User talk:Giro720

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Saturday
6
February
2016
21:14 UTC
Welcome to my talk page.

Archives: Dark past - Keep out! 2 3


Contents

File:Peb0037.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


File:Peb0037.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Hola[edit]

Ví tu discusión sobre mis imagenes subidas, gracias de todos modos por el aviso, oye es que fijate que hace tiempo he querido subir imagenes, pero no sé como hacerlo, como determinar la licencia de la imagén, y pedirle permiso al autor de esa imagén. Me puedes ayudar?, gracias de todas maneras.

--Chrishonduras (talk) 21:39, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiGuide[edit]

Thank you Giro for your translation. Please tell me when it's finished, so i can add it on Youtube. Than, you're free to use it wherever you want (we saw that's kinda useful in Template:Welcome and on Help pages, as well as sitenotice). --Aubrey (talk) 13:00, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Bairros de Padre Bernardo - Goiás.JPG[edit]

Hi! I'm a little puzzled by this edit of yours. How do you know that the uploader is the author of this file? The uploader only claimed that it came from their "personal archive," which of course doesn't say anything about who created it. Could you please explain at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bairros de Padre Bernardo - Goiás.JPG? LX (talk, contribs) 20:12, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Cyndi Lauper photo.[edit]

Hey, that picture of Cyndi Lauper was taked by a fan of her at 1994! Please, I just put photos without rights reserved!

Fixed File[edit]

Hi Giro720. I'm really curious as to how you managed to fix the file. Did you do something during re-uploading to make the pages and cover appear? Thanks. --Angelprincess72 (talk) 17:59, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Well, I just downloaded the original file from archive.org to my computer and then I reuploaded it. I think that you lost the connection (or something went wrong) when you was uploading/downloading the book -- this would explain why your file had 3kB while the original had 5.24 MB. Giro720 (talk) 21:21, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Tito 001.jpg[edit]

Hi! Can You look at picture now? If is still something wrong tell me please.

Thank You, MsFan555 (talk) 10:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Encyclopædia Britannica.svg[edit]

Hi thanks for the info, you can probably take over for me, my English is not very good because I'm German? Greetings Abani79 (talk) 00:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

File:575x459.jpg[edit]

Hi, if you nominate a file for speedy deletion, please provide a hyperlink to the original file. Otherwise please use a normal nomination. Jcb (talk) 11:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks. Giro720 (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Uso de logotipos en artículo IndyCar Series[edit]

Comprendo muy bien el borrado respecto a los logos de por lo del copyright, pero en la wikipedia en Español, y luego haberlo subido a commons, y de insistir previamente antes de subirlos para que dichos logos fueran puestos en el artículo (IndyCar Series) tomando en cuenta los siguientes logos que ya existen en otras wikipedias de otros idiomas, como:

la intención es que permiso o que requiero para accdeer al uso de estqas imágenes que tienen copyright para el uso en el artículo y artículos relacionados sobre IndyCar Series y los ar´ticulos relacionados con las temporadas, que ya están publicadas y se han ido publicando en la versión en español?

Por favor estan amable para abisarme en español y consultar con un wikitecario de la versión en español que me asesore en esta parte y el eventual ayuda en la utilización para el respectivo artículo. Gracias.--Shinobilanterncorps (talk) 15:22, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Archivos Borrados:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Shinobilanterncorps--Shinobilanterncorps (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Brasão-UFRN.jpg[edit]

I had updated the information about this file as requested. Can I remove the copyright infrigiment alert? --Patrick-br msg 19:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Caro, já há uma predefinição pronta para essa situação no Commons. O logotipo da instituição tem pelo menos 50 anos, portanto caiu no domínio público como especificado pela legislação relacionada no PD-BrazilGov. --Patrick-br msg 20:26, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Caro Giro720, se fosse uma empresa pública ou uma empresa pública de capital misto, eu até concordaria com você, porque nesses casos a instituição está submetida à mesma regulamentação das empresas privadas. Mas autarquias são instituições completamente inseridas no serviço público e no ordenamento jurídico do direito administrativo, sendo-lhe aplicadas as mesmas regras da administração direta. E, no caso específico das universidades, elas não gozavam sequer de autonomia até a promulgação da Constituição de 1988, momento posterior ao período em que o material caiu no domínio público. --Patrick-br msg 06:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

File:George Allen Crozet.jpg[edit]

