User talk:Guerinf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Guerinf!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−


Hello, Guerinf!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Grille-pain.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Grille-pain.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Lymantria (talk) 20:57, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Notre-Dame-du-Haut_à_Ronchamp_(1977)4.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Notre-Dame-du-Haut_à_Ronchamp_(1977)4.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:58, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Notre-Dame-du-Haut_à_Ronchamp_(1977)2.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Notre-Dame-du-Haut_à_Ronchamp_(1977)2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Notre-Dame-du-Haut_à_Ronchamp_(1977).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Notre-Dame-du-Haut_à_Ronchamp_(1977).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Groucho NL (talk) 18:57, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Notre-Dame-du-Haut_à_Ronchamp_(1977)3.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Notre-Dame-du-Haut_à_Ronchamp_(1977)3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Groucho NL (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Notre-Dame-du-Haut_à_Ronchamp_(1977)5.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Notre-Dame-du-Haut_à_Ronchamp_(1977)5.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Groucho NL (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Centre_Georges-Pompidou_(15-10-1977).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Centre_Georges-Pompidou_(15-10-1977).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hektor (talk) 16:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Centre_Georges-Pompidou_sur_la_rue_Beaubourg_(1977).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Centre_Georges-Pompidou_sur_la_rue_Beaubourg_(1977).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lophotrochozoa (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Centre_Georges-Pompidou,_escalier_extérieur_(novembre_1977).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Centre_Georges-Pompidou,_escalier_extérieur_(novembre_1977).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lophotrochozoa (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Joëlle Morosoli[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que vous aviez supprimé les photos de l'article de Joëlle Morosoli, en raison de droits? Pourtant, les droits ont été cédés par le photographe Michel Dubreuil. En quoi les photos contreviennent-elles aux droits?

Merci d'avance,

François Guérin --Guerinf (talk) 15:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour,
L'autorisation n'a pas été validée pour des raisons exposées à Joëlle Morosoli directement par courriel. C'est à elle, et elle seule, de faire en sorte que les problèmes évoquées soient résolues. Il sera alors possible de remettre en ligne ces images le cas échéant.--Bapti 13:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour,
Je vous remercie de votre réponse. Madame Morosoli n'a pas de site officiel. Elle est artiste et enseignante, mais ne possède aucune site dédié. Par ailleurs, c'est moi qui avait initialement associé les photos, avant d'apprendre qu'elles n'étaient pas de madame Morosoli mais bien de Michel Dubreuil qui, à ce que je comprends, a bel et bien attribué les droits appropriés pour Wikipédia. Serait-il possible dès lors de retirer le nom de Madame Morosoli et de ne conserver que celui de Michel Dubreuil? Est-ce que cela normalisera la situation?
Madame Morosoli et moi-même sommes très désireux de régler la situation, mais même si je suis collaborateur à Wikipédia depuis un an et demi, il s'agit là d'un aspect qui demeure encore très obscur pour moi. Merci de m'éclairer!
Bien à vous,
--Guerinf (talk) 00:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Ces éléments, c'est à Joëlle Morosoli de les communiquer directement par réponse de courriel : me contacter ici ne réglera en rien le problème.--Bapti 15:03, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Joëlle Morosoli2.JPG[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 01:49, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Grille-pain Seb, Catalogue Manufrance, 1980.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Grille-pain Seb, Catalogue Manufrance, 1980.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--MGuf (d) 16:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Ao619772 casson 1020.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ao619772 casson 1020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Ao619772 casson 1020.jpg[edit]

Salut. Je vous ai laissé une note sur ma page. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Robert Lemay.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Robert Lemay.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  Bahasa Melayu  Bahasa Indonesia  azərbaycanca  British English  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  norsk bokmål  română  Lëtzebuergesch  español  português  English  hrvatski  Plattdüütsch  français  Nederlands  norsk  Malti  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Motopark (talk) 12:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 04.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 05.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 06.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:L'Observatoire de la lumière 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Dollard des Ormeaux meurt à Long-Sault pour sauver la colonie - William Thurston Topham.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Dollard des Ormeaux meurt à Long-Sault pour sauver la colonie - William Thurston Topham.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 09:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 06:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Pavillon l'Homme à l'oeuvre.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Pavillon l'Homme à l'oeuvre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

70.80.213.145 20:14, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Impulsion.jpg was recently deleted[edit]

File:Impulsion.jpg was recently deleted by Fitindia, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request. Reason for deletion : per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Regent~frwiki. Making too many problematic un-deletion requests can lead to administrative actions. It's best to discusses with the admin who deleted your file before filing an un-deletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:41, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Jean Cartier.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Jean Cartier.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Expo[edit]

