User talk:Hans Haase

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hans Haase!

-- 09:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Truly, outstanding work. Admirable and usable.
    Thank you Hans.
     –  – Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 07:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 17:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I will read the guidelines first, then I'll try the revision of new content. --Hans Haase (talk) 16:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Einige deiner DRs[edit]

sind an der Grenze zur Trollerei (z. B. DRs mit unspezifischen Argumenten auf Bilder, wo der letzte DR mit Kept entschieden wurde. Bitte verzichte künfigt auf sowas. --Leyo 14:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Du solltest wissen, dass ich sehr tolerant bin. Commons untersteht der WMF. Die Bilder sind für enzyklopädische Zwecke. Sie müssen lehrenden, erklärenden Charakter haben. Ich trete davon zurück, wenn die Bilder verwendet werden, was ich geprüft habe. In Teilen sind sie redundant. Bilder, die keine derartige Grundlage haben, müssen nicht toleriert werden, es ist aber kein SLA-Grund. Verletzen die Bilder die Privatsphäre, ist dies nicht zu tolerieren, auch es versehentlich oder absichtlich geschieht. Kannst Du mir einen nachvollziehbaren Grund für das Behalten der Bilder nennen? Ich entscheide es nicht alleine, daher die Diskussion, das für und wieder vorzubringen. Der Antrag muss erlaubt sein. Ferner solltest Du, da die Antrage formal abgeschmettert wurden, erkennen, welche Information ich zuvor entfernt habe, die per Bot wieder eingesetzt werden kann und alles andere als mit den Richtlinien übereinstimmend ist. --Hans Haase (talk) 14:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Du kannst Versionen mit Ortsangaben unter COM:AN verstecken lassen.
File:Gynäkomastie.jpg und File:Extreme Form von Dehnungsstreifen.jpg beispielsweise wurden und werden verwendet. Beim nächsten DR auf ein solches Bild werde ich nicht mehr tolerant sein. --Leyo 15:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Sie sind redundant, was ein DR-Grund ist, zudem ist angesichts dieser Angaben nicht auszuschließen es sei "nur zum Zwecke des Vandalismus, persönlicher Angriffe oder als Spam hochgeladen wurde.", laut Richtlinie DR. Kannst Du unter diesen Bedingungen ausschließen, die dargestellte Person hätte dies freiwillig preisgegeben? Privatsphäre ist sehr wohl eine fehlende Richtlinie und wurde über 30 mal beanstandet.[1] Das mangelnde Verständnis hierfür zeigte sich spätestens bei minderjährigen, beanstandet unter Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_34#Child_porn_claim_-_neutral_opinion_needed. Die Abstimmung verlief erschreckend veranwortungslos.[2] Das Bild wurde zurecht entfernt. Du siehst, dass es keine Trollerei war und ich mir bei meinen Beiträgen dies auch nie erlauben würde. Ich werde die Entfernung der Attribute unter COM:AN beantragen. Ungeachtet dessen hatte ich den Benutzer darüber informiert und hätte ihm, ohne das großartig zu verbreiten nahegelegt die bereinigten Bilder bei Bedarf erneut einzustellen. --Hans Haase (talk) 15:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
DRs aufgrund von „Redundanz“ auf Bilder, die verwendet werden, ist Trollerei. Und pauschal begründete Wieder-DRs gehen auch in diese Richtung. Du brauchst nicht auszuweichen. --Leyo 16:07, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Kumpel, mach mir kein Problem daraus! Den vorgehenden DR hatte ich nicht erkannt! Zudem, existieren in den Artikeln bereits entsprechende Bilder. Dies wurde geprüft. Die Interessen der WMF, WMDE und COM sind gewahrt. --Hans Haase (talk) 16:10, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Beim Wieder-DR hast du die dir angezeigte Information zum vorherigen DR ignoriert. --Leyo 16:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Panne, wo sehe ich die, oder sehe ich das erst wenn ich DR gestellt habe? --Hans Haase (talk) 16:38, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Das wird beim Kasten, wo man die Begründung eingeben muss, angezeigt. --Leyo 16:45, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Ok, dann achte ich darauf, ich dachte in der Flash-Version ist das nur Hilfe und Benutzerführung. Wie bekommen wir die EXIF raus? --Hans Haase (talk) 16:51, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

