User talk:Husky

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Add a commment or question to my talk page

Eigenaardig fotoprobleem[edit]

Dag Husky. Vandaag werd deze deze foto geupload die oa zonder licentie op commons nu staat. Ik diende een verwijderverzoek in daarom. De uploader reageerde zojuist daarop op mijn overlegpagina. Zou je de uploader behulpzaam kunnen zijn in al de adminstratieve handelingen die moeten gebeuren? Mvg Sonty (talk) 15:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Boeing787 model transparant.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Boeing787 model transparant.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:02, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

missing OTRS in Wikiportrait[edit]

Hi, I noticed File:Peter Niemeyer.JPG is missing OTRS number. --Jarekt (talk) 19:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi again, When I wrote the above message I was under impression you ware the uploader of the image. I apologize for my confusion. --Jarekt (talk) 02:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Openbeelden[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
User:Openbeelden has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.81.72.88 16:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Follow up[edit]

I just had a look at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Paintings by Theo van Doesburg which we were discussing before I had read it. This is just a quick note to say that I agree with the decision and rationale there. --99of9 (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

"glamwiki" on YouTube[edit]

Hi Hay. Are you the owner of the "glamwiki" channel on YouTube? I was asking around a little while ago trying to find out who has the password so that we can start using that channel for GLAM-Wiki videos, and Multichill pointed me your way. Could you share the password with me if you have it? Thanks! Dominic (talk) 16:18, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't mean to pester you, but I'd like to be able to have this to upload content this week, if possible. Can you get back to me? Thanks! Dominic (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:HuskyBot[edit]

I noticed this bot in recent changes/unpatrolled. 3500 edits without a flag seems a bit off, so I've temporarily blocked the account. I've asked about this on Commons:Bureaucrats' noticeboard#User:HuskeyBot as well. INeverCry 17:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. I've added something to the discussion on the noticeboard. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 18:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Husky,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anefo[edit]

Hello Husky, your bot is adding a Nationaal Archief template and is removing the Images from Anefo category. If an image is from Nationaal Archief, it does not necessarily mean the image is from Anefo. The image could also be from elsewhere. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jan Arkesteijn: you're right. However, there are two Nationaal Archief templates: you've got Template:Nationaal Archief-license and Template:Nationaal Archief. The first adds both 'Images from Nationaal Archief' and 'Images from Anefo'.
The second one only adds 'Image from Nationaal Archief'. For example, File:NL-HaNA 1.01.19 2623 011 Unie van Utrecht.jpg only has 'Images from Nationaal Archief' because it uses the {Nationaal Archief} template, while File:Piet Zwart-NL-HaNA 2.24.01.03-917-1515.jpg has both categories because it uses {Nationaal Archief-license}.
Unfortunately the template name is a little bit confusing. I guess something like {Nationaal Archief - Anefo} would have made more sense. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 12:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Confusing it is. It is not a good idea to manage the categories through templates. In this case it shows, but for new contributors it is downright incomprehensible. It makes contributing to Wikipedia a mess. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh yes, i completely agree that it's confusing. However, there are good reasons why you want to add the categories using the template. For example, if you ever want to change the category on all of these images you only need to edit in in one place (the template). Otherwise, you need to run a bot through the complete collection to change it. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 12:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Even that advantage does not outweigh the disadvantage, I think. Anyway, it's better to rename one of the templates, to at least shed some light on it. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'll add that to my todo list (the renaming). Unfortunately, renaming a template involves editing all pages that already have it :(. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 12:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, it goes to show: ieder voordeel heb zijn nadeel. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Johan Cruyff in trainingspak Nederlands Elftal , kop.jpg. En zo is het. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 13:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

KB categories[edit]

example of a template change that puts the file into the "contributed by KB" category, though they didn't actively contribute it

Hmm, I saw that this now is in the category "media contributed by KB" as well as "images from KB", but I think only the ones that they actively contributed themselves should be in the "contributed by" category. Thpughts? Jane023 (talk) 09:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey Jane, yes you're right. I was rearranging the categories, and it's less work to throw everything together and rearrange later than to go through all the files individually. I'll sort it out! Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 13:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK sounds like a big job - good luck with it! Jane023 (talk) 12:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reply on your comment at Template talk:Artwork/Archiv/2014#Wikidata parameter[edit]

