User talk:Hannolans

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archived discussions

Contents

File:Iris van Dongen - Willem Alexander 2014.jpeg[edit]

Beste Hannolans, als ik het goed interpreteer mogen afbeeldingen van het koninklijk huis niet worden overgenomen. De CC0 op deze link: https://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/copyright lijkt niet te gelden voor beeldmateriaal, alleen voor tekst, helaas :-(. Met hartelijke groet, Elly (talk) 14:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Zojuist gehoord dat fotos eerder wel mochten worden overgenomen. Ik heb bovenstaande teruggetrokken. Sorry voor de storing en het loos alarm! Elly (talk) 16:11, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

We kunnen RVD vragen om dit weer op CC0 te zetten, in het kader van de wet hergebruik overheidsinformatie of gewoon omdat dat bij hun taak past. De prinsessen worden bij ons nu niet meer ouder.... --Hannolans (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

File:A Beautiful Pharma Mind.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:A Beautiful Pharma Mind.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Austriantraveler (talk) 23:26, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Doodstraf.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Doodstraf.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Austriantraveler (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Kick Pruijsbrug[edit]

Hello, I saw your impressive photos of the fortress in Hoofddorp. You seem to live next to this place. I am planning an article about the flight accident in July 1935, including the person of Kick Pruijs, who saved eight personen life. Now a new bridge for cyclists was named after him [1]. Would you like to help me with a photo of the bridge and the sign with the name? That would be very kind. Groeten uit Keulen, --Nicola (talk) 13:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Nicola, I never visited that bridge. When I find time I can make a picture, somewhere in the coming weeks. --Hannolans (talk) 23:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
That would be wonderful :) This is the article that I would like to have it for: [2]. --Nicola (talk) 06:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done Pictures added to Commons --Hannolans (talk) 22:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Raam Maurits[edit]

Ha Hanno! Goed dat dit erop staat. Maar met deze beschrijving kan ik niks: "geknield voor een gebedenboek onder een troon". Hoe ik ook kijk... Waar komt die omschrijving vandaan? Ik zie dat hij een wapenschild vastgrijpt, met in de rand 'Hony soit qui mal y pense'—Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.111.36.135 (talk) 11:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Ik heb de beschrijving meegekopieerd van de link en verder niet bekeken: https://www.bhic.nl/foto/ec295782-45f9-11e3-ae08-ab94c6a577e6 --Hannolans (talk) 12:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Auschwitz_resistance_photo,_no_278[edit]

Richard 12:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

File:KUNSTGEHEIMEN- Hoe maak je met moderne technieken een perfecte kopie van een Rembrandt-.webm[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:KUNSTGEHEIMEN- Hoe maak je met moderne technieken een perfecte kopie van een Rembrandt-.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

lNeverCry 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

File:KUNSTGEHEIMEN- Wat zit er verborgen onder wereldberoemde schilderijen-.webm[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:KUNSTGEHEIMEN- Wat zit er verborgen onder wereldberoemde schilderijen-.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

lNeverCry 01:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

File:RTV NH Zendervormgeving (lang).webm[edit]

Hi Hannolans,

Ik heb dit filmpje verwijderd naar aanleiding van een klacht op OTRS. De persoon die dit filmpje had vrijgegeven bleek niet de rechthebbende te zijn en het filmpje is ook van YT verwijderd. Verder was er nog wat over het portretrecht en bevatte het filmpje materiaal van derden dat in ieder geval niet vrijgegeven kan worden. Mogelijk zijn het citaten maar dat staan we op Commons net zomin toe als fair use. Ik hoop dat het duidelijk is waarom dit filmpje helaas gesneuveld is. Meer details kan ik niet geven ivm. met de vertrouwelijkheid vam OTRS. Natuur12 (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Het filmpje was van het bureau wat al het beeldmateriaal voor NH gemaakt heeft. Jammer dat van dat filmpje niet alle rechten blijkbaar duidelijk zijn. Als het kleine onderdelen betreft is mogelijk wel de minimis van toepassing of kunnen we het er uit snijden. Kan ik het filmpje vervangen voor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53oIOTcAXw8 of zit daarin hetzelfde fragment? --Hannolans (talk) 19:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Bevat deels dezelfde fragmenten dus dat kan ook een probleem worden :(. Natuur12 (talk) 19:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
ok. --Hannolans (talk) 19:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

krugers films Het Groote Mekka Feest[edit]

Mijn vader is in 1964 gestorven in Den Haag (Archimedes straat) en niet in 1937!!

