User talk:Gorupdebesanez

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gorupdebesanez!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:25, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

A "how-to" for files categorization

Hi and welcome to Wikimedia Commons. Thanks for the pictures you uploaded, most of them really considerable. But, just to avoid technical problems of file categorization, I left to you a brief technical "how-to".

• When you categorize a file, it is not needed (and discouraged) to use an over-categorization "descending" and general categories (Cuba, Havana, Castles, Towers, Buildings etc...). The deepest category is sufficient. For example the categories for the Gran Teatro de La Habana, Castillo de la Real Fuerza de La Habana or Catedral de La Habana, El Capitolio de La Habana exist. Of course, a file could have more categories than one, if focusized on different subjects. For example a picture clearly focusized on a woman near/on a car (for example a Ford) in Plaza de la Revolución in 2012, could be categorized in that way: 2012 in Havana, Ford classic cars in Havana, Plaza de la Revolución (Havana), and Women of Havana. It's just an example. Another example could be about this file uploaded by you that I've correctly categorized it as Chevrolet classic cars in Havana and License plates of Cuba.
  • Well... What is over-categorization? As explained at COM:OVERCAT, it is when a file, category or other page is placed in several levels of the same branch in the category tree.
• Do not use synonyms and/or words in different languages to categorize a file, as for example churches/chiese/iglesias, Havana/Habana/L'Avana, Castles/Chateaux etc... Even if the Category:Habana exists it is a category redirect to the Category:Havana and must be empty. A category as the Category:Iglesias is a disambiguation category and, also, must be empty.
• The language used for categories is generally English, also for cities or countries (as Havana, Moscow, Germany, Spain etc) with their English name. Suddenly only categories about some structures have their own name in their language (ex.: "El Capitolio").
• This is just a suggestion: as for COM:RENAME, a more descriptive name for a picture is preferable.

Well, that's all for the "how-to". Thanks again for the pictures and for their quality. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 00:37, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Dodge 1500

Any closeups on the little sedan that I placed a note on in this picture? Would love to see more of the Dodge 1500 (and to find out if I id'd it correctly). Cheers, mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 05:06, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Categories

Hi Gorupdebesanez, Dэя-Бøяg already teached you how to categorize. Please respect the rules of Commons and do what you have been teached! -- Ies (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok. I've seen and fixed the categorization... Well: thanks for the pictures, most of them are really remarkable, and IMHO some of them could be candidated as featured pictures. I've seen that you have tried to fix the categorization, after the notice of Ies. Ok, but:

• 1- Even if "Cuba" and "Havana" exist as categories, it's redundat to categorize the files in that way: (see COM:OVERCAT). And also... due to the fact that national categories as "Cuba" are well structured in thousands of subcategories, there is practically no need to categorize any file directly into the Category:Cuba.

• 2- Choose the deepest existant categories: the main Category:Havana is well structured: for example the categories Castillo de los Tres Reyes del Morro, El Malecón, Houses in Havana, Museum of the Revolution, Plaza de la Revolución and its subcats exist.

Thanks for attention. --Dэя-Бøяg 17:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Well done

Well, I appreciate you are learning the "how-to" for categorization. I've just done some fixes for eventual depper categories. Btw, if some categories (as Valle de los Ingenios or Plaza Mayor de Trinidad) have been still categorized as World Heritage Sites in Cuba, it is not necessary to add the heritage site (Unesco) category in each file. Anyway, good work :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 00:22, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Just another suggestion: Categorizing some pictures, it is sufficient "their own" category. I explain: The files about Dario Fo are well categorized in the category Dario Fo, but not in the category "Nobel Prize", because, as Nobel Prize Winner, the Category:Dario Fo is still categorized into the Category:Nobel laureates from Italy. A similar example could be done for the files about Valle de los Ingenios. The Category:Valle de los Ingenios is still categorized within the Category:World Heritage Sites in Cuba. Another example are the singular images of Rolling Stones: If they depict (ex.) Mick Jagger, the Category:Mick Jagger (categorized into the Category:Rolling Stones) is sufficient. A different speech is for other categories: Category:Venice Film Festival is appropriate for Dario Fo, Glenn Close and/or others, because it is not "OVERCAT" and they are depicted in the Venice Film Festival. Thanx for attention and good work again :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 19:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

I continue not to understand this problem of category... In your exemple a picture of Mick Jagger appears in the category 'Mick Jagger' but not in the category 'Rolling Stones' (where a lot of pictures of Jagger appears). Why? User:Gorupdebesanez-User talk:Gorupdebesanez' 21:41, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

To answer: A picture of Mick Jagger showing only him is sufficient to categorize it as "Mick Jagger", per "overcat", because this category is (obviously) a direct subcat of "Rolling Stones". I know that other pictures of him (and of Keith Richards etc) appear in the general cateogry about the Stones. The reason is simple: Commons, of course, is not perfectly standardized :-) ... Anyway, this one of Mick Jagger is a really little little little issue, beacuse you've learned the "how-to" so... Don't worry and good work :-) Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aulenti03.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aulenti03.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alinea (talk) 11:20, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Grazie per le foto delle edizioni della Mostra del Cinema di Venezia! SunOfErat (talk) 06:22, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Troisi.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Troisi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Dman41689 (talk) 07:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Ame02128 11.jpg

