User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2010 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Cymatium lotorium

  • Je te remercie de ton message. Ta photo de Cymatium lotorium est splendide. Mais je n’ai pas eu le temps de voter pour toi pour QI car elle était déjà promue. J’ai voulu la mettre dans wikipedia France mais tu y avais déjà pensé. Mais il reste l’image de valeur : j’ai voté. Pour le carcharodontosaurus je discute avec Eusebius pour lui expliquer le motif.
  • Thank you for your message. Your photo Cymatium is beautiful. But I have not had time to vote for you for QI because she was already promoted. I wanted to put in wikipedia-France but there you had ever thought. But he remains the image of value: I voted.

For Carcharodontosaurus I discuss with Eusebius to explain the reason. One more time thank you. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:44, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

:-)

Hi George, sorry I was away when you left your greeting. Happy new year (a bit late :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 20:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

All is okay :) --George Chernilevsky talk 20:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Emys orbicularis 2009 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emys orbicularis 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Messer

Hallo George,

sorry, ich bin kein Pilzesammler und habe nicht erkannt, dass das ein Messer ist. Ich vermute aber, dass es anderen Usern ähnlich wie mir gehen könnte. Kannst du einen Hinweis auf das Messer in die Bildinfo aufnehmen? Wie kann ich mein Oppose zurücknehmen?

(Vielen Dank auch für deine gute Arbeit als Commons Administrator. Ich bin erst seit kurzem dabei und finde es sehr spannend.)

Viele Grüße

--Pjt56 (talk) 22:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Cymatium lotorium 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cymatium lotorium 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Black sea water near Fiolent 2009 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black sea water near Fiolent 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

150

La dent.

Merci Georges pour ton soutiens, Merci à Eusebius de m’avoir écouté. Je vais retirer cette photo. Elle a eu le mérite d’attirer l’attention sur les problèmes que nous pouvons avoir pour juger des sujets présentés. Beaucoup d’entre nous ne font pas la différence en paléontologie entre: un dessin d’artiste, un moulage(le crâne du scope est un moulage), une reconstitution, et un fossile véritable. J’ai refais une photo de meilleures qualité pour QI.

George thank you for your support, Eusebius Thanks for listening. I'll remove this picture. It had the merit of drawing attention to the problems that we have to judge the topics presented. Many of us do not differentiate between paleontology: a drawing artist, a cast (the scope of the skull is a cast), a reconstruction and a real fossil. I remake a better picture quality for QI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Cette bonne décision --George Chernilevsky talk 15:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Cymatium lotorium 2010 G1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymatium lottorium (Black-spotted Triton).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Emys orbicularis 2009 G1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emys orbicularis (European pond terrapin).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Re: FPC vote

Hi George, I thank you so much for your advice. Jacopo Werther (talk) 11:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Праздники

Спасибо. А Вас — со Старым Новым годом! --AVRS (talk) 13:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Face-smile.svg И я Вас поздравляю --George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Edible fungi in basket 2009 G1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Picked mushrooms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Limnodromus scolopaceus.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Limnodromus scolopaceus (Long-billed Dowitcher).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Tutufa rubeta

  • Congratulation for "Tutufa rubeta 2010 g1.jpg" can it would be better to turn 180 degrees so that the apex is at the top.
Good idea, thank you
  • test "Veined rapa" on black background
I will try it, but only with empty seashell, not alive animal
  • Thank you for changing the Freibergite is one of my first picture in march 2009.

Amicalement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Ok, thank you Face-smile.svg --George Chernilevsky talk 08:50, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Emys orbicularis 2009 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emys orbicularis 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Emys orbicularis 2009 G3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emys orbicularis 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Tutufa rubeta 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tutufa rubeta 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tutufa bufo 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tutufa bufo 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fomitopsis pinicola 2009 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fomitopsis pinicola 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gluck

Merci pour ton Vote sur le buste de Gluck. Attention il existe sur la photo pour laquelle tu as voté un cadre fantôme. Je l’ai corrigé et je change Gluck1.jpg pour Glcuk2.jpg Merci Pour tes photographies de coquillage dont tu es maintenant le spécialiste, pour que tout soit parfait je suggère que tu mettes la taille du spécimen. Bien amicalement

Спасибо за ваш голос на бюст Глюка. Внимание Есть на фотографию, для которого вы голосовали одной стороны призрака. Я поправил и изменить Gluck1.jpg Спасибо за Glcuk2.jpg За фотографиями вашей оболочки теперь, что ты специалист, так что все идеально я предлагаю вам поставить размеру образца. С уважением --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Merci pour les commentaires, j'ajouterai le montant.
Bien amicalement --George Chernilevsky talk 10:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Cymatium lotorium 2010 G1.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cymatium lotorium 2010 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cymatium lotorium 2010 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 08:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Dewberry fruits 2009 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dewberry fruits 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QI