Hi. I noticed this diff where you added the no permission tag to File:George Allen Crozet.jpg. (The en:George Allen article is on my watchlist on :en.) I am curious for the reason for this tag. All but two of the user's uploads have EXIF data for this same digital camera and EXIF authorship information for Eduardo Montes-Bradley. On en:, the user edits en:Eduardo Montes-Bradley quite a bit. Considering that the image was uploaded here 11 hours after it was taken, I think we have more than enough evidence to believe that this person is Eduardo Montes-Bradley. --UserB (talk) 12:16, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

You are right. I tagged the picture before looking his others picutures (after I foud the article about him too). It was my fault the fact that I don't check the date in the metadate. I really thought in remove the permission tag but I hesitated. Giro720 (talk) 16:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Tagging images with Google as source[edit]

Hello,

If the source mentioned is Google/Yahoo, just add {{copyvio}} rather than "no permission". Thanks, Yann (talk) 05:18, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok. Giro720 (talk) 05:25, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Giro720. You have new messages at Darwinius's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Sonal Chauhan[edit]

I know, and I am providing information, I have uploaded the file hardly a few seconds before, check user's past contributions before leaving messages. Still you are doing are job and I appreciate it.Fanofbollywood (talk) 08:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

It is funny, but you should've checked the file on bollyone website thoroughly, the image you have pointed to has a copyright of Viral Bhayani, which is once again a licensed material of FilmiTadka.Fanofbollywood (talk) 08:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Curved Spike Aerator.jpg[edit]

Esta foto e de minha companhia e eu tenho permisao para usar a foto. O site do internet do "mowermagic" do UK recebeu a foto de minha companhia. Se tenho que provar que e de eu de outra maneira, conte-me como. Obrigado

Esta foto es de mi compania y tengo permiso para usarla como quiero. El sitio de "mowermagic" del UK la recibio de nosotros. Si tengo que probarlo de otra manera, solo dime como. Gracias

My English is best. This photo belongs to my company and we gave it to the site "mowermagic" in the UK to use. If I need to prove it by some other way, let me know. Thanks

File:Faber_Jackson.jpg[edit]

Thanks for the explanation...I am a system's engineer from 1972 and I have the bad habit of leaning to old formats...;-)--Mcapdevila (talk) 17:58, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Bandera de Riobamba[edit]

Hola Giro720!, muchas gracias por el trabajo con el archivo Bandera de Riobamba.svg. Lo aprecio, saludos! --Dabit100 (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Giro720!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

File:LosMochisCityCollage.png[edit]

Hi I see you can understand English and Spanish, that's why i'm going to write in both languages. Check this, it's what i wrote to Denniss user/checa esto, es lo que le escribi al usuario Dennis: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Denniss#File:LosMochisCityCollage.png because he/she did the same like you/ porque él/ella hizo lo mismo como tú. This collage was made and edited by myself and its small pictures were taken and edited by myself/éste collage fue hecho y editado por mí mismo y sus pequeñas fotos fueron tomadas y editadas por mí mismo. That's why I'm the autor of this collage like its pictures. I hope you understand. I erased the tamplate. Greetings./Por eso yo soy el autor de éste collage como de sus fotos. Espero que entiendas. Borré la plantilla. Saludos.--Lomesi (talk) 03:54, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

thanks for saving my bacon, ...again. So did you manually remove something that made the .svg display? Jdcollins13 (talk) 15:21, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry[edit]

Hello Giro720, I apologize, I thought that not having the images are copyright could climb Commons. Since I read about politics, I'm sorry, it will not happen. Dangelin5 (talk) 17:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 0642f43199d1680fb6dd2e88dddb31c0[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Encyclopædia Britannica.svg[edit]

I'm sorry that I can sign only now, I understand you, unfortunately, not quite, you think you should upload the SVG graphic with a different license in the image and link? What sense would that, one would then use the graphics at all (can / may)? I could send you an email so I can upload, then an email address would need from you.

