User talk:Headlock0225

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Headlock0225!

-- 19:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:Baby care rooms[edit]

Could you be more specific? [1] --Benzoyl (talk) 00:17, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Change tables are just one item you might find in a baby care room. There will chairs, floor covering, light fittings etc. Change Tables could also be found in the home, public toilets etc. So there is not an equivalence between change tables and baby care rooms--Headlock0225 (talk) 23:19, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Parenting =[edit]

Can you explain to me what you just did with Category:Parenting? It looks to me like, without bringing it to Commons:Categories for discussion, you basically decided to get rid of the category and make it a redirect to Category:Child care, in the process completely removing some subcats that were about parenting (e.g. --Headlock0225 (talk) 14:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)events or organizations that honor or teach about parenting) but weren't about child care as such. This seems quite wrong to me, especially the removal of a distinction with no discussion. Am I missing something? - Jmabel ! talk 23:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Firtly, let me thank you for bringing this to my attention. In particular I recognise that I should have used Commons:Categories for discussion before making such a drastic move. I shall endeavour to put it back much as it was and raising my concerns through Commons:Categories for discussion. The logic behind my move was that Parenting is so broad a subject and as a category was badly structured compared to Child Care. Also I disagree with you - how can you possibly discuss Parenting without it being about Child Care? However I recognise that it just my opinion so I will put it back as it was. --Headlock0225 (talk) 14:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Child care is certainly am important part of parenting, but (1) you don't have to be a parent to do child care: for example, any nursery school is doing child care, but not parenting; (2) conversely, a civic event to honor parents is not about childcare. They are separate but related concepts, and need separate categories. Because of (1), I don't think child care should even be a subcat of parenting, but there should probably be {{See also}} in both directions. - Jmabel ! talk 16:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Headlock0225,

I kindly request that you don't undo admin actions. If you disagree with the decline of a speedy deletion you can always start a regular DR instead. Natuur12 (talk) 11:49, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies I thought it pretty clear that they were copyright infringements. I thought my speedy deletion requests were being vanadalised! I have done as you suggested and raised a DR for each. I would be interested in hearing in more details from you why you felt they did not qualify for a speedy deletion so I will not make the same mistake in the future--Headlock0225 (talk) 14:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smiling baby lying on towel.jpg[edit]

Hi Headlock0225, the image has been renamed, I guess the description should be replaced too. That, I'll leave up to you. :-) Lotje (talk) 07:09, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove a categorie if it contains extra information[edit]

Dear Headlock0225, I saw that you removed the Category:Baby carriages in the Netherlands from File:Poppenwagen uit de 1960.JPG, but you did not add another category about the Netherlands. Now that information was gone. In itself you were right: this is not a baby carriage, but please add then another category about the location and don't let information in categories get lost. You can only remove a category wihtout adding another one if it is redundant, for instance if a parent category as well as a subcategory is added, then you often can remove the parent. Now I added Category:Toys in the Netherlands to the file. JopkeB (talk) 04:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category removal[edit]

Please don't remove existing categories when adding a new one ([2] one example) Andy Dingley (talk) 11:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies - I was using HotCat and I pressed the Move button rather Copy. I see you have corrected them all - thank you. --Headlock0225 (talk) 09:09, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files tagged as Copyvios[edit]

Hi Headlock, @Túrelio: - I noticed you tagged and deleted a couple of files here and here on User:MdsShakil's talk page. The originals on Flickr (here and here) are clearly tagged as cc-by-2.0, which is valid on Commons, as are hundreds of other photos by the same photographer on the same Flickr page (and also already added to Commons). Once a photographer releases a photo under a CC license, this over-rides any exif copyright data, and also cannot be revoked (see {{Flickr-change-of-license}}), so these files are legitimately on Commons and should be undeleted and considered valid. For them not to be, you would need to prove that the photos on Flickr are 'stolen' (license-washed), which is implausible given the long time span over which this photographer's photos have been posted with cc licenses on Flickr. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 20:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio and MPF: Thanks you for you advice. To be clear, I am not an Administrator and I did not delete anything. I was unaware that a Flickr CC license statement would be considered to over-ride any exif copyright data or at least I wasn't sure. I am merely a User who enjoys chipping away at the iceberg that is uncategorised images. Occasionally, I stumble across images that are questionable copyright violations. If I am not sure, I would apply COM:PRP and Nominate for Deletion. However, now you have clarified that a Flickr CC license statement would be considered to over-ride any exif copyright data, I will bear that in mind in future. Thanks. --Headlock0225 (talk) 09:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alí Primera.jpg[edit]

Hello. How are you? I uploaded the file File:Alí Primera.jpg to Commons. I made that image from this file: I'm not sure if it looks different enough to be considered my own work or a derivative work. I would like some guidance on that please. Muago (talk) 14:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{reply to|Muago} In my opinion it is sufficiently different to be considered your own work. I don't however pretend to be an expert in copyright law and someone with greater experience and knowledge could well disagree. You could try posting on Village Pump for a consensus view. Headlock0225 (talk) 10:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TIFF files[edit]

Hi Headlock,

Thanks for fixing my mistakes! Krok6kola (talk) 15:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]