User talk:Humboldt

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Lac_Tempe.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 03:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Tenganan category[edit]

Hello,
I don't understand this modification. Tenganan is a village of course, but there is no category for "Village in Indonesia" so "Cities in Indonesia" seems a good category.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 07:54, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Ca a l'air parfait maintenant.
Merci bien. Amitié Liné1 (talk) 08:46, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Bujang valley.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bujang valley.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kam Solusar (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

hindu temples in Indonesia[edit]

hi there, why did you remove the category "Hindu temples in Indonesia" from Category:Prambanan? I have readded it. Gryffindor (talk) 13:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Locator jambi.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 03:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Transwiki[edit]

Hi, if you are moving files to commons like you did here it is important to pay attention to the gfdl, which requires a history of revisions. I completed your upload, but please be more careful in future. If you are from france you may find further informations in the french wikipedia: Images which are no on commons will be listed under Catégorie:Désormais sur Commons, there are some hints. You may also use Commons-helper, who helps you generating the description pages. --Martin H. (talk) 09:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

You did several uploads in the past which needs correction, please help. --Martin H. (talk) 10:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Answer: See for example the difference on image Locator jambi.png (EXAMPLE). The main problem was, to find the original upload on the id.wikipedia (my Indonesian is a bit rusty these days ;) ), so it is very helpful, if you figure out the original imagenames and pages and link them in the information field (e.g.: source=[http://id.id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkas:...), so it is better to see, where the image comes from.
The gdfl requires the complete upload history (see example), the information is not lost if the image is originaly deletet on id.wiki, if the origin of the file is known. Thanks for your help. --Martin H. (talk) 17:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

upload from id.wikipedia[edit]

halo Humboldt, not image from id.wikipedia appropriate uploaded to commons. mungkin anda bisa melihat beberapa contoh gambar berikut ini :

  • Image:Reog Ponorogo Indonesia.jpg , di id.wikipedia file tersebut diambil dari en.wikipedia, akan tetapi pada commons anda mencantumkan file tersebut berasal dari id.wikipedia .
  • Image:Puhsarang.jpg, di id.wikipedia file tersebut bukanlah Berlisensi Bebas dan tidaklah di perbolehkan di muat di commons. dan beberapa gambar lain yang saya perhatikan dengan sembarangan anda upload ke commons atau mencantumkan jenis lisensi yang salah.
FYI saya adalah salah satu pengurus di id.wikipedia dan sedang menelusuri berkas-berkas yang duplikat dengan commons.

untuk selanjutnya harap perhatikan dan baca dengan cermat jenis lisensi berkas-berkas yang berasal dari id.wikipedia. Salam --Totty ( ) 17:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Puhsarang.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Puhsarang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 22:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:USS McMorris (DE-1036).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 22:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Category Tree[edit]

Halo Djoehana, Saya sedang mencari tool untuk dapat menempatkan foto2 yang sudah saya upload maupun yang akan saya upload ke kategori tree yang telah ada, sehingga tidak perlu terlalu merepotkan orang lain untuk selalu mengedit/merevisi categori foto2 saya. Saya melihat anda mengedit kategori Hindu temples in Java.. bisakah anda memberi sedikit tuntunan? Trims ESCapade (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Foto Dwarapala Candi Singosari[edit]

Belum sempat kepotret, tapi udah liat arcanya. Berhadap-hadapan membelakangi gunung Arjuna. ESCapade (talk) 10:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Humboldt!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Borobudur Panoramic View.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:37, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


File:Candi Cetho.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Candi Cetho.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--MGA73 (talk) 18:42, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Image:Candi Cetho.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Image:Candi Cetho.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 18:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Please don't blank pages[edit]

Hi Djoehana, thanks for helping out with the Tropenmuseum images. Please don't blank categories when you rename them. Tag them with {{New name}} or {{New name}}. Multichill (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Kings?[edit]

