User talk:Grashoofd

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
OTRS Wikimedia.svg This user is a member of the Wikimedia OTRS team. (verify)


This is a Wikimedia Commons user page.

If you find this page on any site other than Wikimedia Commons, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Grashoofd.


azərbaycanca | български | বাংলা | čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Nederlands | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | shqip | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wikimedia Commons

Archive


File:Drotops megalomanicus Giethoorn.jpg[edit]

Hi, I was so free to crop the image - if you don't like it, please change it back. Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Looks good, thanks! Also, thanks a bunch for all the renaming today! ;-) Best, Grashoofd (talk) 22:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome :) Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Grashoofd,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Cyclic Corrosion Test Chamber[edit]

Hi, I noticed you changed the tag at File:Cyclic Corrosion Test Chamber.jpg.

I'm somewhat inexperienced here at Commons. Please have a look at my query at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Mismatched copyright and OTRS due diligence, which relates to that image as well as several others uploaded by the same person that don't have any OTRS ticket. I am unsure what tag is appropriate, or what procedure to use to nominate for deletion. Amatulic (talk) 19:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Ah, nevermind. I just looked at the ticket again and noticed you've been trying to straighten it out. Thanks. The situation will get resolved one way or another, I guess! Amatulic (talk) 19:10, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 :-) Grashoofd (talk) 12:59, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

image beppe costa[edit]

Hi dear, i noticed you put that tag for the images, I did personally that image. So can I send a mail to permissions-commons? But if a send now the email, the image will be deleted before they give me the permission, or is there a tag that I can put to say "I sent permission just wayt some days"? or something like?

Thanks --Stefiro (talk) 07:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, if you send your permission today or tomorrow, I will take care of it straight away, since I have access to the permissions-commons account. Best, Grashoofd (talk) 07:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
hi, i sent permission just 10 minutes ago, I fixed the permission tag in beppecosta.jpg because I sent permission with gfdl so I put the same license under the image. I was right or I was wrong? Thanks again--Stefiro (talk) 07:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I just found your email in the database. Thanks for sending it to us. I've made the necessary modifications to the files. Grashoofd (talk) 07:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you dear, I sent the last permission, that one about the file Beppe_Costa.jpg. The author of the photos is Dino Ignani. Thanks again --Stefiro (talk) 15:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Photographs by Jac. de Nijs[edit]

What does a description "fotograaf" mean when you hide the category? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Hoi Jan, ik verberg de categorieën omdat het persoonlijke categorieën van de fotografen zijn. Deze 'verbergen' we altijd. Groeten Grashoofd (talk) 12:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Dat is niet terecht, Grashoofd. Misschien als de fotograaf ook de uploader is, maar dit zijn fotografen die professioneel voor ANEFO werkten. Hun werk is een eenheid, een artistieke uitdrukking. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
"Dat is niet terecht", zeg je. Dit doe ik niet om persoonlijke redenen hoor. I don't make the rules Jan. Dit is de policy op Commons, zie ook Category:User categories. Gebruikerscategorieën zijn verborgen. Ik volg alleen maar de regels op. Grashoofd (talk) 12:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
PS: Als je je er echt aan stoort, mag je het wat mij betreft terugdraaien, maar daarmee breek je officieel wel de regels. Ik geloof echter niet dat iemand zich daaraan zal storen dus ga je gang. Grashoofd (talk) 12:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Je vergist je Grashoofd, dat is geen gebruikerscategorie. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:14, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Ok. Het kan me werkelijk geen sier schelen dus doe vooral wat je niet laten kan. Grashoofd (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

1 Pleas use the otrs pending template the next time. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:51, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Will do. Grashoofd (talk) 10:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Own en niet en-wiki[edit]

Hallo Grashoofd, Heel mooi werk dat je talloze afbeeldingen verplaatst, er viel me echter iets op. Je plaatst bij het verplaatsen diverse keren geen eigen werk (own) als bron maar een of ander sjabloon dat zegt dat het van en-wiki afkomstig is. In mijn ogen is dat onvoldoende bron-informatie omdat daarmee in zijn geheel niet wordt verteld waar het werk oorspronkelijk vandaan komt, terwijl dat wel wezenlijk van belang is. Oorspronkelijk is het eigen werk en is {{own}} de correcte weergave. Bovendien staat onder het kopje Oorspronkelijk uploadlogboek al vermeld dat het verplaatst is, daarmee is de vermelding van en-wiki dubbel. Het kopje eronder staat ook nog eens dat het verplaatst is. Verder nog twee puntjes:

  • Zorg dat de datum in het formaat 2014-05-13 komt te staan, zodat de software deze automatisch omzet naar de in de specifieke taal gebruikelijke weergave. Niet een format als 15/2/2008 laten staan graag, wat dat kan de software niet lezen.
  • Onder het kopje licentie dient de weer te geven tekst mijn inziens alleen de gebruikersnaam te zijn en niet met de naamruimte User: er voor.

Groetjes - Romaine (talk) 01:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Romaine. Dankjewel voor de tips, ik zal ze gebruiken! Groeten Grashoofd (talk) 10:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Animals in zoos cats[edit]

Hi, I'm glad to see you've done some work on zoo cats. However in the future, when creating any type of "Animal in zoos" category, please remember to include it not only in the respective zoo category (for instance, "Birds in Saratoga Zoo" but also the correct taxonomical "in zoos" category (such as "Sciuridae in zoos"). --Pitke (talk) 23:45, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

License of File:Jovanna-verheyen-hugues-van-holderbeke-1408293857.jpg[edit]

Grashoofd, Why do you keep on removing {{No license}} template from File:Jovanna-verheyen-hugues-van-holderbeke-1408293857.jpg without adding the actual license? See here and here. All files are required to have license at the time of the upload or they are tagged with {{No license}} template. Having or not having OTRS templates has nothing to do with need for a license. I looked up the ticket and added the proper license to this file but in the future please do not remove {{No license}} tags without adding license templates. --Jarekt (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

The license was included, but was hidden (<!- -->) due to the fact that I hadn't received the proper permissions yet. We can't place the CC-template while that permission hasn't been received yet (meaning that people can use the file under the CC-terms). Please let me do my thing, I'll take care of it. Grashoofd (talk) 15:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Category:Photographers from the Netherlands[edit]

Hoi Lars, ik zag dat je bovengenoemde categorie hebt toegevoegd aan Category:Photographs by Lars Curfs. Bij mijn weten is die categorie niet bestemd voor Commonsgebruikers die geen professioneel fotograaf zijn en ben jij ook de enige uit die groep die erin staat. Is dat niet wat apart? Groet, Apdency (talk) 10:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Dank voor je actie ter plekke. Apdency (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Apdency, graag gedaan. Ik lees in het weekend mijn berichten op mijn mobiel. Een wijziging is dan snel gedaan, een reactie op een bericht gaat wat minder soepel. Maar als reactie op je eerste bericht: Je hebt helemaal gelijk; ik stond daar verkeerd. Groeten Grashoofd (talk) 09:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)