User talk:Hokemo TV

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hokemo TV!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:12, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Bilder fdl und stw

Hallo Hokemo TV,

sorry, dass da plötzlich Bronnbach im Namen stand, das hatte ich verbockt. Ich musste einigen deiner Bilder bessere Namen geben, weil in einem Bestand von bald 17 Millionen Dateien wie auf Commons Namen wie fdl.jpg einfach viel zu unspezifisch und nichtssagend sind. Also habe ich sie zusammen mit mehreren anderen auf beschreibende Dateinamen verschoben und dabei irrtümlich Bronnbach statt Gamburg reingeschrieben. Ich habe es jetzt korrigiert. Ein guter Dateiname sollte am besten den dargestellten Gegenstand, also das Gebäude, den Raum, das Denkmal oder was auch immer enthalten, dann den Ort, wo es aufgenommen wurde, und den Zeitraum, am besten das Jahr oder das Datum. Letzteres am besten in einer Schreibweise, die annähernd der ISO-Norm entspricht, also 20130504 für den heutigen Tag.

Sinnvoll ist es auch, die Bilder auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite gut zu beschreiben und sie in die richtigen Kategorien einzusortieren. Dass man die Dateibeschreibungsseiten wie Artikel bearbeiten kann, hast du ja schon gemerkt. Du kannst Dateien auch in Galerieseiten wie Gamburg präsentieren (Weinsberg ist ein Beispiel für eine von mir gestaltete, nicht mehr ganz auf dem neuesten Stand leider), aber die Kategorien sind für Commons wichtiger. Sie sind leider ausschließlich auf Englisch, aber bei Eigennamen sollte das erstmal kein Problem sein. Neben den Ortskategorien wie Category:Gamburg (Werbach) (leider mit Klammerzusatz, da jemand anders meinte, dass es irgendwo in Missouri auch einen winzigen Ort namens Gamburg gibt) gibt es auch Sachkategorien wie Category:Train stations in Main-Tauber-Kreis. Da könntest du deine Bahnhofsbilder mal einsortieren, probier es einfach mal aus.

Lies dir am besten die in der Willkommensbotschaft weiter oben verlinkten Hilfetexte durch, v. a. Commons:Erste Schritte und Commons:Häufig gestellte Fragen, danach solltest du über vieles Wichtige hier Bescheid wissen. Wenn noch Fragen auftauchen, kannst du dich an mich wenden, kann aber sein, dass es ein paar Tage mit der Antwort dauert. Bei Commons:Forum kannst du allgemeine Fragen zu Commons auf Deutsch loswerden, bei Commons:Village pump auf Englisch. Viele Grüße --Rosenzweig τ 09:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Kategorien und die Sprachlinks zu dt., engl. etc. Wikipedia muss man übrigens nur einmal pro Galerieseite reinsetzen, nicht in jeden Abschnitt. Üblicherweise setzt man sie an den Schluss des Quelltextes. Bei der Galerieseite Taubertalbahn habe ich das jetzt korrigiert. --Rosenzweig τ 09:55, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Unkategorisierte Bilder

Hallo, ich habe jetzt die Category:Bahnhof Edelfingen für Dich angelegt, nachdem ich Deine Bilder in Category:Media needing categories gefunden habe. -- Hämbörger (talk) 08:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Prima, danke. Die Commons-Seite der Taubertalbahn ist zwar noch im "Baustellen"-Status, aber es geht voran. Gruß --Hokemo TV 11:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Löschanträge

Hallo HokemoTV,

wenn du Löschanträge auf eigene Bilder stellst, solltest du ein bisschen genauer angeben, was eigentlich der Grund ist. "Fehler beim (Hochladen)" ist etwas dünn und noch kein Löschgrund. Vielleicht kann man den Fehler auch ohne Löschen beheben? Wenn du mir sagst, was du machen willst, kann ich vielleicht helfen. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 22:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC) gelesen --Hokemo TV 10:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hokemo TV (talk • contribs) 10:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)--Hokemo TV 10:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Bahnsteig -neu- .JPG

Hallo, kannst du beim Bild File:Bahnsteig -neu- .JPG in der Beschreibung noch angeben wo das liegt? Es gibt bisher keinen Ortsnamen und keine Koordinaten. Ich wollte in der Category:Taubertalbahn aufräumen und habe heute bereits über 100 Bilder in passende Unterkategorien einsortiert. Bei diesem Bild kam ich nicht weiter. Es sind noch etwa 80 Bilder, die sortiert werden müssen. Gruß Triplec85 (talk) 21:27, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Update: Dank eines aufmerksamen Hinweises von User:Alraunenstern habe ich die Datei verschoben auf File:Bahnsteig Laudenbach (Württ) neu.jpg (präziser) und in die passende Unterkategorie einsortiert. Damit sind alle der etwa 200 zuvor unsortierten Bilder der Category:Taubertalbahn in passende Unterkategorien sortiert. Gruß Triplec85 (talk) 17:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Kategorien und Unterkategorien in Wikimedia Commons

@Hokemo TV: bitte achte darauf, Bilder nicht in eine Kategorie einzusortieren, wenn sie bereits in einer Unterkategorie davon enthalten sind.

