User talk:Hedwig Storch/HedwigsTalkArchiv

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Kategorie[edit]

servus, bitte deine Bilder auch in passende Kategorien einsortieren! --217.235.42.212 14:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Hallo 217.235.42.212, ich hab's gemacht Hedwig Storch 15:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
hmmmnagut, der gute Wille ist zu loben;-) Konkret gesagt hatte ich mir gewünscht, dass das Schloss Albrechtsberg auch zumindest auch in der Kategorie Dresden erscheint, wenn nicht sogar in der passenden Unterkategorie. Das Sortieren von Bildern ist leider eine sehr lästige und langwierige Aufgabe, deshalb versuche ich immer, Leute selbst zu entsprechenden Arbeiten zu motivieren;-) Da du aus Sachsen zumindest teilweise zu kommen scheinst: Vielleicht magst du ja die Kategorie Dresden mit ordnen helfen? Da is leider noch einiges im Argen... Gruß, --217.235.5.190 22:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
PS.: das Wasserfall-Bild könnte bspw auch noch in eine Kategorie Wasserfälle und in eine passende Unterkategorie von Category:British Columbia. Denn sollte jemand mal einen Artikel über diesen Provincial Park schreiben wollen, wird er wohl eher zufällig bei Landscapes of Canada drauf stoßen. Vielmehr wird er systematisch unter den Fotos von British Columbia suchen... Je genauer kategorisiert wird, desto besser! Danke! --217.235.5.190 23:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Hallo 217.235.5.190, alles richtig, was Du sagst. Nur, ich brauche Zeit und will nichts überstürzen. Vielleicht komme ich in den nächsten Tagen dazu, Deinen Winken zu folgen. Ist Dein Username immer User:217.235.5.190? Gruß Hedwig Storch 07:23, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Nee, der ändert sich jeden Tag. Wenn jemand im unangemeldeten Zustand schreibt, wird ja seine IP-Adresse als Benutzername angegeben. Meine IP is immer etwas mit 235.217.... Bin manchmal zu faul, mich erst anzumelden;-) Heute z.B. habe ich die --217.235.55.135 13:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Begreife. Ich will Dir nicht zu nahe treten. Trotzdem: Wenn ich mal ne Frage habe. An wen könnte ich mich da wenden? Gruß Hedwig Storch 14:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Ich bin eigentlich auch noch net lange hier und schreibe eigentlich lieber "drüben" in der deutschen Wikipedia, deswegen kann ich dir jetzt auch net so wirklich viel erzählen. Mir is grad aufgefallen, dass ich mit meinem Hinweis auf die Kategorie British Columbia deine Diskussionsseite da gleich versehentlich mit einsortiert hatte. Also: Jeder macht Fehler;-) Habs jetzt repariert. Aber kannst mich gerne fragen... Bei kniffligen Fällen würde ich dir Benutzer:Polarlys empfehlen, der is sehr kompetent und sowohl hier als auch in der deutschen Wikipedia Admin... Mir is übrigens dein edit im Dresden-Artikel aufgefallen, als du dein Bild von Albrechtsberg dort eingefügt hast und dabei hab ich mich eben ein wenig geärgert, dass es gar nicht Dresden zugeordnet war... Wie also sollte da ein spanischer Nutzer es finden, der grad am spanischen Wikipedia-Artikel bastelt? Man kann ja nicht verlangen, dass er den deutschen Artikel, den englischen usw nach brauchbaren Artikeln abklappert, sondern jedes Bild sollte eben auch unter anderem in die passende geographische Kategorie einsortiert sein... Gruß, --X-Weinzar 12:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Hallo X-Weinzar, vielen Dank für Deine Antwort. Was das Bild von Dresdner Albrechtsberg betrifft, sicher war meine Einordnung in "Architektur 19. Jh." unvollständig. Aber Du hast mir ja geholfen. Vielen Dank. Mit der Suche in dem englischen Kategoriebaum muß ich mich erst noch anfreunden. Kannst Du mir da mit ein paar strategischen Hinweisen weiterhelfen? Oder sollte ich mir das selber mit Versuch und Irrtum aneignen? Danke auch für den Hinweis auf User:Polarlys. Den werde ich nerven, wenn's arg klemmt. Gruß Hedwig Storch 15:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Da hast du recht, die Kategorien sind teilweise sehr unübersichtlich, und wenn man sich mit Englisch schwertut, dann umso mehr. Mein Tipp: Schau einfach, wo ähnliche Bilder kategorisiert sind. (so sie denn hoffentlich vernünftig einsortiert wurden;-) --X-Weinzar 21:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Hallo X-Weinzar, danke für den Tipp. Schade, dass man im Kategoriebaum nicht mit Wildcards und ähnlichem suchen kann oder so. Vielleicht bekomme ich doch noch ein Gefühl für dieses putzige System. Gruß Hedwig Storch 21:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Foto[edit]

