User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2010 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Note

Hello. I just wanted to inform you that I granted you Autopatrolled rights. Basically, it does not change anything for you, but makes it easier for users watching Special:RecentChanges to find unhelpful edits. Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 00:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank You! I autopatrolled user in Russian Wiki too. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Desna Sosonka 2009 G1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Desna (tributary of the Southern Bug).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

ex-VIC "Fort-Boyard"

Hello. Please note : The nomination of this picture in VIC was withdrawn by the nominator some days before your comments, and is therefore no more to be judged. In my humble opinion, to judge it now is not very fair. Then, two of your three comments seems for me to be non relevant, as concerning the quality (that I know bad) of the shot  : it was a VIC, not a QIC. At last, as I disagree with the judgment process of VIC for the moment, maybe have you seen that I've withdrawn all my nominations. So It would be very kind of you not to comment them until their deletion of the current page . Many thanks, and sorry for my bad English, which is much better than my Russian, and Ukrainian. However, I still congratulate you for the high quality of your own images. Best Regards from Paris --Jebulon (talk) 00:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello George Chernilevsky. J'avais compris que vous étiez très aimable, j'en ai la preuve avec votre message. Merci d'avoir répondu, et en Français ! A bientôt. Bien amicalement, --Jebulon (talk) 22:24, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Sets closure

Hello Georges,
I have closed the promoted set on Soviet ballistic missile submarine classes. Perhaps could you try to close the remaining promoted set on Satyrium titus, following the procedure explained here? (Note: 3.2 has already been made by Eusebius). It would be very kind of you, and I am at your service if you need. With best regards, --Myrabella (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour Myrabella!
I do not understand clearly this procedure, sorry. I do not wish to make a mistake.
If you ask about categorization - it is Lepidoptera.
Commons:Valued images by topic/Life forms/Animals/Arthropods/Butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera)
Respectueusement, --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Здравствуйте Георгий,
That doesn't matter, and thanks for the category! I propose something: I will close this set (not today but soon) and I will document each edit in the edit summary, so you could follow the procedure with an example (in fact, I did so for the SBMS classes set, but the Satyrium titus set might be easier, with only two images in it). I am pretty sure that you will manage to close further sets quite well, making no more mistakes than any of us! With best regards (how to say it in Russian?), --Myrabella (talk) 07:17, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
OK.
  • Yours faithfully = С уважением (the most usual variant in Russian, also typical for an offical letter)
  • With best regards = С наилучшими пожеланиями (more emotional in Russian).
С наилучшими пожеланиями --George Chernilevsky talk 08:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done You can see the closure step by step with comments in the edit summary in my "user contributions" list.
С наилучшими пожеланиями, --Myrabella (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Bonjour Myrabella! J'ai regardé vos actions. Merci. Bien amicalement --George Chernilevsky talk 10:00, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Please remember that User:VICbot neglects Template:VISC-thumb's promises and doesn't process closed VISCs. So the user who closes it should perform the full closing procedure. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks to the tanks ! Thanks for the tanks !

Hello Dear Георгий.
As a lover of History, I would like to congratulate you with the photos of the T34/76 (version A, B, or C ? Smile). I think that this tank took a great part in the common victory againts nazism, and I remember to all those soviet guys who died in this great fight... During a professional journey to Belgorod, a few years ago, I visited the Kursk battlefield, very impressive ! We are far, here, from cherry blossoms ! When you promoted my cherry blossom image as QI, it was my birthday (24 march). So it was an appreciated gift for me ! And then, I have a gift for you too: I've translated in french (from the english version) your informations about the tank and the monument, with a link to the french wikipedia. Best regards. Bien cordialement depuis Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour Jebulon!
Merci pour la traduction en français et pour l'estimation.
J'aussi estime haut l'histoire militaire. Je voyais beaucoup de places, où il y avait une guerre. Là jusqu'ici sont restées les tranchées et le fil de fer barbelé. Je trouvais les munitions, l'armement, les champs de mines et les os des soldat en Russie.

Mon anniversaire le 2 mai (cette année il y aura 43 ans).

Bien amicalement --George Chernilevsky talk 18:33, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

T-34-76 Sevastopol 2009 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! T-34-76 Sevastopol 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Project 775 YAMAL 2009 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Project 775 YAMAL 2009 G1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

T-34-76 Sevastopol 2009 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! T-34-76 Sevastopol 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Xantho poressa 2009 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xantho poressa 2009 G2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Orthodox church Vinnitsa S Bug 2010 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orthodox church Vinnitsa S Bug 2010 G2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Orthodox church Vinnitsa S Bug 2010 G3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orthodox church Vinnitsa S Bug 2010 G3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

201

With all good wishes :)

Quality Image Barnstar.svg The Quality Image Barnstar
For many valuable contributions to Commons and for 200 QI images Herby talk thyme 15:50, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much! --George Chernilevsky talk 17:22, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I do Symbol support vote.svg Support these congratulations, and wait for the 200 next !!--Jebulon (talk) 23:22, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank you too! --George Chernilevsky talk 04:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Antonio da Trento - The Tiburtine sibyl and the Emperor Augustus.jpg

