User talk:Ies/Archive 2011-2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

File:Bergisch_Gladbach_-_Odenthaler_Straße_-_Dreikönige_in_10_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bergisch_Gladbach_-_Odenthaler_Straße_-_Dreikönige_in_10_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.106.39 15:40, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Another nonsense delition request by a sock puppet! -- Ies (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Stopersteine in Wuppertal[edit]

Siehe hier. --Atamari (talk) 12:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Danach hatte ich gesucht. Danke! -- Ies (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Category:Chromatographie d'un extrait de clou de girofle[edit]

Hi, could you please delete the category now, then ? I've emptied it. Regards, Esprit Fugace (talk) 15:54, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

It's arranged to be done. Thanks for your understanding! -- Ies (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Civility[edit]

Your message on July 4, 2010, on User talk:Michiel Hendryckx was cited on the two mailing lists foundation-l and commons-l, as an example of behaviour on Commons that is likely to scare good contributors away. If you can't express yourself in a civil manner, perhaps you should just ignore a lack of categories and not complain at all. --LA2 (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Firstly, good contributors categorize their images. So if ever there was a contributor scared it certainly wasn't a good one. Keep in mind that the user in question ignored the bot reminder times and again. Secondly a lack of categories can't be ignored! As only categorized images can be found any uploading of images without categorizing doesn't make sense! This is the fact the bot already reminded of and I explained. If you think that reminding on categories or explaining that categories are essential is anyhow uncivil you seemingly understand the requirements over here less than any who doesn't categorize. -- Ies (talk) 21:31, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
The message in question was written in July 2010 and brought up on foundation-l and commons-l a week ago. Tell me, was I the first who contacted you about this? Or was there a previous discussion about this? I do share your concern about categories. What has upset several list members was your commanding tone and your tripple (!!!) exclamation marks. These aspects of your message make it more of an expression of your aggression, and less of a useful guidance to a newcomer. The newcomer, it was believed, is more likely to leave than to learn. --LA2 (talk) 15:47, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
LA2, want you awake the appearance that a Please even with three exclamation points is a commanding tone or anyhow aggressive? Don't you think that after Michiel Hendryckx ignored the bot reminder again and again and again a somewhat more considerable reminder was required? Yes, you are indeed the first and only one who contacted me about this. Maybe the others thought twice. -- Ies (talk) 17:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
I personally find it fascinating that the others posted to the mailinglist about your message (the content in this matter), speaking about the need to focus on people and not just content, and then failed to contact you (the person). What I think about boldface and exclamation marks is irrelevant. What counts is whether the newcomer learned or left. It seems Michiel Hendryckx is still around. I haven't checked whether he learned, but I agree with those who think your tone could improve. Native English speakers more seldom write please with three exclamation marks. --LA2 (talk) 18:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
I'll certainly keep on using three exclamation points - if required in case of very ignorant users. It seemed to help Michiel Hendryckx to understand what to do. He learned and there is not any evidence that any user ever left due to three exclamation points. Much ado about nothing. -- Ies (talk) 19:11, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The mailing list message was here. There are examples that are much worse: Commons admins permbanning contributors for no good reason. This happened to Hcrepin (talk · contribs) and to Elkawe (talk · contribs). Or the incessant badgering for a "source" for images that are definitely in the public domain because of age by for example admin Bapti. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Hattingen_-_Martin-Luther-Straße_-_La_Porta_Aperta_01_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hattingen_-_Martin-Luther-Straße_-_La_Porta_Aperta_01_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

91.57.89.136 15:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Remscheid_Lüttringhausen_-_Bauernmarkt_13_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Remscheid_Lüttringhausen_-_Bauernmarkt_13_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

91.57.89.136 15:44, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Besichtigungstermine...[edit]

Interessant:
Sonntag, 20. März, um 11 Uhr, Manuelskotten
Montag, 21. März, um 14 Uhr, Klärwerk Buchenhofen
Mittwoch, 23. März, um 14 Uhr, Wasserturm Hatzfeld
Donnerstag, 24. März, um 14 Uhr, Wasserwerk Herbringhausen