Bonjour, En lisant la page Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pavillon l'Homme à l'oeuvre.jpg, je suis intrigué par la réponse que vous avez faite au proposant. Vous avez écrit que vous ne vous souvenez pas où vous avez trouvé cette image. Si vous ne souvenez pas où vous avez trouvé l'image, comment pouvez-vous affirmer en être l'auteur ? Qu'en est-il des autres photos de l'Expo 67 que vous avez versées ? Est-ce vous qui les avez prises en 1967 ou si vous les avez trouvées quelque part ? -- Asclepias (talk) 19:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour Asclepias (talk · contribs). Les photos sur Expo 67 que j'ai ajoutées proviennent de mon oncle dont j'ai reçu les diapositives en héritage. Je les ai numérisées, nettoyées et retravaillées pour les rendre présentables avant de les téléverser dans Commons. Celle dont vous parlez provient de ce lot, mais je ne l'ai pas mentionné. Je voulais laisser l'utilisateur anonyme exposer ses arguments. Ce qu'il n'a bien sûr pu faire. Bien à vous, --Guerinf (talk) 21:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Merci de cette réponse rapide. Cela clarifie en effet la situation. (Et merci d'avoir publié les photos sur Commons !) Mais il faudrait donc attribuer les photos au nom de votre oncle plutôt qu'à votre nom dans la section «auteur» du modèle «Information» (à moins que vous teniez à garder son nom secret ou à refuser de lui reconnaître la paternité de ses photos). Et dans la section «source» utiliser quelque chose comme par exemple le modèle Photo scan ou Self-scanned ou une indication semblable plutôt que le modèle «Own». Par ailleurs, pour la licence, si vous avez hérité des droits d'auteur, le modèle de licence que vous avez utilisé («self|cc-by-sa-4.0») est correct, mais vous pourriez utiliser le modèle optionnel Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs qui est prévu pour clarifier plus précisément ce type de situation. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC) Ajout : Je vois aussi que les dates de création indiquées sont confondantes. Il y a même une photo qui est datée de l'année 4501. Je suppose que ça devrait être 1967 pour toutes ces photos. :) -- Asclepias (talk) 22:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Ah, merci beaucoup pour ces précisions. La gestion des licences et des droits m'a toujours semblé d'une complexité insensée. Je vais regarder ça et apporter les corrections nécessaires. Salutations cordiales! --Guerinf (talk) 19:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Je viens d'apporter les modifications à Pavillon de l'acier.jpg. Pourriez-vous me confirmer si c'est correct, en quel cas, j'effectuerais les corrections pour les autres fichiers. Merci! --Guerinf (talk) 20:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Oui, ça donne suite très bien aux commentaires ci-dessus. (Juste un détail pour la licence, vous pouvez choisir soit le modèle self|cc-by-sa-4.0 (que vous aviez choisi initialement), soit le modèle Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs (dont j'ai signalé la possibilité), mais normalement il n'est pas prévu d'utiliser les deux modèles à la fois en emboîtant l'un dans l'autre. Mais ce n'est pas vraiment un problème. La différence entre les deux modèles est la phrase d'introduction.) -- Asclepias (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

