User talk:Gerddanigel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gerddanigel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Hallo & Danke[edit]

Hallo Gerd,
vielen, vielen, vielen Dank für all' deine tolle Fotos, die Du hier hochgeladen hast! Das ist tatsächlich ein unglaublicher Schatz, der Wikipedia sehr bereichern wird.

Ich hab gesehen, dass Du das noch nicht so lange machst und wollte Dir zur Seite stehen, falls Du (technische) Unterstützung hier brauchst. Wikimedia Commons ist nicht immer so einfach und vor allem nicht immer so benutzerfreundlich.

Ich habe zahlreicher deiner Bilder bereits kategorisiert (damit sie leichter zu finden sind) und teilweise die Beschreibungen ergänzt. Außerdem hast du mehrere Bilder doppelt hochgeladen, ich hab die Dubletten dann entfernt. Wie gesagt, wenn du Hilfe / Unterstützung brauchst, kannst Du jederzeit hier oder mir per Mail (jckibelka at gmail com) Bescheid geben. Viele herzliche Grüße, --Jcornelius (talk) 14:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Zeitliche Einordnung[edit]

Hallo Gerd, danke für die großartigen Fotos! Beim Anschauen habe ich mir aber gerade eine Frage zu den Fotos vom Bahnhof Schönhauser Allee gestellt:

Am Altbau vor dem Bahnhofsgebäude ist bei dem Foto von 1961 und beim Foto von 1985 eine Leuchtreklame aus Dreiecken zu sehen, beim mittleren Foto fehlt diese. Da sie auf dem Bild von 1985 nicht frisch saniert aussieht, frage ich mich, ob die Jahreszahlen so stimmen. Kannst du dich diesbezüglich erinnern? Danke :) --APPER (talk) 08:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Orte der Fotos[edit]

Hallo Gerd Danigel, ich hab mir erlaubt, deine hochgeladenen Bilder im Wikipedia-Artikel über dich einzubinden. Auch von mir herzlichen Dank für die tollen Fotos. Kannst du bei File:Motorrad MZ 1982.jpg und bei File:Telefonzelle DDR 1988.jpg noch den Ort mit eintragen. Wenn du Hilfe benötigst, melde dich einfach. -- sk (talk) 12:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Berlin Almstadtstraße 1987.jpg[edit]

català  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  မြန်မာဘာသာ  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Berlin Almstadtstraße 1987.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Berlin Wilhelm-Pieck-Straße 1987.jpg[edit]

català  Deutsch  English  español  italiano  မြန်မာဘာသာ  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Berlin Wilhelm-Pieck-Straße 1987.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

File:FKK-Strand Hiddensee.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:FKK-Strand Hiddensee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PaterMcFly (talk) 15:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)