File:Ame02128 11.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Alinea (talk) 09:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Laforêt2.jpg

File:Laforêt2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Sakhalinio (talk) 21:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Pablo Picasso This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ame02128 16.jpg

Yours sincerely, Discasto _talk 21:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Église Sainte-Jeanne-d'Arc de Ro… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Eur14223.jpg

And also:

• File:Eur14224.jpg

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 13:11, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Paul McCartney, 2011 02.jpg

File:Paul McCartney, 2011 02.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paul McCartney, 2011 02.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ruthven (msg) 17:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Ame02128 18.jpg

File:Ame02128 18.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ame02128 18.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 12:19, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Laforêt2.jpg

File:Laforêt2.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laforêt2.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 16:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Ita18028.jpg

File:Ita18028.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ita18028.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Please don't blank pages

Hi Gorupdebesanez,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked File:Ita18028.jpg on Commons. If you meant for the page to be deleted, blanking the page is not the right way to do this. A simple real-world comparison to illustrate: You removed the entire text of a page from a thick folder, but the then empty, useless page itself remained in the folder.

Please use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regularly for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed.

For redirects use #REDIRECT[[Target]] or {{category redirect|Targetcategoryname}}. For more information please read Blanking. Thanks again. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Ita18028.jpg

File:Ita18028.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ita18028.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Murals along U.S. Route 66 This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ame06404 01.jpg

And also:

• File:Ame06404 03.jpg
• File:Ame06404 04.jpg

Yours sincerely, Missvain (talk) 22:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Ame06404 05.jpg

File:Ame06404 05.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This mural was created in 2001 by M. Loughery with M. Steiger. It is signed and dated by the artists. Without permission directly from the artist and/or copyright holder, we cannot host this on Commons per COM:FOP US. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Missvain (talk) 22:26, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Ame06404 06.jpg

File:Ame06404 06.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: These Civil War murals were created by artist Don Gray in 2005. Learn more about them here. Without permission directly from the artist and/or copyright holder, we cannot host this on Commons per COM:FOP US. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Missvain (talk) 22:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:America's highway.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:America's highway.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:America's highway.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Missvain (talk) 22:29, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Galena murales.jpg

File:Galena murales.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Mural created in 2013 by Chris Auckerman and Jon White. Without permission directly from the artist and/or copyright holder, we cannot host this on Commons per COM:FOP US. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Missvain (talk) 22:32, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Ame02128 19.jpg

File:Ame02128 19.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: 'Flag' by Jasper Johns is noted as fair use, which is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

TherasTaneel (talk) 09:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Glenn Close (1992 Venice Film Festival) 02.jpg

File:Glenn Close (1992 Venice Film Festival) 02.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glenn Close (1992 Venice Film Festival) 02.jp… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Film Enthusiast (talk) 02:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Glenn Close (1992 Venice Film Festival) 01.jpg

File:Glenn Close (1992 Venice Film Festival) 01.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Glenn Close (1992 Venice Film Festival) 01.jp… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Film Enthusiast (talk) 02:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

File tagging File:Claes Oldenburg 03.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Claes Oldenburg 03.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Claes Oldenburg 03.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 10:43, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files of TVBoy street art in Italy This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kingsif (talk) 10:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cloud Gate#Files in Category:Clo… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

File tagging File:Paolo Conte 01.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Paolo Conte 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Paolo Conte 01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Yann (talk) 11:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Tulsa, Oklahoma 10.jpg

File:Tulsa, Oklahoma 10.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tulsa, Oklahoma 10.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Ita18022.jpg

File:Ita18022.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ita18022.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Ita18023.jpg

File:Ita18023.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ita18023.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Ita18021.jpg

File:Ita18021.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ita18021.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Please give images better names

---

I noticed you've uploaded File:Vnz05227 06.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error. Please give uploaded files meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the file is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the file itself. Thanks, and happy editing!

--Yann (talk) 13:10, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

File:Laforêt2.jpg

File:Laforêt2.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laforêt2.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Autenticare identita e paternità degli fotografie

Ciao Gorupdebesanez,

Potresti autenticare la tua identità? Le regole di Commons richiedono che chi carica i file possa utilizzare anche VRT tickets [1] per convalidare l'autenticità delle fotografie e la loro paternità.

Sembra che molte delle fotografie appartengano all'agenzia italiana Rosebud e ad altri fotografi. Ti preghiamo di chiarire tempestivamente qualsiasi dubbio riguardante la tua identità e le autorizzazioni ufficiali per ciascun file. Cordiali saluti, Tisourcier (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Please see this thread which concerns your: COM:ANU#Gorupdebesanez. Yann (talk) 14:16, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

File:Claudia Cardinale 1984.jpg

File:Claudia Cardinale 1984.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Claudia Cardinale 1984.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:02, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Madonna with a gun by Banksy This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ita18024.jpg

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Migrant Child by Banksy This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Banksyve 02.jpg

And also:

• File:Banksyve 03.jpg
• File:Banksyve 04.jpg
• File:Banksyve 05.jpg

Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 18:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)