life & Death.jpg[edit]

Hello!

I've sent a few days ago the permission to use this image, to 'OTRS', by email from contact@ericbourdon.com.

I've already added to the photo, for everybody who wants, the links needed to check this permission.

Today, I've no response yet; please tell me if anything missing is needed.

Thank you,

Eric Bourdon

It's ok now. Thank you. --GeorgHH 07:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:180px-BJ Vorster.png[edit]

I tried to select and appropriate tag for the picture but it seems none applies and/or I'm dumb. Anyway, I've added a textual explanation. According to en.wiki, the picture is in the public domain. I've added a reference of the source page in en.wikipedia, hope that's enough. Moongateclimber 10:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, we need the source of the image to verify it is in the public domain. It seems the image on en.wiki is converted from a .bmp image which is deleted, and the uploader hasn't transfered the complete image information. --GeorgHH 11:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Image Artefact(band)[edit]

hello Georg, the situation is as follows: I contribute to english Wiki under the pseudo Ordocello (as is indicated on my french page, Utilisateur:Isabelle_S. ) So I obtained every licence and permission from Guillaume Vrac/Aldébaran about these images of Artefact (mail Re: [Ticket#2007011910017441] Attestation Autorisation publication sous licence GFDL ARTEFACT ).Ihave added theses references under the file. What must I do now? thanks for the infos--isa 21:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Images from gibnews.net[edit]

I have re-instated the image of Iberia landing, and trust that it is correctly tagged. If you have any queries about this please see the page at

http://www.gibnews.net/photos

The picture may look remarkably similar to the ones taken by the other 60 press photographers lined up on the tarmac that day.

I do not read the messages here very often, life intrudes.

--Gibnews 12:06, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Ursulaglocke[edit]

Hallo! Dieses Bild habe ich selbst fotografiert. Ich verstehe nicht, warum es zur Löschung steht.
MfG Andreasdziewior 18:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

RE:Wisconsin Shoots[edit]

To tell the truth, this picture was accidentally uploaded to its own seperate page. The middle version (the 1st one I uploaded) is a higher resolution version that I found and intended to uploaded to Image:Wisconsin Shoots.JPG, where the correct information (source, photographer, description, etc) are already present. I somehow-rather screwed that up, resulting in a duplicate image. The correct source info and such is located here; the hi-res duplicate is here. Since the nessicary information is already present for the image one should be deleted. I will leave the descion of which one stays and which one goes in your qualified hands. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I have uploaded the Hi-Res version to Image:Wisconsin Shoots.JPG. --GeorgHH 22:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Federer_vs_Srichaphan_Basel_2006.jpg[edit]

Hallo GeorgHH. Danke für den Hinweis, ich hatte tatsächlich vergessen, die Lizenzinfo zu informieren. Ist meines Erachtens jetzt erledigt. Gruss, Mschlindwein 22:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Ja, nun ist es in Ordnung. Danke. --GeorgHH 21:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

About the imgage Image:BILLNBOB.JPG[edit]

I find this imgage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:BILLNBOB.JPG in thesame article wich redaction a try to contniuate. Unhopely the lowerist jargon discrabing licences is to havy. Could you help me?--antosh 23:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)--antosh 23:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, without a source which describes the author and date of this photo we cant confirm that it is PD. Images with incomplete source and author information will de deleted. --GeorgHH 21:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Erb.gif[edit]

Sorry, I don´t wrong understand. I speak nur deutsch. But info is richtig, replenish with required. Ahoj--Bosquete 20:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lavrentiev_i_de_gaulle.gif[edit]

As for the other media that I uploaded on wikipedia from the site of NSU, I have got the official permission of the University and it was cited below in the permission tag. Of course, the author is not known himself but the university owns all the publication rights and it was specifically written that the picture source was the official website of the university. I specially required their agreement to the publishment as you can see below and it was written in the permission tag. If you do not understand Russian then find someone who does before deleting pictures...: Мы согласны на публикацию фотографий с сайта НГУ (...) С уважением проректор НГУ по информатизации Андрей Кочеев. et Вы, разумеется можете использовать фотографии, выложенные на нашем сайте для созданных станиц в Википедии при условии указания источника информации - английского сайта НГУ (Ян Резниченко Отдел международных связей Новосибирский государственный университет) I am particularly grateful to you for having destroyed this work so it would be nice if you upload once more the photo on mediacommon and then reput the link on the articles where it was used... As it was written on the picture tags, the source is www.nsu.ru and the permission is given in the small mail above.