GAARNE CORRECTIE, ik ben zijn zoon en enige overblijvende.

drjan@pas.nl

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Drjan27 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Dank voor deze melding. Op alle Wikipediapagina's staat vermeld dat G. Krugers overleden is in 1937. zie bijvoorbeeld https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._Krugers, Universiteit Leiden en Andere TIjden verwijzen ook naar deze informatie. Voordat we dit veranderen, is er ergens online meer informatie te vinden over de sterfdatum van uw vader of indien het privegevoelige informatie betreft kunt u het ook een mail sturen naar permissions-nl@wikimedia.org waar het vertrouwelijk wordt behandeld. Ik zal hier ook een mailtje naar sturen.--Hannolans (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Het groote Mekka-feest acte 3.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Het groote Mekka-feest acte 3.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tostman (talk) 12:33, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Krugers[edit]

It's a pity that the heirs of Georg Krugers didn't want the films about Mecca to be featured on Wikipedia. (1) The OTRS ticket isn't openly available, but I guess there was no chance convincing them of the importance of the films being openly accessible? (2) Is there another source than just the book by Vrolijk & Mols (which relies on talks with the Krugers family) with regard to the death date? (3) The original Wiki version was based on the book by Misbach Yusa Biran: Sejarah Film 1900–1950. Bikin Film di Jawa. Jakarta, Komunitas Bamboo working with the Jakarta Art Council, 2009. ISBN 978-979-3731-58-2, p. 144. Shouldn't his atatement ("died 1937 in Hong Kong") be mentioned, as a contradictory (but apparently wrong) source? Vysotsky (talk) 13:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Ik heb contact en mogelijk komt er wel gerelateerd materiaal beschikbaar. Als dat materiaal er is dan kan het artikel ook beter geschreven worden. --Hannolans (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Gracias. Vysotsky (talk) 23:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
@Vysotsky: er staat nu een video over de film online waarin over de achtergrond van de film wordt verteld--Hannolans (talk) 00:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Ik zag hem vannacht, en heb een van de optredenden al gecomplimenteerd. Mooi! Vysotsky (talk) 08:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

File:California Dreaming - The bankrupt Golden State - (vpro backlight documentary).webm[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:California Dreaming - The bankrupt Golden State - (vpro backlight documentary).webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Speech Jesse Klaver AFAS Live 360° (Virtual Reality).webm[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Speech Jesse Klaver AFAS Live 360° (Virtual Reality).webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Iemke van Dijk Slow Freeze film.webm[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Iemke van Dijk Slow Freeze film.webm. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Iemke van Dijk Slow Freeze film.webm]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Dansen op de vulkaan.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Dansen op de vulkaan.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mbch331 (talk) 10:43, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Riet Neerincx het fotograferen van vaas Colenbrander voor tentoonstelling 1986.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Riet Neerincx het fotograferen van vaas Colenbrander voor tentoonstelling 1986.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elly (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Riet Neerincx Kunstoefening 1953.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Riet Neerincx Kunstoefening 1953.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elly (talk) 11:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Generiek Familie.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Generiek Familie.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2A02:1812:41D:B800:D92F:9C51:9404:5E94 12:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

File:World Press Jodi Bieber (2011).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:World Press Jodi Bieber (2011).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mechanical Turk (talk) 13:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Making handwoven DHAKA fabric in Nepal • ढाका.webm[edit]

Hi there, I thought you might like to know that the file you uploaded here, File:Making handwoven DHAKA fabric in Nepal • ढाका.webm, has been tagged as media of the day for 20 May 2017. Seagull123 (talk) 21:31, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello Hannolans, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:De oeroude kermis in onze tijd.webm[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:35, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Stadsgezichten van Haarlem - Acte 1.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Stadsgezichten van Haarlem - Acte 1.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 14:11, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Template:Rijksoverheid[edit]