I have never seen the Yogya or Solo rulers/royalty ever called kings - was the category for simplicity? I think a qualifier needs to be put that they were never called by that usage - would you agree with that? SatuSuro (talk) 04:50, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Bringing text over - your mutiple identity is very confusing

if you read for instance A History of Modern Indonesia since c. 1300 by M. C. Ricklefs (ISBN 0-8047-2195-5) of the Australian National University, who is considered as one of the most respected historians on Indonesia,

I should know he, if he hasnt thrown the towel, is based in Singapore now and he read my attempt at a thesis about a royal graveyard (sic) and didnt like it - my life was taken up for 10 years plus thinking about sultans/susuhunans as rulers and never kings - apart from having had communciations with him over years - I also did his bio stub on wp en.

you will see that he calls entities like Pajang, Mataram, Surakarta and Yogyakarta "kingdoms" and their rulers (as a logical linguistic consequence) "kings".

Convenience for english speakers

In Indonesia, we say they are "raja", of which the closest translation into English is "king".

menurut pendapat orang translator - I would never use king - and my first supervisor ahli Jawa agreed ruler is far more appropriate

So I can't agree with you.

Thats fine - we are here to try to resolve issues, and as I say my ahli jawa always advised ruler as being far more appropriate specially for Mataram and Yogya and Solo polity.

"King" is a general term to designate the ruler of a polity called "kingdom". The kings are Surakarta bear the title of Susuhunan, which is untranslatable into English. Those of Yogyakarta bear the title of "sultan", which has been adopted by the English language. But both are titles born by kings

I cannot agree with you - as I would always, after spending ten years + utilising the horrible orang belanda translations of the Javanese cultural world, and having lived and listened to the conversations amongst juru kunci at my royal gravesite will always defer to 'ruler' - so there we have it.

Cheers and thanks for your response - I am not going to actually change anything - but, but If I add any text where I come across usage as saying that the term 'king' I will probably parenthetically add that 'ruler' is far more appropriate.

Just in case you want to haul out the usual kamus definitions of the use of raja - please dont bother - they lack any sense of etymological depth or any sense of where things come from or the variances of usage in time or in space - I simply am claiming that to ascertain from any one source as a definitive usage simply doesnt carry any weight with me - specially when we start looking at basa jawa - indonesian word play. At the point we hunt down Revo or readup Romo Zoet's work - for some third opinions :) SatuSuro (talk) 10:11, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

I do hope I am not misunderstood here - I am not trying to ask you to change it - or to change it - I was very keen to get your reasoning for the usage - and I appreciate you using a specific text and offering your interpretation. I hadnt outlined my experience dealing with usages during my internship in Central Java of some 15 years ago - and would not expect you to know - but hey I am extra cautious when making a claim to authority over meaning, so it was good to get your side. Cheers SatuSuro (talk) 10:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your understanding response - and thanks for taking the time to respond - I really appreciate it - yes I think really in the end we might thinking about living with a stange combination of 'kingdom' and 'ruler' - if we can live with that - a very strange mix but I tend to remember hearing of the late Pangeran Diponegoro who is allegedly said the earlier version of Bahasa Indonesia was the language of the chooks (ayam) - and the Javanese terms might in fact be of more assistance - but the terms can be even more ambiguous to those not familiar with Javanese culture. I suggest we leave the categories as they are - and perhaps over time that when the Tropenmuseum material is slowly pulled into shape we will have some further need to refine categories with appropriate terms, and perhaps scratch our heads again as to what would Diponegoro say? or even more esoterically what would have alm Romo Zoetmulder have said of the terms... SatuSuro (talk) 13:46, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Somehow I have ended up answering the last comment by gnangarra at my own talk page :( - it is stirring a lot of memories - might need a day or two to think through all the issues - sorry to have invaded your talk page so extensively - thanks for your good faith response to my extended discussion - I will get back to you on this all - cheers SatuSuro (talk) 13:58, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

