User talk:Goesseln

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

{ {Welcome|Goesseln|}}

TUSC token 5eb3a31cf88511f10ea51272af4fdbbf

[edit]

I am now owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 87d42065aa65ff713630fa5762e0509e

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Files you uploaded may be deleted

[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 00:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PD-text --Goesseln (talk) 07:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Siegfried Lichtenstaedter-1.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 08:34, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Linder1918-10.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:22, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

author=Government of Hungary 1918
--Goesseln (talk) 07:11, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Yōko Tawada Signatur.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Foto im Meraner Stadtanzeiger

[edit]

Hallo Goesseln, der "Meraner Stadtanzeiger" hat dein Foto [ [File:Meran Villa Mathilde 10.jpg|150px]] benutzt, ohne jegliche Kennzeichnung der Quelle. s. http://issuu.com/meraner/docs/2014_05/9?e=0 --ManfredK (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Goesseln,

[edit]

eins meiner gerade hochgeladenen Fotos muss gelöscht werden. Da ich hier sehr unerfahren bin, habe ich aus Versehen ein Foto hochgeladen, welches ich nicht selbst gemacht habe. Jetzt habe ich stattdessen das eigene hochgeladen. Wie kann ich das Foto schnelllöschen lassen? Habe versucht einen Kommentar auf die Seite zu schreiben und in die Zus.fassungszeile, weiß aber nicht, ob die Löschung so klappt. Gibt es eine Möglichkeit eine fehlerhafte Hochladung sofort rückgängig zu machen. Schöne Grüße --Anima (talk) 02:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Das Foto ist gelöscht. Ein Glück, aber ich muss noch viel lernen hier. Weiß nicht, wie ich formal korrekt die Löschung beantrage. Gruß --Anima (talk) 11:29, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Erich Brill-030.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 14:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not-PD-US-URAA --Goesseln (talk) 07:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Miltiades Manno 910.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 12:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Goesseln, mir ist aufgefallen, dass Du diese Kategorie beim Hochladen von File:Peter Haslinger 2015.JPG angegeben und sogar von de:Peter Haslinger verlinkt, aber dann nicht angelegt hast. Holst Du das bitte nach? Danke und Gruß, --Emha (talk) 08:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

it's a wiki. --Goesseln (talk) 13:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foto Karl-Grabmayr-Straße

[edit]

Hallo Goesseln, dieses Foto zeigt die Hausnummer 16 (man sieht die Hausnummer unter dem Schriftzug). Kannst du das nochmal überprüfen? Danke und LG --ManfredK (talk) 08:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

nur bin ich nur selten in Meran. Also wäre es das einfachste, Du korrigiertest meinen Fehler. danke. --Goesseln (talk) 13:25, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Danke! LG --ManfredK (talk) 20:23, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ullstein Eule 1916.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 16:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:François-Xavier Vispré Le concert.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Martin K. (talk) 21:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

much ado about nothing, oder: wieviele Dimensionen hat ein Trompe l'oeil, zwei oder drei ? --Goesseln (talk) 06:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File mover

[edit]

Kensst du Commons:Requests_for_rights#Filemover auf Wikimedia Commons? Wenn die offizielle Empfehlung Commons:Dateien verschieben dir klar ist, dann kannst du dort nach dem Benutzerrecht "Dateiverschieber" fragen. Du bist ein fachkundiger Benutzer, das könnte nuetzlich sein.--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Post auf COM:AN/U

[edit]

Hallo Goesseln, dein Posting auf COM:AN/U war dort deplaziert, weil dieses Board für Probleme MIT Benutzern, nicht für "Probleme" von Benutzer gedacht ist. Ich habe es hierhin verschoben, wo man auch deutsch spricht: Commons:Forum#Kategorien_f.C3.BCr_eine_Person. --Túrelio (talk) 16:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wie bekomme ich das

[edit]

hin? beim hochladeassistent muss ich ein genaues datum eingeben, sonst geht das hochladen nicht, hast Du eine lösung dafür? ich verzweifle da regelmäßig. danke! --Donna Gedenk (talk) 12:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ich wüsste nicht, dass beim Hochladen ein "genaues" Datum eingegeben werden muss, irgendein Jahr täte es auch, nur ist das Datum, an dem das Objekt aus dem Internet gefischt wurde, denkbar schlecht und könnte im Falle ohnehin bei Quelle angegeben werden.
eigentlich geht es aber um das Entstehungsdatum der Abbildung:
wann hat Schaarwächter das Foto gemacht?
da Schaarwächter pd-old-70 ist, ist das Datum aber für das Urheberrecht ziemlich unwichtig
für die Vita von Rosa Sucher könnte es interessant sein, wenn das mal ein Leser wissen will.
für Vorlagenexperten gibt es unter c:Category:Time, date and calendar templates eine breite Auswahl, zum Beispiel auch die Vorlage c:Template:Complex date, dann sähe das so aus:
before 1904
date QS:P,+1904-00-00T00:00:00Z/7,P1326,+1904-00-00T00:00:00Z/9
--Goesseln (talk) 14:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
hier schon https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UploadWizard&uselang=de. danke für den link zu den vorlagen. schöne weihnachten.--Donna Gedenk (talk) 19:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Salvo D'Acquisto Bozen Peter-Rosegger-Park.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.40.3.91 19:55, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