@Asclepias: Bonjour, j'ai terminé les modifications aux fichiers d'Expo 67. J'aurais une autre question. On m'a supprimé une photo (voir rubrique précédente dans cette page) pour une obscure raison que même la demande de restauration n'a pas éclaircie. Il s'agit pourtant d'une œuvre d'art public, répertorié sur le site de la Ville de Montréal. Pourquoi devrait-elle être supprimée dans WP? Et que faire alors de toutes les autres œuvres d'art public que l'on retrouve dans WP? Merci pour vos lumières! --Guerinf (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour, Merci pour les modifications. C'est vraiment bien ces photos de l'Expo. Je possède moi-même des diapositives de l'Expo prises par mon père et dont j'ai hérité. Je me déciderai peut-être un jour à faire l'effort de les numériser et de les publier sur Commons.
En ce qui concerne le fichier «File:Jean Cartier.JPG», je ne peux bien sûr pas le voir puisqu'il est supprimé mais, d'après le titre du fichier et d'après le contenu de la discussion de suppression, je vais supposer qu'il s'agissait d'une photographie d'une oeuvre d'art de Jean Cartier (1924-1996), autre qu'une oeuvre de sculpture ou d'architecture.
Le problème est que toute oeuvre d'art est protégée par les droits d'auteur de l'artiste qui l'a créée. Si l'artiste est mort, ces droits passent à ses héritiers. Cela signifie notamment que seul le propriétaire des droits d'auteur peut faire ou autoriser la publication d'une reproduction de l'oeuvre, même dans un médium différent. La photographie de l'oeuvre est une forme de reproduction de l'oeuvre. On ne peut donc pas publier une photographie de l'oeuvre à moins d'obtenir la permission explicite du propriétaire des droits d'auteur ou à moins qu'une exception dans la loi le permette.
Une oeuvre est ainsi protégée, pendant un certain nombre d'années et de manière variable, selon les lois en vigueur dans les différents pays. Par exemple, les oeuvres de Jean Cartier (1924-1996) sont actuellement protégées au Canada jusqu'à la fin de l'année 2046 (cela serait même prolongé jusqu'à la fin de l'année 2066 si l'actuel gouvernement fédéral réussit à faire adopter son projet de loi qui vise à faire passer la durée des droits d'auteur de 50 ans à 70 ans après la mort de l'auteur).
Le fait qu'il s'agisse d'une oeuvre d'art public répertorié sur le site de la municipalité ne change rien au fait que l'oeuvre est protégée par les droits d'auteur comme n'importe quelle autre oeuvre. Si la question est pourquoi la municipalité peut publier sur son site une photo de l'oeuvre, c'est probablement parce que la municipalité a obtenu des propriétaires des droits d'auteur le droit de reproduire l'oeuvre ou que la municipalité a acquis d'eux les droits d'auteur.
Si la question est pourquoi d'autres photographies d'oeuvres d'art se trouvent sur Commons, il y a plusieurs cas possibles. Premièrement, les oeuvres dont l'auteur est mort depuis suffisamment longtemps pour que les droits d'auteur soient expirés. Deuxièmement, certains types d'oeuvres dont la loi étatsunienne, qui régit Wikimedia, permet explicitement les reproductions photographiques, par exemple les oeuvres d'architecture. Troisièmement, des photographies de types d'oeuvres qui n'entrent pas dans la catégorie précédente et dont la direction de Wikimedia n'autorise pas la présence sur Commons parce que les reproductions photographiques n'en sont pas permises aux États-Unis, mais que des administrateurs de Commons tolèrent actuellement en pratique, par exemple certaines oeuvres de sculpture. Font notamment partie de cette catégorie les photographies de sculptures situées de façon permanente dans des endroits publics au Canada, ce qui est permis par la loi canadienne mais pas par la loi étatsunienne. Mais pas les photographies de certains autres types d'oeuvres, par exemple les peintures murales, ce qui n'est pas permis par la loi canadienne. Je vous épargne un développement plus approfondi sur les problèmes reliés à cette situation bancale sur Commons car cela sort des limites de votre question. Quatrièmement, les photographies où l'oeuvre d'art ne paraît pas de façon importante mais plutôt de manière minuscule, accidentelle ou incidente. Cinquièmement, des photographies qui ne répondent à aucune des conditions pour être sur Commons et qui ne devraient pas y être mais que personne n'a remarquées ou proposées pour suppression.
Je remarque que l'utilisateur qui a fait la demande de suppression de votre fichier semble s'être donné pour mission de faire un ménage dans les photographies correspondant au cinquièmement ci-dessus. Il en a proposé pour suppression probablement plusieurs centaines. Il ne faut donc pas y voir quelque chose de particulier à votre fichier. En général, ses propositions semblent justifiées.
En conclusion, en ce qui concerne les oeuvres d'art public situées au Canada, ce qu'il faut surtout retenir de tout cela, c'est qu'il s'agit d'éviter de verser sur Commons des photographies d'oeuvres protégées par droits d'auteur, par exemple de murales. Il est possible de verser des photographies d'oeuvres d'architecture, parce que la loi le permet. Quant aux photographies de sculptures, elles sont en principe interdites mais actuellement tolérées sur Commons. Chaque contributeur de Commons décide ce qu'il fait en connaissance de cause. Les propriétaires des droits d'auteur d'une sculpture pourraient possiblement se plaindre selon la loi des États-Unis qu'une photographie de l'oeuvre est utilisée sans permission sur Commons. C'est rare mais c'est déjà arrivé par exemple pour des sculptures situées en Europe.
-- Asclepias (talk) 23:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Wow, merci beaucoup pour ces précisions. C'est très clair. Salutations! --Guerinf (talk) 14:38, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 14:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)