GHy[edit]

This is utterly devoid of logic. The image is a gif, and is used on my Wikipedia page. I suggest you amend your deletion request as it stands it is hypocritical.(also, the request is of false basis; there is no policy of having a gif uploaded.) --Dark Mistress (talk) 03:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

I've speedy kept this per {{userpageimage}}. INeverCry 04:03, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Ok, you asked, so that was no soft vandalism. Keep. --Hans Haase (talk) 09:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Deletion nominations[edit]

"PORN!" is not a valid deletion rationale. That it is pornographic does not mean that it is out of the project scope. The specific image I am referring to would have been out of scope for being unusably low quality (too pixelated/blurry), but that is a rationale that is independent of the subject matter. It is, in this case, a moot point, however, as the image was also a copyvio. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:20, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Regarding this "COPYRIGHT!" is similarly not a valid reason for deletion, nor is "out of scope!". You need to explain why what you are saying is true, not just state that it is as if it's obvious. People have different opinions on what is within scope, and copyright is a notoriously complex field. Explain yourself! -mattbuck (Talk) 10:40, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
The pictures require an educational value inside the encyclopedia. If this is not fullfilled, it may be to illustrate an users' page. But what I saw was porn collections without any educational value. This is danger for the project. If pictures where copied illegally, either to publish hate on former friend (identifyable naked pictures) or copy unauthorized material while the source already has deleted it, we are hosting it still to make the picture alive in the web. I totally do not agree with this. This will eat the legal budget of nothing, if anybody complains publishing his/her pictures. Else if a deletion request has been voted for "keep", it is more a reason to keep controversial pictures. But the picture got a review. Regarding a vote and the project scope users should act responsible for the project. If pictures are legal and the owner uploaded it for educational reasons, the owner can give his statement and proof why the picture is in the project scpoe. [3][4] --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 12:16, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
In deletion requests regarding scope, the onus is on the nominator to state why it is not within scope. Think of it as COM:PRP but in reverse - for copyright we are cautious and delete things, for scope we are cautious and keep things. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
COM:PRP hits it. Sorry, I have send several DRs. The picture you are talking about I got huge worries regarding copyright. If there were other information like EXIF of similar, I would have had doubt really to send the DR. --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 02:28, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Re:Pictures[edit]

Hi and thank you for the advice. I am very noob with inkscape, but I am trying to render the remaining sketches in svg and it seems ok. --Tino 032 (talk) 15:16, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

First try? Well done! --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 15:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Photo challenge[edit]

Hi Hans. I noticed 3 of your images are included in Category:Photo challenge/2014 - March - Surface textures but have not been added to the entries at Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - March - Surface textures. Do you intend to enter them in the challenge? HelenOnline 18:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

I am still trying to get a closeup in focus of the stacked tape. A part of the picture in higher resolution may fit more to the March 2014 photo challenge. While i can't take these photos i would like to participate with the present pictures. Thank you. --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 12:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
OK but please add your entries at Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - March - Surface textures before the end of 31 March (UTC). Click on edit next to the Entries subheading and add the filenames and captions to the bottom of the list. HelenOnline 12:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


COM:AN/U[edit]

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Português | Русский | Svenska | +/−


float  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Clocks by night edit warring. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

darkweasel94 09:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

I agree that some of your categories do not make sense. Please discuss first, and do not engage in edit wars. You should only do categorization if there is consensus. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Side makers[edit]

You ought to rename this category: "Automobile side maker lights". It should be marker, not maker. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes, thanks. My kb ate a key again. --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 16:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Compliment[edit]

Your USB OTG setup is cool! Grossdm (talk) 19:15, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

File:MediathekView Screenshot (German language version) at 2016-10-08.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:MediathekView Screenshot (German language version) at 2016-10-08.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Krdbot 22:01, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Hans Haase,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)