«Уже было отклонено». А как искать в архиве этих обсуждений? Спасибо.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Архив здесь: Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 2010
Основная претензия по качеству "completely oversaturated", то есть сильно перенасыщенные цвета.
То же самое видно по данным EXIF Вашей фотокамеры:
Модель камеры Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
Контрастность Сильное повышение
Насыщенность Большая насыщенность
Резкость Сильное повышение
В результате таких настроек и получился перенасыщенный (пережжённый) кадр. Учтите эту ошибку, и в следующий раз у Вас получится гораздо лучше.
С уважением и пожеланием творческих успехов, Георгий --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Спасибо. Значит, надо просто перебирать архивы; я было думал, что есть поиск по архиву. Что до EXIF, то эти значения не имеют смысла. Съёмка была в RAW и потом обширная обработка. А в EXIF записаны настройки камеры, которые никак не влияют на готовую фотографию. — Что до "лучше", то я понял, что критика упирается в слишком красные, густые, непрозрачные, однотонные ягоды?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Можно использовать вкладку "Где используется" на страничке файла. А потом искать с внутри страницы средствами поиска броузера (для Mozilla Firefox это "Правка"/"Найти") по предполагаемой фразе.
Вопрос по качеству относится ко всем цветам, а не только к красному. Зеленый тоже светится очень ярко, полутона почти отсутствуют. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Orthodox church Vinnitsa S Bug 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orthodox church Vinnitsa S Bug 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Tutufa bufo 2010 G1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tutufa bufo (Red-ringed Frog Shell).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pachygrapsus marmoratus 2009 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Blood parrot cichlid 2010 G1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blood parrot cichlid 2010 G1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Astronotus ocellatus 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astronotus ocellatus 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


The hidden fires of the Flame Nebula

Dear George Chernilevsky, Thank you for promoting the above image to FP recently. You recommended that it be placed in the fpc category: Places/Satellite images. However this image was taken from a ground based telescope and therefore I would recommend placing it in Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy. What do you think? Originalwana (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, Astronomy is better, i agree. With best regards, --George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks

For fixing my "copy and paste" error :) Regards --Herby talk thyme 14:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Always please Face-smile.svg, it is minor correction and anything especial. Other users correct my errors too. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:24, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your relentless work doing a lot of tedious closures in several projects, for your ever kind comments, helpful nature and many valuable contributions. You are a great asset to Commons! --Slaunger (talk) 19:20, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
And I certainly agree with Slaunger Face-smile.svg --Herby talk thyme 19:29, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Oh, many thanks! It is pleasant and unexpected. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Brachypelma klaasi 2009 G01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brachypelma klaasi (Mexican Pink tarantula).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Old tower 2010 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old tower 2010 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Fiolent Sevastopol 2009 G5.jpg

Hi George - thought you might be interested to know, this shows Juniperus excelsa - MPF (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! I have added more information. With best regards --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! I had used 'Krym' as the Latin alphabet transliteration of Крим. But you're right, it is usually Crimea in English ;-) MPF (talk) 13:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Old tower 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old tower 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rapana Black Sea 2009 G6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rapana Black Sea 2009 G6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fomitopsis pinicola 2009 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fomitopsis pinicola 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thanks again

I usually "preview" my saves but I guess I only saw the signature on my comment not on the QICtotal, thanks. That page is odd sometimes it is fine and sometimes not. And my thanks for your support elsewhere :) --Herby talk thyme 13:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Наклон

Значит, напишите «против», что делать. Этот наклон нельзя устранить — трудно попасть туда, где сделан снимок. Кроме того, я его не замечаю, потому что сужу по вертикальной трубе. Вы судите по зданиям и горизонтальным трубам? Они все сняты под углом. А что до поворотов в редакторе, это добавляет слишком много искажений.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Вертикальная труба как раз более заметно наклонена. А в фотошопе поворот делается достаточно аккуратно, причём с сотыми долями градуса. Может, попробуете исправить? Ещё замечание по снимку - он словно с большим приближением сделан. Некоторые участки словно залиты однородным цветом.
С уважением --George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
А куда она наклонена? Направо или налево? Заливки это от моей любви к насыщенности, и если вы расскажете, где они, тогда я посмотрю внимательнее. Что до аккуратности, то поворот по определению аппроксимация, а значит, ухудшение картинки. Как бы хорошо ни делать пересчёт, он останется пересчётом. Увы мне :).--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Наклон вправо (против часовой стрелки). Я его исправил так:
Adobe Photoshop CS
Image\Rotate canvas > Arbitrary... Angle 0.75 CW
Качество визуально не ухудшилось. А заливки - на фронтальных стенах, белых и розовых. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:34, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Там и должны быть заливки. На таком расстоянии нельзя получить детали стены, а можно только шум матрицы. Шумодавка почистила его и оставила заливку, особенно если стена белая каменная и хорошо отражает свет. То есть падает влево, против часовой. Мне кажется, это такой горизонтальный tilt, потому что нельзя было держать объектив параллельно композиции, пришлось снимать под углом. Вот оно налево и сходится.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 01:35, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Шумодавка аппаратная (камера) или софт? Если софт, то можете пересоздать, только менее агрессивно давить шумы. Наклон я как раз по вертикальным трубам и проверял. Заодно и крыши выровнялись. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:53, 6 February 2010 (UTC)