User talk:Heuschrecke

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Heuschrecke!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

VDNKh alcove.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VDNKh alcove.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I wish you were in the centre, but QI for me. --Kadellar 11:41, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Savvino Storoozhevsky Skete Planet.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Savvino Storoozhevsky Skete Planet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit of distortion, but QI for me. --Kadellar 17:39, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Serg Posad Descent.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serg Posad Descent.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:22, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Church of Venerable Savva 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Venerable Savva 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame about the sky, but ok. --Mattbuck 10:19, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Novodevichy Transfiguration Dome 02 c.jpeg[edit]

Mojn,

da zwei Kommentatoren bei deinem Bild File:Novodevichy Transfiguration Dome 02.JPG bemängelt haben, dass es oben zu wenig Rand (= Himmel) gibt, habe ich mal eine Version mit einem Bisschen mehr Himmel angefertigt. Ich habe deine Informationen übernommen; was meinen Anteil betrifft, erreicht er meiner Meinung nach nicht die "Schöpfungshöhe" für einen eigenen Beitrag. Ist nur ein Beispiel.

Auflösung und Schärfe deines Bildes beeindrucken mich ebenso wie die anderen Kommentatoren! Ich war zwar mal in Moskau, aber Nowodewitschi habe ich nicht besucht.

Grüße, Aisano (talk) 21:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Dear Aisano, I'm extremely grateful for your contribution! Now I changed the nomination link to your version of the file. I was away for a while without internet, so I couldn't perform any corrections. Sorry for my misleading username, but I'm actually Russian :) Ich kenne Deutsch ein bisschen, aber nicht zu gut, um die ganze Antwort in Deutsch zu schreiben (I hope the sentence makes sence at least). Cheers, Heuschrecke (talk) 14:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • upd: I noticed that the image contained a dust spot pointed out by Kreuzschnabel, so I re-uploaded the original image to fix that. I mentioned you in the Authors section. Thanks a lot once more! Heuschrecke (talk) 18:10, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Здравствый, Heuschrecke, твой немецкий язык – намного лучшый чем мой русский. Maybe you should create a user page with a "Babel" infobox ({{userboxtop}}{{user ru}}...) to tell people about the languages you use etc?
It was certainly the best thing that you took over my "sky" to your version. I would now like to propose my intermediate version for deletion (thanks for mentioning me in the comment to your version) but before I do that you should remove it from your page. Do you agree?
Привет, --Aisano (talk) 18:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Novodevichy Transfiguration Dome 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Novodevichy Transfiguration Dome 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Very good sharpness, but the upper crop is too tight. --Iifar 07:04, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Would be fine for me if there was a bit more space on the top side --Kreuzschnabel 07:58, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment If you add more sky at the top (there's enough sky in the picture) you might want to blur the extremely noisy sky --Aisano 19:47, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support It will be difficult to add more sky. But also without it the photo is QI. And where do you see an extremely noisy sky? -- Lothar Spurzem 22:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
You may change your support to promotion, as nobody has voted against the picture so far. Sorry for saying "extremely noisy"; I never can see that with my eyes but Gimp tells me that the sky is noisy, which is normal at an exposure time of only 1/1000 s. I uploaded a proposal to point out how the crop at the top side might be repaired. --Aisano 19:04, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
I changed to promotion. -- Lothar Spurzem 22:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but the upper crop is too tight. --Kadellar 12:57, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
✓ Done I changed the link to Aisano's version with extended sky. Huge thanks Aisano, I was away and didn't have time to fix anything. Heuschrecke 14:37, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Now I notice Kreuzschnabel pointed out a dust spot; I removed it (and also a small piece of the building sticking out in the lower-right corner)Heuschrecke 18:02, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
The crop is ok for me now, so back to Promotion. --Kadellar 21:25, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Reply[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Heuschrecke,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Khamovniki St Nicholas Church 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khamovniki St Nicholas Church 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 13:49, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Panoram Soller and Ofre.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoram Soller and Ofre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good to go Poco a poco 22:44, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Palma de Mallorca cathedral view from west.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palma de Mallorca cathedral view from west.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:24, 15 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Palma de Mallorca Cathedral portal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palma de Mallorca Cathedral portal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

WLM Barnstar[edit]

WLM Barnstar finals 2012.svg

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Trevi top.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trevi top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tor dei Conti.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tor dei Conti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very pretty, but a bit blurry on the left. Maybe fixable? Mattbuck 04:34, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Uploaded a sharper shot Heuschrecke 18:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Better. Mattbuck 20:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

O2 Arena.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! O2 Arena.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dull because of the weather, maybe it coiuld improve with a crop up and down, but QI for me. --Kadellar 13:16, 20 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

