User talk:Hiiumaamudeliklubi

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hiiumaamudeliklubi!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Kultuurimälestised Vikipeediasse

Tere! Palun kinnita esimesel võimalusel oma eelistustes (link ülal paremal reas) oma e-mailiaadress, et saaksin Sulle läbi Commonsi kirja saata. Asi puudutab kultuurimälestiste fotovõistlust ja on väga oluline. Lase headel uudistel endani jõuda! Adeliine (talk) 12:37, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Hiiumaamudeliklubi, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kõpu tuletorn. Vaade ülevalt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but small.--ArildV 11:43, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Hiiumaamudeliklubi, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hellamaa panoraam.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hellamaa panoraam.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Turbaraba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality image. --DAJF 02:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellamaa panoraam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --P e z i 08:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hanikatsi laiu panoraam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:18, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Püha kirik 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very small file. --XRay 12:39, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Watermarks

Hi Hiiumaamudeliklubi, please respect Commons:Watermarks and do NOT watermark your images. -- Ies (talk) 17:11, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angla tuulikud 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail and color --Daniel Case 07:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Käsmu sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kihnu õigeusu kirik 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heltermaa-Rohuküla praam 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungla sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite sharp! Can see the details from a distance Good quality. --Caballero1967 21:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lennusadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lumekunst2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuressaare linn ja sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kärdla sadam 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. English desrcription would be helpful. --Ermell 21:27, 16 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Kruusamägi 12:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montu sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Noblessner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koguva sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Okay to me. --Florstein 09:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rohuküla sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo and I know it is quiet difficult to make a sharp photo like this Q1one --Michielverbeek 23:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palade lasteaed.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:57, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soela sadam 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kärdla Lennujaam Hiiumaal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 08:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tuletõrjujate kokkutulek 2013 Hellamaa rannas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 06:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pühalepa kirik, Hiiumaa 2016 jaanuar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I know this is a difficult shot but can you at least try to fix the perspective problem? --Code 07:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Better now? Kruusamägi 14:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Honestly I don't see any difference but after having another look I believe that from this perspective the verticals simply can't be rectiliniear, so I give a  Support. Second opinion appreciated anyhow. --Code 06:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lennusadam 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lennusadam 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Kahala järv

Kas siin pildil on ikka Kahala järv? Mulle endale tundub see pigem nagu et:Lohja järv. Kruusamägi (talk) 04:20, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruserahu, Esiküla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kassari merepõhi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 June 2018 (UTC)