Oh and yeah my english is seemingly poor, hope you can me understand. Regards Sandro ;) Abani79 (talk) 00:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Brasao Estado Minas Gerais / Brasil[edit]

Dear colleague, I understand your concerns with regards to the official description and appreciate your attention to the matter. The issue is, the coloured version of the coat of arms is hardly in use, eg. the governor of the state uses a black/white outline., the government the triangle from the flag accompanied with the text "Governo de Minas". I understand, the version from the official government website as the current official interpretation of the official CofA and hold it to be in line with applicable laws. I do not deem it my task to interpret Minas Gerais state law beyond the interpretation of the state government - IMHO, this would constitute something too close to "Original Research". If somebody feels, the linked to version on the government website is incorrect, then the case should not be argued within the realm of WP discussions. An enquiry with the governor of the state, who should by convention also be the guardian of the state insignia, would be more suitable. A similar case, eg. is the Flag of the Brazilian state of Paraiba: here the verbatim text of the law prescribes the word NÉGO to be in the red field of the flag. The state government interprets, that after a spelling reform also the historic reference ought to be adjusted, and uses the text on the flag without the accent on the E. Again, I leave the interpretation of the law to the state. I suggest, any discussion should be continued on the items talk page, which I have annotated accordingly. Very best regards, OAlexander (talk) 10:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm very happy that someone else cares about flags and CoA, particularly the ones from Brazil. I understand that may be differences between the description based and the de facto CoA. All I want is avoid that wikipedia shows wrong information, wich, as we know, will spread fast by others websites. Don't worry: I'll not change the file before discuss. I'll let my opinion in the discussion page. Giro720 (talk) 15:22, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Brasao Estado SaoPaulo Brasil.svg[edit]

I have uploaded a new optimised version obtained from a government publication. I personally preferred your red and if there is a good reason to use it, let me know and I will substitute it. Abraço, OAlexander (talk) 10:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

That red color is the same used in File:Bandeira do Estado de São Paulo.svg, wich is specified in the Visual Identity Manual, p. 15 (RGB:196-0-8/#C40008). But if we pay attention, we can notice that this manual uses RGB colors and itself doesn't follow its specifications. ¬¬. It's also unclear if the specifications should be used for the CoA or just for the flag/logo. Giro720 (talk) 13:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


UserJghjhgjghjgh Hello Giro720 what is this permission

File:Allosaurus size comparison.svg Thumbnail Issues[edit]

Hello Giro720, A few weeks back there was a system notice about a thumbnail issue when uploading new versions of files. I just noticed you were able to fix it on File:Allosaurus size comparison.svg. I needed to crop the image and uploaded a new version and now the thumbnails arn't generating. Could you possibly fix this again? Thank you for your help. Steveoc 86 (talk) 12:07, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing the image! Does DOCTYPE mean it is a problem with the files I am uploading? Steveoc 86 (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for the information! Steveoc 86 (talk) 15:24, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

[[File:EVO 2.jpg]][edit]

Hi there.

Can I just ask, before you make an action, why is it not free? I am sure that the image is free, as it's created by me, and the license also states that the image is free. And also if it was not free, I wouldn't have uploaded it on Commons isn't it?

The image is free: there is no copyright violation. That's all I want to tell you.

Reply on my talk page, thanks. =) --Gaming&Computing (talk) 21:15, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

EVO 2[edit]

Ok mate, if you think it's a copyright violation, then can you at least help me to figure it out what the correct copyright is.

I think it's not a violation but you think the opposite, so lemme ask for your help.

Reply on my talk, thanks =) --Gaming&Computing (talk) 21:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 41a68e872364a29b4d258714716adb43[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Your Assistance is Requested[edit]

I am preparing to upload an .svg that I just created, and it will likely not display (like the others you fixed) and I would greatly appreciate if you could troubleshoot the code, (like you did for the others) at your convenience. Many thanks, Jdcollins13 (talk) 17:27, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

As I predicted File:Rubber guard flowchart.svg Jdcollins13 (talk) 17:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Flag of Muhammad Ali.svg[edit]

Hi Giro720. In the original picture, only the stars are skewed and the crescent is perfectly fine. If it were a mistake, wouldn't the crescent also become skewed? To me, it looks as though the stars are asymmetrical on purpose. Thanks for your advice Abjiklam (talk) 22:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

There is no mistake... it's not a matter of skewed "file" (you're right, the file and the crescent is OK). To me, it's just strange to use skewed stars... usually flags use symmetrical stars (so if you rotate the star in 72º, the falg will be the same); I don't remember flags using skewed stars. But thanks for asking. Giro720 (talk) 00:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Re: File:Collage of views of Piotrkow Trybunalski.png[edit]