I think we might need a conversation at some point about categories - I am in the process of pruning by hot cat from various central java temples - categories that I fee a re grandparent cats sitting with grandchildren cats. You are most welcome to revert any of my changes if you find that I have contravened the intent of COM:OVERCAT or COM:C - cheers SatuSuro (talk) 01:26, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Nah - by now it is no big deal the categories are being cleaned up by other editors bots anyway - although there have been arguments that Borobudur may have started as a hindu structure, and evolved into a buddhist - when I find old dutch photos with 'hindu monument' for borobudur I dont believe them. As far as I know all central javanese temples have been found with distinct sculptures that give the id clearly ( b or h) - as for other parts of java/indonesia I havent investigated enough - thanks for your response - and my we continue this interesting discussion over time - as for the word austronesian and it use - that is another conversation again sometime - cheers SatuSuro (talk) 14:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Translation request[edit]

Hi Djoehana, I'm working on getting the Commons templates available in more languages. A lot of languages are already complete, but Indonesian isn't. Would you be willing to help out? Translation is done at http://translatewiki.net . If you want to help you can leave a note here and start translating here. Might look like a long list, but with some clever copy and pasting (have the list of countries open) it shouldn't take up a lot of time. Translation are generally available at Commons within 48 hours. Multichill (talk) 09:35, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Hindu temples[edit]

Yes, it was in some of the 19th century pictures of Borobudur - they have in their titles 'hindu monument' - they did that sort of thing then :( SatuSuro (talk) 13:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

X I cross the mention of any kings after our previous conversations :0 - as for any of the material relative to candi or temples or whatever - please note I am trying always to reduce down to as few categories as possible - trying to make sure parent/child categories are not found together - so I do hope I do not step on any toes when I do that. In other words apologies in advance if I removed categories that you might have added :) - I try to keep the category space simple SatuSuro (talk) 13:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Category:Sangir Islands[edit]

You should use {{Move}} if you want to rename a category. The name you redirected to is different than the one in use at the enwp. You might want to have that page renamed. Multichill (talk) 17:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello Multichill, I don't understand your position. The original name is Sangihe. Just look at any version other than the English one. Sangir is the name of the people and the language. Why should the English version prevail? Anyway, it can be changed as well... :-) Humboldt (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Because that happens to be our naming of categories policy, see Commons:Categories. Please don't hop talk pages. Multichill (talk) 20:17, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, my English is deficient so I don't grasp what you mean by "hopping". Anyway, I will not let myself be drawn into a fight about Indonesian names being corrected by "categorists". Meanwhile, I have changed the name to en:Sangihe Islands, but I suppose you will decide what is correct or not... :-) Humboldt (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
I started a discussion here, so you should respond here. Hopping is spreading a discussion over multiple talk pages. Changing a category into a redirect should only be done in obvious cases. In other cases it's better to use move and just wait. We'll see what happens :-) Multichill (talk) 20:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Its odd to think I might be the native english speaker trying to keep up with you both (trying to follow, aka mencari apa apa) - I personally object to a larger number of categories for Indonesian subjects/things here on commons, but have not done anything about it so far SatuSuro (talk) 00:06, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
I am more concerned that there are some categories created here in commons that do not tie into anything on en wp - unless they exist in id wp? SatuSuro (talk) 09:50, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Moslem?[edit]

Mohon maaf kalau saya menganggu atau yang lain - sorry I am not very sure where you got that from (Moslem graves) - we need to have a very serious discussion about your category creation exercises if you are going to invent that sort of stuff - Islamic or muslim might be closer to the mark SatuSuro (talk) 01:21, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

And if you read http://hnn.us/articles/524.html it is outright offensive - and should not be used in a multilingual context like commons SatuSuro (talk) 01:43, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Maybe I am wrong? maybe Islamic cemeteries? SatuSuro (talk) 03:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Multichills answer I think is a good one - in some cases religious type might be too narrow a scope - SatuSuro (talk) 03:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Sri_Mulyani.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sri_Mulyani.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 16:22, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