Hallo Hedwig Storch, Das Foto "Bild:Cosmos bipinnatus Schmuckkörbchen 2 August 2007.jpg" ist im deutschen Wikipedia bei den Schmuckkörbchen abgelegt. In der Bildbeschreibung steht "correct name is Anemone tomentosa". Warum legst du das Bild nicht unter Anemone ab? Gruß Wolf Meusel 17:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Wolf, ich danke Dir für den Hinweis. Ich habe das Bild aus dem deutschen WP-Artikel "Schmuckkörbchen" entfernt. Viele Grüße Hedwig Storch 20:27, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:IbizaStadt2.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:IbizaStadt2.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:36, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Barcelona,_Poble_Espanyol_2.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 12:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Deine Bilder[edit]

Hey, bitte versuch, deinen Bildern brauchbare Kategorien nach Pflanzenart zu geben. Ich lösche die Kopien in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, ist das ok? Gruß, Code·is·poetry 13:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Codeispoetry, danke für Deine Nachricht. Alles, was ich an Bildern in der deutschsprachigen WP mit {{NC}} gekennzeichnet habe, kannst Du löschen. Jedes meiner in die Commons hochgeladenen Bildern bekam von mir bisher mindestens eine Kategorie verpaßt. Ich danke Dir für Deine Mühe. Viele Grüße Hedwig Storch 13:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Ok, kein Problem. Image:Nelken 8 Juni 2003.JPG, Image:Hunds-Rose (Hagebutte) 8 Juni 2003.JPG und Image:Karthäuser-Nelke 8 Juni 2003.JPG‎ haben keine Kategorien. Gruß, Code·is·poetry 14:07, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Buchen[edit]

