User talk:Hektor

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Hektor!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Jsc2006e39242.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 21:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

  • There seem to be two versions of the same image, one small (100 kb) and one large (1000 kb or so). I think that the added value to have an image ten times larger is low and the large one should be deleted. For some reason people who download the NASA image tend to favor the larger ones, which is not reasonable.Hektor 20:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Chapron_Delahaye.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chapron_Delahaye.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. — Timichal 20:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Tramway_valenciennes_ligne2.PNG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tramway_valenciennes_ligne2.PNG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 08:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

sorry[edit]

I will restore in a moment and once again I'm sorry :)Szczepan talk 08:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

done Szczepan talk 08:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. Hektor 09:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocage pour violations de copyright répétées[edit]

User:Rama/copyvioblock-fr Rama 11:23, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Expliquez. Ces images sont des photos d'affiches produites par le gouvernement français sur lesquelles il n'y a pas de copyright. Ou est le proiblème. D'autre part vous parlez de violation répétées. Ses images ont été chargées en une fois. Vous pratiquez la zéro tolérance ? Et comment contacte t on un administrateur quand on est bloqué ?Hektor 11:32, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Tu peux me contacter par mail ou sur ta page de discussion, comme tu vois.
  • Oui, nous pratiquons la tolérance zéro.
  • Ces affiches ne sont pas produites par le gouvernement français mais par des cabinets publicitaires.
  • Quand bien mêmes alles auraient été produites par le gouvernment, je ne vois pas du tout pourquoi elles ne seraient pas soumises au droit d'auteur ; tu confonds la France et les États-Unis d'Amérique.
Ce genre d'affirmations me confortent dans mon idée que tu devrais vraiment te mettre au courant de ces choses avant d'uploader des images n'importe comment. Rama 11:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Je demande à être débloqué. je n'uploaderait à l'avenir aucune photographie de document imprimé. 90.34.113.8 11:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
OK. Rama 12:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Olympic park.JPG[edit]

You uploaded this image which you claim to be your own work. On the upload page you agreed to place it under a Free license but did not specify which one. Please do so by replacing the {{OwnWork}} tag with a suitable copyright tag. Oxam Hartog 22:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Uijeongbu metro.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by John Bot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. -- John Bot(My Operator|My Contribs) 00:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Re : Crau & autoroutes[edit]

Voilà, c'est corrigé. Bonne continuation. Sting (talk) 01:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Tramway Bordeaux.svg[edit]

Hey.

I saw you edited the line B map to include up to Clavezux. Can you also edit this composite map to include up to Claveaux? Thanks. gren (talk) 00:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Hektor!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:56, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

File:AMTP 020T Schneider.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:20, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

File:M bahn.jpg[edit]

Hello Hektor,

I made a new svg version of your File:M bahn.jpg. Could you add a valid license like {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0}} or so to the file? Otherwise, both I and the tool derivativeFX don't know which license to use for the new (derived) file. --Michael Kümmling 09:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, now I've uploaded File:M-Bahn.svg. --Michael Kümmling 09:58, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Prisches.jpg[edit]

Hello Hektor, You uploaded the current image on File:Prisches.jpg over a previous file, I was wondering if you would bother if the two photos were split in two files, so that we would have two pictures of that church? Cheers, --- Darwin Ahoy! 18:04, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

  • I would have no problem whatsoever. The second picture is of bad quality unfortunately. I will try to come back there some day. Thanks anyway for checking this kind of things. Hektor (talk) 07:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. I splitted the file, and the older image is now at File:Prisches 2.jpg, for your reference. I don't think it is of bad quality. Thanks for allowing this, now Category:Prisches has two images instead of only one. :) --- Darwin Ahoy! 23:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Plans du Grand Paris Express[edit]

Bonjour et merci pour tes plans du Grand Paris Express, ils sont de super qualité ! Serait-il cependant possible de les éditer afin de réduire leur taille réelle ? En effet, le format est trop petit pour lire les stations dans les pages descriptives (en tout cas pour les petits écrans), mais beaucoup trop grand en taille réelle afin de rendre leur lecture possible. Ce serait super, d'autant que le reste de l'article est aussi de qualité et que l'on pourrait proposer la labellisation. Cordialement, En-bateau (talk) 16:35, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

  • J'ai réduit le plan principal. Hektor (talk) 08:07, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Pour info, Rome à rajouter au conditionnel sur la 14: http://www.stif.info/IMG/pdf/Metro_14.pdf - Gonioul (talk) 15:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Je ne crois pas, cette station est exclue du projet. Hektor (talk) 10:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Chemin de fer du cambrésis le cateau departure.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:19, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Complexe souterrain Châtelet.svg[edit]

C'est gentil d'avoir massacré les layers...

Gonioul (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Don't vandalize files.[edit]

Renominating something because you disagree with it being kept is one thing, but vandalizing the licenses of images because you think think it's legitimate is quite another, as you did here and here. Do that again, I won't hesitate in requesting you be temporarily blocked from editing. Fry1989 eh? 01:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Removing illegitimate tags is not vandalizing. -Hektor
Yes I'm afraid it is. Removing a valid license because YOU think it's illegitimate is vandalism. I won't tolerate it. You have been told this is too simple, you are going to have to live with it. Fry1989 eh? 19:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

I put a section on the file talkpage so you can discuss it if you like. Penyulap 09:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

So thinking you are wrong and acting accordingly is vandalism ? what a fine wikimedia contributor you make. Ok let me explain again. The IOC will sue. I am 100 % sure of it. And then there will be a lawsuit between the IOC and the WIkimedia foundation. It will cost money, no matter who eventually wins. It might well happen that the IOC eventually loses, but there will be money spent. So my question is, aren't there better ways to spend the money of the Wikimedia Foundation than to defend the presence of this image on Commons and allow you to have your little ego trip, especially knowing that we can put it in the various wikipedias and claim fair use, which will make no difference to the casual user ? Hektor (talk) 07:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I think the normal process is the IOC asking WMF to remove them. If the WMF decides to with an office action then end of story with no costs. If they decide to keep them then they wait for the IOC to make the next move. Then the lawyers on both sides weigh further costs vs principles. Our choice now should be to wait until the IOC contacts WMF. In other words we should wait for a decision from the WMF. Anyone is free to contact WMF legal liaisons if they wish and give them a heads up. --Canoe1967 (talk) 18:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

[1][edit]

I have reported you for abuse of DR process, and am requesting you be temporarily blocked from editing Commons. Your repeated nominations of the same image, a total of 5 times in under a week is unacceptable. Fry1989 eh? 17:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

I've blocked you for 1 week, because you obviously don't understand our policies. I'm not sure what you are trying achieve through getting these files deleted, but know that if you do it again after the block expires, I'll indef you -FASTILY 18:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Pymouss Let’s talk - 23:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.