User talk:I.Sáček, senior

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

File:Anatomy_and_physiology_of_animals_A_hair-cs.jpg[edit]

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | português | português do Brasil | македонски | +/−

Image-Converted to SVG (blue).svg
Please use SVG
Thank you for uploading File:Anatomy_and_physiology_of_animals_A_hair-cs.jpg!

Did you know that the SVG format is often the best alternative for this type of image? Scalable Vector Graphics have a lot of advantages: They scale better, the file size is usually smaller then raster graphics, and they are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export, though the result is not always what you may expect. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. However, it will be also an improvement if you can export (save) this image in PNG format without artefacts and upload. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (Just to avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put the raster image into a svg container as embedded raster.)[1] Thanks, and happy editing!

RE RILLKE Questions? 11:49, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Pozdrav[edit]

Zdravím milovníka přírody. Děkuji za moc pěkné fotografie, které ukládáte na commons. Pokusím se je nějak blíže kategorizovat.--Dendrofil (talk) 17:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Fern identification[edit]

Perhaps File:Adiantum2.jpg and File:Adiantum0003.jpg are Asplenium trichomanes, not Adiantum? Choess (talk) 03:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC).

Yes, this fern is Asplenium trichomanes, Sleziník červený, probably. Is it my mistake.--I.Sáček, senior (talk) 14:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, I.Sáček, senior!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:12, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

I use some of your photos[edit]

Hi I.Sáček, senior!

I have use two photos of Otaria byronia from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directly in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") twice:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=34432


If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=I.%20S%E1cek

This is my "contributor card", for example:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn


In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón

--Fernando.lison (talk)

Thanks for your report, Fernando Lisón. I'm glad for it. Enjoy my work with patience.--I.Sáček, senior (talk) 20:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for you, of course!! Anything for your "contributor card" http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=I.%20S%E1cek ? --Fernando.lison (talk)

Copyright status: File:7.díl html 63bcefb2.png[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:7.díl html 63bcefb2.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your message, problem now solved.I.Sáček, senior (talk) 06:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:6.díl html m2a4253bb.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:6.díl html m2a4253bb.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 08:00, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

URL adresa byla v pořádku, soubor lze dohledat v případě potřeby. Zpřesnil jsem jej, protože to vyžadujete Vy. Já nepotřebuji dokonale přesný odkaz ani existenci tohoto souboru na Wikimedia Commons. Udané soubory jsou snadno dohledatelné. Pokyn dokonale přesné adresy neexistuje a dost mne to zatěžuje. A zcela zbytečně. Pokud potřebujete smazat nějaké soubory Vy, protože Vy pochybujete o správnosti mnou udaných informací, projděte si soubory, které jsem načetl a smažte ty které se Vám nezdají. Veselé vánoce. I.Sáček, senior (talk) 13:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
You are indeed required by Commons policy to provide complete and verifiable source information when uploading. Thank you for providing the full address. With that information, I was able to correct the incorrect date, authorship and PD information that you initially provided. LX (talk, contribs) 13:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Poskytl jsem "fully correct" informace, které bylo možné z daného historického zdroje vyčíst. Správné a pravdivé. Je to tak? Mám snad u každého obrázku který byl v osmnáctém století odvozen od zdroje z desátého století pátrat po prapůvodci? To je tady běžný požadavek? Mimochodem, obávám se, že jste k obrázku vložil zavádějící a neúplné informace. I.Sáček, senior (talk) 14:06, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
To, co jste původně uvedl, bylo datum vzniku díla 2013 a jako zdroj jen zcela nekonkrétní archive.org (což nijak neprokazuje, že je to konkrétní dílo svobodně šiřitelné, a tedy na Commons přijatelné). Nemusíte „pátrat po prapůvodci“, v tomto případě by stačilo uvést přesně a správně to, co už víte. --Mormegil (talk) 11:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Jenže já nevím. Nevím. Neznám přesnou adresu knihy kterou jsem četl před rokem a vybral si z ní fotografii, a tu fotografii použil v dokumentu a z toho dokumentu ji teď převedl na obrázek abych ji mohl tady použít. Musím ji hledat. A než ji najdu tak to trvá. Nemyslím že by ale bylo v nápovědě uvedeno něco přesnějšího odhledně adresy. V každém případě se hádat nebudu. Pokud jsem sice dobře pochopil, tak archive.org není youtube.org, nicméně to asi viditelně nestačí. Pokud se vám nějaká z černobílých neostrých rozpitých fotografií, které jsem načetl bude zdát nějak opravdu podezřelá nebo ty soubory nebudete moci v Commons mít, protože mají adresu archive.org, což je podezřelé, nebo jen odkaz na stránku s naskenovanou knihou z osmnáctého století v níž někde může (ale ve skutečnosti opravdu vůbec nemusí) hledaná ilustrace být ( to je podezřelé, že o tom mluvím), vymažte je prosím. Rád se přizpůsobím a ušetřím si (a Vám) námahu. Omlouvám se za vzniklé potíže a velice děkuji. Až budu mít rok nebo dva čas, tak se načítání a přesnému popisování a dokladování budu věnovat. Zatím děkuji a hezký den přeji I.Sáček, senior (talk) 14:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC) .