Hallo Hedwig, wo hast Du diese Aufnahmen (Image:Buche2007-10-29a.JPG und Image:Buche2007-10-29b.JPG) gemacht? Wenn es in Deutschland und nicht eben in der Exotikabteilung eines Botanischen Gartens war, kann das nur die Rotbuche Fagus sylvatica sein. Andere Buchen wachsen hier nicht. Grüße, --Ies 15:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Frank, vielen Dank für Deine Hilfe. Ich habe die beiden Dateien an die Kategorie Rotbuche eingeordnet. Viele Grüße Hedwig Storch 16:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC). P.S. Ich danke Dir auch noch sehr für Deine anderen Berichtigungen mit botanischen Seitensprünge.
Hallo Frank, nochmal Dank für die Einordnung meiner beiden o.g. Bilder in Commons. Mir ist noch unklar: Warum gibt man einem Bild keine Kategorie, wenn man es in den gleichnamigen Artikel (zu der Kategorie) einordnet? Gruß Hedwig Storch 08:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Hallo Hedwig, das ist ein Stolperstein, der schon häufig diskutiert wurde, doch nirgendwo vernünftig erklärt ist. Das Problem liegt daran, dass Botanik und Wiki-Software bezüglich der Kategorien nicht wirklich gut zusammenpassen. Kategorien sind für dauerhafte Bezeichnungen gedacht. So werden “Tree”, „Flower“ oder „Stone“ auch in hundert Jahren noch so heißen und es wird keinen Grund geben, daran irgendwas zu ändern. Die Bezeichnungen von Lebewesen sind jedoch grundsätzlich vorläufiger Natur, da sie auf Hypothesen beruhen. So gibt es beispielsweise keine feststehende Artbezeichnung wie Exemplium fixum, sondern nur die Hypothese, dass eine Pflanzenpopulation, die zur Identifizierung einen Namen enthält, eine Art darstellt. Wird die Hypothese widerlegt, ist der Name hinfällig. Da insbesondere die Pflanzenarten so alle naslang neue Namen erhalten, fällt hier das Softwareproblem von Wiki besonders auf. Während sich Artikel leicht umbenennen, verschieben und umleiten lassen, ist das mit Kategorien entweder nur unvollkommen (seecat) oder gar nicht möglich. Deshalb hat sich schon lange bewährt, ALLES in Kategorien, Pflanzenarten als Ausnahme jedoch in Artikel zu setzen. Probleme machen nur ein paar radikale und fanatische Kategorisierer (lache nicht, die gibt es leider!), die keine Ahnung von Botanik haben, doch aus idealistischen Gründen auch die Pflanzenarten kategorisiert sehen wollen. Ein trauriges Beispiel ist User:Polbot, ein Bot, der in einem „Testlauf“ tausende von Pflanzenarten-Kategorien erzeugte. Zwar konnte der Bot nach heftigen Protesten gestoppt werden, doch nun sind die Kategorien kaum wieder zu beseitigen, da dieses von den Radikalen als Vandalismus ausgelegt wird. Die Massenkategorisierung des Bots hat bestehende, mühevoll erarbeitete Strukturen aus noch nicht (in Kategorien) und bereits identifizieren Pflanzen (in Artikeln) zerstört. Dazu kommt, das sich der Aufwand der Botaniker für die ständige Überwachung der Fotos und Identifizierung der Pflanzen auf das mehr als Doppelte und damit auf ein unzumutbares Maß vergrößert hat und sie deshalb die Bot-erzeugten Kategorien ignorieren. Weiterhin entwickeln sich Kategorien und Artikel nun auseinander, da einige User die Artikel, andere, insbesondere Neulinge, die Kategorien bevorzugen, wodurch man nun an zwei Stellen suchen muss. Insgesamt wurde durch diesen Vorfall Zuverlässigkeit und Qualität im Bereich der Pflanzen stark und dauerhaft verringert. Bitte helfe mit, das Problem nicht noch weiter zu vergrößern: Setze Bilder gut identifizierter Pflanzen bitte in Artikel, nicht in Kategorien. Vielen Dank! Falls Du mal Schwierigkeiten haben solltest neue Artikel anzulegen und/oder an die Kopfdaten zu kommen, helfe ich Dir gerne. --Ies 13:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Hallo Frank, danke für die ausführliche Erläuterung und Dein Hilfe-Angebot. Hoffentlich kann ich mir das merken: Eine gut bestimmte Pflanze in einen Commons-Artikel! Nicht in eine Kategorie. Viele Grüße Hedwig Storch 13:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


Image:Bild183-R98911.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Bild183-R98911.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PD-GermanGov is not applicable for images from the "Bundesarchiv". PD-old not applicable too, image is from 1906. Raymond Disc. 09:07, 14 November 2007 (UTC)


Image:Hetzjagd.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Hetzjagd.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Licensing. LX (talk, contribs) 12:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Madeira, Palheiro Gardens - Geranium maderense IMG 2314.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madeira, Palheiro Gardens - Geranium maderense IMG 2314.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello Hedwig Storch/HedwigsTalkArchiv!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichill (talk) 12:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bautzen, Schloßstraße DSCF0018.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:Bautzen, Detail DSCF0022.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:Bautzen DSCF0027.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Monte (Funchal) - Dracaena draco (Fruits) (Kanarischer Drachenbaum) IMG 2029.JPG (Antwort)[edit]

