User talk:INeverCry/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive 1 Archive 2 →
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, INeverCry!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Wikimedia Commons Welcome 05:28, January 10, 2009‎


You're now a filemover

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

Commons File mover.svg

Hi INeverCry/Archive 1, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

--Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


Thank you for the file rename of File:Upload Wizard User Test 9 - User D.ogv! :) The Helpful One 18:58, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) INeverCry 19:10, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Heusden schandpaal

Hello, You changed the name of this file which was incorrectly named as a schandpaal (pillory). The borderstone however never was intended as a pillory. A similar borderstone stands near my house and is mentioned in the dutch monumentregister as a borderstone. Unfortunately user Foroa keeps reverting the improvements without any good reason, and numerous good reasons on the talkpage why it can not be a pillory, are simply ignored with the poor reason that the original name of the file was right. Can you please help reasoning with this user? Thank you. LeeGer (talk) 15:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

What's needed here is a reliable source supporting either pillory or borderstone. Otherwise the dispute can't be resolved. The blog reference is not a reliable source. A reference from an official area website, or an area newspaper website, etc, is what's required. In the absence of a reliable ref, the alternatives are to keep it as it is with the dispute notation in place, or to reach consensus on a neutral name. INeverCry 20:59, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
I do have a photograph of a similar borderstone on my mobile phone. Just can't get it uploaded as linking it to this laptop won't work. It's exactly the same kind of pole, with the same coat of arms and the same year. This one is listed on the goverment monumentregister as a borderstone. See here (dutch). LeeGer (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Since this file is now protected, you will have to contact User:Foroa or another admin about re-naming it. I'm not an admin, so there's really not much that I can do. INeverCry 19:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Phyllobius argentatus - Polydrusus sericeus

Please rename the File File:Silberner Grünrüssler (Phyllobius argentatus).jpg. Its 100% Polydrusus and not Phyllobius. The actual name provides false information which is already spreading throughout the wikis. If you are not sure on Polydrusus sericeus either make it Polydrusus cf. sericeus or Polydrusus ssp. (or something better fitting - like proposed in the rename template..) keeping it with the definitivly wrong name is no option.

Regards --Aiwok (talk) 12:30, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Participants of 5th Wikipedian photowalk in Budapest 02.jpg

Thank you for renaming this image. Could you help to make this file appear correctly in Category:Podmaniczky–Vigyázó mansion, Budapest and Category:Wikipedian photowalk in Rákosmente? Now I can not see the picture in these categories only the old filename (Participants of 6th ...) --Rlevente (talk) 20:58, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry to disturbing you - now the categories are correct. It seems I did not have enough patience waiting it. --Rlevente (talk) 21:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

File renaming

Could you explain why did you move a dozen or so EZB images this? Materialscientist (talk) 03:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

The moves were requested. The requests were incomplete, but it looked like the new names were more descriptive than the old shorter ones. I just filled in the criteria as #2 and moved the group of 28 or 29. The requests came from this IP. You can see this if you look at the history of each of these files. INeverCry 08:38, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
I see - surely, they should have been declined, because the old German name was Ok, and harmonization was not needed. I'll send the request to the delinker, as reverting those moves now is counterproductive, but the uploader will have all rights to object (then I'll revert the moves and reprimand you :-). Materialscientist (talk) 08:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Sorry. I'll know better next time. It's time for an unrelated break though. INeverCry 09:00, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


"When you do these move requests you need to include the criteria number"

No, I actually don't. I need to include a reason. I never included criterion numbers before the 'rename' template was altered, and I still don't. DS (talk) 20:30, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

There's a reason that when the 'rename' template was altered, it was customized so that it still works even without including a numbered criterion. That's what the double-pipe is for. DS (talk) 23:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Please stop behaving like an idiot. You are smarter than this. DS (talk) 23:16, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
You'll note that I did not call you an idiot, I said you were acting like an idiot, and that you are smarter than that; however, it would be disingenuous of me to not concede that this is a mere semantic nicety. I have included valid reasons and I always do include valid reasons, and specifying numbered criteria 2346978 1985971 1209869871 is not necessary. Don't just discard the reasons on the grounds that you don't like the format -- or, if you can't bring yourself to get involved in these, leave them for someone else. DS (talk) 23:24, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
"When there's no number, I have to delete the "no valid number" notice before making the move. If you put in a number, I just click move and confirm and it's done. Why can't you type in 1 simple number?" -- why can't you delete one simple notice? DS (talk) 23:36, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

"One more question: why does it say You need to input a value between 1 and 7 which corresponds to the file renaming criteria in big red text on the move request template if that's not necessary?" - bad design. It wasn't necessary before the template was edited to allow for greater internationalization, and it's not necessary now. If you're not comfortable with these, leave them for someone else. DS (talk) 23:39, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

I am attempting to establish a consensus for whether or not it is necessary at Commons talk:File renaming#Require_a_numeric_reason_parameter_.232_in_the_range_1-7_for_Template:Rename.   — Jeff G. ツ 20:06, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Please note that the phrase "anyone else" -- as in "I strongly disagree with your assessment, let's see if anyone else does" -- means "someone who is not INeverCry". DS (talk) 23:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Remember how, earlier, I said "you're smarter than this" ? DS (talk) 00:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Kindly cease and desist from making personal attacks, no matter how well they are veiled.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:14, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Actually, you have started using a criterion number, but the number you chose, 0, is invalid. If you're not comfortable with the syntax of the rename template, leave its use for someone else.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Commons:File renaming

Can this be of any help to you? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Filemover rights abusing

Why did you do this? Read COM:FR#Which files should not be renamed?: Files should NOT be renamed only because the filename is not English and/or is not correctly capitalized (Remember, Commons is a multilingual project, so there's no reason to favor English over other languages). File had good Russian name. So you should not rename it!--Anatoliy (talk) 00:46, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

You're completely mistaken about the reason this was moved. User:Bechamel requested the move saying the name was offensive. I figured the word "parade" might seem offensive when the image appears to show bowing slaves or servants. You should read the summary before accusing me of something that's not at all true. Thanks. INeverCry 18:50, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


OK! It's right. Thank you) --Bestalex (talk) 05:00, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Heads up

In such moves [1] (unless requested by the uploader), try to keep the original language (copy/paste from the links, use commas for conjugation if unsure about the grammar, or just skip it). This minimizes complaints, as the uploader has the right to preserve the original language, and English is by no means required. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 08:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Will do. INeverCry 17:52, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


You're right. Thanks, Laura Fiorucci (talk) 23:29, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks for your efforts.

Many thanks for your efforts. --Pixi Uno (talk) 19:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


Thanks for the help with renaming the file. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 18:12, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Glad I could help. INeverCry 21:15, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Palazzo Pisanelli.jpg

Hi INeverCry, I have read from this book I have (Napoli sacra. Guida alle chiese della città, coordinamento scientifico di Nicola Spinosa; a cura di Gemma Cautela, Leonardo Di Mauro, Renato Ruotolo, Napoli 1993-1997, 15 fascicoli.) that this tower doesn't represent a part of palazzo Pisanelli (whose voice hasn't any sources) but the bell tower of Regina Coeli church. Please may you change the name of this image? Thank you!--CityClass (talk) 13:36, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I wish you get well soon very heartily! ;)--CityClass (talk) 17:52, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


Hello INeverCry I'll thanks to you for renaming my files. --Markus Schulenburg (talk) 07:23, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm happy to help. INeverCry 07:28, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Vitruvian Barnstar Hires.png The Technical Barnstar
Thanks so much for cleaning up all my "Banhof" and "Hauptbanhof" misspellings. That was a lot of work I made for you, so please accept this barnstar as a small token of my appreciation. Thanks again and take care! Michael Barera (talk) 19:58, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
A very nice surprise! Thank you! INeverCry 20:19, 19 July 2012 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, INeverCry. You have new messages at Tuvalkin's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
Great work renaming files & making Commons more useful to all for many generations. Many thanks. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 14:13, 1 August 2012 (UTC)


Thank you for renaming the "File:Tsushima fr.png". Azukimame

Thank you for rename the "File:ATEE5@43X.jpg. KMBAVC19 (talk) 09:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Face-smile.svg You're both welcome. INeverCry 19:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Charlevoix bascule bridge.jpg

You just renamed this file, so I apologize for requesting another rename. Chris857 (talk) 19:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


Why are you deleting my user profile photo leebrandoncremer.jpg ??