Hi Hannolans,

if you upload from Rijksoverheid.nl (e.g. File:Jongetje 30km.jpg), please use this template!--Tolomm (talk) 10:58, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:Herdenking Ravensbrück.webm[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:08, 22 July 2017 (UTC)


File:Def-klu-20170519-id7bee6ak-web-hd.webm[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:12, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

File:De Rozentuin in Kamp Amersfoort.jpg[edit]

Hallo, Hannolans, heb je er iets tegen wanneer ik een typo corrigeer? Lotje (talk) 14:52, 26 August 2017 (UTC) @Lotje: Dit is al even oud, maar uiteraard niet --Hannolans (talk) 11:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Bijlmer[edit]

Ik heb de 1939 foto zonder het watermerk. Uw foto is nl door mij op de site van stelling amsterdam geplaatst. Ik heb daar de copyright voor aan Aviodrome betaald voor beperkt privegebruik, ic een besloten forum van SvA. U heeft die nu op publlieke site wiki geplaatst. Geeft dit niet copyright problemen? Hun copyright staat nl linksonder van uw eigen file! Als die copyright problemen er niet meer zouden zijn, dan mag u mijn file gebruiken ic zonder het watermerk. Moet in dat geval die copyright opdruk van Aviodrome ook niet van af?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Huibterhaar (talk • contribs) 10:48, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Goed om te horen. De rechten in Nederland zijn zeker verlopen. Het is werk van een organisatie en dat verloopt 70 jaar na openbaarmaking of als er sprake is van ongepubliceerd werk, 70 jaar na creatie. Dat geeft organisaties uiteraard onverminderd het recht om ze te koop aan te bieden en er een watermerk op te plaatsen. Een foto zonder watermerk zou heel fijn zijn. --Hannolans (talk) 11:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

File:RTL Nieuws Leader 2014.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:RTL Nieuws Leader 2014.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

213.46.17.47 18:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

ANEFO[edit]

Dear Hannolans, As you have also been busy categorizing ANEFO photographs, you might be interested in this contribution on Wikimedia Outreach. Vysotsky (talk) 10:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Archief Aletta Jacobs op UNESCO-lijst.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Archief Aletta Jacobs op UNESCO-lijst.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alice2Alice (talk) 11:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

File:MH17 Crash - Korte film.webm[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:MH17 Crash - Korte film.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Zoranzoki21 (talk) 13:32, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Logo politie.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Logo politie.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FOX 52 (talk) 16:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Leon de Winter over het succes van de serie Big Little Lies.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Leon de Winter over het succes van de serie Big Little Lies.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

xplicit 13:34, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Lex Hoefsloot over automerk Lightyear.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Lex Hoefsloot over automerk Lightyear.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

xplicit 13:35, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Misbruikzaak filmproducent Harvey Weinstein.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Misbruikzaak filmproducent Harvey Weinstein.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

xplicit 13:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Blackface[edit]

Blackface minstrelsy only applies to examples of blackface minstrelsy. It does not apply to films or other works outside of that narrow category. If you don't understand the difference, please don't change categories. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 04:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

The movies that evolved from the blackface ministrelsy tradition like the Jazz singer are inside that category as well. It make sense to put the ministrel culture in one category as it is interrelated and unrelated to for example Othello --Hannolans (talk) 13:22, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Yes, they are "related" to that tradition but apart from that tradition. Just like a modern reproduction of a piece of antique furniture would not belong in the antique furniture category. They are different things. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Ok, I understand the idea. But those images are in the categories The Jazz Singer (1927) as well as Upper and Lower and both categories are within the category Blackface minstrelsy, that was not me, but already categorised like that. Is that incorrect? Those images are now double categorized. --Hannolans (talk) 00:44, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
@World's Lamest Critic: I added blackface under the category "black people in art". Why did you remove that? Blackface is defined as a representation of black people in theatre. I cold not find a category 'black people in theatre', so 'black people in art would be the best fit. --Hannolans (talk) 00:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Are these black people? Or are they white people in black makeup? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Images in the category 'blackface' is about theatrical makeup used predominantly by non-black performers to represent a black person. It would be natural to categorise that under makeup and under black people in art as it is about https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Black-colored_people in art.--Hannolans (talk) 17:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
You know the difference between black people and black colored people. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Actually both categories apply, blackface is black-colored and it is a representation of black people. Probably that is not true for all blackface situations you mean? But currently it is in the defintion of the category--Hannolans (talk) 00:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Yes, that's exactly what a racist would say. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 04:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, but I'm not a racist. Please give normal arguments --Hannolans (talk) 08:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Let's have a chat[edit]