Hallo Martin, ich dachte, bei Pflanzen genügt es, wenn man das Foto in den Artikel der betreffenden Kategorie einordnet. Warum ist die Kategorisierung erforderlich? Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 07:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Ich interpretiere es so: Jedes Bild sollte kategorisiert sein, die Artikel dienen der Illustration und der Präsentation besonders guter Bilder und einzelner Details in diesem Fall der Pflanze. Kategorien sind wesentlich einfacher zu händeln, bei der Kategorisierung muss auf Optik nicht geachtet werden, das Bild ist aber dennoch dem Themengebiet zugeordnet. Kategorien verwildern zwar auch sehr schnell (z.B. die Kategorie Category:Berlin, wo sich in der Hauptkategorie irgendwann ein Bodensatz von unkategorisierbaren oder einfach nur uninteressanten Bildern bildet), Artikel veralten aber, da die neusten Bilder nicht in den Artikel eingetragen werden und so nicht auffindbar sind. --Martin H. ( ) 11:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Martin, danke für Deine Erklärung. Das sehe ich alles ein. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 15:27, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Amazona parrot[edit]

"Image:Funchal Botanical garden - Amazona ochrocephala IMG 1841.JPG"; it the parrot shown here a hybrid as indicated in the description, or is it the one in the file name? It would be helpful if you would clarify. Snowmanradio (talk) 20:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello Snowmanradio, and thank for your hint. This file has an incorrect name. A correctly named duplicate exists at: Image:Funchal Botanical garden - Amazona finschi x Amazona ochrocephala IMG 1841.JPG. Regards --Hedwig Storch (talk) 12:18, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Von einem TauernautobahnParkplatz aus IMG 8070.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 10:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


File:Am Waldbächlein, Scharbockskraut Ranunculus ficaria 2708.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Qualitätsbilder[edit]

Hi, ich bin zufällig auf Deine Bilder gestoßen und habe zwei bei den Qualitätsbildern vorgeschlagen. Bei vielen anderen guten Aufnahmen ist mir der etwas enge Beschnitt aufgefallen, Du könntest Deinen Objekten manchmal mehr Platz gönnen. Sorry, will nicht stören. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Mbdortmund, danke für das Lob. Mit dem Beschnitt, das stimmt. MfG --Hedwig Storch (talk) 07:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Das schöne Weintraubenbild hat schon ein Pro ;-) --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:09, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Wow! Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 17:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Hedwig Storch!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Schneerose (Helleborus niger) 3498.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Gelb4744a.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Fliege 6015[edit]

is Sarcophaga sp. maybe carnaria I have to check.Nice detail of the head. Characteristic red eyes, widely separated in the female.atb Robert akaNotafly (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Identification[edit]

Hedwig. You can post fly pics to the Dutch website Diptera.info Wasps to the German site Hymis.forum for expert id Both sholud googl easily and membership is free. Some id I can do but on these sites we both get a second opinion. I have had your gallery bookmarked for some time.Very appealing photography. Have you anything else from Corfu? I have analogue only and a poor scanner. atb from Ireland Robert Notafly (talk) 20:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello Notafly, thank You for Your help. I have added now 17 Corfu-Pictures on my directory Corfu. Many greetings --Hedwig Storch (talk) 21:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Many thanks.It is a beautiful island.I'll keep watching your uploads.Slainte Robert Notafly (talk) 11:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Please, many greeting --Hedwig Storch (talk) 11:31, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Insekt auf Blüte der Hunds-Rose 7967.JPG[edit]

Myathropa florea. A male. I misidentified it at first. Then I realised. A very useful photo showing the pattern on the thorax.Very best regards Robert Notafly (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello Robert, I thank You for identification. Happy Pentecost --Hedwig Storch (talk) 09:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Three identifications[edit]

Mesembrina meridiana, Echinomyia fera and Gasteruptiidae so far.I will look at your other pics soon. All are excellent photos. Did you travel this year? I was in Germany, Sweden and Italy. A good year for me.Very best regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 21:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello Robert, thank You for 3 idents. I was in Egypt in January. Many greetings --Hedwig Storch (talk) 11:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Unidentified Lycaenidae[edit]

Pleased to be able to help. Best Wishes. ACCassidy (talk) 00:34, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Sendtners Alpenmohn (Papaver sendtneri) 5684.JPG[edit]

Dear Hedwig,

I have reclassified your picture File:Sendtners Alpenmohn (Papaver sendtneri) 5684.JPG.
It is for sure not a Sendtner's poppy, Papaver alpinum subsp. sendtneri (Syn. Papaver sendtneri), which has white flowers, but the similar Kerner's poppy, Papaver alpinum subsp. kerneri (Syn. Papaver kerneri) which has yellow flowers. Plants are are often mislabelled even in botanical gardens.