Just to let you know, the one oppose appears to be a joke. :) –Juliancolton | Talk 16:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

OK, fixed --George Chernilevsky talk 16:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! –Juliancolton | Talk 17:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Xantho poressa 2009 G2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xantho poressa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Poster Papaver 2a.jpg

Hi George,

I wonder which of the two Poppy posters in FPC should be promoted. As is now, and if no more oppose votes fall on the alternative version, I think this is the one that should pass. What do you think? Cheers, Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi Joaquim Alves!
I think, both deserved rewards. Only one photo from three coincides only.
In similar situation i have lost one award, however it was unfair IMO. We are have very similar FP several times.
With best regards --George Chernilevsky talk 19:29, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Please forgive me to insist. I don't think that is correct because the second version was intended as an alternative to the first. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
  • OK, wait for result. May be good idea is Delist one? --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Mega-Moll 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mega-Moll 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Xantho poressa 2009 G3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xantho poressa 2009 G3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Matches 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matches 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Boletus Impolitus dried 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boletus Impolitus dried 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Mega-Moll 2008 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mega-Moll 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Xantho poressa 2009 G3.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xantho poressa, male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion Rana sylvatica

Rana sylvatica SC.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rana sylvatica SC.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rana sylvatica SC.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 07:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello George, I think there is an error on this promotion: there is a total of only 4 supporting (7-3=4) votes and 5 are needed. But maybe I missed something. --Cephas (talk) 15:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi Cephas!
Promotion is correct. Read Rules
1. At least 5 supporting votes
2. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority)
Example: 5 support, 2 oppose - promoted; 6 support, 3 oppose - promoted too.
7 support, 3 oppose - congratulations, good result.
With best regards --George Chernilevsky talk 20:34, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Boletus Impolitus dried 2010 G1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boletus impolitus (Iodine bolete), dried.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

35

Re: FPC voting

Could I use the {{opp}} template, or would that mess up the bot too? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

{{opp}} is correct IMO --George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Project 61M Smetlivyy 2009 G1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Guard ship Smetlivy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

За vote

Excuse me, but what does your {{за}} vote mean? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:07, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

за = support in Russian. It is correct vote for FPCBot processing. For more info You can read Commons:Polling templates.
With best regards, --George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Xantho poressa 2009 G5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xantho poressa 2009 G5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Xantho poressa 2009 G6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xantho poressa 2009 G6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

RSD-10 2009 G1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
RSD-10 Pioneer .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

today !

Hello George Chernilevsky !


Today is a great day, if I'm not wrong !! So, I'm happy to wish you a very happy birthday !! ( So do "Commons" too : the picture of the day is yours .) Best regards from Paris.--Jebulon (talk) 08:51, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Merci bien!
Je suis très content que j'ai un bon ami à Paris! --George Chernilevsky talk 09:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
And let me add my best regards too then :) Felicitations --Herby talk thyme 09:22, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much :) --George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Pour

Excuse me, but what does 'Pour' mean when voting on FPC? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:59, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Pour = Support in French --George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Also, do you speak French or German or English as your native language? You use all three when voting on FPC. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: about images of ’SSO’

Уважаемый Георгий! Прошу Вас как автора и правообладателя изображения нарукавной эмблемы ССО «Альмагест» вставить её также и в качестве иллюстрации в статью Шелкография (Трафаретная печать). Наименование метода их изготовления в статье ССО я уточнил.

Со своей стороны, я мог бы дополнить викисклад аналогичным изображением нашивки ССО «Оптимум» (экон. ф-т ЛГУ), автором дизайна которой (1980), м.пр., я сам и являюсь :). Вообще, если порыться в моих архивах, можно было бы набрать материал и по ССО других ф-тов (в 1980-84 при Бастрыкине я был членом Большого комитета – председателем фин.-рев.комиссии по ССО) — и при наличии свободного времени посвятить им специальный раздел в Википедии.

Cherurbino (talk) 07:43, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Приятно познакомиться!
Нашивка «Альмагест» - это мой дизайн. Я был художником стройотряда в 1985 году.
С уважением, Георгий --George Chernilevsky talk 08:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Spassiba !!

Merci beaucoup Gospodine George pour cette très gentille BARNSTAR que je ne mérite pas !! Je suis très content d'avoir deux featured pictures, mais surtout très fier de tes compliments, mon ami de si loin vers l'est ! Je te salue amicalement, --Jebulon (talk) 20:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Kotsjubinsky 76 Vinn 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kotsjubinsky 76 Vinn 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kempa Vinnitsa 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kempa Vinnitsa 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Scope changed

Hello, I changed the scope on Commons:Valued image candidates/Mount Nebo BW 6.JPG to Mount Nebo (Jordan). So your support vote is expired. --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

FPC careless reviews

Hi George,

You may be interested in participating in this_discussion. Cheers, Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:11, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Polyporus squamosus 2010 G1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polyporus squamosus 2010 G1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Polyporus squamosus 2010 G2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polyporus squamosus 2010 G2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Polyporus squamosus 2010 G3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polyporus squamosus 2010 G3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.