--Atamari (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Remscheid_-_Alleestraße_-_Cola_03_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Remscheid_-_Alleestraße_-_Cola_03_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.106.70 11:00, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Wuppertal_-_Bundesallee_04_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wuppertal_-_Bundesallee_04_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:12, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Wuppertal_Zoo_08_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wuppertal_Zoo_08_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.106.196 10:51, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Mining carts vs. lorries[edit]

Sag mal, kannst Du diese Änderung _irgendwie_ begründen? Und wäre es zuviel verlangt, hier den normalen Weg zu gehen, anstatt einen SLA zu stellen? Möglicherweise auch erst einmal jemanden fragen, der vom Fach ist? --Markscheider (talk) 19:15, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Dem möchte ich mich auch mal vorsichtig anschließen, weil "Lorry" mich auf :en jedenfalls nicht zu den erhofften Fahrzeugen geführt hat, Siehe auch en:Lorry (disambiguation). Bei solchen Problemen, vor allem wenn ein gutes Wörterbuch nicht weitergeholfen hat, habe ich normalerweise einfach mal die en-native speakers auf der VP gefragt, welcher Begriff üblich und unmißverständlich ist. Nicht dass das immer eine klare Lösung ergeben hätte, aber doch oft. --Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Meinereiner ist Bergingenieur von Beruf und spricht auch leidlich Fachenglisch. Ich wollte les zunächst ein Gelegenheit geben, sich zu der Aktion zu äußern. Einspruchsmöglichkeiten sind bei SLA nicht vorgesehen, deshalb hat das ein Geschmäckle. Der Artikel en:Minecart existiert. --Markscheider (talk) 19:26, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Das mit dem SLA darfst du nicht so dramatisch nehmen, das hat auf Commons etwas anderen Stellenwert als auf :de. --Túrelio (talk) 19:30, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Da der englische Artikel Minecart lautet, ist die Kategorie Mining carts mit deutlich abweichender Schreibweise zumindest fragwürdig. Fragwürdig ist auch, nur einige Bilder der Loren in die neue Kategorie zu setzten und andere in der alten Kategorie Lorries zu belassen. Zudem ist nicht nachvollziehbar, warum Loren in Deutschland (Bilder aus Category:Lorries of Germany) plötzlich nicht mehr in Deutschland sein sollten und unter den allgemeinen Mining carts verschwinden. Mir sahen diese Änderungen insgesamt so unüberlegt aus, dass ich sie erst einmal rückgängig gemacht habe. Gegen eine Verschiebung der Loren nach Minecarts hätte ich jedoch nichts einzuwenden. Dann gehören aber bitte auch alle Bilder von Loren in diese neue Kategorie und nicht nur einige. Und dann sollte auch der Inhalt der Kategorie Loren in Deutschland mit Untergategorie (unter neuen Namen) erhalten bleiben. -- Ies (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Über die Schreibweise Minecart vs. Mining Carts kann man disputieren. Wie sähe Deiner Meinung nach der Plural von minecart aus? Definitiv aber sind Hunte keine Loren und Loren keine lorries. Warum die _Hunte_ nicht mehr in Deutschland sein sollen? Das hatte ich mir für eine evtl. spätere Bearbeitung aufgehoben. Es sind jetzt nicht _so_ wahnsinnig viele, als daß eine Unterkat gerechtfertigt gewesen wäre - aber auch darüber kann man _reden_. Das, was du gemacht hast, ist aber einfach nur falsch. Im Bergbau gibts keine Loren, das sind Hunte oder Förderwagen. Loren gibt es bei Feldbahnen. --Markscheider (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Zwischenbemerkung: Mining Carts bezieht sich auf das Verb "to mine", Mine Carts auf das Hauptwort "Mine". Das eine bezeichnet also ein Ding das "beim" bergbauen benutzt wird, das andere ein Ding das "in" einem Bergwerk benutzt wird.--Wuselig (talk) 08:15, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Hunte sind sowohl das eine wie das andere. Eine kurze Google-Recherche meinerseits brachte keine großen Vorteile für eine der drei Varianten, so daß man im Prinzip jede davon wählen kann. "Minecart" bringt viele Treffer mit Bezug auf Minecraft, aber da es in dem Spiel um Bergbau geht, ist auch das zutreffend. Maximal hat das Spiel diese Variante etwas in den Vordergrund gerückt. --Markscheider (talk) 10:13, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