Best botanical regards, --Réginald (To reply) 09:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello Réginald, I thank You for corrections. With best wishes --Hedwig Storch (talk) 13:25, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Leirhnjúkur, Fumaroles 5957.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:36, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Zwischen Krafla und Leirhnjúkur 5930.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Kohlschnake8882.JPG...[edit]

Eine sehr gute Seite für Dipteren ist auch http://www.diptera.info. BTW Auf http://www.offene-naturfuehrer.de/web/Fliegen_und_Mücken_–_Diptera_(Familienübersicht) bastel ich gerade u.a. an den Dipteren. Vielleicht gibt es ja auch Interesse hie und da mitzuwirken? Gruß --Andreas P. (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Andreas, danke für die Hinweise und das Angebot. Fotos will ich gerne beisteuern. Zu mehr wird es nicht reichen, weil ich keine biologische Ausbildung hab. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 04:50, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Greetings[edit]

Greetings Hedwig I was with my daughter when we found this little sailor after a gale [1] Lucky for him and us.Warm regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

3 fehlbestimmte Bilder[edit]

Hallo Hedwig Storch/HedwigsTalkArchiv,

das Bild Image:Jelängerjelieber, Geißblatt, Lonicera caprifolium IMG 6638.JPG sowie die damit verbundenen Bilder Image:Jelängerjelieber,_Geißblatt,_Lonicera_caprifolium_IMG_5355.JPG und Image:Gartengeißblatt_(Lonicera_caprifolium)_9918.JPG können nicht Jelängerjelieber (Lonicera caprifolium) zeigen, da diese Art zwei völlig verwachsene Hochblätter direkt unter der Blütendolde besitzt (vgl. z. B. mein Bild Image:Lonicera_caprifolium_RF.jpg und das Bild File:Lonicera_caprifolium_fruits.JPG mit den Fruchtständen). Ich habe die Bestimmung Ihrer Bilder vor einiger Zeit bei http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Plants/Archive46#ID_for_possibly_misidentified_images_requested diskutiert. Ich habe die Bilder erst mal zu Category:Lonicera periclymenum geschoben und die Beschreibung geändert. Falls es sich um eine Wildpflanze aus Deutschland handelt, ist das auch recht wahrscheinlich. Wenn die Pflanze aus einem Garten oder aus einer anderen Gegend stammt, dann ist das eher unsicher. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:30, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Robert, danke. Es sind Gartenblumen. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 12:24, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Hallo Hedwig! Dann bin ich mir allerdings sehr unsicher, ob es sich um Lonicera periclymenum handelt. Die orangeblütige Lonicera-Art auf dem Bild Image:Jelängerjelieber,_Gartengeißblatt,_Lonicera_caprifolium_IMG_5367.JPG sieht übrigens auch nicht nach Lonicera caprifolium aus, da meiner Meinung nach die Hochblätter direkt unter der Blütendolde frei sind und nicht in der typischen Weise verwachsen. Ich habe das Bild mal zu Category:Unidentified Lonicera geschoben. Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:42, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Danke, Robert. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 17:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Pflanzenbestimmung[edit]