Beste Husky, you should be able to edit Template:Artwork/doc. Thanks for doing it! Cheers, --Marsupium (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mondrian lookalike.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mondrian lookalike.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Uncle Fred 19:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Knuffels.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Knuffels.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vikiçizer (talk) 22:24, 13 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Plush Toys.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Plush Toys.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vikiçizer (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Wikipedia course group Gouda.JPG[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Husky!
Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

YvoBentele (talk) 15:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Datering foto van Wikiportret van Corinne Kruger[edit]

Beste Husky, ik kwam foto tegen van Corinne Kruger: File:Corinne-kruger-1427711918.jpg. De foto is kennelijk gemaakt door Lars Mennen en door jou upgeload vanaf Wikiportret en voorzien van datering 30 maart 2015. Die datum kan niet kloppen, gezien het overleden zijn van Kruger, een nogal vervelende onjuistheid, mijns inziens.

Volgens de "verborgen" metadata zou de foto met Photoshop zijn gedigitaliseerd op 23 feb 2009. Als dat klopt is de foto niet later dan die datum gemaakt, maar zou wel eerder kunnen zijn gemaakt. Met vriendelijke groet , --Paulbe (talk) 09:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kleine aanpassing in gahetNA template[edit]

Ha Husky. Op https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Timmietovenaar#template_Nationaal_Archief vraagt Hannolans zich af of de al te expliciete verwijzing naar het samenwerkingsverband gewijzigd kan worden zodat het template ook gebruikt kan worden door andere gebruikers. Zou dat mogelijk zijn? Zelf lukt het mij niet om aan het template te knutselen omdat het beveiligd is.

File:Kmt hilversum.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kmt hilversum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hanswol (talk) 10:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ☎ 12:06, 22 March 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Tom kok.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tom kok.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tom kok.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

IagoQnsi (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Beerbottle dezeezuiper.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Beerbottle dezeezuiper.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

. HombreDHojalata.talk 23:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Beerbottle troubadour.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Beerbottle troubadour.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

. HombreDHojalata.talk 23:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Beerbottle liefmans abdis.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Beerbottle liefmans abdis.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Bahasa Melayu  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

. HombreDHojalata.talk 23:32, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Presentatie(s) op WMNL verenigingswiki[edit]

Beste gebruiker,

In het verleden heb je één of meerdere presentaties geüpload naar de verenigingswiki van Wikimedia Nederland. Wij zouden deze graag toevoegen aan ons presentatiearchief op Wikimedia Commons. Er is echter geen licentieinformatie opgegeven bij de oorspronkelijke upload(s) naar de verenigingswiki waardoor het niet mogelijk is de upload over te zetten met Commonshelper. Daarom zouden we je willen vragen of je de presentaties zelf alsnog zou willen uploaden naar Wikimedia Commons, en ze in Category:Wikimedia Nederland presentations zou willen plaatsen. Hartelijk dank!

Met vriendelijke groet, --AWossink (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hee Arne. Om welke presentaties gaat het? Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 10:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dat is een snelle reactie! Het zou gaan om:
Alvast hartelijk dank! Groet, --AWossink (talk) 11:06, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dag Arne, ik heb ze allemaal geupload op Commons (onder iets meer beschrijvende namen). De enige waar ik dat niet bij heb gedaan is de Wiki Loves Art presentatie (deze). Die heb ik niet zelf gemaakt, en ik heb het idee dat de afbeeldingen daarin ook niet allemaal CC-BY-SA zijn. Risico neem ik dan liever niet om het op Commons te zetten. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 22:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Begrijpelijk! In ieder geval heel erg bedankt voor het uploaden van de andere presentaties! Dat maakt ons archief hier weer een stuk beter! Groet, --AWossink (talk) 11:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rietveld_Schr%C3%B6derhuis[edit]

Dear Husky,

I am a Prof. in Architectureand I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rietveld_Schr%C3%B6derhuis. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia, or we can use your proper name if you prefer. Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com --hippofish 19:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 19:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I send you an e-mail! Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 08:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
hi, nice uploads. i may be converting some of your metadata to artwork template, i.e. [1]

i would suggest you look at commons:pattypan for mass uploads, it is great. cheers. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 12:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! And you're welcome to convert my uploads to {artwork} of course. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 13:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Brug 213[edit]

