User talk:Holger.Ellgaard/Archive 5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Handkannasilver.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Handkannasilver.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

I99pema (talk) 10:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hej. Holger. Ser att du också fick detta automatmeddelandet. Det verkar som om användaren som laddat upp originalbilden tagit friskt direkt ur Nationalmuseums egna bildsamlingar --I99pema (talk) 10:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hej, jag har bara omflyttat delbilderna för att bättre passa i artiklar.--Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 11:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Brunkebergstunneln

Hej Holger Jag är intresseard av bilden File:Brunkebergstunneln 1886.jpg (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brunkebergstunneln_1886.jpg). Jag söker tillstånd att använda bilder i en bok som jag och mina kollegor håller på att skriva. Får vi använda bilden? Vi behöver högupplösta original, finns det? Tack på förhand

Bästa hälsningar Radhlinah

Hej! Bilden är fri att använda då upphovsmannen är död i över 70 år. Bilden är skannad från boken "Stockholms gatunamn". Någon annan variant har jag tyvärr inte. Hälsningar --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

LX (talk, contribs) 10:28, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stockholms Stadsteater 2009.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Stockholms Stadsteater 2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 09:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stockholms Stadsteater 2009.JPG

Hej, jag har märkt bilden File:Stockholms Stadsteater 2009.JPG som du laddat upp för radering. Den består ju till stor del av andra bilder (affischer) som med sannolikhet är upphovsrättsskyddade. Jag såg först efteråt att det var du som laddat upp den, jag kanske skulle frågat först. Men "no offense intended", i alla fall. /NH (talk) 09:41, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Äsch, det här blev rörigt. Se meddelandet ovan istället. /NH (talk) 09:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Retzius,G.jpg

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Retzius,G.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Retzius,G.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:18, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Citybanan Stockholm City pressvisning 2012 02.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Citybanan Stockholm City pressvisning 2012 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 18:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(Cropping and) reducing resolution of other contributors photographs

Please don't !! Bengt Nyman (talk) 14:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stockholmskällan logo.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Stockholmskällan logo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Mar11 (talk) 07:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Djurgarden Lilljan 1.jpg

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  中文  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Djurgarden Lilljan 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hasse Ekman 1953.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Hasse Ekman 1953.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stigfinnare (talk) 21:30, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hagasessorna 1945.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Hagasessorna 1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stigfinnare (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fatima och Gösta Ekman 1962.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Fatima och Gösta Ekman 1962.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stigfinnare (talk) 21:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Tensta allé 1971.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Tensta allé 1971.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pierpao.lo (listening) 10:31, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fotot är fri enligt Stockholmskällan (CC-BY. "Du får använda materialet fritt om du anger upphov") och behöver därför inte diskuteras här. Man bör läsa ursprungskällan ordentligt innan man anmäler en bild för radering.--Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 11:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cellofan.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Cellofan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Stig Lindberg Sparhunden.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Stig Lindberg Sparhunden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Konserthuset Stockholm.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Konserthuset Stockholm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 15:29, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Michael_Thonet_14

Dear Ellgaard, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Michael_Thonet_14.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia or we can note your proper name if you prefer. Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 13:00, 19 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 13:00, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Please my proper name: Holger Ellgaard (without "dott"). Best regards, --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 13:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Brunkebergstorg 1969.jpg

Hej! Angånde det här. Syns verkligen Malmskillnadsgatan på bilden? Gatan på bron ser ut att vara parallell med Hötorgsskapornas fasad, och borde vara Vattugatan eller möjligen någon parallellgata till den. Malmskillnadsgatan bör vara skymd bakom Televerkets hus. /Ö 20:21, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hej! Stämmer bra! Tack för uppmärksamheten. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 07:20, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jacobsen,_7an

Dear Holger.Ellgaard,

I would like to use these images, too: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jacobsen,_7an.jpg, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/08/Graves_kittel_1984.jpg and https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fil:PH-Lampan_1.jpg. 

Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com--hippofish 17:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 17:06, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Holger.Ellgard,
I would like to repeat my message about visual permission.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jacobsen,_7an.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/08/Graves_kittel_1984.jpg
https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fil:PH-Lampan_1.jpg.
Best regards,
Mustafa Demirkan Mustidede (talk) 13:31, 28 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You do not need to ask for permission. If you use the images under the license given, all you need to do is mention Holger Ellgaard's name as the photographer. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Exactly! --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 14:14, 28 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You also need to mention the license (and apply the same license to any derivative works). LX (talk, contribs) 14:16, 28 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You are supposed to "link to" the license in a reasonable manner. Doesn't say "mention". --SergeWoodzing (talk) 08:36, 29 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Doesn't say "link to" either (that's not possible in every medium). The specific requirement is to "include a copy of, or the Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) for, this License". The point is: mentioning the author alone is not sufficient. I'd suggest reading the license before using any licensed content. LX (talk, contribs) 09:20, 29 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Just to explain myself, this is what you get when you follow the license link on the image page in question. Says "link to". If that's wrong, perhaps it should be corrected? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:57, 30 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Dear SergeWoodzing and Holger.Ellgaard
Thank you so much for information.
Best regards,
Mustidede (talk) 14:02, 30 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Y Ekstroem lamino.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Y Ekstroem lamino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

72.95.104.248 12:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Betalstation 2010.jpg

Dear Holger,

I was wondering if it is possible to get this photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Betalstation_2010.jpg in high-resolution (300 DPI)? We are looking to use it in a book published by Island Press (located in Washington DC) and need a high-resolution version of the image. If you are able to help us, we would really appreciate it.

Thank you! Isabella —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.230.115.226 (talk) 16:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Isabella, this photo has resolution 300 DPI. For more details please scroll down to "Metadata" and klick on "Visa utökade detaljer". --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(Excuse me for butting in.) You can actually print any image at 300 DPI, since DPI is just a measure of the relationship between the number of pixels in the image and the physical dimensions. If you print a photo that is 3168 pixels wide at 300 DPI, it will be 3168/300=10.56 inches (268 mmm) wide. Cheers, LX (talk, contribs) 19:18, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Släktträdsduken.JPG

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Släktträdsduken.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Släktträdsduken.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth O (talk) 09:41, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, jdx Re: 20:53, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image without license

File:Kosta-Boda vinglas, 2018 TEST.webm

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 14:56, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Grönsö slott, Röda förmaket, 1968.jpg

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Grönsö slott, Röda förmaket, 1968.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:24, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ingen källa och upphovsman?? Allt som behövs finns på beskrivningssidan. Källa: Slott och herresäten i Sverige - Uppland, Skapare: Erik Liljeroth. Eller vad menar du? Jag tar bort din tagg! --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Din bild "Husnummer Strandvägen 78.jpg"

Hej! Eftersom jag ska lägga in en del bilder med husnummer, var jag inne och kikade på kategoriseringen av andras bilder (varav en del råkade vara dina). Jag såg en bild från Strandvägen 78, den biten av Strandvägen heter ju numera Dag Hammarskjölds väg. Jag tänkte bara höra om du kommer att lägga till någon uppdatering i beskrivningen?

Kul för övrigt att se dina bilder! :-) // Zquid (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fixat! --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 16:53, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
"Gillar" :-) // Zquid (talk) 09:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Repeated deletion requests

Hi, please read the previous closure statements. If the owner of the building thinks that they have a legal base for their request, they can contact OTRS, so that we can direct them to our legal department. Don't nominate the files again. Jcb (talk) 09:47, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Jcb, what is the correct email address to ORTS the owner should use?
The Swedish law is clear: Photographing buildings, whether public or private, is permitted by law as long as the photographer is in public place. The photographs can then be used in printed matter and other two-dimensional shapes. Thus, permission from an owner of a building is not required to photograph the building. Authorization is required only when the photographer walks onto the landowner's land, private property.--Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 10:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
When was the building built? I would think that the copyright on the building has expired, so that this law is irrelevant. Jcb (talk) 10:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Jcb. Swedish law makes no difference if the house is new or old. The photographer must be authorized if he is in private land. It was my fault and once again I ask you to delete the pictures. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 10:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Arkitektur- och Designcentrum 2014a.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Arkitektur- och Designcentrum 2014a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 20:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fiskaren mindre 14, april 2019g.jpg etc.

Hi Holger, as you are surely aware, per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Sweden#Freedom_of_panorama FoP in Sweden is currently in dispute. As you are based in Sweden, you may be more up-to-date regarding FoP legislation in Sweden than I. If the artist of this mural is known, I would recommend asking for a permission, to be on the safe side. --Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Fiskargatan 9, sept 2010.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Fiskargatan 9, sept 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ChoHyeri (talk) 10:44, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]