Ich bin darauf aufmerksam geworden, weil du viele Bahnhofsbilder im Main-Tauber-Kreis in "Bahnhofskategorien" und jeweils noch in die Überkategorie "Taubertalbahn" einsortiert hast. Das ist dann ja doppelt, da die Bahnhöfe und Bahnstationen bereits Unterkategorien der c:Category:Taubertalbahn sind.

Anderes Beispiel: Falls ein Bild nur die Burg Gamburg zeigt. Dann wird es nur in die Unterkategorie "Burg Gamburg", nicht in die Überkategorie "Gamburg" einsortiert.

• c:Category:Gamburg (Werbach)
  • c:Category:Burg Gamburg

Es wird auch nicht in andere Überkategorien wie Gemeinde Werbach, Main-Tauber-Kreis, Baden-Württemberg, Deutschland, Europa, Welt, usw. einsortiert, sondern nur in der letzten passenden Unterkategorie c:Category:Burg Gamburg.

Die Category:Gamburg (Werbach) ist aktuell noch überfüllt mit Bildern, die in passende Unterkategorien von Gamburg einsortiert werden sollten, z.B. c:Category:Tauberbrücke Gamburg, c:Category:St. Martin (Gamburg), c:Category:Eisenbahnbrücke Gamburg, c:Category:Burg Gamburg, usw. usw. usw.

Eventuell müssen passende Unterkategorien für manche Bilder von Gamburg erst noch erstellt werden. Dabei kann ich dir gerne behilflich sein. Für die Taubertalbahn gibt es bereits die meisten notwendigen Unterkategorien.

Viele Grüße Triplec85 (talk) 12:08, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Auch für sehr spezielle Bilder wie File:Wm-Ochsenf.jpg konnte ich mir der c:Category:Rail transport traffic control diagrams of Taubertalbahn eine passende Unterkategorie finden, sodass es nicht mehr in die Überkategorie c:Category:Taubertalbahn einsortiert werden sollte. Gruß Triplec85 (talk) 12:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Bf Hochhausen(Tauber)Lage.jpg

File:Bf Hochhausen(Tauber)Lage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 21:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Entbehrlich, löschen. MfG --Hokemo TV (talk) 17:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hp Oberstetten.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Hp Oberstetten.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hp Oberstetten.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Rosenzweig τ 17:07, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Löschen, habe nur mündliches Einverständnis.MfG --Hokemo TV (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Abzweig der Taubertalbahn.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Abzweig der Taubertalbahn.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abzweig der Taubertalbahn.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Schnellstmöglich löschen. Ich habe zwar die Lizenz, aber kein Interesse daran umständlich Formulare auszufüllen. --Hokemo TV (talk) 15:08, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:Abzweig der Taubertalbahn2.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Abzweig der Taubertalbahn2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abzweig der Taubertalbahn2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Schnellstmöglich löschen. Ich habe zwar die Lizenz, aber kein Interesse daran umständlich Formulare auszufüllen.--Hokemo TV (talk) 15:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Abzweig der Taubertalbahn.jpg

File:Abzweig der Taubertalbahn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Triplec85 (talk) 16:28, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Abzweig der Taubertalbahn2.jpg

File:Abzweig der Taubertalbahn2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Triplec85 (talk) 16:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Wie oben beschrieben, in den Müll damit. --Hokemo TV (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gamburg(Tauber) Schwerlast und LÜ.jpg

Copyright status: File:Gamburg(Tauber) Schwerlast und LÜ.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Gamburg(Tauber) Schwerlast und LÜ.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 23:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Delete --Hokemo TV (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Löschen ist völlig unnötig. Hier wird nur bemängelt, dass du das Bild ohne Lizenzbaustein hochgeladen hast. Ergänze einfach den Lizenzbaustein, den du für deine anderen hier hochgeladenen eigenen Fotos verwendest ({{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}) reinkopieren + abspeichern), und alles ist ok. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 11:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Datum eines Bildes

@Hokemo TV: Bei deinem Bild File:Gamburg, Ansicht im Winter.JPG müsste als Datum wohl 1999 statt 1899 richtig sein? Gruß Triplec85 (talk) 19:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Eingang CIMG0002.JPG

Copyright status: File:Eingang CIMG0002.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Eingang CIMG0002.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Hp Hochhausen neu.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:06, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Hochhausen(Tauber)x.jpg

File:Hochhausen(Tauber)x.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 12:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Elpersheim Umbau.JPG

Copyright status: File:Elpersheim Umbau.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Elpersheim Umbau.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

@Hokemo TV: Das Bild ist ja von dir. Ich denke, du müsstest nur (wie bei anderen Bildern von dir gesehen) den folgenden Teil dazu kopieren, dann sollte es passen:

== {{int:license-header}} ==
{{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}

Viele Grüße 2A02:8070:51B7:E400:54B2:FBF5:1A58:7846 21:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)