"Das hatte ich mir für eine evtl. spätere Bearbeitung aufgehoben" halte ich für eine nachträgliche Schutzbehauptung. Du hast genau das gemacht, was Du mir vorwirfst, nämlich ohne Absprache eine Änderung durchgeführt. Gilt denn "darüber kann man _reden_" nur für mich und nicht für Dich? Wenn Du Dich gerne absprichst, erwarte ich schon, dass Du dann auch mit gutem Beispiel vorangehst. Was Du nicht gemacht hast. -- Ies (talk) 12:24, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Für was Du das hältst, ist relativ egal. Nichtsdestoweniger ist es wahr, und für eine sinnvolle Änderung, die ich auch fachlich korrekt einschätzen kann, benötigt niemand Absprachen. Du dagegen ignorierst die Arbeit und Gedanken, die andere (in dem Fall ich) sich gemacht haben.--Markscheider (talk) 20:39, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Das ist falsch. Denn hätte ich Deine Arbeit und Gedanken ignoriert, hätte ich alles so belassen wie Du es geändert hast. Statt dessen habe ich aber Deine Änderungen aus sachlichen Gründen (siehe unten) rückgängig gemacht. -- Ies (talk)
Wenn wir mit den gegenseitigen Schuldzuweisungen aufhören, kommen wir aber vielleicht im Thema weiter. Der Plural von minecart ist minecarts. Den Unterschied zwischen Hunte und Loren macht die deutsche und vermutlich auch die schwedische Sprache. In der englischen Sprache sehe ich diese begriffliche Trennung nicht. Bezeichnenderweise verlinkt der deutsche Artikel „Hunte“ nicht auf einen englischsprachen Artikel. Da hier bei Commons nicht in deutschen, sondern in englischen Begriffen kategorisiert wird, sehe ich ein Problem darin, Deine Idee von der Trennung zwischen Hunte und Loren in Kategorien umzusetzen. -- Ies (talk) 12:24, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Zwischenbemerkung: Es wir auf Commons weitestgehend auf Englisch kategorisiert. Wenn es aber keinen englischen Begriff gibt, dann spricht nichts dagegen den landessprachlichen Begriff als Kategorienamen zu benutzen. --Wuselig (talk) 08:02, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
"In der englischen Sprache" bezeichnet lorry _vor allem_ etwas gänzlich anderes.Punkt. Und der Unterschied ist auch nicht meine Idee, sondern einfach ein Fakt. Aber egal, ich werde bestimmt keinen Editwar anzetteln, noch mir die Mühe nochmals machen. --Markscheider (talk) 20:39, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Ich habe die Category:Lorries für Loren/Hunte weder erstellt, noch durch Kategorien definiert. In Ihrer Geschichte siehst Du, dass dort (außer einem bot) fünf verschiedene Benutzer tätig waren, ich aber nicht. Mir ist deshalb nicht klar, warum Du mir die Schuld an dieser Kategorie gibst. Wie schon geschrieben habe ich nichts gegen deren Umbenennung in Category:Minecarts, so wie der Begriff im englischen Artikel verwendet wird. Du hast bisher aber nicht erklärt, warum die Kategorie davon abweichend Categorie:Mining carts heißen soll. Dann hast Du auch noch nicht erklärt, wie Du Dir vorstellst, das besser zu machen, was ich Deiner Behauptung nach falsch gemacht habe. Dass die deutsche Sprache einen Unterschied zwischen Loren und Hunte macht, ist zwar Fakt, aber eben eine Eigentümlichkeit, die sich wohl nur in der deutschen (und schwedischen) Sprache findet. Und solche Eigentümlichkeiten lassen sich nicht immer kategorisieren. Ähnliche Probleme kenne ich auch aus der Botanik. Beispielsweise gibt es in der deutschsprachigen Literatur etliche detaillierte Bezeichnungen für Blütenstände, die sich in der englischsprachigen Literatur so nicht wiederfinden. Dort ist die sprachliche/begriffliche Einteilung viel grober und teils auch unterschiedlich. Auch sind die Definitionen von Dornen und Stacheln in der deutschen und englischen Sprache so unterschiedlich, dass sie wirklich nur annähernd vergleichbar sind. Deren Kategorien sind entsprechend gering und mit viel falschem Inhalt gefüllt. Aber das ist eine andere Baustelle. Was ich sagen will ist: Es nützt nichts, hier bei Commons auf Begrifflichkeiten der deutschen Sprache zu pochen.
Also, siehst Du eine Alternative dazu, die gesamte Category:Lorries nach Category:Minecarts zu übertragen? -- Ies (talk) 06:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Das kann man machen; allerdings würde ich nach wie vor einen Unterschied zwischen Hunten/Förderwagen und Feldbahnloren machen wollen. Vielleicht sollte Wuseligs Vorschlag Anwendung finden, die Kategorie eben deutsch zu benennen, da es kein wirklich eingeführtes und weit verbreitetes Wort im Englischen dafür zu geben scheint. Tipping wagon oder chaldron wagon werden zwar in en:Feldbahn oder anderswo genannt, aber wenn Du Dir die Googleergebnisse dazu anschaust, wirst Du verstehen, warum ich da skeptisch bin. --Markscheider (talk) 10:13, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Aloe arborescens varieties[edit]