You removed "Blackface minstrelsy" from File:Sich a Getting Up Stairs, T. D. Rice.jpg. Rather than just fixing it, I'm going to ask you what you were thinking. Why did you do that? How is this not blackface minstrelsy? Why are you editing these categories at all? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

I added Thomas D. Ric to the category Blackface ministrelsy as he is a blackface entertainer, so I removed it for this image falling into this category. --Hannolans (talk) 00:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
That makes no sense. You removed the category "blackface minstrelsy" from an image of blackface minstrelsy. What do you mean by "blackface entertainer"? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
A blackface entertainer is an artist specialised in performing in blackface minstrels. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Blackface_minstrel_performers That category by the way is a subcategory of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Blackface_minstrelsy As the english wpikipedia has for this field welldefined categories I am reusing the same convention for categories and subcategories as the english wikipedia category structure and link Wikidata items to them. I'm not sure if you are aware that in Commons it is practice to put a file in the most specific category. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Categories ? --Hannolans (talk) 00:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Commons has its own category structure, separate and apart from English Wikipedia. If someone comes to Commons looking for images of people in blackface, I think they should see those images rather than having to dig several layers to specific performers they likely aren't familiar with. There's no issue with the image being in both categories. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 14:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Ah I see your reasoning. No, that's not how Commons work. We should always put images in the most specific category as mentioned in Commons:Categories#Category_structure_in_Wikimedia_Commons. If you want to have an overview of images with for example blackface, we can create a page. See for example Van Gogh: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vincent_van_Gogh doesnt give you an overview of the paintings of van Gogh, however, you can find them on the page Vincent_van_Gogh --Hannolans (talk) 16:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Animatie Brand bij Chemie-Pack te Moerdijk, 5 januari 2011.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Animatie Brand bij Chemie-Pack te Moerdijk, 5 januari 2011.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Nieuwsuurpresentatoren.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nieuwsuurpresentatoren.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:59, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Licentie Surinaamse overheid[edit]

@Lymantria: (voor jouw informatie ook even een link naar dit overleg) en hallo Hannolans. Ik neem aan dat je (Hannolans) nog geen reactie hebt terug gehad van de Surinaamse overheid over het geven van een duidelijkere licentie. Ik had al enkele foto's geüpload voordat ik het overleg in het Auteursrechtencafé toen begon en ben daar eerst even mee gestopt totdat er meer duidelijkheid is. Vandaag werden daar drie van geverifieerd door Lymantria (maar wel met een andere licentie). Zie dit overleg en de licentie die op die drie foto's werd geplakt. Zou er misschien nu ook een speciaal sjabloon voor de Surinaamse overheid gemaakt kunnen worden, omdat die foto's nu blijkbaar ook al voldoen? Ik dacht ik betrek jullie beide maar even bij dit overleg, in de hoop dat ik meer foto's kan gaan uploaden. Ymnes (talk) 20:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Ik denk dat de licentie die ik heb gekozen {{Copyrighted free use}} prima van toepassing is in dit geval. Een eigen sjabloon maken voor de website van de Surinaamse rijksoverheid zou kunnen, maar er staat ook een zinnetje "tenzij anders vermeld". Dat maakt het m.i. ongeschikt als licentie-sjabloon. Het is zeker niet {{Cc-zero}} als daar niet expliciet naar wordt verwezen. Lymantria (talk) 16:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Oké duidelijk, daar kan dan alleen de Surinaamse regering nog iets in veranderen. Ik ben in elk geval blij deze licentie te kennen, want bij die foto's staat vaak niet een uitzondering vermeld. En foto's van Surinaamse politici zijn schaars. Ymnes (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Het is qua tekst dezelfde als Template:SurinameGov. Deze heeft als voordeel dat er expliciet naar de licentietekst verwezen wordt van de Surinaamse overheid. --Hannolans (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Die had ik helemaal nog niet gezien. Bedankt! Zo gauw ik tijd heb, ga ik hem gebruiken. Ymnes (talk) 19:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Marc-Marie Huijbregts verbaast zich bij Regionaal Archief Tilburg.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Marc-Marie Huijbregts verbaast zich bij Regionaal Archief Tilburg.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 16:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Blue Planet II- Freek Vonk.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Blue Planet II- Freek Vonk.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Animalparty (talk) 03:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:TV-Serie De Luizenmoeder.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:TV-Serie De Luizenmoeder.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Happytravels (talk) 09:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Nieuwe film 'Bankier van het verzet'.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nieuwe film 'Bankier van het verzet'.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