Hallo Hedwig, ich habe soeben das Bild File:Gras 7829.JPG von Category:Grass nach Category:Dactylis glomerata verschoben. Deine Bilder File:Gras 5321.JPG, File:Gras 5322.JPG und File:Gras 5324.JPG gehören wohl alle zur Gattung Anthoxanthum, vermutlich Ruchgras (Anthoxanthum odoratum). Allerdings wäre hier Ort und ungefähre Meereshöhe nicht schlecht, weil es mit Anthoxanthum alpinum eine Verwechslungsart gibt, die offenbar vor allem im Gebirge vorkommt. Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 10:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Robert, habe vielen Dank für Deine Spezifizierungen. Ich freue mich immer sehr, wenn mir jemand hilft. Die vier von Dir genannten Dateien habe ich mit „Ostthüringen, Garten, 170 m ü. M.:“ präzisiert. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 18:48, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Hallo Hedwig Storch/HedwigsTalkArchiv, dann wird das bisher unbestimmte Gras wohl Anthoxanthum odoratum sein. Gruß -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:04, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Hallo Robert, nochmal vielen Dank. gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 22:46, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Eidechse 5476.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

done. --Hedwig Storch (talk) 07:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Fliege 6449g.jpg[edit]

I think this is Dexia vacua and put it in Dexiinae as a start. Also an identification of Insekt 6700.jpg to Empis (Kritempis)livida Linnaeus, 1758 Empididae. Both are excellent photographs Best wishes Robert Notafly (talk) 19:53, 7 July 2011 (UTC) PS. I like this Marienkafer too [2]

File:Wireless remote sensor 7046.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:19, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

done --Hedwig Storch (talk) 19:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Reval-8439.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


File:Reval-8425.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:55, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


File:Reval, Rathaus-8401.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:57, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


File:Reval-8374.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:58, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


17.2.2015 --> ----------------------------------------------

File:Stockholm Gamlastan, Carl Larsson-8133.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

done --Hedwig Storch (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Augustusburg Schloßkirche-9902.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:00, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Danke![edit]

Hallo Hedwig,

Lieben Dank für die Fundortsangaben zu Deine hübsche Weberknechtbilder :o) Pudding4brains (talk) 11:33, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Gern geschehen. Guten Rutsch ins Neue Jahr wünscht Dir --Hedwig Storch (talk) 12:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Gleichfalls! ;o) Pudding4brains (talk) 18:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Artbestimmung auf File:Golddistel (Carlina) 7493.JPG[edit]

Hallo Hedwig Storch/HedwigsTalkArchiv, ich habe das Foto File:Golddistel (Carlina) 7493.JPG zu Category:Carlina acaulis geschoben und die Beschreibung korrigiert, da es sich hier offensichtlich um eine Silberdistel (Carlina acaulis) und nicht um die Golddistel (Carlina vulgaris) handelt. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Danke, Robert. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 12:37, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Wasserläufer[edit]

Hallo Hedwig,

Könntest Du mir vieleicht nochmal verraten wo das Wasserläufer-Bild entstanden ist (bzw wo der Wasserläufer sein natürliches Vorkommen hätte). Vielen Dank schonmal :o) Pudding4brains (talk) 22:19, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Pudding4brains, den habe ich in Sachsen am Rand eines Gebirgsbächleins in 350 m ü. M aufgenommen. Grüße --Hedwig Storch (talk) 22:24, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Danke Hedwig, In Deutschland sollte das eigentlich Velia saulii sein. Hab dan mal eine Umbenamsung auf File:Bachläufer 5967.jpg vorgeschlagen ;o) Dankender Gruss Pudding4brains (talk) 00:16, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

I use some of your photos[edit]

Hi Hedwig!

I have use some photos of Aeshna cyanea from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directly in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=33754


If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Hedwig%20Storch

This is my "contributor card", for example:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn


In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón

--Fernando.lison (talk)

Hello Fernando Lisón Martín, I thank you for informations. With best regards --Hedwig Storch (talk) 13:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Using one of your pictures in a textbook[edit]

I will be using your picture of the Karnak relief (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Karnak_temple,_Großer_Säulensaal_9501.JPG) in a textbook. It will show at about 7 cm high and be credited to 'Hedwig Storch' in the legend immediately below. Since this is print, and I can't hyperlink to your picture or user page, please let me know if you would like any other information to appear in the credits (such as location, an URL, whatever). Just in case, my e-mail is thechabon aa a t hotm ail d o o tt com. Thanks very much for sharing that great picture. Iiiiaaaa (talk) 15:16, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello Iiiiaaaa, you can write "Hedwig Storch (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hedwig_Storch)". Regards --Hedwig Storch (talk) 13:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