I nominated that image (File:Lee Brandon-Cremer.jpg) for deletion because it's an unused personal image. INeverCry 06:03, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Svenska | +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

INeverCry, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard an it subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons-lr webchat on There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

What are you doing?

You have ru-1, so I'll write in Russian.

Зачем вы переименовали File:COA of Podil Raion Sml.svg на File:COA Obolonskyi, Kyiv, Ukraine.svg? Ведь это же разные районы города и у них разные гербы. Теперь в статьях, где был герб Подольского района, будет герб Оболонского. Например здесь в других версиях среди гербов Подольского района теперь также герб Оболонского.--Anatoliy (talk) 09:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

The move was requested by the uploader. Here's what he put in the request: {{rename|COA Obolonskyi, Kyiv, Ukraine.svg|7|I am author. I want use my uploading for another image in SVG format}} I guess he typed a 7 when he meant a 1. If you have any more questions about this file you should consult User:Leonid76 (User talk:Leonid76). INeverCry 15:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Choco chip cookie.png For fixing Category:CDC Vital Signs. Thanks! Smallman12q (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Face-smile.svg I'm glad I could help. INeverCry 00:34, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

CRW 79338x10.jpg

I've already emailed permissions-commons. I did it right after uploading, and noted both the old name and the new name. I didn't get an OTRS ticket number in reply, I guess that address doesn't use OTRS? Gigs (talk) 17:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Since you just uploaded this, it will take some time to get OTRS taken care of. If you want to ask a question on this I would direct you to Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. I've tagged the image as OTRS pending. INeverCry 17:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC)


Thank you for the new profile, it will make my job easier, but what means "move and replace"?--Shadowxfox (talk) 20:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. I've responded on your talk. INeverCry 20:41, 22 August 2012 (UTC)


Hi. Thanks for the barnstar. Congratulations on your new tools and good luck! Érico Wouters msg 23:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

I had not seen. Thanks for showing me. I'll look.Érico Wouters msg 00:34, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
See: [2]. I'll help.Érico Wouters msg 00:45, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Several photos out of scope...Frowny.svg The single way is send for DR? Érico Wouters msg 01:06, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
The only way is to send DR? Érico Wouters msg 01:35, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh, I marked wrong! DR was the same, I pressed the wrong button. Sorry for my lack of attention.Érico Wouters msg 01:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Yes. I pressed the wrong button. See: [3], [4].Érico Wouters msg 01:48, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


I want an advice from you. Once I needed to explain that an image without metadata (without date, without EXIF, without description, without geocode) in low resolution cannot be declared as an image with «doubtful auhtorship». To prove this, I uploaded the image without metadata and used it in discussion. Now I am in trouble and want to ask for your advice. How can I prove that lack of metadata has nothing in common with «doubtful auhtorship»? Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:22, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

I've found that the lack of EXIF, etc, is often an indicator of doubtful authorship. Many of the files labeled as doubtful authorship for the above reasons do turn out to be taken from the internet without permission, and are deleted as copyvios. I think it's generally understood that lack of EXIF, etc, isn't always an indication of doubtful authorship, but I think in the majority of cases it usually is. In any event, I would recommend that you start a discussion at Commons:Village pump, where you can voice your concern and get community feedback. INeverCry 19:35, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
No rule makes me to publish EXIF. Even more, publishing EXIF I have no security against others to take my EXIF data and show it as their EXIF data.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:26, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
The basic concern for uploading of images on Commons is copyright status. When you upload an image you have the burden of showing that it complies with copyright policy. When images are reviewed/inspected on Commons, details such as EXIF, size, quality, subject, etc, are used to help determine if the image is acceptable for inclusion on Commons or not. You don't have to publish EXIF, but it may very well lead to someone thinking that the image is a copyvio. As for security, uploading images to the internet obviously carries a certain risk of improper use, etc. INeverCry 23:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
This is a horrible perversion. One thinking the image is a copyvio cannot base on its EXIF, because EXIF may consist of any data I want.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:34, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Most people who grab images off the internet aren't sophisticated enough to alter EXIF, even when it clearly shows that they aren't the creator (I've seen quite a few images with copyright tags in their EXIF uploaded here). Also, when it comes to the obvious or relatively obvious copyvio images uploaded here, lack of EXIF is trumped by size/quality, subject matter, and common sense deduction. In the end, those who upload images that aren't theirs are the people Commons is trying to stop, and certainly not trusted users like yourself. INeverCry 16:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Inappropriate renaming

Hi. As long as I understand this renaming is not appropriate. Did you read the talk page ? I believe that even the uploader wants to make a person (s) member of uploaders' ethnic group, wrong information mustn't be accepted. And I think that our best way is using titles without ethnic and religious factors. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 23:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

