User talk:Jacek Halicki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Halicki)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort Ostróg 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Twierdza Srebrna Góra, fort główny (donżon) 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Niemcza, pl. Rynek 15 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Niemcza, pl. Rynek 15 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Baszta Bramy Górnej w Niemczy 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Baszta Bramy Górnej w Niemczy 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Koscioł Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP w Niemczy 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Koscioł Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP w Niemczy 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Koscioł Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP w Niemczy 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Koscioł Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP w Niemczy 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Niemcza, pl. Rynek 19 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Niemcza, pl. Rynek 19 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Niemcza, pl. Rynek 34 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Niemcza, pl. Rynek 34 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Stadnina w Świdniku 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stadnina w Świdniku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Stadnina w Świdniku 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stadnina w Świdniku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Stadnina w Świdniku 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stadnina w Świdniku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Stadnina w Świdniku 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stadnina w Świdniku 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Gramofon Daniel 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Gramofon Daniel 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Gramofon Daniel 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Gramofon Daniel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Koscioł Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP w Niemczy 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Koscioł Niepokalanego Poczęcia NMP w Niemczy 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Schronisko Orzeł, Góry Sowie, Sudety.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Schronisko Orzeł, Góry Sowie, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Dom ogrodnika w Bukowcu 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dom ogrodnika w Bukowcu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

2016 Konica Auto S3 1.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2016 Konica Auto S3 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Konica Auto S3 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Natura 2000.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Natura 2000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Stodoła w Bukowcu 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stodoła w Bukowcu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Stodoła w Bukowcu 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stodoła w Bukowcu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Budynek mieszkalno-gospodarczy w Bukowcu.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Budynek mieszkalno-gospodarczy w Bukowcu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Młyn w Bukowcu 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Młyn w Bukowcu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Młyn w Bukowcu 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Młyn w Bukowcu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Młyn w Bukowcu 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Młyn w Bukowcu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Świdniku 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Świdniku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Stajnia w Świdniku.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Stajnia w Świdniku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Staw Kąpielnik w Bukowcu 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Staw Kąpielnik w Bukowcu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Staw Kąpielnik w Bukowcu 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Staw Kąpielnik w Bukowcu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Staw Kąpielnik w Bukowcu 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Staw Kąpielnik w Bukowcu 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Staw Kąpielnik w Bukowcu 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Staw Kąpielnik w Bukowcu 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Staw Kąpielnik w Bukowcu 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Staw Kąpielnik w Bukowcu 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Wieża widokowa w Bukowcu 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa w Bukowcu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Wieża widokowa w Bukowcu 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa w Bukowcu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Wieża widokowa w Bukowcu 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa w Bukowcu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Wieża widokowa w Bukowcu 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Wieża widokowa w Bukowcu 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Świdniku 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Świdniku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Dwór Górny w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór Górny w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Dwór Górny w Nowej Rudzie 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór Górny w Nowej Rudzie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Dwór Górny w Nowej Rudzie 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dwór Górny w Nowej Rudzie 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

File:2017 Miniaturka Małej Syrenki w Kopenhadze.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2017 Miniaturka Małej Syrenki w Kopenhadze.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Polimerek (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