grund: keine Panoramafreiheit in Italien. --Goesseln (talk) 22:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bevor man wieder mit mir schimpft

[edit]

das ist ein ausweis, offizielles dokument, darf ich das foto eh verwenden? also nur ausweisfoto des kindes. https://www.google.at/search?q=%22Chana+baumgart%22&client=firefox-b&dcr=0&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5pMS-gb3ZAhVEJlAKHQ6IBMIQ_AUICigB&biw=1920&bih=883#imgrc=C8Mfq-4_CKPz9M: --Donna Gedenk (talk) 21:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

das fragst du besser bei de:WP:URF, dort wird auch nicht geschimpft.
und, bei der Gelegenheit, versuche mal deinen Kollegen zu beruhigen, der sich im Verfolgungswahn wähnt. Am besten er löscht den Halbsatz. --Goesseln (talk) 22:09, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
danke, dann frage ich mal dort.--Donna Gedenk (talk) 22:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victoria Kent.png

[edit]

I am expecting your answer in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Victoria Kent.png.--Chamarasca (talk) 16:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hussmann

[edit]

Hallo Goesseln, Du hast bei meinen Foto vom Hussmannplatz in Fürstenberg die PD-old-70-Vorlage ergänzt. Das Foto ist aber erst sieben Jahre alt und der Fotograf lebt bislang noch ;-) Natürlich kann sich ein nachdenkender Mensch selbst überlegen, dass der Fotograf eines Digitalfotos noch nicht 70 Jahre tot sein kann und überlegen, dass sich die Vorlage nur auf das abgebildete Werk beziehen kann, trotzdem halte ich das für falsch. Die Vorlage sollte mE so gestaltet werden, dass sie sich eindeutig auf das abgebildete Werk und nicht auf das Foto bezieht. So kann ich das derzeit nicht erkennen. Es könnte ja z.B. auch jemand einen Bot bauen, der PD-ausgezeichnete Bilder von Commons irgendwo automatisch verwendet. --Dehio (talk) 08:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

mein Fehler. --Goesseln (talk) 09:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Goesseln, I was wondering if there are other pages of the Sonderfahndungsliste G.B. vailable somewhere. thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no, I got only this one page from a german library (scanningwork was not done by me) as an example of the original. The article de:Sonderfahndungsliste G.B. was done bei user zsasz and he was very much and repeatedly critized by me for taking the english translation-transscript with many many faults. But that was on the web, the original is only in a handful of libraries. So much work and effort so badly done. Sad that. --Goesseln (talk) 13:45, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Goesseln for this and also for the reply on the German Wikipedia. Curious to see what happens now. Anyway, I added the image to the Hebrew article. There might be someone there who is willing to take a close(r) look into this at their end. Lotje (talk) 15:11, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please could you leave a note on the talk page, explaining this edit and which tag you think is appropriate? Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 13:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nina Kandinsky-110.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

138.207.159.19 16:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reiss Engelhorn Museum

[edit]

Hi, Please do not create individual deletion requests. You better contribute to the discussion on the admins' board. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kometen kommer omslag 1968.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 13:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WMF chatroom

[edit]

Hallo Goesseln, gibt es einen WMF chatroom in dem man sich treffen kann?
Bitte siehe die links die unter w:de:user talk:Wurgl#Normdaten zusammengefasst sind. Gruß aus München,
no bias — קיין אומוויסנדיקע פּרעפֿערענצן — keyn umvisndike preferentsn talk contribs 18:00, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walter Poller Arztschreiber 1946 Einband.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 20:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing license tags

[edit]

Please do not remove license tags like you did in Special:Diff/441810715 without replacing them with the correct license tag or nominating the file for deletion. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Oberammergau, Bayern - Passionsspielhaus gegen den Kofel (Zeno Ansichtskarten).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


File:Starnberg, Bayern - Salondampfer Luitpold in Fahrt (Zeno Ansichtskarten).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 21:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing license tags -- second warning

[edit]