New Providence Wharf 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New Providence Wharf 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support --Iifar 08:15, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Greenwich Foot Tunnel, Greenwich side.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greenwich Foot Tunnel, Greenwich side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Royal Naval College Greenwich view from the Thames.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Naval College Greenwich view from the Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support --Rjcastillo 19:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Greenwich Foot Tunnel, Greenwich side.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Greenwich foot tunnel, entrances (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Number 4 Princelet St.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Number 4 Princelet St.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, but mildly unsharp. --Mattbuck 08:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Novodevichy Transfiguration 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Novodevichy Transfiguration 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --The Photographer 14:52, 3 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The Shard and Southwark Cathedral.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Shard and Southwark Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Queens College Clock.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Queens College Clock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Emmanuel College Chapel Top.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emmanuel College Chapel Top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Bgag 22:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grantchester Church.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grantchester Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Two images of greek islands on QIC[edit]

Hello! I don't want to start an unnecessary discussion about two of your images directly on the QIC page. But maybe, you can answer my question on your discussion page. The images File:Kelyfos sunset boat 01.jpg and File:Kelyfos sunset.jpg are promoted as QI. In both images, the colours seem way too intense to me. Did you enhance them? Maybe too much? Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with lighting conditions in greece during the summer, so I can't say, if these colours are real. In my home region something like this is impossible. --Dirtsc (talk) 12:18, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kelyfos sunset.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kelyfos sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 16:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Betty Gordon Moore Lib Cambridge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Betty Gordon Moore Lib Cambridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:49, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

CMS Central Core 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CMS Central Core 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:01, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kelyfos sunset boat 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kelyfos sunset boat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Awesome! -- Felix Koenig 16:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Please go for FP --Martin Falbisoner 05:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! Heuschrecke 08:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
A small tilt. --Villy Fink Isaksen 10:07, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Neos Marmaras Bay 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neos Marmaras Bay 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

CMS Central Core 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central core, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Betty Gordon Moore Lib Cambridge.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Betti and Gordon Moore library, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Novodevichy Nikolskaya 01.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikolskaya Tower, Novodevichy Convent.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

CMS Roof west view.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CMS Roof west view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The image must be QI, but it needs a little perspective correction and there are CAs. If you want, I cant write notes--Lmbuga 00:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
I can fix the issues if you want: It's a good picture--Lmbuga 00:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done Fixed what I saw. Please add a note if any CA remains. Heuschrecke 22:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok, good--Lmbuga 21:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Neos Marmaras Bay 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neos Marmaras Bay 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cam Paradise Reserve.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cam Paradise Reserve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Thanks[edit]

I really like the photos of Cambridge colleges you added today, they're very impressive. Thanks for uploading them. Nev1 (talk) 13:47, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Removal of QIC nominations[edit]

Hi, can you explain this? Did I do something wrong when nominating these images? I'm confused. darkweasel94 20:13, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • I'm terribly sorry, I didn't want to delete anything. I was reviewing some pictures, saved my changes and it said there was an editing conflict. Then I clicked 'save' again (which as I now understand must never be done), and this deleted your nominations. Please accept my apologies. Can you just repeat your edit? Heuschrecke (talk) 20:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Ok, I've repeated it, no problem. darkweasel94 20:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • ... and got into an edit conflict with someone else who did the same. :) In the future, you may want to "show changes" after an edit conflict so you don't accidentally do something you don't want to do. darkweasel94 20:29, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • Thanks for advice! Heuschrecke (talk) 20:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blank line[edit]

Hi Heuschrecke !

Thanks for sharing with us your nice photos !

Would you please be kind enough to consider, according to the QI guidelines, to leave a blank line between every of your nominations in the QIC page ?

It is less confusing, and helpful for reviewers. (I've corrected your last proposals).

Thank you very much.--Jebulon (talk) 10:06, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130816 Stadtwache view from Marktplatz Ahrweiler.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 Stadtwache view from Marktplatz Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--ArildV 13:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130826 Ehrenbreischein 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130826 Ehrenbreischein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:43, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130826 Festung Ehrenbreitstein 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130826 Festung Ehrenbreitstein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. -- Felix Koenig 14:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130826 Festung Ehrenbreitstein 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130826 Festung Ehrenbreitstein 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support nice --Christian Ferrer 11:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130816 Schloss Drachenburg 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 Schloss Drachenburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support there's a smidge blue veil, but very nice photo nonetheless --A.Savin 17:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130826 Rhein Mosel Schlossgarten 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130826 Rhein Mosel Schlossgarten 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130826 Preußisches Regierungsgebäude Koblenz Tower Closeup.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130826 Preußisches Regierungsgebäude Koblenz Tower Closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 12:10, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130816 Niederhutstrasse from Marktplatz Ahrweiler.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 Niederhutstrasse from Marktplatz Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High quality.-ArildV 19:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130816 Pfarrhaus Ahrweiler.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 Pfarrhaus Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130816 Belfry of St Laurentius Ahrweiler.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 Belfry of St Laurentius Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 12:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130816 St. Laurentius Kirche Ahrweiler.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 St. Laurentius Kirche Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:49, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130816 Bonner Munster Top 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 Bonner Munster Top 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good and sharp !--Jebulon 09:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130826 Lion Deutsches Eck 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130826 Lion Deutsches Eck 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very interesting element. Crop a bit tight below maybe, but very good sharpness and level of details.--Jebulon 09:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