So what is happening?[edit]

With the royal graves categories? SatuSuro (talk) 14:19, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

OK i think I see the pattern - no problems SatuSuro (talk) 14:31, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Selamat tahun baru[edit]

Good to see you still hard at it! cheers - have a good new year!! SatuSuro (talk) 00:09, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Correct?[edit]

Hi Djoehana, could you review the edits like this one? I'm not sure these edits are correct. We're using a layered structure and I'm not sure if I'm happy with another layer here. Multichill (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

I'd like to see the reply to this as well SatuSuro (talk) 05:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC) I have left comments at Multichill's talk page SatuSuro (talk) 06:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Cheng_Hoo1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cheng_Hoo1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sven Manguard (talk) 21:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kota Sabang.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kota Sabang.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Kota Sabang.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth_O (talk) 07:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:MaumereBay.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MaumereBay.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:MaumereBay.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Smooth_O (talk) 08:43, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Reply to your category question[edit]

Suggest you please contact the user that made this edit DIFF, thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 19:02, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Islamic architecture in Indonesia[edit]

Hi, you're right, forgive me for the mistake. --Z 20:48, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Company_managers_of_the_Netherlands_Indies[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Company_managers_of_the_Netherlands_Indies has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Ivan Pozdeev (talk) 10:20, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


File:Migration map4.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Migration map4.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cavann (talk) 20:16, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Also notified original creator in English Wikipedia [1] Cavann (talk) 20:28, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Plumpungan inscription translation.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Plumpungan inscription translation.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 21:19, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Peta Kepulauan Sula.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Peta Kepulauan Sula.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 18:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)


Oh dear[edit]

So when did the idea to change from Adisucipto to Adisutjipto actually come from? Please explain, as I see no reason why you should have done that sats (talk) 09:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

OK so the airport still has signs with the old spelling, and the international flying information has new spelling. Bodoh sekali. or in english dumb. Inconsistent. sats (talk) 09:23, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

inconsistency makes a fool of an encyclopedia that tries to keep things in order... pandering to the idiosyncracies of indonesian inconsistencies makes the editor ?... I see it a bit like the time and space people wasted in this project trying to show the emperor he has no clothes. the emperor has no clothes and spends a lot of time trying to prove he has them. it must be commons. sats (talk) 14:35, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Bogor_Agricultural_Institute[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Bogor_Agricultural_Institute has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Hysocc (talk) 12:12, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Please note[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plumeria specifically states that Frangipani are Kamboja in Indonesian, and the original file sources show that the dutch spelling is Kemboja - I fail to see how you can arrive at Kemboja for english? sats (talk) 05:26, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

apology - happy new year - my mis-reading of edit histories once again sats (talk) 09:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Terminal abdulrahman saleh.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Terminal abdulrahman saleh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 12:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Sky Aviation di Blimbingsari.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sky Aviation di Blimbingsari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gunnex (talk) 15:43, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Bays by province[edit]

Hi Humboldt. I see you just recreated an already deleted category Category:Bays of North Sulawesi. I previously requested this category to be deleted as don't see the point of categorizing large geographic features by small and changing administrative subdivisions. Many of the large bays of Sulawesi are shared between multiple provinces, so placing images into subcategories by province makes them harder to find. I think mixing up physical geography and human geography is confusing. --ELEKHHT 12:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Bls: Kantor kecamatan[edit]

Halo, maaf baru sempat membalas. Sempat berpikir lama, saya setuju untuk pengategorian per provinsi, tapi mungkin saya tambahkan di berkas baru saja. Kalau berkas lama, ga sanggup, foto kantor camat yang saya potret ada ratusan! Ezagren (talk) 07:36, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Bawean2.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to licensing Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content : images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Bawean2.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.


Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | svenska | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 22:43, 26 December 2014 (UTC)