I've taken care of this, and responded on your tp. Thanks. INeverCry 00:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Merci. Takabeg (talk) 03:00, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Dont identify Kurdish People as you want. You dont have such a right!--Gomada (talk) 08:46, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In my opinion, this renaming of Gomada's file hasn't been very sensitively and respectfully done and it's obvious that Gomada now has got a category of being a Kurdish nationalist, a controversal guy, to whom you may pay very little attention. For your information, Gomada is a very skilful editor in the Kurdish Wikipedia, and his point here is as respectable as any other experienced editor's, like Takabeg, even if he expresses himself differently in English. Why have you renamed his file to English, by the way? Isn't even the Kurdish language or toponomy valid? I think you should try to discuss with Gomada a possible renaming of the file, if the adjective is so not appropiate; after all he has uploaded it, so please assume good faith, and please don't ignore other peoples opinions! Thank you, and hope I haven't made you cry :) --MikaelF (talk) 12:26, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
I understand your point of view of the Kurdish people and/or Kurdish nationalists. However you (MikaelF) completely ignore point of view of the side of Zaza people and/or Zaza nationalists. In cases such as Metin Kahraman, I respect both sides but I cannot support both sides. I recommend every user to behave neutrally and chose neutral names. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 13:12, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
No, I do not ignore either one or the other side. I am a big fan of Metin & Kemal Kahraman and I have all their CDs (and the cassettes)! Yes, neutrality is very important, but sometimes it's like you see ghosts where there are none and it doesn't justify not respecting someone else's opinion or just ignoring it. The names of the files, as long as they identify the image, it's up to the uploader to decide if to name them in Kurdish, Zazaki or whatever language. But it's basic to discuss it with the uploader if you think a renaming is necessary. I upload my files in Kurdish, as they refer mostly to Kurdistani culture, and it's not about fanaticism, and I wouldn't be glad if anybody renamed them into English or any other language. Thank you both. --MikaelF (talk) 16:44, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
I understand that you and Gomada have strong feelings about this issue, but I hope neither of you take any of this personally, as I certainly have no personal stake in it, or opinion on the gentleman's ethnicity one way or the other. The ethnicity of the subject is disputed, so I think that a neutral name is best. The file's original name was File:Metin Kahraman(Kurdish musician).jpg, btw, so I don't see an issue with title language here. In any event, I respect both sides in this discussion/dispute, and I think the neutral name is best for both. INeverCry 17:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Im not a monster, but im quite bored of Takabeg. He doesnt really care about my people. He just tries to impose his opinions. There are not enough Kurds around, therefore he makes decisions for my people. I will never accept that. Let us to decide about our own culture. If we have mistakes, we will correct it by ourself. You dont know about us as much as we know. But Takabeg thinks that, he knows our people more than us. Look at all pictures or articles about Kurds on Wiki. He has a contribution there. I cant even describe my own picture. He changes that. Is that normal? Dear INeverCry, maybe you cant understand Takabeg's language. But i can see what he tries to do. You are out of the topic, you just changed name. But this is not so simple. He can act like he cares neutrality or sources. But i know that, its not true. Look at the category of Zazas which he has created. He has added descriptions in English, Kurmanji and Kirmanjki. All are copies from wikipedias. But, he has changed the word of KURD.Almost all speakers of the Zaza language consider themselves as Iranian. See the original in wikipedia Are you kidding? Kurds are not Iranian too? Why do you need to change that? If you arent againist Kurdish identity why do you change it? You try to decieve people by rubbish of neutrality but you dont have respect for Kurdish identity. Then where is your neutrality? I hope to not waste my time for Takabeg once again. And INeverCry, i was angry with you because you didnt even try to tell me that you want to change the name. I believe that, it would be a kind behaviour, if you could ask me before changing.--Gomada (talk) 22:51, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Let me reiterate that I have no personal opinion whatsoever in the matter, and assure you that I repect all people, and all nationalities. As an administrator, I have to maintain neutrality. I can't pick between you and Takabeg over who is right, so I chose the ethnically neutral filename once Takabeg notified me that he disputes the ethnic claim and naming. If you have a problem concerning Takabeg, I would recommend you take it to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems, or you can start a discussion of the filename/ethnicity issue at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. INeverCry 23:10, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Closure of a DR

Please re check on the decision you have made on the Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Erzdiakon_Thomas.jpg So that it may discussed and resolved and better that re-nominating the image once again. A discussion is progressing on the village pump, Please participate if you are interested.--...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 05:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

I closed that as keep again because the first nom showed no support for delete, and after 5 days, the second nom showed no support either. I could have left it open another 2 days, and if you want to nominate it again, I'll leave it for another admin to close. I don't think a delete consensus will be reached, especially looking at the above VP discussion. If that above discussion had taken place at the deletion nom, it would've been closed as keep or left open ad infinitum like many others. In any event, I appreciate the calm and professional way you've handled this. INeverCry 16:59, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Well, It can close only after seven days from opening a DR, That was not followed and thus re-nom, again a close after 5 days, Again a re-nom and finally it will end up in nom-close war, Anyway a discussion is underway and the result will come very soon, and it will be helpful for may files in my list for deletion/undeletion.--...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 09:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Royal Armouries Ms. I.33

Alright, if you give me move permission, I'll sort this out manually It's 64 files & I was hoping somebody might use a bot, but I'll probably get around to doing it over the next days. Thanks, --Dbachmann (talk) 07:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 16:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

ok, thanks. I finished the job, apart from a single move which I am not allowed to do without deletion privileges (due to a mistaken move to the target filename earlier, so the target filename is now a redirect). Could you do this move for me:

thank you. --Dbachmann (talk) 10:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 16:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Deletion Message

Will you or someone on Wikimedia Commons delete these picture please?--GoShow (talk) 18:45, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Tomb of Nefertari symmetry entrance.jpg

File:Egyptian doctor.png

File:Christian Monk from Lindisfarne006.jpg

File:Christian Monk from Lindisfarne001.jpg

File:Dragon Lantern.jpg

Considering that you've already nominated these files for deletion, I would prefer to let the nomination process go the full 7 days to see if others have opinions on whether or not they sould be deleted. INeverCry 19:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Im confused

Hello, I started to (try) and learn the Wiki thing a few years back. Ended up doing the upload of a few powerboat racing pictures that I had taken at some of our boat races. Today I see a "nomination to delete" thing come to my email.. After reading, looking and searching -Im not really sure what I'm supposed to do.

Hoping you (INeverCry) can help me with this? It looks like you have labeled my foto for some kind of copy-right infringement -but I'm not sure

Thanks in advance for your help -Kip

PS: The picture Im referring to is:

Also I have one other that hasnt been comented on, Its at:

I labeled both images because they are low quality with no EXIF, which is often an indication that an image has been taken from the internet. Do you have copies of these images at full resolution with EXIF, and not altered, framed, or captioned that you can upload? That would be the easiest way to show that these are really your work. Full res images without captions and borders have more educational value and are more useful also. INeverCry 23:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for renaming files

Thanks for takeing care of all the files I uploaded with wrong names. /Haxpett (talk) 05:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'm glad I could help. INeverCry 14:57, 1 September 2012 (UTC)


Thank you very much -- Flag of Venezuela.svg George Miquilena · talk 16:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 17:19, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


Interesting deletion reason. --Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 19:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

That's very strange. I deleted that image along with the other 4 in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gopi33151. The deletion is done with an automated tool, and it looks like all 5 files have the wrong request. I don't copy and paste anything - all I do is click a [delete] button and [ok] it by pressing enter, so it's weird that the tool would come up with the wrong request. INeverCry 20:02, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Indeed, that's strange. Maybe you should contact the tool's developer. --Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 20:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
The tool gave that same incorrect rationale for a few other deletions, all done at 12:44. My next deletion at 12:47 Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kataxenna - Purple Hair.png is fine. If this happens again I'll see about reporting it. INeverCry 20:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: AWB and Autopatrol


Thank you :) --Winiar 20:58, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 21:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


File:Union Infantryman prepare for orders to charge the fortifications of Petersburg, Virginia..jpg

Please rename to Chancellorsville, Virginia or delete please--GoShow (talk) 01:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

✓ Renamed INeverCry 02:19, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
You're welcome. INeverCry 02:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar and Autopatrol

Thank you very much for the Commons Barnstar, and for the autopatrol rights you granted to my account. I'm really pleased with your appreciation. Kind regards, MJJR (talk) 20:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC).

Re: autopatrol given.

