User talk:Henryk Borawski

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Witam. Henryk Borawski (talk) 00:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hello, Henryk Borawski!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:


2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

File:2009-07 Skandawa 8.jpg[edit]

you wrote 2nd of July - where do you know that from? I doubt that :D ...Sicherlich Post 13:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

hmm, ale dlaczego tylko rok ja znam miesiac? nie rozumiem ..Sicherlich Post 18:51, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Category:Gardens and parks in in Sanok[edit]

Dzięki za spostrzegawczość. To moja omyłka pisarska w postaci powtórzenia "in". Lowdown (talk) 07:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Cerkiew Proroka Eliasza Dojlidy 3.jpg[edit]

Steinsplitter (talk) 13:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC) OK HaB >talk< 04:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Cmentarz Proroka Eliasza Dojlidy 1.jpg[edit]

Steinsplitter (talk) 13:42, 23 February 2014 (UTC) OK HaB >talk< 04:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kaplica na cmentarzu Proroka Eljasza w Białymstoku 1.jpg[edit]

Steinsplitter (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC) OK HaB >talk< 04:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Government buildings in Łódź[edit]

Witaj – co to znaczy "Budynki rządowe w Łodzi" [1], "rządowe" czyli jakie? – Darekm135 (talk) 23:56, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Rozumiem, ale tutaj umieściłeś "Government buildings in Łódź‎" w kat. opisanej: Samorząd Łodzi (Government of Łódź) / a w kat. "Government buildings in Łódź" jest "Town hall in Łódź" (poza Urz. Miasta jest tam też Urz. Woj., ale tylko gościnnie – całość jest własnością miasta), natomiast ze starym ratuszem na placu Wolności mogę się zgodzić [2] – historycznie własność miasta, ale obecnie siedziba Archiwum Państwowego, czyli spełnia Twoją definicję budynku rządowego, tylko to chyba nie powinno być w kat. "Government of Łódź" [3] – Pozdrawiam – Darekm135 (talk) 00:41, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Przepraszam, ale tak też nie powinno być: np. "Police in Łódź‎" lub "Firefighting in Łódź‎" są w kat. "Public services in Łódź" – i to rozumiem – ale "Public services in Łódź" jest w kat. "Services in Łódź", a ta ostatnia kategoria w "Commerce in Łódź" i następnie w "Economy of Łódź". "Banking in Łódź‎", "Housing in Łódź‎" tak, ale co ma Police lub Firefighting wspólnego z Commerce? – Darekm135 (talk) 01:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Fhotos by Henryk Borawski[edit]

Co to jest "Fhotos"? Zwiadowca 21 17:08, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Widzę, że jesteś na commonsie a mimo wszystko nie odpowiadasz. Chyba należało by to zmienić. Zwiadowca 21 15:46, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


Rudolph Buch (talk) 16:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Szczecin - Solarisy Urbino 12.jpg[edit]

Nie rozumiem tej edycji. Chyba zamiast Category:Vehicles in Szczecin by color powinna być kategora Category:Buses in Szczecin by color. Zmieniłem. Zwiadowca 21 20:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Buses in Szczecin by color[edit]

To znowu ja. :) Skoro utworzyłeś tę kategorię, to powinieneś też stworzyć kategorie:

Zwiadowca 21 20:16, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Train station platforms in Kamień Pomorski[edit]

Nie ma takiej kategorii. Zwiadowca 21 23:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

tematu nie było. Zwiadowca 21 23:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Commons:File renaming[edit]

Twój wniosek o zmianę nazwy nie mógł być uwzględniony, ponieważ nie był zgodny z zasadami Commons. Punkt 5 regulaminu zmiany nazw, na który się powołałeś, mówi o łamaniu zasad, takich jak przekleństwa, reklamy, itp. Jeśli jest to plik, który wgraliśmy na Commons sami, można korzystać z punktu #1 -- uploader's request. Przy kryterium nr 1 można zmienić nazwę nawet wtedy, gdy ta zmiana nie spełnia innych wymogów.

Pozdrawiam, Wieralee (talk) 18:41, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
  • OK. Jakie pliki powinny mieć zmienioną nazwę?
    • pkt (#) 5 powód zmiany nazwy - "Poprawa błędów w nazwach plików (np. prawidłowa pisownia czy data w nazwie pliku)",
    • pkt (#) 7 powód, gdy to ma na celu "Usunięcie pejoratywnych, obraźliwych lub wulgarnych słów z nazw plików".

Więc, w czym tkwił mój błąd ? HaB >talk< 03:18, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Karol Świderski.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karol Świderski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Oleola (talk) 19:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)


Dzień dobry – czy potrafisz określić co przedstawia to zdjęcie, czy może to być Białystok? [4] Sugerowałem się barwami na flagach i obecnością wśród tych zdjęć (podpisane Trip to Poland) zdjęcia dworca w Białymstoku – pozdrawiam – Darekm135 (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


Auntof6 (talk) 04:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)