Hello. It's not possible to cite all the filenames of the pictures used in this collage, because some of them was used directly from my computer and are not loaded to commons. I will probably soon upload all of the rest pictures used in this collage. I'll try to fill any gaps in the description ASAP. In few minutes i'll load new version of this image. According to Your request it will, be jpg. Thanks for Your advices. Maddox84 (talk) 19:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Ok, now i see that i can't update png to jpg file, so i think this one must stay png but in the future i will upload jpg. Maddox84 (talk) 19:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
    • Hi, i uploaded missing pictures and added notes with description which part of collage is which picture. I hope now it's ok? Greetings Maddox84 (talk) 17:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

SVG header declarations[edit]

I've only been using Firefox since 2009; before that time I knew nothing and cared nothing about Firefox. And all my files which don't contain xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" contain <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd"> (an SVG which contains neither won't display on Wikimedia Commons). My main platform for testing SVG files has always been Adobe SVG plugin (not either Inkscape or Firefox), and Adobe SVG plugin version 1.0 (widely distributed with early releases of Windows XP) would refuse to display a file containing xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg". During the early years of uploading SVG's, I was actually more concerned with Adobe SVG plugin version 1.0 compatibility than Firefox compatibility... AnonMoos (talk) 13:00, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

OK, but any rule absolutely requiring xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" on all SVG uploads must be rather recent -- it wasn't enforced as recently as April 26th... AnonMoos (talk) 14:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: File:Flag of Governors of Amazonas.svg[edit]

Olá, Giro720, obrigado pelo aviso. Também fiz o mesmo com File:Flag Governors of Mato Grosso do Sul.svg. Quanto à imagem File:Natal RN.jpg, acabei de corrigir. O problema era que eu havia enviado a nova versão porque haviam duas fotos que não eram de Natal (a da Praia da Pipa, que não fica em Natal e sim em Tibau do Sul; e a outra era a das dunas, que fica vizinho a Natal, em Extremoz). Eu não havia entendido o que o Anon perguntou porque eu nunca foi bom em língua inglesa. Eu venho também trabalhando com bandeiras ultimamente, além dos mapas. E agora? Marcos talk 02:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

It's funny !!![edit]

Concerning File:CCCern.jpg first I receive a message asking me to categorize it properly, and once donne... YPUPI, good job Pintopc ... now we "Nominating for deletion" ?!?!??!?!

Giro 720, não se preocupe com a linguagem oficial que tem que ser empregue, a comprova-lo a sua mensagem pessoa tão simpática. Por outro lado o facto de pedir para ser informado por correio-e permite-me saber o que se está a passar com o que meto lá. Acrescentei no ficheiro que se encontra nos Commons que enviei ao Cern uma mensagem para ver o que será possível fazer. Entretanto obrigado e bravo pela iniciativa de votação, mas onde a abriu pois gostava de ir ver o que por lá se diz. Um abraço Pintopc (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Desculpe, mas sou de novo eu por causa du File:CCCern.jpg Aquilo que disse aqui não se pode aplicar ao nosso CCCern.jpg? Pintopc (talk) 22:28, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

detalhes de CCCern[edit]

Giro720, importaste de ir ver estas informações, S.F.F. ? Pintopc

Parece-me que "nos cruzamos" a uma dada altura, e se de qualquer maneira eu não conseguir a autorização "deles" tenho sempre a tua do verdadeiro local. Muito obrigado. E já agora sabes-me responder a "Como editar um Comment ou o {{Information file?" em Commons:Esplanada ? RE-Obrigado Pintopc (talk) 20:12, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Ajuda[edit]

Olá, Giro720, boa tarde. Já que você sabe criar uma imagem com um editor de texto, poderia, quando puder, refazer essa bandeira aqui? É que eu a fiz baseada da fonte que aparece na imagem, e ela ficou muito mal feita. Caso possa fazê-la, agradeceria muito. Aguardo resposta! Marcos talk 20:34, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Resposta[edit]

Boa tarde, Giro. Aquelas imagens eu costumo carregar em "png" porque "jpg" é mais um tipo de imagem que praticamente eu não gosto muito. Quanto à permissão OTRS, eu logo logo enviarei (simplesmente havia carregado porque, no final da página, existia um aviso dizendo É permitida a reprodução do conteúdo desta página em qualquer meio de comunicação, eletrônico ou impresso, desde que citada a fonte e o autor.). Foi daí que eu carreguei. Já em relação à imagem sobre Pau dos Ferros, será que eu poderia carregar uma nova versão antes de ela ser eliminada? Agradeço a melhora naquela imagem "png".