Ciao INeverCry. Ti ringrazio per la fiducia. A presto. Discanto (talk) 00:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)



As member of the WLM 2012 team for France, I can't really do the deletions by myself ; could you take care of Nasser785 uploads ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 20:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 20:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. VIGNERON (talk) 20:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Selective kept without explanation

Hello INeverCry, You have kept everything of my DR with one exception from the same day with exactly the same deletion reason. But the special is in this first DR, I give Multichill answer and question for all this DR on this day, but nobody has answered anything! (Only you kept like a bot.) So I beg you for an answer, because you are (not only as an admin) that obliged. As you can maybe see I am a little pissed off, when I hit the wrong note, I apologize. PS: Because this is definitely a normal deletion request in which is normally (ever I've seen) the file be deleted. So here is given another reason for an explanation. Greetings -- πϵρήλιο 10:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Perhelion. I closed the DRs you mention, such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Horgen wappen.png, because I only saw the keep vote by Multichill with no responses. Had there been a link to the one you responded on in each of the others, I would've left them all open. In these cases I was trying to clean up week-old DRs and I saw the keep vote by an experienced admin and kept them. You should discuss this directly with Multichill. INeverCry 17:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for response, I do this. For fact the last similar DR from this day (next day after midnight) was deleted (although the image is so not completely downscaled identical, as like by you/the other) I'd never before negative personal contact with Multichill in any way. -- πϵρήλιο 09:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Territorial waters of Israel.gif


Orrlingtalk 01:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 01:26, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


Thank you for giving me autopatrol rights. Can you check these files if you have time and delete some of them beceuse of copyright violation? Or should I open DR for every one of them?--Rapsar (talk) 16:02, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you again, for barnstar :)--Rapsar (talk) 16:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Well-deserved. As for the logos, You'll have to DR any that are copyvios. INeverCry 16:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
As Rapsar, I thank you for the autopatrol rights. Edhral 17:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
You're welcome. INeverCry 18:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Out of scope images

Hi, INeverCry. I'm in the category Category:Media needing categories as of 8 February 2012, which ones have you checked? Érico Wouters msg 20:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure early January is the farthest I've gone yet, though I may have done a few here and there in the later months. I'm still doing 2011 stuff, including CSDs and some DRs for non-notable people, logos, etc. INeverCry 22:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Okay. Thanks.Érico Wouters msg 00:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


You're scaringly fast (A.K.A Kfar Warburg)

Orrlingtalk 22:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Face-smile.svg INeverCry 22:48, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

re: Move request

Feito! Luan fala! 00:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Obrigado! Luan fala! 00:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
De nada! INeverCry 00:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


I do not mind renaming like here - so no objection to adding the ",Jeruslem", but do keep my numbers (the IMG-0009 part) to help me find the pictures of they are needed or if people have questions about them. I usually keep so more meta data, and I need the numbering to find it. Deror avi (talk) 20:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

I'll remember that in future. I'm sorry if this caused you any inconvenience. INeverCry 22:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


Hello INeverCry! I read this on User talk:Iseo1000...I think that File:Bivio Cimia.JPG and File:Bivio Iudeca SP 27.png are taken from Google Maps, and File:Zdenek zeman.PNG is a copyviol from here (cropped image). I think thate Iseo1000 should be blocked, and all these images should be deleted! Thank you, --Delfort (talk) 16:09, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing this to my attention Delfort. I've taken care of it. INeverCry 17:31, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Fw:Autopatrol given

Hello INeverCry! Thank you very much for your confidence in my personal.

I am at your service and Commons. --Allforrous (talk) 23:33, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thanks for your contributions. INeverCry 23:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


Thank you very much!--Etrusko25 (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 00:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

New autopatroller

Thanks for giving me this autopatrol rights! --Enfo (talk) 08:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 17:09, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

file move

I'm sorry - all my mistakes. The door has two wings - the right and left. Everything was ok with left. Badly sent "right". Wait, please, check again, and possibly improved, and in 10 minutes you will be able to correct name - ok? --Jolanta Dyr (talk) 00:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC) thanks - it's ok, just one more file and that's it - a thank you for your help --Jolanta Dyr (talk) 00:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC) For now, I have too little experience, my own files, which keep the charge and therefore prevail over them. However, many have yet to learn. Maybe in the future :), but thanks for the offer --Jolanta Dyr (talk) 00:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC) Ok, thank you--Jolanta Dyr (talk) 00:59, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

You deleted my photo, why?

Hi there, you deleted a photo of John Frawley that I was using in a Wiki. The photo was uploaded to Commons by John Frawley himself. Could you please tell me why you assumed there was a copyright violation?

(cur | prev) 20:06, 5 September 2012‎ CommonsDelinker (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (6,327 bytes) (-60)‎ . . (Removing "John_Frawley_pic.jpg", it has been deleted from Commons by INeverCry because: Copyright violation, see commons:Commons:Licensing.) (undo) Farmer bev (talk) 09:12, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Hi Bev. The image was deleted because it was believed to have been taken from, and so was a copyright violation because that site is labeled "Copyright 2008 - 2012 Real". The photo is a professional portrait of Mr. Frawley, and so we would need permission from the photographer to have this image on Commons. INeverCry 16:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, INever,

Mr Frawley assured me the photo was his copyright, when I sought permission to use it. Since the copyright was his, I assumed he took the photograph himself using a time delay on his camera, which is fairly well-known technology, or otherwise that his wife exercised the camera shutter. Mr Frawley is one of the owners of the website Real What does he have to do to assure you and Wikipedia that the copyright belonged to him, before he uploaded it to Commons himself? Farmer bev (talk) 22:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

I recommend that he follow the instructions at Com:OTRS so that the deleted file can be restored or he can upload another. INeverCry 22:20, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

OK and how does one prevent erroneous deletion of the next uploaded photograph please? Farmer bev (talk) 22:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Once permission for an image is received thru the OTRS system, the image is tagged with an OTRS ticket showing that it complies with Commons copyright policy. INeverCry 22:42, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your assistance. I'm sorry, I've messed up the code a little bit. Farmer bev (talk) 02:38, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you !

Hi, and many thanks for your fast renaming [5] :) Regards, --Floflo (talk) 18:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 18:33, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Kindness Barnstar Hires.png The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for renaming around 50 files, all of which I requested to be renamed! Your hard work is appreciated! Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:53, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks. I don't know which award I like better, this or the one above it. ;) INeverCry 21:04, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Please rename once more

Hello, thank you for your help with renaming my picture to File:Brno, Tábor 16.jpg. However, could you please rename it once more so that it is called File:Brno, Tábor 16.JPG? I know there is no semantic difference between "jpg" and "JPG", but only with all caps it will fit into the rest of my series from that street. (Actually, I filled it right into the "move page" dialog, but the case was changed automatically by the wizard. I noticed this and changed the template manually, surprisingly to no effect anymore, though.) Please note that probably you will need to rename the file by hand. Thank you for your help. Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 22:55, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Done. INeverCry 22:58, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Restoring a video

Hey there,

Could you restore this video? "Bahrain_army_open_fire_on_protesters.ogv". It was deleted on 13 August. The owner finally changed the description to add it was licensed under CC BY SA 3.0. This is the video linked by many media channels/websites (such as [6] and [7]); it has 2m+ views (2,388,531). Mohamed CJ (talk) 07:50, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Renaming to File:1934 Atlantic tropical storm 12 track.png

Hello. Please do not immediately rename files as asked by User:Supportstorm in the light of this issue. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 06:51, 15 September 2012 (UTC).

OK. INeverCry 07:05, 15 September 2012 (UTC)


John Shakespeare is an apparently notable cartoonist, while the editor was dishonest copyright violator.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz  (Discussion) 00:53, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

When I saw the CSD, one thing came to mind: DUHHHHH! I was so busy with the defamation angle, I didn't see what was staring me right in the face. ;) INeverCry 01:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar!

