User talk:HermannSchachner

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, HermannSchachner!

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear HermannSchachner,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pellia endiviifolia (fa, 144836-474709) 5108.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very useful. It would be good to give the place more clearly in the caption and above the scale. --Archaeodontosaurus 09:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bazzania tricrenata (d, 145456-474255) 8610.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very useful. The species name should be in italics (I corrected). Some minor chromatic aberration. --Archaeodontosaurus 09:19, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear HermannSchachner,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Ein kleines Dankeschön[edit]

Hallo Hermann,
ich bin eben über Deine zahlreichen Moos-Bilder "gestolpert". Wenige haben die technischen Möglichkeiten, solche Aufnahmen zu machen und die wenigsten davon interessieren sich für Bryophyten. Damit es Dir am Ende nicht wie den Moosen ergeht (nämlich völlig zu Unrecht meist kaum beachtet), möchte ich Dir hier ganz herzlich für diese wertvollen Bilder danken: Vielen Dank! El Grafo (talk) 15:29, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
hallo El Grafo! danke für deine anerkennung. alle diese bilder sind quasi ein nebenprodukt von meinem hobby. was meine technischen möglichkeiten anbelangt: meine foto- u.mikroskopausstattung ist recht bescheiden, fast primitiv, ungefähr nach dem prinzip "mit geringen mitteln den größtmöglichen erfolg erzielen". und dass sich für moosbilder und moosartikel nur wenige interessieren, na das ist eben so. HermannSchachner (talk) 19:38, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dem schließe ich mich an. Umso toller, dass du jetzt das lange nicht ausgereizte Mikroskop von WMDE zum Leben erwecken kannst. Freue mich sehr darüber! Denis Barthel (talk) 09:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ja das zeiss ist schon toll, da lässt sich weit mehr herausholen gegenüber dem meinigen. HermannSchachner (talk) 18:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Metzgeria fruticulosa (a, 144707-474823) 2301.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

habe bei allen Fotos == ..int:license-header.. == ..self|Cc-zero.. ergänzt. da muss beim hochladen unbemerkt etwas schiefgegangen sein. HermannSchachner (talk) 14:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pohlia elongata (b, 112725-471212) 6758.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK for me. --C messier 18:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dicranum elongatum (b, 113209-471249) 6803.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Maybe a bit too soft. --C messier 18:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Hubertl 18:31, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mit großer Begeisterung[edit]

sehe ich auf dein unermüdliches Schaffen! Ich hoffe, dass das Zeiss-Mikroskop tatsächlich eine Hilfe ist, wenn auch nur, um die Mühen der Ebene zu überwinden. Arbeit bleibt ja genug. --Hubertl 10:59, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

das zeiss-mikroskop ist immer fleissig und der berg der moosbilder wird immer grösser;-) ja ich arbeite recht gern damit. --HermannSchachner (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo-phylles 2017[edit]

Hi Hermann,

I noticed many remarkable photos of botanics on your gallery.

The International Salon Photo-phylles should interest you ! Please have a look here : http://www.jjmilan.sitew.fr/#accueil.A

This is both a competition and a pedagogical exhibition. Each year the selected pictures are exhibited in various places for more than 3 months and they receive some 4 - 5,000 visitors, among them about 3,000 young people coming with their teachers.

The entry is completely free of charges. We would be honoured to receive some of your best pictures in Bordeaux.

Best regards, Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 21:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC), administrator of the french Wikibooks[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Frage zur Mikroskopie[edit]