File:1024 Gelbbindiger Mohrenfalter-3137.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


File:1024 Raggaschlucht-2794.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:41, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


File:1024 Seebachtal, Quelle-3228.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely Liliana-60 (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

File:1024 Nordpolausflug- Nordostgrönland-05052012223.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


File:1024 Nordpolausflug- Nordostgrönland-05052012222.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:36, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


File:1024 Nordpolausflug- Nordostgrönland-05052012221.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:37, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


File:1024 Nordpolausflug- Nordostgrönland-05052012219.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:37, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


File:1024 Nordpolausflug- Nordostgrönland-05052012217.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


File:1024 Nordpolausflug- Nordostgrönland-05052012213.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


File:1024 Nordpolausflug- Nordostgrönland-05052012203.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:38, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


File:1024 Nordpolausflug- Nordostgrönland-05052012198.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


File:1024 Nordpolausflug- Nordostgrönland-05052012196.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


File:1024 Nordpolausflug- Nordostgrönland-05052012188.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Hedwig Storch,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Guten Tag,

wir möchten darüber informieren, dass wir Ihr Bild (Wiki-Commons)

Türme des Neuen Muskauer Schlosses / Bad Muskau

- selbstverständlich inklusive der Copyright-Hinweise und Urheber-Angaben - in unserem nicht-kommerziellen Projekt << FVKS-Kalender "Unterwegs" 2013 >> zum Thema "Türme" verwenden.

>> http://www.kalender.fvks.eu

>> http://kalender.fvks.eu/2013/02/17/turme-des-neuen-muskauer-schlosses-bad-muskau-de/

Wir hoffen, alles korrekt umgesetzt zu haben.

Der Kalender begleitet auch unseren aktuell laufenden Fotowettbewerb (fotowettbewerb.fvks.eu), ebenfalls zum Thema Türme.

Grüsse FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. kalender@fvks.eu, Agata, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 15:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Märzenbecher 2112.JPG[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Märzenbecher 2112.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 18:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Hallo JuTa, vielen Dank für Dein aufmerksames Hinschauen. Nach 4 Jahren habe ich endlich die Lizenz vergeben. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 07:40, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

File:MallorcaKatamaran.webm[edit]

Als webm hochgeladen

Hallo Hedwig, ich habe einfach mal das von Dir vorgeschlagene Video konvertiert. Die Qualität ist nicht umwerfend aber ich denke akzeptabel. Die verwendete Software und die Einstellungen habe ich auf COM:FORUM#Video hochladen angegeben. Könnstest Du bitte alle nötgen Informationen zur Lizenz, ... nachtragen? Besten Dank! -- Rillke(q?) 14:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Rainer, vielen Dank für Deine Arbeit. Ich hab die Daten nachgetragen und will mal in nächster Zeit den VLC-Player probieren. Grüße --Hedwig Storch (talk) 08:12, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:1024 Nelken-1148.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1024 Nelken-1148.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 23:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:1024 Alpen-Spitzkiel (Oxytropis campestris)-2081.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1024 Alpen-Spitzkiel (Oxytropis campestris)-2081.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:1024 Botanischer Garten ‚Alpinum Juliana‘-2892.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1024 Botanischer Garten ‚Alpinum Juliana‘-2892.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:23, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo Hedwig Storch,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Copyright status: File:1024 Wespe-3798.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1024 Wespe-3798.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:1024 Zwergzikade-3901.jpg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:1024 Zwergzikade-3901.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

File:1024 pps8 b w farbempfindlichkeit.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1024 pps8 b w farbempfindlichkeit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Steinsplitter (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Steinsplitter, danke für die Info. Ich habe dort geschrieben, daß alles auf meinem Mist gewachsen ist. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 15:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)