Hi Les, To answer your question, Aloe arborescens is a very variable species with different sub-species and varieties in different parts of Africa. The flower colour also varies (Think of roses - they're also all the same species but their flower colour varies), but I can assure you, it is indeed Aloe arborescens! Cheers. Abu Shawka (talk) 08:00, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. As the yellow flowering Aloe lookes rather different than the red/orange flowering Aloe arborescens I know from private collections and Botanical Gardens over here I was in doubt about its identity. Well, I'll trust in your expertise! Btw, I'd appreciate much more plant images from SA. There are many Euphorbs growing (to give a broad hint). -- Ies (talk) 14:25, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Schon mal ein Hungertuch gesehen?[edit]

--Atamari (talk) 13:42, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Danke[edit]

hierfür. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 19:48, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wuppertal[edit]

Vielleicht kannst du am 22. Mai --Atamari (talk) 14:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Gewindegang[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Gewindegang has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Wizard191 (talk) 17:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Threads_in_art[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Threads_in_art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Wizard191 (talk) 17:56, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Herten Westerholt - Schlossstraße 16 ies.jpg[edit]

Sorry, hättste was gesagt, hätte ich's selber rückgängig gemacht. Schöne Aufnahmen! --Kürschner (talk) 20:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Deletion proposal for File:Bad Bevensen - Krummer Arm - Ratsapotheke 05 ies.jpg[edit]

Hello!

Sorry for my incorrect proposal for deletion with this image: File:Bad Bevensen - Krummer Arm - Ratsapotheke 05 ies.jpg

I apologize for this action. But now, I am an expert of the German Panoramafreiheit!

--A.Ceta (talk) 19:43, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Schirgiswalde - Adolf-Kolping-Straße - Bruder-Klaus-Kapelle 02 ies.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Schirgiswalde - Adolf-Kolping-Straße - Bruder-Klaus-Kapelle 02 ies.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

Brackenheim (talk) 06:07, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Bad_Muskau_-_Schmelzstraße_04_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bad_Muskau_-_Schmelzstraße_04_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tzollo15 (talk) 07:39, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Entrance stairs in Wuppertal[edit]