Hiya, you gave me a photographer's barnstar back in August and I haven't had the opportunity until now to say thanks! It really made my day (okay, more like month!). The gesture gave me a bit of confidence, so I've just posted the picture you mentioned to the English WP FPC: [8]. Fingers crossed. ^^ Julia\talk 12:55, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Julia. The barnstar was more than well-deserved, so I'm glad you liked it. I certainly liked that image; it almost looks to me like the poor thing crawled into the flower and ate itself to death. I looked at the nom on WP, and I notice someone has already dropped the technical hammer. I put in a support vote, for whatever it's worth. When it comes to images and any other works of Art, I don't care at all for technical jargon; I just like what I like and love what I love. INeverCry 17:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Jenna-Louise Coleman.jpg

Hi there. I was just about to upload this image but the flickr upload bot says an image at that location has previously been deleted. Is this the same image? And as a follow up, if so, why was it deleted? Hiding (talk) 17:07, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

No, that's not the same image. The image I deleted was this. INeverCry 17:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Okay, that's great. I've uploaded this image to that location then, thanks. Hiding (talk) 17:20, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Media needing categories

Hi INeverCry, I'll keep an eye on that category, just added the link on my userpage. By the way, thanks for the barnstar you gave me a few days ago Face-smile.svg Lobo (howl?) 20:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

I've been sifting thru these files for about a month now, and I've nominated 1000+ images for DR and CSD. With over 150,000 files, there has to be atleast 10000+ images that should be deleted for copyvio or being out of scope. I've even found 100s of blatant copyvios like album covers, movie posters, and facebook sourced images. As for the barnstar, that was well-deserved. INeverCry 20:32, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar!

I really appreciate it, thank you! --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 20:27, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. I don't like to pass up people like you, who've made so many good contributions, without showing my appreciation. INeverCry 20:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


Thanks a lot for your caring help in renaming.--Переславская неделя (talk) 20:20, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'm glad I could help. INeverCry 22:20, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Undeletion of I-sopod Flotation Tank.jpg

Hi INeverCry. Would you mind undeleting File:I-sopod Flotation Tank.jpg? As detailed on the file talk page, and in a email which I will send to you, a representative of the company who holds the copyright to the image appears to be willing to donate the file to Commons. Thanks, David1217 (talk) 02:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

If/when the OTRS process is completed, myself or another admin can restore the image. INeverCry 03:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
All right then; I have replied the employee's email, asking them to send permission to OTRS. I'm still a bit unfamiliar with all of the procedures here on Commons. David1217 (talk) 03:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
The instructions at OTRS are pretty straight-forward, so I hope it won't take too long to get the permission sorted out. You should direct the person who will be taking care of this to follow the detailed instructions on the OTRS page, and to use the standard email template that is given there. INeverCry 03:45, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Choco chip cookie.png Thanks for your moving my picture to the right name. Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Face-smile.svg You're welcome. INeverCry 18:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)


Thank you! I already know of these links in, are very useful even but still did not know how they worked here. Congratulations by 4,000 administrative actions! Clin Érico Wouters msg 22:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

We're all shooting for 2nd place. ;) INeverCry 22:58, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Fastily in 1st no doubt.Érico Wouters msg 01:37, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. Useful table.Érico Wouters msg 02:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

image (تصاویر)

سلام ؛ تعدادی از تصاویری که من خودم تهیه کرده ام توسط سایت های دیگری منتشر شده است. و این تقصیر من نیست. این تصاویر مداوم توسط مدیران ویکی پدیا حذف می شود در حالی که پدید آورنده تصاویر من هستم. و به علت عدم رعایت کپی رایت در این ایران این تصاویر بدون اجازه من در سایت های دیگر هم منتشر شده است. لطفا رسیدگی و راهنمایی بفرمایید . با تشکر

Hi, I have created a number of images that have been published by other sites. It is not my fault. Continuous images are deleted by Wikipedia administrators, the Creator pictures I am.Due to non-compliance with copyrights in this images without my permission on other sites reported. Please examine and tips here. Thanks Omid hendupur (talk) 05:12, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

The file you uploaded, and I deleted, was the same low resolution (54 kb) as the one here. You would have to prove that you are the original photographer in order to have this image on Commons. I would recommend that you upload the original image with a higher resolution and the original EXIF. INeverCry 06:32, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Moving images

Hi, you said the other day that I should ask you if I ever needed help, so I wonder if I could take you up on that.

I've uploaded six images of gestation crates taken inside Smithfield Foods. I named the files on my computer with the name of the company so I could find them easily, but now that I've uploaded them it seems inappropriate to retain the company name in the file name. It looks a bit pointy. So I was wondering if you'd be willing to move them for me, or whether the best thing is to file a move request. The images are File:Smithfield Foods gestation crates 1.jpg, File:Smithfield Foods gestation crates 2.jpg, File:Smithfield Foods gestation crates 3.jpg, File:Smithfield Foods gestation crates 4.jpg, File:Smithfield Foods gestation crates 5.jpg and File:Smithfield Foods gestation crates 9.jpg

I was thinking that a generic title might be better, e.g. File:Gestation crates 1.jpg, and so on. Any help or advice much appreciated. Best, SlimVirgin (talk) 04:18, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for doing that, and so quickly, and for giving me the filemover right. I really appreciate your help. All the best to you, SlimVirgin (talk) 06:47, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm glad I could help. I think you do great work on, as you know, and I like seeing you over here as well. INeverCry 15:54, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

The Barnstar

Hi. Thanks very much for the Barnstar. Made my day. Cheers, Colin (talk) 06:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Well-deserved. INeverCry 15:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Please undelete

Hi INeverCry,

please undelete the files File:Albert Anton von Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt.jpg and File:Karl Günther von Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt.jpg.

They have been uploaded with a wrong licence and the uploader claimed copyright, but they are old paintings and can be kept with pd-old-100. I will change the licence/description after restoration. Thank you. --Schwäbin (talk) 09:00, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm going to decline restoring these files. These are tiny thumbs and are too low quality to be of any educational value, and so are out of scope, beyond any copyvio issue. I would recommend that you or the original uploader upload larger, higher-quality versions. INeverCry 16:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


I saw you suggested Admin statistics to our new admin. I find that useful, although, as you say, it can be time consuming, particularly if you go back more than three months. It does have the advantage that it works in real time, so you can see what you did right up to the moment. It's disadvantage is that it shows only those people who are currently Admins.

You might look at Commons:Database_reports/Users_by_log_action. It is an all time record, and, while it is only updated once a day, it loads immediately. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Jim. I've placed a link to this on my userpage. INeverCry 18:25, 22 September 2012 (UTC)


You can recover it? Yanki14 (talk) 21:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

It is of course possible to restore the image. But why did you request to delete it: "אני יצרתי ואני רוצה למחוק"? I don't want myself or another admin to have to keep deleting and restoring this. Are you sure you want it restored, and are you going to keep it? INeverCry 21:40, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
You do not understand, I wanted to delete the original image (like matanya did) and then I posted another picture (same name) which I want to keep. (I do not know English well) Yanki14 (talk) 21:48, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. Yanki14 (talk) 21:56, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
You're welcome. INeverCry 21:57, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Coventry Cathedral after the air raid in 1941.jpg

Change the 1941 to 1940 thank you --GoShow (talk) 23:36, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 23:40, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Looking to other contributions of copyright violations uploaders

Please try to look into other contributions of copyright violations uploaders. Sometimes you mark one of images as such, but there are other problematic images uploaded by same user. Even same logos :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Will do. INeverCry 17:35, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio delete message

(I answered your question on my talk page, this is something else). I've seen from some time this kind of delete message from you like the one in this file - File:59801973KimmarieJohnson610201070844PM.jpg. I don't know how you are doing it, but it should preferably show the elimination precise reason (in this case, Turélio copyvio notice), so that we don't have to look inside the deleted image log to find what it was, in case of need. This should be automatic when you chose the garbage can below the copyvio notice. Are you using some other process to delete them? Cheers, --- Darwin Ahoy! 00:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I've been using the big square delete button at the top of the page directly above the image. I'll switch to the can in future. In regard to Lobo, I'll see about that soon. INeverCry 00:18, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! It may not seem that important, but it makes a big difference to those who need to check it, and most important, it stays visible for everyone, even non admins, and appears on CommonsDelinker edit summary on the other projects, if the file was used. --- Darwin Ahoy! 00:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