20130808 Kings College Chapel 01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
King's College Chapel, Cambridge, south view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
20130826 Alt St. Heribert Cologne.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alt St. Heribert southwest view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130808 Kings College Chapel 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130808 Kings College Chapel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Rjcastillo 17:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130406 Ely Cathedral 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130406 Ely Cathedral 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Sharp, but I don't like the composition, sorry. Also, the building of the right is a bit tilted CCW. I'm thinking of declining the proposal--Lmbuga 21:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Too tight at bottom IMO--Lmbuga 21:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Tilt corrected. Crop cannot be made better (below are chaotic roofs, unpleasant). Let's discuss. Heuschrecke 23:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
New review: weak Symbol support vote.svg Support It's a good image IMO --Lmbuga 00:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
I accept your opinion and your criterion, but the picture could be better with a little less of sky--Lmbuga 01:00, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

20130816 Niederhutstrasse from Marktplatz Ahrweiler 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 Niederhutstrasse from Marktplatz Ahrweiler 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:23, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130826 Festung Ehrenbreitstein 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130826 Festung Ehrenbreitstein 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 15:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130808 Kings Back Court 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130808 Kings Back Court 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:15, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130816 St. Laurentius Kirche Ahrweiler view from above.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 St. Laurentius Kirche Ahrweiler view from above.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130215 Kings College Chapel Hi-res 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130215 Kings College Chapel Hi-res 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Poco a poco 11:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130808 Castle End from Kings Bridge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130808 Castle End from Kings Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Very good --Rjcastillo 17:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC) Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment yes very good but tilted on right --Christian Ferrer 05:02, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130826 Lion Deutsches Eck 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130826 Lion Deutsches Eck 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, I like the details, QI for me. --J. Lunau 16:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130826 Rhein Mosel Schlossgarten 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130826 Rhein Mosel Schlossgarten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 05:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130816 Adenbachviadukt 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 Adenbachviadukt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130215 Kings College Chapel Hi-res 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130215 Kings College Chapel Hi-res 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Dirtsc 15:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130816 Roofs StadtMueum Ahrweiler.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 Roofs StadtMueum Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good but the left window is leaning out --Christian Ferrer 17:32, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
It's barely noticable, and is impeccable otherwise. Mattbuck 21:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

20130406 Ely Cathedral 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130406 Ely Cathedral 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130215 Kings College Chapel Hi-res 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130215 Kings College Chapel Hi-res 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Vry good quality. -- Felix Koenig 14:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130816 Drachenfels.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 Drachenfels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Heuschrecke,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Heuschrecke,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tavira Street 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tavira Street 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 09:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Castro Marim Fort 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castro Marim Fort 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 10:03, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tavira Street 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tavira Street 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tavira river bank 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tavira river bank 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Awsome picture. Nice work! Jakec 14:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Faro Marina and Pedestrian area.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro Marina and Pedestrian area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ria Formosa Castro Marim 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ria Formosa Castro Marim 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Castro Marim Castle Inside 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castro Marim Castle Inside 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tavira river bank 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tavira river bank 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 14:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ria Formosa Castro Marim 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ria Formosa Castro Marim 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Castro Marim Fort 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castro Marim Fort 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130808 Kings College Entrance Hi-res.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130808 Kings College Entrance Hi-res.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130808 Kings College Front Court Fountain.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130808 Kings College Front Court Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Faro Beach 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro Beach 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 12:51, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Faro Stranded Boat.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro Stranded Boat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support --A.Savin 12:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Castro Marim Fort 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castro Marim Fort 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 22:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Invitation to take part in the categorization of QI[edit]

Dear Heuschrecke! Your images were reviewed and have been promoted to Quality Image status. Congratulations! I invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. All new images with this status are automatically placed to the page Commons:Quality_images/Recently_promoted. They have to be manually tagged with relevant categories using the QI categorization tool (see link at the top of the page, the author of this tool is User:Dschwen). Very few users do this job now, so a large number of uncategorizated photos accumulates on this page time to time… --Bff (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Faro Chapel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs perspective correction. One dust spot. --Cccefalon 09:08, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Done, thanks. --Heuschrecke 22:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 16:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ria Formosa Tavira 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ria Formosa Tavira 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Castro Marim Fort 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castro Marim Fort 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. IMO it would be better with less sky. --XRay 09:28, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Castro Marim Church and Castle.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castro Marim Church and Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 18:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Castro Marim Castle Inside 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castro Marim Castle Inside 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 18:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

20130826 Statue Alt Markt Cologne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130826 Statue Alt Markt Cologne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. But: Please add the geo location. --XRay 16:14, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pub signboard cup Ahrweiler.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pub signboard cup Ahrweiler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but geolocation should be appreciated. --JLPC 16:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130808 Kings College Chapel Closeup 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130808 Kings College Chapel Closeup 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 12:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130808 Kings College Front Court Fountain Crop 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130808 Kings College Front Court Fountain Crop 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 12:01, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Faro Beach 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faro Beach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support OK --A.Savin 12:14, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

20130816 Rathaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20130816 Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Halavar 12:01, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo Heuschrecke,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo Heuschrecke,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again![edit]

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]