FYI: Here's an article about the mermaid http://web.archive.org/web/20170109010223/http://journalisten.dk/havfruens-arvinger-tjener-fedt-pa-ophavsret --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:04, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Opactwo w Bukowcu 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Opactwo w Bukowcu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Dom opata i kościół św. Józefa w Krzeszowie.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Dom opata i kościół św. Józefa w Krzeszowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Plac Grunwaldzki w Nowej Rudzie.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Plac Grunwaldzki w Nowej Rudzie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Opactwo w Bukowcu 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Opactwo w Bukowcu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Sztuczna ruina w Bukowcu 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Sztuczna ruina w Bukowcu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Sztuczna ruina w Bukowcu 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Sztuczna ruina w Bukowcu 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Opactwo w Bukowcu 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Opactwo w Bukowcu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Kościół św. Józefa w Krzeszowie.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Kościół św. Józefa w Krzeszowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2017 Nikon D5500.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Nikon D5500.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2017 Ballantine's Finest.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Ballantine's.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2017 E-papieros mod 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 E-papieros mod 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2017 Likier wiśniowy Krupnik.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Likier wiśniowy Krupnik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2017 Likier śliwkowy Krupnik.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Likier śliwkowy Krupnik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Sztuczna ruina w Bukowcu 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Sztuczna ruina w Bukowcu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Sztuczna ruina w Bukowcu 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Sztuczna ruina w Bukowcu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Sztuczna ruina w Bukowcu 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Sztuczna ruina w Bukowcu 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Góry Sokole, Rudawy Janowickie, Sudety 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Góry Sokole, Rudawy Janowickie, Sudety 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Motocykl typu chopper 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Motocykl typu chopper 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Góry Sokole, Rudawy Janowickie, Sudety 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Góry Sokole, Rudawy Janowickie, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Góry Sokole, Rudawy Janowickie, Sudety 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Góry Sokole, Rudawy Janowickie, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2016 Motocykl typu chopper 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Motocykl typu chopper 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kościół ewangelicki, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kościół ewangelicki, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kościół ewangelicki, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kościół ewangelicki, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kościół ewangelicki, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kościół ewangelicki, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Tablica na zabytku.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Tablica na zabytku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kaplica św. Floriana 08.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, kaplica św. Floriana 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Sony DSLR-A700 z gripem N50.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sony DSLR-A700 with N50 battery grip.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Nysa Kłodzka w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nysa Kłodzka in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Wieża ratusza w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2015 Śnieżne Stawki, Karkonosze, Sudety 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Śnieżne Kotły, Śnieżne Stawki, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Brama Wodna, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Brama Wodna, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Baszta Kłodzka, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Baszta Kłodzka, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica cmentarna 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica cmentarna 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica cmentarna 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica cmentarna 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, mury obronne, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, mury obronne, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, mury obronne, 12.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, mury obronne, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Muzeum minerałów w Złotym Stoku 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mineral museum in Złoty Stok, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Muzeum Minerałów w Złotym Stoku 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mineral museum in Złoty Stok, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, mury obronne, 16.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, mury obronne, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Brama Wodna, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Brama Wodna, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica cmentarna 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, kaplica cmentarna 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Leśny Park Przygody w Złotym Stoku.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
High Ropes Course Skalisko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Gnom w Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gold Mine Museum in Złoty Stok, bronze gnome sculpture.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, główny budynek 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gold Mine Museum in Złoty Stok, main building, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, główny budynek 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gold Mine Museum in Złoty Stok, main building, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, kolejka 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gold Mine Museum in Złoty Stok, narrow gauge railways.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Muzeum Kopalni Złota w Złotym Stoku, tunel 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gold Mine Museum in Złoty Stok, underground.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Baszta Rycerska, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Baszta Rycerska, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Baszta Rycerska, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Baszta Rycerska, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2015 Baszta Rycerska w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Baszta Rycerska w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2015 Konsola Sony PSP-3004.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
PSP-3000, black.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Gramofon Daniel 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Unitra turntables, Daniel G-1100 fs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Radmor 5102 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Radmor 5102 stereo receiver.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 03.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Radomierz, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 14.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 15.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 19.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 27.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Baszta Kłodzka, 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Baszta Kłodzka, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 04.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Radomierz, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 06.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Radomierz, eye of providence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 07.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Radomierz, stucco over side entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 08.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Radomierz, chancel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Figura św. Trójcy, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Figura św. Trójcy, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 7, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 7, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 28.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 28.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 23.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ratusz, 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 4, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 4, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 09.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Radomierz, altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Kościół Matki Bożej Różańcowej w Radomierzu 12.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Rosary church in Radomierz, stained glass window.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Minox C 8.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minox C, open, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Minox C 9.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minox C, open, back view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 7, 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 7, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 8, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 8, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Figura św. Trójcy, 08.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Figura św. Trójcy, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Figura św. Trójcy, 09.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Figura św. Trójcy, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 7, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 7, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Minox C 6.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minox C, close, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Minox C 7.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minox C, close, back view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Minox C 10.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minox C, in case.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Tamron SP AF 70-200mm.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