xplicit 01:29, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Burgemeester Samkalden en Otto Frank naast het beeldje van Anne Frank.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Burgemeester Samkalden en Otto Frank naast het beeldje van Anne Frank.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Robotje (talk) 20:18, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you![edit]

Gaufre biscuit.jpg hi, nice uploads - i would note that the creator template is: {{creator:Piet Mondrian}} not {{creator|Piet Mondrian}} cheers Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

File:02-06-1948 04033 Suzanne Arts (6526606021).jpg[edit]

Hallo Hannolans, de beschrijving bij deze file: Foto Peter van Zoest. Heeft dit betrekking op de fotograaf of op de persoon die de foto (collectie) ter beschikking stelde? thank you for your time. :) Lotje (talk) 10:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Template:Koninklijk Huis[edit]

This template might be incompatible with Commons. You are welcome to comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prinses Beatrix.jpg. Regards. Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Koningin-maxima-okt-15-s.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Koningin-maxima-okt-15-s.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: see website "Het auteursrecht op de foto's in deze rubriek berust bij de RVD en wordt hier uitdrukkelijk voorbehouden." (copyright is with the Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst and all rights are reserved)
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MoiraMoira (talk) 06:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Koningin-maxima-okt-15-s.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Koningin-maxima-okt-15-s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Wassenaar 2013 Hare Majesteit Koningin Máxima.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wassenaar 2013 Hare Majesteit Koningin Máxima.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Celia Homeford (talk) 08:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Mijn fout[edit]

Pardon, ik was niet bekend met de alternatieve spelling. De mensen van de bibliotheek zelf hadden mij gezegd dat de naam verkeerd was en ik had het niet kunnen vinden, bedankt dat je een bron hebt gegeven die het tegendeel bewijst. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 09:45, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Wel, het stond enigszins weggestopt in het artikel. Ik heb de alternatieve schrijfwijzen inmiddels ook toegevoegd aan Wikidata.--Hannolans (talk) 13:11, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

File:A Museum reinvented.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:A Museum reinvented.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Majora (talk) 03:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Bløf en Geike over Zoutelande in DWDD.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bløf en Geike over Zoutelande in DWDD.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

xplicit 23:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

File:5 jaar Nationale Politie.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:5 jaar Nationale Politie.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Johnny de Mol vindt dat foute humor moet kunnen.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Johnny de Mol vindt dat foute humor moet kunnen.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

xplicit 09:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:(quick) HOW TO GABBER MUSIC.webm[edit]

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:(quick) HOW TO GABBER MUSIC.webm, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 21:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Opening Mauritshuis in Madurodam.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Opening Mauritshuis in Madurodam.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

xplicit 11:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Emilie Gordenker.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Emilie Gordenker.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Emilie Gordenker.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Uncategorized uploads[edit]

Hannolans, I know you have a keen interest in Nazi-related topics. Are File:Kampkleding in Rijksmuseum.jpg and File:Kampkleding in Rijksmuseum 2.jpg images of Nazi concentration camp prisoner uniforms? Should they be in Category:Concentration camp uniforms? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 18:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