Marcos talk 17:33, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Estarei aguardando uma resposta antes de enviar a permissão Marcos talk 17:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
✓ Done. Enviei a nova versão. Agora a versão antiga poderá ser apagada do histórico. Marcos talk 20:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Só uma coisa: obrigado pela reflexão a respeito das imagens jpg e png. De fato eu não havia pensado nisso. Muito obrigado! Só ainda não vi a resposta a respeito das imagens com permissão OTRS. Marcos talk 22:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

RE:MontagemMarabá.jpg[edit]

Olá Giro720, eu carreguei as imagens que faltavam para a montagem. Duas delas já estavam carregadas (File:IgrejadeSãoFélix.JPG; File:Praça duque de Caxias.JPG), e as outras três são:

Você pode verificar que eu precisei retocar algumas delas para poder fazer a montagem. Boas contribuições! HallelTalk 21:48, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Blason Vide 3D.svg and layers[edit]

Hi, i'm a contributor of the french Wikipedia. I just realized that you suppressed all layers information from this file. But layers are a very useful feature for artists learning heraldry. The use of the different layers is important to them, to understand where they should put the components of the coat of arms they're working on. So, can you please tell me why you deliberately deleted those layers? I'm planning to restore the file from 2006 but before that, i'd like to discuss with you, to avoid a possible edit war. --Flappiefh (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi Flappiefh. Thanks for your message. My intention was remove the unused gradients and make the drawing more light and accurate. When I redrew it, I saw no reason to keep groups for layers composed by just 1 element, but I thing I get the point now. The inkscape:label (with "Fond écu", "Meubles", etc,) is also usefull to identify the layers, right? The contour and reflection layers should be locked. I'm missing anything else? If you don't mind, I'll upload a new version restoring these features from the original drawing. My appologies, and sorry for take your time. Giro720 (talk) 14:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Yes, you got the point. In the French heraldry project, we use to make coats of arms using this structure (you can see the 4 layers). The Contour and Reflet final layers must be locked, yes. OK, I let you do the job. Thanks for understanding. Bye, Flappiefh (talk) 15:22, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

QUAND ALLEZ-VOUS RESTAURER LES CALQUES DU GABARIT "BLASON VIDE 3D" ??????????

A votre réponse : je dis, NON vous n'avez pas restauré le téléchargement FAIT DEFAUT ? ____________________A FAIRE

Publish foto[edit]

Hello! how can I prove that the site football.ua gave me permission to publish his photo? Confirmed to me they forwarded by mail, but it is in Russian.

Issue with uploaded pictures[edit]

Thanks for the help! I added a note and a few questions at Commons:Help desk#Thumbnail/EXIF issues with uploaded images.--Codrin.B (talk) 22:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Giro720,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Flag_of_Libya_(1951).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flag_of_Libya_(1951).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 19:03, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Licenciamento de Ficheiros[edit]

Boa tarde, várias vezes fui avisada por violar as regras de licenciamento, gostaria de saber como é que eu sei qual é a licença a utilizar, alguns sites não especificam nada sobre direitos autorais, logo como posso saber qual a licença utilizada. Gostaria também que me esclarecesse se um print screen ou fotografia tirados por mim de uma imagem ou vídeo de outros autores é considerado de minha própria autoria ou não. Aguardo resposta. Shania Twain Portugal (talk)

Re[edit]

Giro, q arquivo era aquele do Marcos Pontes q vc deletou? Era da NASA? Nem lembro mais. Sei que tem um lá na wiki-pt. MachoCarioca (talk) 06:28, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Specimen_of_the_typeface_Pecita.svg[edit]

Hello. Can you help me ? I uploaded a new version of this svg file taken from http://pecita.eu/i/pecPrev.svg. It seems work fine but... no! the old version is still active. Do you understand why ? Regards.

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

PD-BrazilGov[edit]

Giro o que você quis dizer com "Ele foi publicado ou encomendado pelo governo brasileiro (federal, estadual ou municipal) antes de 1983.", não encontrei essa lei em lugar nenhum. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 00:14, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

A XVIIth century shield for Wikipedia[edit]

Hi ! I've noticed your talent to create good models of shield for heraldry. I created a XVIIth century shape but it's nowhere as good as your work.

Gabarit écu XVIIe siècle vide.svg

Would you be able to create a version that respects the same standards ?

--ThoMiCroN Blason famille Phelippes de La Marnierre.svg (d/t) 14:44, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Tih s2 juh 3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tih s2 juh 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

   FDMS  4    16:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Gunnex (talk) 10:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)