2016 Minox C 8.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2016 Minox C 8.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Minox C 8.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 7, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 7, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 8, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 8, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 8, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 8, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Willa Hubertus w Złotym Stoku.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Hubertus in Złoty Stok, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Folwark w Tomicach 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Tomice, gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Folwark w Tomicach 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Tomice, folwark.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Pałac w Tomicach 10.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Tomice, avant-corps.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 8, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 8, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 9, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 9, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 10, 06.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 10, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 10, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 10, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 10, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 10, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Schronisko Orzeł, Góry Sowie, Sudety.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orzeł Hostel, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Stadnina w Świdniku 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horse stud farm in Świdnik, recreation horse cart.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Stajnia w Świdniku.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Horse stud farm in Świdnik, stable interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 3.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park pavilion in Bukowiec, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 10, 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 10, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 11, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 11, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 4, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 4, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Pawilon parkowy w Bukowcu 4.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park pavilion in Bukowiec, inscription and relief .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Stodoła w Bukowcu 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barn in Bukowiec, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Dom ogrodnika w Bukowcu 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gardener's house in Bukowiec, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Stodoła w Bukowcu 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barn in Bukowiec, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 06.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 13, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 13, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Młyn w Bukowcu 3.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Watermill in Bukowiec, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Budynek mieszkalno-gospodarczy w Bukowcu.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Residential-economic building in Bukowiec, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Rezerwat przyrody Głazy Krasnoludków 09.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nature reserve Głazy Krasnoludków, mushroom rocks.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Świdniku 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Nicholas in Świdnik, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2017 Nikon D7100.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Nikon D7100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2017 Sigma 10-20 mm f-3.5 EX DC HSM.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Sigma 10-20 mm f-3.5 EX DC HSM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2017 Mod Siegelei Mini Book Kit 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Mod Siegelei Mini Book Kit 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 07.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 08.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 09.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 12, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Świdniku 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Nicholas in Świdnik, belfry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Wieża widokowa w Bukowcu 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Observation tower in Bukowiec Palace Park, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Wieża widokowa w Bukowcu 3.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Observation tower in Bukowiec Palace Park, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Wieża widokowa w Bukowcu 5.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Observation tower in Bukowiec Palace Park, spiral stairs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2017 Mod Siegelei Mini Book Kit 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Mod Siegelei Mini Book Kit 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2017 Sigelei Evaya and Kayfun V4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Sigelei Evaya and Kayfun V4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Staw Kąpielnik w Bukowcu 03.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kąpielnik pond in Bukowiec, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Dwór Górny w Nowej Rudzie 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Nowa Ruda, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Dwór Górny w Nowej Rudzie 3.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Nowa Ruda, coats of arms over main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Opactwo w Bukowcu 3.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum in Bukowiec, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

2015 Winobluszcz trójklapowy 02.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2015 Winobluszcz trójklapowy 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Winobluszcz trójklapowy 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2017 Pinceta ceramiczna 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Pinceta ceramiczna 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2017 Pinceta ceramiczna 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Pinceta ceramiczna 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2017 Sigelei X-Tank.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Sigelei X-Tank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 13, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 13, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 13, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 13, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2016 Opactwo w Bukowcu 4.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum in Bukowiec, tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Dom opata i kościół św. Józefa w Krzeszowie.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Joseph in Krzeszów Abbey, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Sztuczna ruina w Bukowcu 5.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Artificial ruins in Bukowiec Palace Park, closeness.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2017 Nikon D5500.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikon D5500.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 08.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 09.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 14, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 14, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 14, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 14, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 14, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 14, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 14, 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 14, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2017 E-papieros mod 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mods (electronic cigarettes), power supply Wismec Reuleaux RX 2/3 and vaporizer SvoëMesto Kayfun V4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2016 Góry Sokole, Rudawy Janowickie, Sudety 3.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Góry Sokole, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2014 Zieleniec, kościół św. Anny 09.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anne church in Zieleniec, Maria column.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 11, 02.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, oriel window.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2017 Nikon D7100.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikon D7100 with Nikkor AF-S DX 18-70 mm f/3.5-4.5 lens.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2017 Sigma 10-20 mm f-3.5 EX DC HSM.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 EX DC HSM.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 13.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 19, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 19, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 07.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 10.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 17, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 14, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 14, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 11, 09.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 11, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2015 Hologram marki Sigelei.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holography, brand Sigelei certificate of authenticity.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 21, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 21, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 21, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 21, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 21, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 21, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 22, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 22, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 18, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 18, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 19, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 19, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 20, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 20, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2017 Mod Siegelei Mini Book Kit 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mods (electronic cigarettes), Siegelei Mini Book Kit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 23, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 23, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 24, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 24, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 21, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 21, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2017 Pinceta ceramiczna 1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ceramic tweezers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 24, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 24, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2017 Sigelei Mini Book and Kayfun V4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Sigelei Mini Book and Kayfun V4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 24, 06.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 24, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 24, 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 24, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 25, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 25, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 25, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 25, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 25, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 25, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 25, 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Rynek 25, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