File:Plagiomnium undulatum (h, 144543-474730) 8020.JPG

Hallo Herrmann, ich habe eine Frage zu Deinem Bild File:Plagiomnium undulatum (h, 144543-474730) 8020.JPG. Kannst Du Dich noch erinnernn, wie Du das aufgenommen hast? Ich habe heute versucht ähnliche Fotos zu machen (hauptsächlich weil ich die Fluroeszenz von Chlorophyll aufnehmen wollte, aber auch Hellfeld). Ich hab ein Blatt in Wasser zwischen Deckglas und Objektträger gelagert, aber es war doch ziemlich gewellt. Und vor allem die Bildqualität scheint mir bei Deinen besser zu sein. Weißt Du noch, was für ein Objektiv Du benutzt hast? Ölimmersion? Liebe Grüße --Dietzel65 (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hallo Dietzel65! ja ich kann mich sehr gut erinnern ;-), weil ich x-tausende fotos mit dem mikroskop gemacht habe und eine ganze menge davon hier auf commons sind. ich mache meine mikr-fotos MIT objektiv ( ein 100 mm makroobjektiv ); es ginge auch ohne objektiv, das tu ich aber nicht weil da zuviel staub auf den sensor kommt. der schärfebereich von einzelnen mikr-fotos ist sehr klein und ergibt kaum brauchbare fotos. meine lösung ist: ich mache jeweils eine reihe von aufnahmen wobei ich dazwischen die schärfeeinstellung am mikroskop nachstelle. danach wird diese bilderserie mit einem stapelprogramm am pc auf ein bild zusammengesetzt, ich mache das mit Combine ZM, ein freewareprogramm. hier in der wikipedia gibts e einen artikel "CombineZ". noch zum präparieren: blatt in wasser zwischen deckglas u.objektträger mach ich genauso; bei gewellten blättern hilft ein sanfter druck auf das deckglas manchmal ein wenig, aber ganz flach bekommt man sie nicht. ich suche mir bereiche aus, die möglichst wenig wölbungen haben. öl verwende ich so gut wie nie, weil ich nur bis zur 400-fachen vergrößerung gehe und das geht ohne öl. --HermannSchachner (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Herrmann, vielen Dank für die ausführliche Info! Ich meinte eigentlich welches Mikroskopobjktiv, aber das hast Du ja mit 40x trocken auch beantwortet und der Rest ist ebenfalls interessant. Ich hatte neulich ein 63x-Wasser-Objektiv für ohne Deckglas mit Deckglas benutzt, da kein passendes Objektiv im Revolver war. Ich werde wohl umbauen müssen, und dann probiere ich es noch mal mit einem 40x/0.8-Trockenobjektiv. Jedenfalls schönen Dank für die 'Positiv-Kontrolle' hier auf Commons, an der ich meine Bilder messen kann. Schöne Grüße Dietzel65 (talk) 15:14, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
In recognition of fine contributions regarding biology related topic (bryophytes). Bramadiarya (talk) 18:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Vielen Dank fürs Sphagnum-photos Mitteilen ! Die helfen mir sehr bei der Erkennung der Arten. Grüsse aus dem Süd-West Frankreichs ! FlorentBeck (talk) 14:18, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
hallo FlorentBeck, danke! Es freut mich, wenn meine Fotos hilfreich sind. Grüsse aus Österreich. HermannSchachner (talk) 05:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Special Barnstar
Tausend Dank für die absolut copyrightfreien Bilder vom Baum des Jahres 2019! Sie retten Leben ;) Und die Moosbilder sind wirklich großartig; zu schade, dass sich nicht mehr Menschen für Moose interessieren... Eidechse7 (talk) 14:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback![edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder vom Reichraminger Hintergebirge[edit]

Servus HermannSchachner, Ich werke grad am Reichraminger Hintergebirge. Wie ich sehe hast du die Moosflora schon näher untersucht. Hast du vielleicht Bilder vom Borsee bzw. Viehtaleralm? lg und Guten Rutsch. Tigerente (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

servus Tigerente, ich war nur 2014 zweimal hintereinander bei dem Waldmoor zwischen beiden, einmal über den Borsee, einmal über Viehtaleralm. An Fotos hab ich nur zwei Moose aus dem Moor (Calliergon cordifolium, Sphagnum capillifolium), sonst nix, vom Borsee nichts und auch Viehtaleralm nichts. Schade, ich hab sonst nix fotografiert... Was für ein Werk entsteht da? Gutes Neujahr! u. schöne Grüsse, HermannSchachner (talk) 19:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Servus, Danke und Schade. Wir haben sehr wenige Bilder vom Hintergebirge. Ich bin meist nur im Süden unterwegs. Ich werde den WP Artikel zumindest auf Lesenswert heben. Und nächsten Frühling mal zum Borsee schaun. lg Tigerente (talk) 20:33, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]