File:0 Hemerocallis - Yvoire.jpg

Hi INeverCry;

Thank you for your quick and efficient help in renaming my file.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 08:14, 24 September 2012 (UTC)


Thank you for giving me autopatrol rights :) If I will do any mistakes please correct me. Basik07 (talk) 19:45, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Cathedral of Freedom

Hi, can you please send me (post on my talk page) the description page (text) for the deleted File:Katedrala Svobode II.png? I need it to find out when and under which license the image was uploaded. Thanks a lot. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyright violation - AmandaBlain.jpg I specifically emailed the site and asked them to add the line to the top of the article as i was told to do in the IRC help desk. "Photo available for use by CC-BY-3.0 -" above the logo. Why was this removed/reported? (not sure if i did this in the right spot! sorry new here :) ) Geek4gurl

Looks good to me. I've restored the image: File:Amanda-Blain.jpg. INeverCry 20:23, 25 September 2012 (UTC)


Hello. Regarding this edit, did you notice in the history and talk page that it had already failed a speedy 13 months ago? You might want to bring it to a regular deletion discussion. Cheers! —Ashanda (talk) 01:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

We'll see how the speedy goes this time. Hopefully if one of my fellow admins doesn't think it worthy of speedy deletion, they'll convert it to DR rather than just removing the tag as was done last time. INeverCry 01:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

A favor

Hi INeverCry, hope you're well. When you have time, I was wondering if you could help me out with two admin tasks:

Thanks! :] -FASTILY (TALK) 08:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 17:41, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks!! -FASTILY (TALK) 07:08, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Any time. INeverCry 16:22, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hanuman showing Rama in His heart.jpg

Please explain by which policies of Commons was this image kept. There is no date. There is no proof that it is published before 1952 to be eligible for PD-India. The Ravi Varma Press was run years after Ravi Varma sold it to others in 1901 and his death in 1906. How can the dead founder of a Press be the author after he has sold the rights and after his death? --Redtigerxyz (talk) 15:14, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

I felt that, with the inclusion on the image of the name of Anant Shivaji Desai who most likely died before 1952, that the image was published in India before 1952. Perhaps the license should be PD-India rather than PD-Art. I could, of course, be wrong in keeping it, and if you feel strongly that this is so, please feel free to re-nominate it, and I'll let another admin do the closing. INeverCry 18:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Will try to find out when he died. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:43, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Used your name at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Siva-parvati-by-raja-ravi-varma.jpg :). Please correct me there if I have misinterpreted. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:55, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Looks ok to me. Another interesting thing is that the image on the third page at the source here is dated, and I think it might say either 1924 or 1929, but I'm not sure. That might be a reasonable date range for all of the images, if that's what it says. In any event, it looks like Mr. Desai lived to a very ripe old age. ;) INeverCry 19:12, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

File:GR VIEW 8 20120912 160046.jpg‏

TNX :)! יעל י (talk) 19:56, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) INeverCry 19:57, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


Thanks :) Fry1989 eh? 22:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Well-deserved. INeverCry 22:27, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

book of leszek czarnecki

Hello, you have just deleted some pictures of leszek's czarnecki books. I am a representative of the publisher and the copyright belongs to me. How can I prove it?

Go to OTRS. The directions there will show you how to email permission for the use of these files. The files you uploaded can be restored if/when permission is received by email at OTRS. INeverCry 20:02, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

your assistance please

Thanks for (temporarily) restoring File:Al Qaeda scrapbook 2.jpg.

User:Fastily, who speedy deleted the image, out of process, is on record that they thought it would be ineligible for copyright protection if certain changes were made. I made those changes, so, rather than returning to the image to delete it, would you restore its talk page?

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 22:19, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Done. I also deleted the older versions of the image. INeverCry 22:30, 27 September 2012 (UTC)



you notified me about the deletion of a file calles File:Vanessa Hudgens 2012 Paris.jpg. I have absolutely no idea why this file was deleted, but I think you made a mistake. If I remember well, this file was uploaded by me the same days as File:Vanessa Hudgens 2012 Paris 2.jpg.

Those files are not my own work and I never pretended that they were : they are the work of an amateur french photographer called Georges Biard, who gave me permission to upload them and sent an OTRS permission. He is the author of over 1500 works present on wikimedia commons, all of which have been uploaded by me with his permission (and confirmed by him with an OTRS permission).

This picture of Vanessa Hudgens may not have been the most important work by Georges Biard on commons (I can't remember if it was even used on any project), but I think it was deleted by mistake and should be restored ASAP, as there was no copyright violation whatsoever. You should have asked me first... I wouldn't want this to happen to other pictures. Thanks, JJ Georges (talk) 22:45, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi JJ Georges. I've looked at this and what happened is another user (User:Ro Cachins) removed the OTRS permission and changed the descriptions. I've restored the file without these changes. I'll deal with the above user. INeverCry 22:55, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Ok thanks a lot. Not that this picture is very important per se, but for a minute I was scared that there could be a problem with Biard's other pictures. I have spent a considerable amount of hours uploading his photos, which are often wonderful and very useful. I have always been 100% honest in the process. JJ Georges (talk) 23:00, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
I've warned the user who removed the OTRS tag. They had also uploaded an image of Vanessa Hudgens taken from the internet, which I deleted. You should keep any images of Vanessa you've uploaded watched, in case they try to do this again. If you see this user do anything like this again, let me know. INeverCry 23:09, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
I certainly will. Thanks a lot. I hope I won't have to watch all the 1500+ photos I uploaded ! In case anything like this happen (i.e., a picture by Georges Biard - all of them have been uploaded by me - without permission), you can also ask me first or, if I'm not there, ask Bapti who has put the OTRS tag on all of them. Best regards. JJ Georges (talk) 23:13, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

DR closing

Hello INeverCry, please be very careful when closing DRs,and only speedy close them when you are absolutely sure they are uncontroversial. You closed this and this DR and speedy deleted 2 files that had already been discussed before in the undeletion requests, and whose licenses were reviewed and accepted. I believe you have good intentions on trying to get rid of the open DRs, but this way you are doing more harm than good. If it's not an obvious copyvio, then let it open for two weeks or so. There's no need for such a rush. Cheers, --- Darwin Ahoy! 05:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

I didn't "speedy delete" or "speedy close" anything. Those DRs were in the "Latest requests to be closed" section which means all the DRs listed are "eligible to be closed". Also, where's your admonishment of User:Armbrust, an experienced user who messed up on these two DRs you mention, and who should've checked before DRing them? I've deleted and closed alot of these closeable 7 day-old DRs in the last 3 or 4 days, and these 2 are the only ones I've had complaints on, so do you really think I'm doing more harm than good? I don't think that part of your message was fair. I'm doing my best to help out, and I try to be as careful as I can. Mistakes will happen, but so far I think I've done a good job of keeping that to a minimum. INeverCry 05:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Hmm - My bad, I've read 28 September there I don't know why. I don't know what's the thing with Armbrust, this is the second time he tries to delete them. Possibly he's not aware of the discussion that took place at undeletion requests. You're right, it wasn't fair, my mistake and I apologize for it, since the rant was about DR speedy closing. Nevertheless, you should try to improve your sixth sense for those traps, if the license is reviewed, then there's most probably a lot more to it than what it shows... And you should have seen it as well when you were going to delete the file, on that occasion it shows the old log below, and there were the previous delete and undelete logs, with the links for the discussion. --- Darwin Ahoy! 06:09, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
I stopped reading that at "Nevertheless". ;) Seriously though, we all make mistakes, and none of us are perfect, but I'll continue to try my best to avoid them. INeverCry 06:22, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Deleting duplicate images