2014 Nowa Ruda, rynek 01.JPG
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2014 Nowa Ruda, rynek 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Nowa Ruda, rynek 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 09.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 07.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 15.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 11.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, wójtostwo 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, wójtostwo 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, wójtostwo 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, wójtostwo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 08.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystrzyca Kłodzka, Sempołowskiej 13, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:20160810 Pyay, Myanmar 9593.jpg[edit]

Bardzo dziękuję za poprawki! -- Jakubhal 08:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny, ogrodzenie 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny, ogrodzenie 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

2017 Sigelei Evaya and Kayfun V4.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2017 Sigelei Evaya and Kayfun V4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2017 Sigelei Evaya and Kayfun V4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Gorzanów, zespół kościoła św. Marii Magdaleny 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, zespół kościoła św. Marii Magdaleny 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny, ogrodzenie 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny, ogrodzenie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny, ogrodzenie 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny, ogrodzenie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny, ogrodzenie 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny, ogrodzenie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny, ogrodzenie 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Gorzanów, kościół św. Marii Magdaleny, ogrodzenie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 06.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 07.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Pieta w Gorzanowie.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Pieta w Gorzanowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2017 Sigelei Evaya and Kayfun V4.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mods (electronic cigarettes), Power supply Sigelei Evaya 66W and vaporizer SvoëMesto Kayfun V4.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 10.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Anthony of Padua in Gorzanów, latern.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 13.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Anthony of Padua in Gorzanów, window.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 11.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Anthony of Padua in Gorzanów, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
2014 Pieta w Gorzanowie.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St. Anthony of Padua in Gorzanów, pietà.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 11.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół, budynek bramny 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, kościół, budynek bramny 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 09.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 08.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 07.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Nowy Waliszów, dwór 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Antoniego Padewskiego w Gorzanowie, 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 15.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 20.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 21.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Małgorzaty w Starej Łomnicy, 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 09.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2015 Dwór Dolny w Starej Łomnicy 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Dolny w Starej Łomnicy 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2015 Dwór Dolny w Starej Łomnicy 06.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Dolny w Starej Łomnicy 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2015 Dwór Górny w Starej Łomnicy 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Dwór Górny w Starej Łomnicy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Stary Waliszów, kościół 06.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Stary Waliszów, kościół 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica św. Rocha w Starej Łomnicy, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2015 Staw w Paczkowie 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Staw w Paczkowie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2017 Smog nad Nową Rudą.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Smog nad Nową Rudą.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2015 Honda HR-V.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Honda HR-V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2015 Staw w Paczkowie 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Staw w Paczkowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2015 Staw w Paczkowie 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Staw w Paczkowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2017 Kościół św. Anny na Górze Świętej Anny 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017 Kościół św. Anny na Górze Świętej Anny 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014 Wodospad w Kłodzku.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 Wodospad w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2015 Staw w Paczkowie 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Staw w Paczkowie 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2015 Staw w Paczkowie 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2015 Staw w Paczkowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)