User talk:HerrAdams

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bild Geometrie

[edit]

Mir ist nicht klar, warum Sie mein Bild gelöscht haben. (Geometrie, zu Bertrand Dorny)

Ich bin Eigentümer des Kunstwerkes, es hängt in meiner Wohnung, und ich habe es auch fotografiert. Wo ist die Urheberrechtsverletzung? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MCDorny (talk • contribs) 06:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MCDorny: mag schon sein, aber dadurch wird das abgebildete Kunstwerk noch lange nicht gemeinfrei! Sie haben (sofern Sie nicht der Künstler sind) nicht die nötigen Rechte („Die Fotografie weist keine ausreichende Originalität für einen Urheberrechtsschutz auf.“) für die freie Lizensierung des abgebildeten Kunstwerks. Die angegebene CC-by-SA-4.0 Lizenz war somit schlicht falsch und eine andere z.B. Template:PD-Art kann auch nicht angewandt werden, da der Künstler ja erst 2015 verstarb und das Kunstwerk daher noch urheberrechtlich geschützt ist. --HerrAdams (talk) 06:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ich blicke da nicht wirklich durch.... was muss ich tun, um das Bild "durchzubekommen"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MCDorny (talk • contribs) 10:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@MCDorny: du musst zunächst wissen wer der aktuelle Rechteinhaber des Kunstwerks ist – weiteres Vorgehen hier --HerrAdams (talk) 12:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distomo Memorial.jpg

[edit]

Hallo Herr Adams!

Du hast ein Foto als urheberrechtlich bedenklich markiert (und dann auch noch gelöscht?!), das ich selbst vor Ort aufgenommen habe und das von mehreren Wikipedia-Seiten verwendet worden ist: File:Distomo Memorial.jpg

Kannst du das bitte erklären?

Grüße Martin Windischhofer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin Windischhofer (talk • contribs) 11:41, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Siehe Template:NoFoP-Greece. --HerrAdams (talk) 14:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fotowettbewerbe

[edit]

Hallo HerrAdams, darf ich dich auf die aktuellen Fotowettbewerbe (und deren Teilnahmebedingungen) aufmerksam machen. Würde mich freuen, Fotos von dir im Bewerb zu sehen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date={{taken on|2017-10-19 16:07:46|cat=no}}

[edit]

Hallo Herr Adams, warum das? Date= {{taken on|2017-10-19 16:07:46|cat=no}}

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:D%C3%BCsseldorf,_Mettmanner_Stra%C3%9Fe_13-15_(2017)_(2).jpg&curid=63468123&diff=263818017&oldid=263555305
-- Kürschner (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ist jetzt in der passenden Unterkategorie von Category:Photographs taken on 2017-10-19 enthalten. --HerrAdams (talk) 19:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

remove border

[edit]

Hallo, wenn du einen unerwünschten Rand entfernst, dann stelle die neue Version unter dem gleichen Namen rein, sonst entsteht unnötig Unordnung! Gruß --Mewa767 (talk) 19:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, du hast beim Foto File:Rhaetenhaus 1958.jpg angegeben: „Autor: Rhaetia, CC-BY-SA-3.0-DE. schriftlich erhalten.“ Könntest du eine Kopie dieser schriftlichen Genehmigung, mit Angabe des Dateinamens, an Commons:OTRS schicken und das Bild mit {{OTRS pending}} kennzeichnen? Derzeit ist der Lizenzstatus des Bildes ungenügend. Danke -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 14:08, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kopiert nach de:Benutzer Diskussion:Knallexus --HerrAdams (talk) 13:00, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of PD-old-assumed

[edit]

Please avoid using {{PD-old-assumed}} inappropriately. In the case of HL Damals – Kottwitz.jpg you uploaded the file with no known published author. Thanks -- (talk) 10:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

personality rights template

[edit]

Du hast bei einem Foto das personality rights Template hinzugefügt. Das ist auch richtig. Doch ich frage mich, warum nur bei diesem einen Bild, das aus eiener Reihe von über 20 Fotos mit identifizierbaren Personen ist. --GPSLeo (talk) 16:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GPSLeo: Ich bin auf dieses Foto gestoßen, weil es in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia verwendet wird. Ich habe mir dann nicht die Mühe gemacht, in der Kategorie nach weiteren Fällen zu suchen. In die anderen gehört der Hinweis natürlich auch eingefügt. --HerrAdams (talk) 17:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Würdest du das wirklich an alle Fotos packen, ist ja nur ein Hinweis, die Persönlichkeitsrechte gelten mit oder ohne Template, oder einfach an die Kategorie als ganzes. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Korrekterweise müsste es an jedes Foto mit Personen, weil in der Kategorie (ich gehe davon aus du meinst diese) ja auch Fotos ohne Personen sind, die der Hinweis natürlich nicht betrifft. Aber wie du richtig feststellst, ist es nur ein Hinweis und damit nicht zwingend notwendig, wie es ein Lizenzbaustein wäre. --HerrAdams (talk) 17:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, DCB (talk) 22:05, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, DCB (talk) 22:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 19:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo - da habe ich ein neues Script ausprobiert und gleich einen kapitalen Bock geschossen. Danke für die Reparatur. LG + PX -- MaxxL - talk 08:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kapellen-Kat

[edit]

Hallo @HerrAdams: danke für das Erstellen der beiden Deimenried-Kategorien! Nächsten Sonntag geht's in deinem westlichen Heimatgebiet weiter. Diesmal zwischen Huglfing (incl des fotogenen Schwayerhofs), Eglfing, Egenried und Eberfing. Dabei kommen auch die restlichen Gebäude in Huglfing dran die ich zuvor übersehen hatte zu fotografieren. Herzliche Grüße --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 18:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ich sage Danke für die Fotos! Habe ein paar auch in die Artikel zu St. Magnus Huglfing und St. Michael Berg eingebunden... Dann hoffen wir mal auf gutes Wetter am Sonntag. Gruß --HerrAdams (talk) 19:04, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ich glaube ich verschieb die Tour aufs nächste Wochenende, die Wetterlage ist mir zu unsicher. Gruß --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 18:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Kloster Hosios Lukas, Denkmal 2015-09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Geraki TLG 13:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hallo HerrAdams,

ich habe die Fotografin des Bildes selbst kontaktiert und sie erteilte mir die Erlaubnis zur Nutzung des Fotos auf Wikipedia. Wieso handelt es sich also um eine Copyright-Verletzung?

Über eine kurze Rückmeldung würde ich mich sehr freuen. Bei weiteren Rückfragen stehe ich Ihnen selbstverständlich gerne zur Verfügung.

Vielen Dank vorab! Ypsln (talk) 17:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, da das theoretisch jeder behaupten könnte, muss diese Erlaubnis an Wikimedia Commons gesendet werden. Wie das geht steht hier. --HerrAdams (talk) 17:50, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:2017-07-16 Campendonk Museum Penzberg 023 (35925641841).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]