Graouilly54 13:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

If you have a written permission to use the image under a concrete free licence like PD or GFDL you can send a copy to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (see Commons:OTRS) and ask for undeletion here. Or give a link to a web site with copyright information. Thank you. --GeorgHH 21:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I will do it but I am quite angry that I have to do it whereas I respect the copyrights and asked the university for agreement. Thus I have to lose time only because you did not read all the permission tag... You made a topic on my discussion page but I go on media commons only when I need to upload a picture and check regularly my wikipedia account...For that reason, I think that sending mail would be greater before deletion...Graouilly54 08:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:2001.09.00. Portugal. Almendra.jpg[edit]

I'm sorry that I did take too much time to do the copyright tag of the photo 2001.09.00. Portugal. Almendra.jpg. I was some months away from Wikipedia.

Thank you for remind me about the faulty copyright tag.

Francisco, Xuaxo 21:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back to commons, and thanks for adding a licence tag. --GeorgHH 21:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

About Polish clans, Polish families and Polish coats of arms[edit]

Dear friends:

If you have some extra time, I would appreciate if you can take a look to Category:Coats of arms of clans of Poland and Category:Polish nobility coats of arms images, mainly the Talk pages.

There is an Italian wikipedian, who knows nothing about Polish history and Polish szlachta and he is rearranging the categories in Category:Coats of arms of Poland

In commons he is User:G.dallorto

My point of view may have some mistakes but I would thank you very much your thought and your discussion on this issue.

As today I got few time I am sending this same message to:

If you know somebody else interested in Polish heraldry and Polish szlachta, please invite him to join this Discussion.

Best regards, my friends, and thank you by your answer to this request. --Gustavo 08:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

About some pictures[edit]

Hallo, I've read the informations you have given me about a picture that was erased some weeks ago, and so I think that you have erased it, maybe. For this reason, I'm going to explain you one thing, and to ask you some informations. Yesterday I've uploaded a new picture, named Image:Bugatti Type40.JPG. If you read the information I've written in that page, you can find that I've taken this picture in 1995, and below you can also find that I've taken it by a digital camera. Naturally it seems impossible, because here in Italy (I'm italian) in 1995 there weren't any digital camera, ora anyway they were very rare. So, how can it be? Simply, I've taken the original photo in 1995 with a conventional camera, and yesterday I've taken a photo of that old picture (see the low quality of the image) with a digital camera, because I haven't got a scanner to read the original photo. I think that it's possibile to do this way. Nextly, I'll upload other pictures this way. Please, tell me if it's possible. Instead, for what's about the last picture deleted, I'll try to upload it again, but I'll insert more informations about the picture, and the website where it was taken from. Please give an answer about these questions as soon as possible. Bye bye. User:Luc106

Hello Luc, naturally you can make a scan or digial photo of your own pictures, there's no problem.
Basically be sure that you give so much informations you can to your uploads, then they will not be deleted. Important informations are about the author, the source and the licence. You can use {{Information}} to describe a image, a short overview for describing images you can find here. If you have questions, feel free to leave me a mesage. --GeorgHH 22:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Trümmerfrau Dresden 2.JPG[edit]

Hi GeorgHH, thanks for pointing out the lack of information regarding the copyright of that picture. You wrote:"I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear." I'm still quite a commons newbie and i can't see what exactly it is you are missing. The summary says clearly that the source is own work, that I (User:Torsten) am the author of this content and also that i put it under the copy left. It would be nice if you could explain what makes you conclude that the creator of this content is not specified. thanks a lot -- Torsten 09:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)