Again: please do not remove license templates from file description pages, as doing so does not adequately resolve any copyright problems the file may have. If you believe that a file is incorrectly licensed, please apply the correct copyright tag or nominate the file for deletion. Removing copyright tags, especially without an edit summary, is considered vandalism and continuing to do so may result in you being blocked from editing. Thanks, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Knud Holmboe Butter making 1930.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Knud Holmboe Butter making 1930.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Knud Holmboe jews in the Mellah of Tripoli 1930.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Knud Holmboe jews in the Mellah of Tripoli 1930.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angelika Szekely Promotion Graz 1917.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gestumblindi (talk) 21:25, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gárdos Péter.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gárdos Péter.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 06:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wols Das blaue Phantom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hekerui (talk) 14:16, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erich Kästner Walter Trier Emil 1931 Einband.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hekerui (talk) 12:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jacob Schönberg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than using the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

vielleicht kümmert sich mal jemand um die Benutzerfreundlichkeit von solchen grundlegenden Funktionen wie Verschieben, Löschen, statt hier Vorträge zu halten. gruß --Goesseln (talk) 14:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kuppelgletscher

[edit]
Val di Fassa Dolomites Belvedere Marmolada ... mit dem Gletscher an der Punta Rocca von der Seite (2019)

Vielleicht ein oder mehrere Bildausschnitte für Marmolata oder die Gletscherforschung, Vorher-Nachher-Vergleiche etc., schon eine ungewöhnliche Wölbung, und wer weiss, was da noch alles auftaut oder abrutscht? Auf dem Foto wären auch Delba (it: Alba) mit dem Avisio im Tal, das Skigebiet am Monte Becce mit Aussicht auf Marmolada und Serauta, Undici und Dodici in hervorragender Tieffenschärfe mit drauf. LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 14:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gespaltener Fels

[edit]

Hallo Goesseln, danke für Deine Abänderungen. Der Gespaltener Fels wird beim Landesamt für Geologie, Rohstoffe und Bergbau, sowie auch im Daten- und Kartendienst der LUBW als Gespaltener Felsen angegeben. Vermutlich ist das ein Fehler, bin mir aber nicht sicher. Dann müsste die Category namentlich abgeändert werden. Grüße Olga Ernst (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

das ist auch nicht so richtig wichtig, unsere Lemma- und Kategoriennamen müssen ja nicht "stimmen", dem Leser und interessierten Kategorienauswerter ist auch so geholfen.
Etwas anderes sind die Kategorien am Schafberg, das ist auch so "weites Feld". Ich habe mal angefangen, das irgendwie hierarchisch zu ordnen, aber habe auch alsbald aufgegeben...
Und dann hatte ich seinerzeit meine drei Knipsbilder fälschlich dem/der Lochen "zugelemmat", das müsste ich eigentlich ändern - zum Verschieben fehlen mir aber die Commons-Rechte.
Also bin erstmal wieder woanders abgetaucht. gruß --Goesseln (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ein Verschieben ist ja schnell beantragt mit move oder rename, oder manchmal beantrage ich es direkt bei einem Administrator ;-) Grüße--Olga Ernst (talk) 09:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Der Sonntag Beilage Der Wiener Tag 6 Dezember 1936 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 22:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georg Friedrich Zundel Paula Bosch 1907.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gzjun (talk) 11:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goesseln I'm the grandchild of Eva Michaelis-Stern. If I understand correctly, you have created an entry on Wikipedia for her. My Father would love to connect and maybe add some details and look into creating an English version. My email is ofermichaelis@yahoo.com . looking forward to hearing from you. all the best. 193.116.101.197 07:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do my best. Your message should have been posted at https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Goesseln or at https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diskussion:Eva_Michaelis-Stern&action=edit&redlink=1&section=new
anyhow, we will see... --Goesseln (talk) 08:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 07:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 22:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jacques Decour 10.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Goesseln,

du hast die Dateibeschreibung aus der Quelle mont-valerien.fr übernommen: "Lettre de Jacques Decour à son épouse et à sa fille". Der Brief ist allerdings adressiert an "Madame et Monsieur Decourdemanche" und beginnt mit "mes chers parents", ist also offenbar an die Eltern gerichtet. Erst auf der Rückseite (Jacques Decours 20.jpg) folgt der Brief an die Tochter Brigitte. Sollten wir das also nicht lieber zu "Lettre à ses parents et sa fille" korrigieren?

Freundlichen Gruß, Jossi (talk) 19:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ja, bitte. --Goesseln (talk) 19:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Jossi (talk) 16:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 02:54, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roger Broders Monte-Carlo 1930.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 21:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nutshinou Talk! 14:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]