Please, try mass replacing of duplicate images before you delete them. It should be really easy using CommonsDelinker. With just deleting stop signs, you have created a lot of unnecessery work for editors of several projects ([11], [12], [13], [14] – looking just on few in the languages which I understand) I suppose that now the images have to be replaced by hand :-(.--Tchoř (talk) 06:32, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Je mi líto. Budu vědět víc příště. INeverCry 06:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


Can you please close the DRs in the list with Keep? Thanks. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 16:12, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done. When the temporarily undeleted images have been checked, please place either (keep) or (re-delete) after their entries on the list. INeverCry 17:00, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Please undelete File:Ravana Lfting Kailasa Mountain.jpg and File:Hanuman showing Rama in His heart 2.jpg for checking. Thanks. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Updated the list with "Keep" or reason for deletion (applies "Re-delete"). Please check --Redtigerxyz (talk) 17:19, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Updated the pending. Have already left Yann a note that I requested you to close DRs. I had actually requested him to undelete and check as he can read Hindi (the language in which Anant Shivaji Desai's name is written). :) Thanks for helping out with this issue and giving the idea to figure out the probable dates of the lithographs. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:10, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm glad I was able to help. INeverCry 05:24, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Two of the undeleted need deletion: File:Maha Rana Pratap Singh.jpg and File:Death of Abhimanyu.jpg. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 06:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
I've re-deleted them. INeverCry 06:28, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Also, please leave a comment at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFile:Sita_1.jpg. Thanks. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 09:41, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

your assistance please

Thanks for restoring File talk:Al Qaeda scrapbook 2.jpg.

I'm sorry, could you restore the earlier uploads? I know User:Fastily thinks they are problematic -- but frankly I think they have been showing bad judgment, and I don't really trust their judgment. User:Fastily has asserted, in several comments, that they are not an administrator, so their opinion is of no greater significance than any other contributors'. Even if he or she was an administrator, I think they should have weighed in, in the open discussion, not perform a speedy deletion, they weren't prepared to properly explain.

Personally, I would prefer to wait until others have weighed in on whether the image needs any blurring, prior to deleting the earlier versions. Ordinary contributors can't weigh in if the earlier versions remain deleted.

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 23:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

I've brought this issue to the admins' notice board: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#File:Al Qaeda scrapbook 2.jpg. My fellow administrators can look at those earlier versions without restoring them, and hopefully we can get some consensus on the whole thing. INeverCry 23:38, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


Hi there. "Watermark" is not an acceptable rationale for filing a speedy deletion request. There are plenty of freely licensed images with watermarks in them. Obviously if there's other evidence to go with the watermark, that's fine, but that evidence also needs to be in the speedy request. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

In future I'll make sure to add further applicable details. Thanks for the help. INeverCry 22:01, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Cool, enjoy the rest of your weekend :D Sven Manguard Wha? 02:48, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

About flag and coat of arms of Paraguay

Dear INeverCry: Is possible to recover the deleted archives with the coat of arms and flag of Paraguay when these are the national symbols used today by the State? Here you have many graphic examples: #1, #2 or #3. Best regards. --Echando una mano (talk) 23:21, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

I don't know what deleted archives you're referring to. Do you have a link? INeverCry 23:26, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


Started this about a year ago when I realized how many pages at en:WP didn't have photos, and just kept going. Tend to stay away from the film shots because sometimes they're not PD, but there's a lot to be gotten from television, Broadway and radio. Marilyn Monroe did very little television, but we have a publicity photo of her with Jack Benny from an appearance she did on his show. For the shows that didn't make DVD, these photos are the only way for people to get an idea of what the program was like. Still waiting to find one of Danny Thomas as the guy from Planet Twilo from the old Dick Van Dyke show, though-have yet to see any shots from that episode. Thanks again! We hope (talk) 00:59, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Patrolling new images can be a bit monotonous, especially during WLM, when it's building after building after building. It's nice to have ladies like this to look at instead once in awhile. ;)

Please restore: File:TarasovVI.JPG

Please restore: File:TarasovVI.JPG This is a scan of a family photo of my grandfather. Vasily E. Tarasov If you have any questions, please write to e-mail

If you wish to have the image restored, you'll have to email permission to Commons. You will find directions for doing this at OTRS. INeverCry 16:35, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your profile image

Your profile image is really lol, thanks --The Photographer (talk) 03:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Face-smile.svg INeverCry 03:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

File mover

Hello INeverCry,

Thank you for giving me filemover right. It is very kind of you to give me the choice. I will do my best but if I will do any mistakes please correct me.

Best regards,

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:21, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Black Brant 8/9 Image


...for the express file renaming. --Lošmi (talk) 21:41, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. I've also added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you look to be a trustworthy contributor. INeverCry 21:54, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Ruben Canelo

Thank you for your prompt renaming of the file "Lord Professor Ruben Canelo of Studley" to "Ruben Canelo". Is there any possibility of deleting the redirect? Professor Canelo is a real person, but the "Lord of Studley" stuff is a bad joke. I am trying to eliminate this hoax from the various corners of the internet where it proliferated or mirrored, and the Commons redirect could be one such corner. If deleting the redirect is against policy, then never mind. And thanks again. MelanieN (talk) 13:26, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 16:38, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of a poor quality file (mine)


In the past I uploaded this file of a Crowned Pigeon, which is of quite poor quality. Just now, I have uploaded 14 new, higher-quality photos of Crowned Pigeons (you can see them here).

Can you delete the old, poor quality photo as it is unneccesary?

Thank you,

--SuperJew (talk) 07:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done. I also removed the link to this file at Goura cristata, so you may want to replace it. INeverCry 16:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much. --SuperJew (talk) 06:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

FCC after all

INeverCry, when I saw this figure in context in Close-packed lattices, I realized that it is really fcc after all. It is a highly misleading figure, not the way such lattices are normally represented, and shouldn't be used to illustrate fcc lattices in articles. But you'll need to restore its earlier name. Sorry for the bother. RockMagnetist (talk) 18:30, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

I've moved it back. (File:Fcc lattice 4.jpg). You'll have to be more careful in future, especially with files like this one that link to quite a few pages. INeverCry 21:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


Dear INeverCry! Why did you remove the work of Natalia Mishina "Alice in Wonderland"? She gave permission for publication .... Sincerely,--Alexander Aster (talk) 10:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Alexander. Permission for File:" Алиса в Зазеркалье ".jpg and any other copyrighted images has to be sent by email to OTRS directly. Once this is done, the file can be restored. INeverCry 16:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Dear INeverCry!
Yes, it was sent to the line. Natalia sent from your mail box and I do not know whether there was any - any response? It will come only on October 11.
Sincerely,--Alexander Aster (talk) 21:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
There's a backlog, so it may take a little while. Once the email is processed by OTRS, the files can be restored. You can check on the status of an email sent to OTRS at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. INeverCry 22:49, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Files like file:95a Konovaltsia Street, Lviv (1).jpg