@Hannolans: in case you missed my note. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Are you deliberately ignoring my question? You uploaded another Nazi concentration camp uniform image yesterday, so I know you're still active here. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:22, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded File:Concentration Camp Jacket Worn by Isabel Wachenheimer.jpg for you as that is the official image of the same prisoner uniform I uploaded earlier. --Hannolans (talk) 22:38, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Your answer to my question about image categories was uploading an image and expecting me to understand that? Please just categorize the images. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bijlmerbajeskamer.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bijlmerbajeskamer.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Smooth O (talk) 12:45, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Renville-overeenkomst ?[edit]

Hallo Hannolans, toevallig stootte ik op deze en enkele andere afbeeldingen. Aan de datum te zien zou dit de delegatie kunnen zijn voor de Renville-overeenkomst. Kan jij dit eventueel bevestigen? Thank you for your time. Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 07:51, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Ik weet denk ik te weinig van deze onderhandelingen. Maar de foto stelt over de West te gaan en Renville over de Oost. --Hannolans (talk) 22:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Nieuwe film 'Bankier van het verzet'.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Nieuwe film 'Bankier van het verzet'.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mutter Erde (talk) 09:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Anne Frank lacht naar de schoolfotograaf.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Anne Frank lacht naar de schoolfotograaf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mutter Erde (talk) 09:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Charles Birke biedt het 1e exemplaar van Achter de Kawat aan aan mw. Tjarda va, Bestanddeelnr 930-2531.jpg[edit]

Hallo Hannolans, waarom voegde je de Category:1800 establishments toe? Lotje (talk) 12:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

i think thuis was a batch edit mistake. Sorry!--Hannolans (talk) 21:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Categorization[edit]

@Hannolans: File:De schoenenafdeling van het kledingcentrum in Ataka, Bestanddeelnr 255-6933.jpg vind ik persoonlijk een nogal verwarrende toevoeging. De beschrijving maakt dit ook duidelijk. Wat stel je voor? Lotje (talk) 08:19, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Ja ik ook. Ik ad destijds de foto's grof gecategoriseerd op Oost-Indie. Maar in dir geval is er geen direct verband. --Hannolans (talk) 16:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Franse-kleuren-paleis-op-de-dam.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Franse-kleuren-paleis-op-de-dam.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

B dash (talk) 15:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Koninklijkhuis has released this image under CC-0. The copyright template is attached with with further information and the CC-0 license during that time of upload (note that they changed their licence policy some while ago, see also former discussions that concluded to keep those pictures) --Hannolans (talk) 16:56, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Muntenbord.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Muntenbord.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Triplecaña (talk) 13:50, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

This image was uploaded under Creative Commons zero, see the license information provided at the item. --Hannolans (talk) 13:55, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Willy Koningsdag Compilatie (2014 - 2016).webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Willy Koningsdag Compilatie (2014 - 2016).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:14, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Dansen op de vulkaan.webm[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Dansen op de vulkaan.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:32, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Rechtmaken afbeelding[edit]

Beste Hannolans, onlangs maakte jij een foto, door mij gemaakt, van een stint rechter. Is daar een speciaal programma voor? Ik heb net een bestand ge-upload van een helikopter met de opslagplaats van de reddingsboot in Katwijk, in 2010. Door de helikopter (waar de foto eigenlijk voor bedoeld was) staat de opslagplaats er nogal scheef op. Wellicht wil jij dit rechtzetten of mij vertellen hoe dit te doen? Alvast bedankt. Zie: File:KNRM Life boat station Katwijk with helicopter 3 july 2010.jpg. Ik moet er nog meer foto's van hebben (nettere), maar kan ze niet meer vinden, is al enkele jaren geleden. Maak ik nog wel een keer, maar niet binnenkort :-) M.v.g. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Ik gebruik 'Foto's' van Apple op de Macbook. Bij bijsnijden kan je hierin foto draaien en zelf past ie ook tiltcorrectie toe. Zou mooi zijn als op Commons iets staat. Ik heb hem rechtgemaakt. --Hannolans (talk) 21:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Ok hartelijk dank. Ik heb geen Macbook, dus dat komt goed uit. Ik zal eens kijken voor een Windows-programma. Groeten, - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:45, 11 October 2018 (UTC)