Category:Plant collection of Gymnázium Brno-Řečkovice‎[edit]

Dobrý den. Domnívám se, že není důvod, proč by školní botanické zahrady neměly být kategorizovány mezi botanické zahrady - a to bez ohledu na to, zda jsou či nejsou veřejně přístupné. --ŠJů (talk) 00:18, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Dobrý den. Znaky pro - zahrada musí mít systém a klasifikaci, rostliny jsou víceméně uspořádány podle výskytu Evropa, Asie, Středomoří a podobně, více či méně i podle biotopů, ačkoliv bylo snahou aby více méně tvořily nějaké dekorativní celky.
Znaky proti - zahrada musí plnit funkci botanické zahrady - neexistují popisy (děti je devastují a obvykle stále znovu a znovu zaměňují, je to velká legrace), tedy lze ji špatně využít jako botanickou zahradu, není využita k výuce botaniky nebo biologie, pokud vím. Je to dobrá školní zahrada, škoda že to není spíše RPG na počítači.
Není to botanická zahrada, je to školní zahrada - zahrada u školy, možná v minulých letech učebna pod širým nebem, možná hřiště. Bohužel nic víc. Když si udělám úplně stejně soukromou zahradu na které bude šedesát a více druhů rostlin bez popisu a budu ji používat jako botanickou zahradu, tedy ke studiu botaniky, bude to asi botanická zahrada. Snad může pasivně učit jednoduchými výukovými tabulemi děti, které chodí kolem nich a pod nimi a do podvědomí dětí tak gravitací prosakují informace. Slabikář ale není slovník přestože tam mohou být stejná slova.
Tohle je určitě školní zahrada. Pokud je továrna používaná jako galerie továrna, pak je toto botanická zahrada a kategorii jsem chybně odstranil.I.Sáček, senior (talk) 09:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Myslím, že nikdo nezpochybňuje, že jde o školní zahradu. Řeč je o tom, zda jde o botanickou zahradu. Školská povaha zřizovatele zahradě na její botaničnosti nic neubírá. Pokud má spíše charakter sbírky rostlin a nikoliv jen pozemků pro pracovní vyučování či zahrady pro přestávkovou rekreaci žáků, tak stěží mohou být o její povaze botanické zahrady rozumné pochyby. A fakt, že je botanická zahrada nějak poškozena nebo špatně vybavena, také nic nemění na její povaze. --ŠJů (talk) 15:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Ano, má spíše charakter sbírky rostlin podobné botanické zahradě, nikoliv pozemků se zeleninou nebo fotbalového hřiště. I.Sáček, senior (talk) 15:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Meripilus giganteus[edit]

You may be right. See my talk-page... Kleuske (talk) 12:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Photo usage permission[edit]

Dear Mr. Sáček, I am writing to you for your kind permission to use the nice photo of Abutilon theophrasti (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Abutilon_th333.jpg). I want to use it in our student textbook about invasive biology. The URL and your name will appear together with the photo in the textbook. Thank you in advance. Mingxing

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mesing (talk • contribs) 09:29, 13 November 2014‎ (UTC)

Dear master, this photo is free for your pleasure, for your use. As your own. Is very low quality, sorry. If you can use photo for science, I will very glad for it. Thanks. --I.Sáček, senior (talk) 06:31, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

And information: In those same locality, in this year (2014), are not any abutiolons (or very low count), in site is growing corn. Population up in first decade 21. century, after this 2011 count were low. --I.Sáček, senior (talk) 06:40, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Domovský list 0014.jpeg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Domovský list 0014.jpeg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)


Category:Diseases and disorders of plants by biological agent[edit]

Hi I.Sáček, senior, please understand that this is not an appropriate category for your images. Like all "... by ..." categories, for instance

it should be used for subcategories only. Therefore please use one of the subcategories of Category:Diseases and disorders of plants by biological agent to categorize WHAT biological agent causes the diseases and disorders of the plants in your images. If you don't know the biological agent, simply use Category:Diseases and disorders of plants. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 20:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Good day, master
I understand very well, it will be done i next time. But in few cases it is here only for symptoms. This symptoms is no typicaly for one group of patogens, but for plants. Today, unfortunately, I did not see what I pictures gave here (no thumbs). --I.Sáček, senior (talk) 21:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)