I uploaded and I later personally nominated for speed deletion bacause found, that they were not free, accorning to nofop (found authors and checked dates when tey died). What a problem? And please, stop deleting my basings of discrepancy this files to nofop. I'l not make them 70 times again (near 70 files deleted). Better help in adjustment of problem with this nonsense nomination (of files wich are really free): Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aeou.--Сергій (обг.) 18:05, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

I removed the speedy tag because these are already part of a DR as you noted above, in which the status of all the involved files will be decided. INeverCry 18:14, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
So I guess you were CSDing the ones that are definitely no FoP. If you do so again, I won't remove it. This was a bit confusing. Sorry. INeverCry 18:23, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Wlasnie ze nie sa czescia tego DR. Pan moze sprawdzic. Tam juz nowa porcja... Ale nominowane przeze mnie zostali usuniete poniewaz przytoczylem dokladne argumenty nieodpowiednosci do nofop. A w wymienionym wyzej DR? Tam argumentow poprostu niema. Nominator widocznie usunal tamte nic nie czytajac i przypuscil, ze sytuacja z reszta 735 jest "analogiczna" (Skad to przypuszczenie?). // Przepraszam, nie wiem co to - "CSD".--Сергій (обг.) 18:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
CSD just means speedy delete. INeverCry 19:11, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, it was my mistake. For some reason I decided that you know Polish ... In short, I said that these files are not included in the above DR. There are two different situations. Files that you recovered had justification for removal (nofop), made by miself. And DR have some different justification (in my opinion there is no proper justification at all and I'm trying to prove that).--Сергій (обг.) 19:25, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The files that were tagged for speedy deletion also had DR tags, which is why I removed the speedy tags. Anyways, a mass DR with 700+ images is mind boggling to say the least. I would figure that this huge DR won't be closed for quite a while. We'll see what develops as we get comments and opinions from experienced users and admins. I'll ask to a few people. INeverCry 19:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Files I listed below... I'm requesting they be undeleted

I am requesting that you restore the files listed:

As I explained to EugeneZelenko, I am new to wikipedia and I made a mistake in the copyright information. After talking with more experienced users in the teahouse, I corrected the copyright information and had all parties concerned (Bar-Bare Records, Willie Buck and Bob Corritore) submit and have the images re-tagged so that the proper copyrights were reflected. Commons:OTRS has the emails releasing the use of the files to wikicommons. Please undelete the files so I can continue building this page. Thank you so much for your repsonses and any help you can offer would be gretly appreciated. Monorail11261 (talk) 18:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

In order to restore these files, I would need confirmation from OTRS that the emails had been received and processed. You can check on the status of these emails at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. INeverCry 18:53, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Could you restore File:K0202.JPG?

I contacted the original author of File:K0202.JPG at a BBS linked from his website, and he confirmed that he contributed the photo to Wikimedia Commons by himself [18]. Therefore there is no copyright concern and I think we can restore it. --whym (talk) 22:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

I've restored it. Please add the above info to the source or to the image's talk page with a "see talk" note in the source. Otherwise this may get deleted again. Thanks. INeverCry 23:25, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your prompt response! I've added it to the summary. --whym (talk) 23:33, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Great work

Thanks for your help on renaming files/images. I'd give you a barnstar but I don't know how to do it on commons, but give yourself one if you like! Anyway, just to let you know you are appreciated. Sun Creator (talk) 01:12, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Working Man's Barnstar.png The Working Commoner's Barnstar
Thanks for your help on renaming files/images. Sun Creator (talk) 01:12, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Approved! :) Sun Creator (talk) 23:36, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

You proposed elimination in my uploads

These images I have uploaded are from my private collection of old diskettes. Cuts are my other works. metalllinux (talk) 11:18, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

The images you've uploaded are all available on other websites. I've added a note regarding this to the deletion nomination. You should direct any further comments to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Metalllinux. Thanks. INeverCry 18:35, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Amazing race 1 map.PNG

Hi INC, hope you're well. When you have time, could you restore the above linked file for me? I appear to have mistakenly deleted it per Commons:Deletion requests/File:TAR1 carte.tif. Thanks, FASTILY (TALK) 06:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 06:42, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! -FASTILY (TALK) 10:04, 7 October 2012 (UTC)


Thank you INeverCry for your work, the results of which I have come across many times. I know the file movers’ job is sometimes rather thankless... I send greetings with a large hat tip in your general direction. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC)


Hi! Could I ask you why this file has been kept, despite in the new deletion request, made on 30th September, all the votes were to delete it? Thank you, bye! :-) -- Vonvikken (talk) 10:25, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Pure stupidity on my part. It looks even dumber considering my delete vote is the first vote. What happened was I somehow looked at the earlier kept DR and thought somehow that somebody had forgotten to actually keep it. Face-wink.svg Anyways, I've undone the keep so that another admin should be able to close it soon. INeverCry 15:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Ok, no problem! ;-) Bye! -- Vonvikken (talk) 16:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)


Thanks a lot for a barnstar --Moonik (talk) 16:01, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Nie ma za co. :) INeverCry 17:25, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Another Ecce Homo by Cecilia Giménez

Here. Regards. Escarlati (talk) 23:45, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

✓ Deleted INeverCry 23:58, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. Escarlati (talk) 00:13, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
By Elías García. According to Spanish law (80 years) and he died in 1934. Escarlati (talk) 00:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
I've left a note about this at the uploader's talk (User talk:Darwinius#A file of yours @ CSD). INeverCry 00:34, 9 October 2012 (UTC)


Why did you delete this picture? What has to be done to restore is? --Meister und Margarita (talk) 07:11, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

This image states in its description: "Scene from the opera Lulu by Alban Berg. With Christine Schäfer as Lulu and John Bröcheler as Dr. Schön. Salzburg Festival 1995." The image itself is very grainy, and looks to be a scan from a magazine or taken from a website. The image is also available thru tineye: [19]. The "own work" claim doesn't seem to be true here. INeverCry 17:58, 8 October 2012 (UTC)


Thanks! Adam Bishop (talk) 13:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. INeverCry 17:59, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Godkiller deletions a month after permission sent to OTRS?

Hi INeverCry- You deleted 5 files today that were posted with permission of the rights holder.

- (Deletion log); 23:34 . . INeverCry (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Godkiller Walk Among Us limited edition dvd.jpg ‎(No permission since 19 September 2012)

- (Deletion log); 23:34 . . INeverCry (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Godkiller Walk Among Us issue 2 cover.pdf ‎(No permission since 19 September 2012)

- (Deletion log); 23:34 . . INeverCry (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Godkiller Walk Among Us episode 2 dvd.jpg ‎(No permission since 19 September 2012)

- (Deletion log); 23:33 . . INeverCry (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Godkiller Walk Among Us dvd cover.jpg ‎(No permission since 19 September 2012)

- (Deletion log); 23:33 . . INeverCry (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Godkiller Silent War audiobook cover.jpg ‎(No permission since 19 September 2012)

There was a discussion on the talk page when I uploaded them [20], and I directed user Túrelio to the page on the official site that states the images are available for use under Copyleft Free Art License 1.3. [21]

On September 20, Turelio said he forwarded a screenshot to OTRS.

Could you please restore the files? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mechagodzilla (talk • contribs) 17:00, October 8, 2012‎ (UTC)

Restored and tagged with OTRS pending. INeverCry 00:23, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! - Mechagodzilla 17:32, October 8, 2012‎ (PAC)

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, INeverCry. You have new messages at Darwinius's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Would you nind..

... taking care of this picture also? It's a derivative work from this one that you've just deleted. Best regards and many thanks --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 15:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 16:20, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks :-) --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 16:56, 9 October 2012 (UTC)