Wuppertal - Engels-Haus 05 ies.jpg

Wir haben im Bergischen Raum einige Treppchen zu den Häusern... meinst du es lohnt sich die zweiläfigen in einer Kategorie zu unterteilen? Nebenbei bemerkt, was ist wohl von Architektur gesehen richtig, eine zweiläufige oder doppelläufige Treppe am Engels-Haus? Und was wäre die beste Übersetzung des Begriffs? Leo.org gibt "dog-legged stair" (für zweiläufige Treppe) an. Oder meinst du die Anzahl lohnt sich nicht? --Atamari (talk) 09:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Grundsätzlich ist es eine gute Idee, für zweiläufige Treppen eine Kategorie anzulegen. Auch für solche aus Deutschland würde sich eine Kategorie lohnen, für Wuppertal alleine aber wohl (noch) nicht. Aber: wenn man bei Google mit Stichwort „dog-legged“ nach Bildern sucht, bekommte man außer vielen Hundebeinen nur wenige Treppen angezeigt. Und diese entsprechen nicht denen, die wir als zweiläufig kennen. Bei Suchen mit Stichworten wie „doglegged“ und „dog legged“ sieht es nicht besser aus. Hier fehlt uns also noch die richtige Bezeichnung der Treppen in der englischen Sprache. Leo sollten wir hier nicht trauen. -- Ies (talk) 15:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Überlingen - Gradebergstraße - Musikschule 06 ies.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Danke für Deine Hinweise[edit]

Lieber les, Dein Hinweis ist sehr freundlich, dass meine Bilder nicht katalogisiert sind. Ich sage es aber ganz offen: Ich spreche Deutsch, und zwar sehr gut. Wenn ich Bilder hochladen will, melde ich mich auf der deutschsprachigen Seite an. Wenn ich dann versuche, eine Kategorie zu finden, komme ich zu englischsprachigen Begriffen. Beispiel: anstatt Bergbau > Mining. Das begreife ich alles nicht. Wo und wie finde ich denn die entsprechenden Kategorien? Wenn man das nicht auf einfache Art und Weise finden kann, nutzt es nur Leuten, die Englisch gelernt haben. Im Übrigen reicht es mir, wenn die Bilder in den von mir geschriebenen Artikeln aufgeführt und ordentlich beschrieben sind. In diesem Zusammenhang schau Dir doch bitte mal den Artikel Papiermuseum Alte Dombach an und was dort auf der Diskussionsseite in den letzten Tagen geschrieben wurde. Nimm das aber bitte nicht persönlich, denn mir ging es nur um die Sache. Wenn Du mit mir im Kontakt bleiben und mir Tips geben könntest, würde ich mich sehr freuen. Dann aber bitte über meine Benutzerseite Benutzer:Pingsjong, weil ich wikimedia nur selten nutze. Und jetzt kann ich noch nicht einmal richtig signieren und muss es improvisieren. Also nochmals danke und viele Grüße--der Pingsjong


In Dänemark gibt es keine Panoramafreiheit für nicht-Gebäude:

File:Hobro - Brogade 02 ies.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hobro - Brogade 02 ies.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro - Havn 05 ies.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hobro - Havn 05 ies.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro - Havn 04 ies.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hobro - Havn 04 ies.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro - Brogade 07 ies.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hobro - Brogade 07 ies.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro - Brogade 06 ies.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hobro - Brogade 06 ies.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro - Brogade 05 ies.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hobro - Brogade 05 ies.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro - Brogade 04 ies.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hobro - Brogade 04 ies.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro - Brogade 03 ies.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hobro - Brogade 03 ies.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 18:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro_-_Adelgade_08_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hobro_-_Adelgade_08_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 07:00, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro_-_Adelgade_09_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hobro_-_Adelgade_09_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 07:00, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro_-_Adelgade_12_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hobro_-_Adelgade_12_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 07:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro_09_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hobro_09_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 07:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro_-_Havn_08_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hobro_-_Havn_08_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 07:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro_-_Havn_07_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hobro_-_Havn_07_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 07:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro_-_Adelgade_10_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hobro_-_Adelgade_10_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 07:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro_-_Adelgade_11_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hobro_-_Adelgade_11_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 07:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Hobro_04_ies.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hobro_04_ies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 07:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)