Je raadt het nooit, maar ik had je foto "Dijksgracht street end.jpg" nodig. Waarom heb je deze oerlelijke brug (wist je wel dat het een brug was?) gefotografeerd? In ieder geval dank daarvoor!,Ceescamel (talk) 14:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dag Cees, wat leuk zeg. Ik wist wel dat het een brug was, maar niet dat het ding ook nog een nummer had. Ik heb toen een hele serie foto's van de Dijksgracht gemaakt, en deze zat er toevallig tussen. Waarom heb jij 'm nodig? Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 08:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Uiteraard voor de/een serie over bruggen (dus op naar 214) in Amsterdam. En daarmaa ook een inkijkje in de geschiedenis van Amsterdam. Het leuke is dan dat ik van deze brug, waarvan bijna niemand het bestaan weet een foto vond, terwijl van bruggen in de binnenstad waar iedereen over heen loopt soms nauwelijks een recente foto is.Ceescamel (talk) 10:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Als je verzoekjes hebt wil ik best een keer een foto in de binnenstand voor je maken. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 09:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons bot inactivity[edit]

Hello!

Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 5 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you wish for your bot to retain it's bot flag, please speak up on the deflag page. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can re-request the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards, ~riley (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Expiry of GWToolset user group memberships[edit]

There is a proposal on the Bureaucrat's noticeboard to automatically expire GWT memberships after one year unless the user requests an extension. Please add your views and suggestions to the discussion. The reasonably informal process for getting access to GWT access will remain as is.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Revi. 15:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, (talk) 20:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File copyright status[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your recent file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:45, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jeff G.: , i'm not quite sure to which 'recent file uploads' you are referring to. As you might have seen from my user page, i've been a Commons user for quite a while so i'm pretty well aware of the rules considering copyright violations. Maybe you could be a bit more specific? Cheers. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 21:09, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Photos of plushies. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Percy Plush and the links thereon.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jan Asselijn - The Threatened Swan.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Jan Asselijn - The Threatened Swan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 22:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wikimeet06012007-07.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Wikimeet06012007-07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ciell (talk) 11:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted file - userpage[edit]

Hallo Husky, zonet zag ik dat deze niet meer bestaat. Misschien wil je het gaatje wel opvullen hiermee? Face-smile.svg Lotje (talk) 16:32, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Lotje: , hee wat gek. Die afbeelding is blijkbaar verwijderd, maar het is mij volstrekt onduidelijk waarom. Ik kan 'm niet vinden in de deletion logs, en er is ook geen deletion request aangemaakt. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 16:39, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wat jammer nou! Lotje (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ik zie als moderator geen logs of deleted versions onder die filenaam? Ciell (talk) 18:06, 27 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Een rename zonder redirect is toch ook mogelijk? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 13:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dan zou ik als Commons moderator het eigenlijk nog wel in het logboek moeten zien, maar er is helemaal geen logboek onder die naam... Ciell (talk) 19:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Andere mogelijkheid: Husky (of iemand anders) maakte nooit het bestand aan. :-) Lotje (talk) 06:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Naturalis-Homo-Erectus-Dubois.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Naturalis-Homo-Erectus-Dubois.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bill gates portrait.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bill gates portrait.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bill gates portrait.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Bill gates portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Textielmuseum-cabinet-10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Textielmuseum-cabinet-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bruggen[edit]

Husky; jij bouwt gevaarlijke bruggen. Aan de ene kant op water invaren en aan de andere kant alleen maar land.:-) Het zijn twee aparte bruggen. Links is 962, waarvan binnenkort een artikel en dan zal ik ook de foto hernoemen.Ceescamel (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Brug 432
brug 432


Goed gespot! Ik zie dat ik het in de beschrijving wel duidelijk heb gemaakt dat het niet om die brug gaat, maar in de bestandsnaam is dat inderdaad niet zo heel handig. Ik kon destijds denk ik niet vinden dat het viaduct zelf ook een brugnummer had, maar dat weet jij natuurlijk beter dan ik. Dank! Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 14:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Depictor stats[edit]

Hello! Roughly how many images are processed with Depictor daily? Thanks! EpicPupper (talk) 13:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@EpicPupper: Great question! I've crunched a couple of numbers and i've got this:
  • Total number of images processed since August 24th 2021: around 410.000. So that would be about 1.600 a day, but edits have slowed down since the beginning. Here's a table with processed images per month for all 'completed' months:
Month Processed images
Sep 2021 92436
Oct 2021 91016
Nov 2021 81771
Dec 2021 15896
Jan 2022 27887
Feb 2022 24954
Mar 2022 39983
Apr 2022 13744
So for April it's more like 460 per day. Still quite a lot of images that are being processed! Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 22:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]